Karnataka Court July 2015 Judgments
Lakshmana Vs. Ramamani
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-27-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the Order dated 3.1.2015 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Gauribidanur/Chikkaballapur in M.C.No.10/2011 on IA No.XII (Annexure-A) and consequently allow IA No.XII filed by the petitioner under order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 of CPC (Annexure-F).) 1. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the order dated 3-1-2015 passed on I.A.12 in MC No.10/2011. 2. The petitioner herein is the petitioner in MC No.10/2011. The said Petition was filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking restitution of conjugal rights. In the said Petition which was at the stage of evidence an application has been filed seeking to amend the Petition and convert the same into a Petition under Section 13(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking dissolution of marriage. The respondent herein opposed the said application. The Court below after taking note of the rival contentions has...
Tag this Judgment!Ramahia and Another Vs. The State of Karnataka, Kalaburgi District
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-26-2015
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in the event of arrest, in Cr.No.292/2014 of K.R.Nagar P.S. Mysore District for offences punishable under Sections 366, 376 of IPC, under Sections 4, 17, 21 OF Pocso Act 2012 and under Sections 9, 10 Prohibition PF Child Marriage Act, 2006 and etc.,) 1. Petitioners are parents of a minor girl by name Varalakshmi, aged about 15 years. Based on an information given by a Doctor that the said minor girl was pregnant, the Child Development Officer lodged a complaint which has been registered as Cr.No.292/2014 in K.R.Nagar Police Station alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 366, 376 IPC, Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012 and Sections 9, 10 and 11 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. 2. Heard Sri. Raju C.N., learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional SPP for respondent - State and perused the records. 3. Learned counsel for the pe...
Tag this Judgment!Ramahia and Another Vs. The State of Karnataka, Kalaburgi District
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-26-2015
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in the event of arrest, in Cr.No.292/2014 of K.R.Nagar P.S. Mysore District for offences punishable under Sections 366, 376 of IPC, under Sections 4, 17, 21 OF Pocso Act 2012 and under Sections 9, 10 Prohibition PF Child Marriage Act, 2006 and etc.,) 1. Petitioners are parents of a minor girl by name Varalakshmi, aged about 15 years. Based on an information given by a Doctor that the said minor girl was pregnant, the Child Development Officer lodged a complaint which has been registered as Cr.No.292/2014 in K.R.Nagar Police Station alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 366, 376 IPC, Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012 and Sections 9, 10 and 11 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. 2. Heard Sri. Raju C.N., learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional SPP for respondent - State and perused the records. 3. Learned counsel for the pe...
Tag this Judgment!Nagegowda Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-24-2015
1. This criminal appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 by the Advocate for the appellant praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to set aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 7-12-2009 in Spl. Case No.114 of 2004 passed by the I Additional Sessions and Special Judge, Mysuru, convicting the appellant-accused 1 for the offence punishable under Section 304 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and also under Section 135(1) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 (In this judgment the words the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 ?, wherever they occurs should be read as Electricity Act, 2003 ?), and appellant-accused 1 is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years with fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for six months for the offence punishable under Section 304 of IPC and further the accused 1 is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months with fine of Rs.1,000/- and in...
Tag this Judgment!B. Vamana and Another Vs. The New Mangalore Port Trust
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-24-2015
(Prayer: This WP is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondent to consider the one half service rendered by the petitioner from 4.11.1969 to 22.3.1973 as Mali cum Mazdoor on daily wages (NMR) basis for the purpose of computing the qualified service for the purpose of payment of pension and gratuity in terms of the OM dated 14.5.1968 issued by the Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance and in OM dated 10.3.1986 issued by the department of personnel and Training, Govt. of India as incorporated in Govt. of India's decision no.14 u/r 14 of the Central Service (Pension) Rules, 1972 etc.,) 1. The case of petitioner No.1 is that he was employed as Mali-cam-Mazdoor on daily wages under Nominal Muster Roll (for short 'NMR') and he worked as such with the respondent- New Mangalore Port Trust (NMPT) from 04.11.1969 to 22.03.1973. Thereafter, he was absorbed as a regular employee. From such date, he worked continuously up to 30.06.2004, when he took...
Tag this Judgment!M/s. Sharp Watch Investigation and Security Services and Another Vs. S ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-24-2015
(Prayers: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to quash the impugned Tender Notification dated 18.12.2014 issued by the R-2 vide Ann-S and quash the impugned show cause notice dt: 28.11.2014 vide Ann-Q and also quash the Ann-R both issued by the R-2. This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to quash the impugned order dtd 13.11.2014 passed by the R-1 the Appellate Authority and Principal Secretary to the Government, Health and Family Welfare and Medical Education Department, Bangalore which is produced at Annx-P and etc.) 1. The petitioner in both these petitions is the same. Though the petitioner in W.P.No.54411/2014 has filed the petition in his personal name, W.P.No.712/2015 is filed in the name of the Enterprise owned by the petitioner. 2. The petitioner has responded to the tender notification issued by the second respondent. At the first instance, the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment!Preethi Ranka Vs. The State of Karnataka, rep. by its Secretary, Urban ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-24-2015
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the Government Order dt.13.3.2015 passed by the State Government R-1 herein (Annx-M) and the order dt.9.4.2015 passed by the BDA (Annx-N) and the letters of corrigendum issued by BDA and both dt.16.4.2015 passed by the BDA (Annx-P and Q) and etc.) 1. Facts briefly stated are: (i) Land measuring 2 acres 39.5 guntas (12089.88 square meters) in Sy.Nos.27/1, 28/4, 28/5 and 28/6 situated at Lalbagh Siddapura Village, Kasaba Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk, Bengaluru, belonging to the petitioners was designated for use to residential purpose under the Revised Comprehensive Development Plan, 1995, notified under Section 13 of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, ( ˜Actfor short) by the State Government. In the Revised Master Plan, 2015 w.e.f. 25.06.2007, the lands in question were designated for use to Parks and Open Spaces. (ii) Petitioners made an application dat...
Tag this Judgment!Smt Preethi Ranka Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-24-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF JULY2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos. 17446-17453/2015 (BDA) BETWEEN:1. SMT. PREETHI RANKA AGED ABOUT38YEARS D/O SRI. ASHOK DHARIWAL R/AT NO.8/32 BULL TEMPLE ROAD BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE560004.2. SMT. SEEMA DHARIWAL AGED ABOUT34YEARS D/O SRI ASHOK DHARIWAL R/AT NO.8/32 BULL TEMPLE ROAD BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE 560004.3. SMT LATHA GOTHI AGED ABOUT39YEARS D/O SRI ASHOK DHARIWAL R/AT NO.8/32 BULL TEMPLE ROAD BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE56000.4. KUM. DEEPIKA AGED ABOUT28YEARS D/O SRI ASHOK DHARIWAL R/AT NO.8/32 2 BULL TEMPLE ROAD BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE56000.5. SRI ASHOK DHARIWAL AGED ABOUT63YEARS S/O P SUGAN CHAND R/AT NO.8/32 BULL TEMPLE ROAD BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE56000.6. SMT VIJAYA DHARIWAL AGED ABOUT57YEARS W/O SRI ASHOK DHARIWAL R/AT NO.8/32 BULL TEMPLE ROAD BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE56000.7. SRI GOVINDA AGED ABOUT65YEARS S/O LATE SRI GOVINDAPPA R/AT NO.28/4, 5TH MAIN ROAD FIRST BLOCK JAYANA...
Tag this Judgment!B Vamana Vs. The New Mangalore Port Trust
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-24-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF JULY, 2015 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN W.P.NO.43494/2012(S-R) BETWEEN1 2. B.VAMANA S/O B.VENKAPPA AGED ABOUT66YEARS R/AT: A.SUBRARAYA PAI COMPOUND URVA STORE, MANGALORE-575 006. THE NEW MANGALORE PORT PENSIONERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION NORTHERN END QUALITY CONTROL BUILDING, PANAMBUR, MANGALORE-560 010 A BODY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SHRI SUBRAMANYA RAO. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI.SARAT CHANDRA BIJAI, ADV.,) AND THE NEW MANGALORE PORT TRUST PANAMBUR POST, MANGALORE-575 010 REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. ...RESPONDENT2INDIA PRAYING TO (BY SRI B.C.ANIKETH, ADV., FOR SRI G.N.HEGDE, M/S.DUA ASSTS.) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE ONE HALF SERVICE RENDERED BY THE PETITIONER FROM411.1969 TO223.1973 AS MALI CUM MAZDOOR ON DAILY WAGES (NMR) BASIS FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPUTING THE QUALIFIED SERVICE...
Tag this Judgment!N. Ashok Reddy Vs. N. Anitha and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-23-2015
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India praying to set aside the order dated 22.8.2014 passed by the 14th Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore in O.S. No. 5391/2013, (Annexure “ J) on the valuation and the Court fees payable by the petitioner on the counter claim in the amended written statement dated 31.7.2014.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and Smt. R. Anitha, the Government Advocate, since the Government has been impleaded as a party to the present petition. 2. A short question raised by the defendant in his written statement is, as to what exactly the court fee is payable by the defendant on the counter-claim? 3. Smt. Anitha N., the respondent/plaintiff has filed a suit for the relief of declaration of title and possession of the suit property, which is a vacant site with a watchman hut built thereon situated at Hulimavu village, Begur Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk, and the said property is said to have been pur...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »