Karnataka Court July 2015 Judgments
Vasanthi D Shetty Vs. The Managing Director
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-22-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF JULY, 2015 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA MFA No.4589 OF2011MVC) BETWEEN1 VASANTHI D SHETTY W/O LATE DAYANANDA SHETTY AGED ABOUT45YEARS, R/A NEAR NANDODIGUTTU, NEAR BICO COMPANY, ULIYARGOLI, KAUP, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT ARCHANA SHETTY D/O LATE DAYANANDA SHETTY AGED ABOUT23YEARS, R/A NEAR NANDODIGUTTU, NEAR BICO COMPANY, ULIYARGOLI, KAUP, UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT.2. 2. ... APPELLANTS (By Sri. PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY H, ADV.) AND1 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KSRTC, K.H ROAD, BANGALORE.560 002. THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED DIVISIONAL OFFICE, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE-560 004. 2 REP. BY ITS NEAREST DIVISIONAL OFFICE, DIVISIONAL MANAGER, KRISHNA COMPLEX, 2ND FLOOR, G.B PANTH ROAD, UDUPI. ... RESPONDENTS (By Sri. O MAHESH,ADV. FOR R2 NOTICE DISPENSED TO R1) *** THIS MFA FILED U/S1731) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:21.01.2011 PASSED IN MVC NO.1259/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFF...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Pilla Akkayyamma W/O Late Byrappa Vs. Channappa Since Dead by Lrs ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-22-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF JULY2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1015/2011 (DEC/INJ) Between: Smt.Pilla Akkayyamma, W/o late Byrappa, D/o late Byrappa, Aged about 63 years, R/o Avathi Village, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural Dist. 562 110. Smt.Rangalakshmamma, W/o Sriramappa D/o late Byrappa, Aged about 53 years, R/o Ittasandra Village, Nandagudi Hobli, Hosakote Taluk, Bangalore Rural Dist. 562 114. 1 2 3 (By Sri Rajanna, Adv.) Rangappa, S/o late Byrappa, Aged about 56 yeas, R/o Haliyuru Village. Vijayapura Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural District 562 110. . Appellants. 2 Channappa, Since dead by L.Rs. S/o late Channappa, Aged about 43 years. D/o late Channappa, Aged about 33 years. W/oi late Channappa, Aged about 43 years. And :1. 1(a) Smt.Akkayamma, 1(b) Muniraju, 1(c) Smt.Manjulamma, 1(d) Lakshmamma, 1(e) Smt.Munithayamma, D/o late Channappa, Aged about 43 years, r/o Chokkan...
Tag this Judgment!Anitha Kishori D Silva Vs. The Land Acquisition Officer
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-22-2015
-:1. :- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 22ND day of July, 2015 -: PRESENT :- THE HON' BLE MR. SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA WRIT APPEAL Nos.640-41/2014 (LA) BETWEEN: ANITHA KISHORI DSILVA, W/O ROBERT JEROME DSILVA, AGED ABOUT49YEARS, BY HER HUSBAND AND G.P.A. HOLDER, ROBERT JEROME DSILVA, AGED ABOUT57YEARS, S/O LATE ALPHONSO DSILVA, R/AT VAMANJUR OF THIRUVAIL VILLAGE, MANGALORE TALUK AND DISTRICT-575 001. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI: SAMPAT ANAND SHETTY, ADV.) AND:1. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, CUM ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MANGALORE SUB-DIVISION, MANGALORE, DAKSHINA KANNADA-575 001.2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT, MANGALORE, DAKSHINA KANNADA-575 001.-.:2. :- 3.4. 5.6. 7. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. GERALD LOBO, AGED ABOUT57YEARS, S/O LATE A.J.LOBO, R/AT PADDE PADAVU, KANDAVARA, KAIKAMBA, POST KINNIKAMBLA,...
Tag this Judgment!The Manager Vs. Bhimraj
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-22-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF JULY2015BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI M.F.A.No.10685/2013 (MV) C/w M.F.A.No.878/2014 M.F.A.No.10685/2013 BETWEEN: The Manager, Bajaj Allaianz General Insurance Company Limited., City Branch II, No.31, Ground Floor, T.B.R.Tower, Adjacent to Jain College, Mission Road, Bangalore 560 027. By its Manager Appellant (By Sri O.Mahesh, Advocate) AND:1. 2. Bhimraj, Aged 62 years, S/o late Ramaswamy, R/at No.12, 1st B Main, 13th Cross, J.C.Nagar, Bangalore 560 086. Annapurna Beninje Major, D/o B.Sridhar Kakkillaya, No.6/23, 2nd Floor, 2 Shri Soubhagya Nilaya, Balaji Cross, Vivekananda Nagar, Kathriguppe, Bangalore 560 085. ... Respondents (By Sri K.T.Gurudeva Prasad, Advocate for Sri C.Ramakrishna, Advocate for R1; Sri J.Pramod, Advocate for R2) This MFA is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the judgment and award dated 20.09.2013 passed in MVC No.2528/2011 on the file of the 12th Addition...
Tag this Judgment!Pavan Kumar Vs. Microsoft Corporation (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-21-2015
(Prayer: This Crl.P. is filed under S.482 Cr.P.C, praying to set aside the order dated 01.08.2011 passed by the xiv A.C.M.M., Bangalore in PCR No.5679/2010 (now registered in C.C.No.27012/2011) direct to register a criminal case against the petitioner, who is Accused No.3, for the offence p/u/s.138 of M.I. act and quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.27012/2011 (PCR No.5679/2010) presently pending on the file of XXV Addl. Cmm., Bangalore for the offence punishable under S.138 of N.I. Act as against the petitioner.) 1. Respondent is the complainant and the petitioner is the accused No.3, in C.C.No.27012/2011, pending on the file of XXV Addl. CMM., Bengaluru City. The said criminal case was filed by the respondent, against the petitioner and two others, alleging commission of an offence punishable under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ('the Act' for short). In the complaint, the allegations made, which are relevant for deciding of this petition, read as follows: "3. Accus...
Tag this Judgment!All India Trade Union Congress and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-21-2015
(Prayer: This Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the impugned order dated 22.1.2015 vide Ann-A issued by R-1 and direct the Respondents to continue the jurisdiction of the existing Labour Courts for expeditious adjudication of Industrial Disputes and etc.) Nagarathna, J. 1. Government Order No LAW 164 LCE 2014 dated January 22, 2015 [Annexure-A to the writ petition] is assailed in this writ petition. Initially, the writ petition was listed before a learned Single Judge, who, by his order dated June 6, 2015, has referred the matter to Division Bench, by holding that the writ petition raises questions of public interest and importance. 2. The first petitioner is All India Trade Union Congress, represented by its President, the second petitioner is Engineering and General WorkersUnion, represented by its General Secretary and the third petitioner is Industrial Law PractitionersForum, represented by its Secretary. These petitione...
Tag this Judgment!S. Sudaramurthy and Others Vs. Saraswathi Lakshmanan and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-21-2015
(Prayers: This Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 6.1.2009 passed in O.S. No. 1672/1993 on the file of the XXXVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, partly decreeing the suit for partition and separate possession and the appellants herein prays to set aside the above judgment and decree in so far as it relates to item 1 and 3 to 9 of suit schedule properties. This Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 6.1.2009 passed in O.S.No. 1672/1993 on the file of the XXXVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, partly decreeing the suit for partition and separate possession and the appellants herein prays to modify the above judgment and decree and further be pleased to decree the claim of the appellant herein for partition and separate possession of item no.2 of the suit schedule a property (1320 equity shares in Metal Lam...
Tag this Judgment!B.M. Muniraju Vs. The Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals)-V, Bangalore a ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-21-2015
(Prayer: This ITA is filed under Sec.260-A of Income Tax Act 1961, arising out of order dated: 20.02.2015 passed in ITA No.1472/bang/2013, for the assessment year 2009-10 praying to: i. Formulate the substantial questions of law as mentioned above; ƒ ii. Allow the above appeal by setting aside the judgment/order dated 20.02.2015 in ITA No.1472/Bang/2013 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench BBangalore for the assessment year 2009-10 produced herewith and marked as Annexure-A to the appeal.) 1. This appeal, which has been filed by the assessee, pertains to the Assessment Year 2009-10. The assessee-appellant is a Class-IV employee in the postal department. He purchased certain land ill village Dummannahalli on 27.7.2006. The said land was notified for acquisition under the provisions of Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act, 1966 (for short 'the KIAD Act'). The final notification was published on 17.05.2007. Thereafter, on the basis of an agreement en...
Tag this Judgment!Ravindra alias Ravi Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-21-2015
1. The judgment and order dated 25-11-2011 passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court No.17, Bangalore City in Sessions Case No.733 of 2008, convicting accused 1 to 3 for the offences punishable under Sections 436, 302, 307 and 109 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, is called in question in this criminal appeal. 2. Case of the prosecution in brief is that accused 3 is the first wife of deceased Muniyappa; disputes arose between deceased Muniyappa and accused 3 after few years of the marital life; two children were born out of the wedlock between the deceased Muniyappa and accused 3-Rekhadevi; since the disputes could not be resolved between the parties, accused 3 started residing in her parents place; deceased Muniyappa married Smt. Pushpa (another deceased); out of the said wedlock between Muniyappa and Pushpa a child was born and the said child was aged about two years at the time of incident in question. It is the further case of the prosecution that accused 1-R...
Tag this Judgment!Rama and Others Vs. Sharadha
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-21-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying this Hon'ble Court the following reliefs:- 1) The Impugned order at Annexure-E (Order passed on I.A. No. 1, dtd: 26.10.2010 by Senior Civil Judge, Honnavar in G. and W. No.1/2010) may kindly be quashed by issuing Writ of Certiorari. 2) A Writ of Mandamus may kindly be issued by directing the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Honnavar to dismiss the pending G. and W. Case No. 1/2010 for want of Territorial Jurisdiction by holding that the court at Honnavar, Dist: Karwar, has no territorial jurisdiction to try and adjudicate the case bearing G. and W. Case No. 1/2010.) 1. The petitioners, who claim to be the grand-mother, uncles and aunts of the minor children, are before this Court, challenging the order dated 26th October 2010, made in Guardians and Wards Case No. 1 of 2010 on the file of the Senior Civil Jude at Honavar, rejecting the application filed by them under Section 9 of the Guardi...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »