Karnataka Court July 2015 Judgments
M/s. Arasor Corporation Vs. M/s. Xalted Information Systems Private Li ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-28-2015
(Prayer: This Company Petition filed under Section 433 (e) and (f) read with Section 434 (1)(a) and (c) red with Section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, praying to wind up the respondent company under the provisions of Section 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 and etc;) 1. The petitioner is a company incorporated and registered under the laws of the United States of America and is said to have its registered office in California, United States of America. It was said to have been incorporated in the year 2001. 2. The petitioner is said to be engaged in the business of manufacture of integrated circuits, components and sub-systems-used in various applications including wired and wireless communications. The respondent is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 (Hereinafter referred to as the Act', for brevity). It is said to have its registered office at Bangalore. It is stated that M/s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, (Hereinafter referred to as the BSNL', for brevity), ...
Tag this Judgment!Shrikant Vs. Subhas and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-28-2015
(Prayer: This Writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, Praying to set aside the order dated 05/06/2015 of the court of the PRL. Senior Civil Judge, Ranebennur passed on I.A.No.5 in R.A.81/2012 vide Annexure-G and allow the application I.A.No.5. 1. The petitioner-plaintiff/appellant filed the above writ petition against the order date 05.06.2015 dismissing his application I.A. No. V filed under Order XVIII Rule 18 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short the CPC'). 2. The plaintiff/petitioner filed O.S. No.146/2009 for declaration of title in respect of suit schedule Aproperty and consequential relief of mandatory injunction against the defendant to hand over the vacant possession of the suit schedule properties by removing the illegal construction, contending that the plaintiff is the absolute owner and in possession of the suit schedule properties, purchased under the registered sale deed dated 13.04.2005 for valuable consideration and the...
Tag this Judgment!K.S. Shivanagowda Vs. The Deputy Commissioner, Davanagere District and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-28-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the Respondents not to dispossess the Petitioner from Old Survey No.30/4, New Survey No.63 of Tuggalahalli, Kasaba Hobli, Honnali Taluk, Davanagere District measuring 5 acres 33 guntas (33 guntas is kharab) and etc.) 1. I.A.1/2015 is filed by the petitioner under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC seeking an order of temporary injunction to restrain the 4th respondent from interfering with petitioner's peaceful possession of the land in question. 2. Having regard to the nature of the grievance made in the main petition and the facts involved in this case, learned counsel for all the parties have addressed their arguments both on the main matter as also on the application filed. 3. Petitioner is the purchaser of land bearing Sy. No.30/4 (New No.63) situated at Tuggalahalli Village, Kasaba Hobli, Honnali Taluk, Davanagere District, measuring 5 acres 33 guntas. 4. Fourth respondent h...
Tag this Judgment!H.R. Shadaksharappa and Another Vs. Assistant Labour Commissioner, Bel ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-28-2015
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India R/W S.482 Cr.P.C., praying to quash the Letter dated 26.8.2014 issued by the 1st Respondent Certified Copy of which is produced as Annexure-D in so far as it relates to Sl.No.5 is concerned by holding that the said letter is issued in an arbitrary manner. B) Quash the complaint filed by 2nd Respondent in C.C.No.432/2014 on the file of the Court of Prl.Civil Judge and JMFC at Hosadurga Certified Copy of which is produced as Annexure-E; C) Quash the order dated 15.9.2014 passed by the court of the Prl.Civil Judge and JMFC at Hosadurga in C.C.No.432/2014 Certified Copy of which is produced at Annexure-F.) 1. The petitioners are the President and Secretary of Sri Siddarameshwara Vidya Samsthe, registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960. The Society has constructed a Community Hall, which is permitted to be used for the purpose of holding conferences and marriages. The 3rd re...
Tag this Judgment!K. Veerabhadraiah and Another Vs. State of Karnataka, Department of Co ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-28-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the circular/order dt.29.1.2015 vide Annexure-A passed by R2 and direct the respondents to permit the petitioners herein to file nomination, contest, vote and participate from Backward Classes (OBC) Category in the proposed election of R-6 bank scheduled to be held on 1.3.2015 as per calendar of events at Annexure-B.) H.G. Ramesh, J. (Oral): 1. In these writ petitions, the petitioners are challenging Government order bearing No.CO 24 CLM 2015 dated 29th January 2015. By the said order, seats are reserved separately to the two categories of backward classes in the Boards of Co-operative Societies in Karnataka. 2. It is contended that the aforesaid Government order providing internal reservation among the backward classes is contrary to clause (ii.) of sub-section (3) of Section 28-A of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 ('the Act'), as such internal reservation to perso...
Tag this Judgment!Smt Honamma Vs. Sri C H Honnegowda
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-28-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF JULY2015BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA WRIT PETITION NO.140/2015 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. HONAMMA, AGED56YEARS, W/O SRI SHIVE GOWDA, R/O MADAGUDDANAHALLI, BAGURU HOBLI, CHENNARAYAPATTANA57311 (BY SRI.D. PRABHAKAR ADV) AND:1. SRI C.H. HONNEGOWDA PETITIONER S/O HONNEGOWDA, AGED MAJOR, R/O CHAGACHAGERE VILLAGE, GANDASI HOBLI, ARASIKERE TALUK. 573164 2. SRI. HONNEGOWDA S/O SANNEGOWDA, AGED MAJOR, 3. SRI.KUMARASWAMY S/O HONNEGOWDA, AGED MAJOR24. SRI NANJUNDAPPA S/O HONNEGOWDA, AGED MAJOR5 SRI PRAKASH S/O HONNEGOWDA, AGED MAJOR6 SRI SHIVASWAMY S/O HONNEGOWDA, AGED MAJOR, PARTIES NO.2 TO6ARE R/OI CHAGACHAGERE VILLAGE, GANDASI HOBLI, ARASIKERE TALUK 573164.7. SMT. KAMALAMMA W/O RANGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT56YEARS, RESIDING AT MADAGUDDANAHALLI, CHENNARAYAPATNA TALUK-573116 (BY SMT.SONA VAKKUND ADV. FOR R1 & R4 R3,R5,R6 & R7 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) ...RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES2...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Arasor Corporation Vs. M/S Xalted Information Systems Pvt Ltd
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-28-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF JULY2015BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY COMPANY PETITION No.66 OF2010BETWEEN: M/s. Arasor Corporation, A Company incorporated and Registered under the Laws of United States of America and Having its registered office at 411, Clyde Avenue, Mountain View, CA-94043-2009, United States of America. Represented by its Authorised Representative Sri. Ashwani Sharma. (By Shri/Smt. E. Massilamani, Shri B.K. Nandakumar and Shri Suraj Govindaraj, Advocates) PETITIONER AND: M/s. Xalted Information Systems Private Limited, A Company incorporated under The Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered office at: C/o. Silver Software Private Limited 1st Floor, Plot No-23/24, EPIP I Phase, Whitefiled, 2 Bangalore, Karnataka 560 066. India. Represented by its Managing Director. (By Shri Dhyan Chinnappa, Senior Advocate for Shri Arunkumar, Advocate for M/s. Crest Law Partners) RESPONDENT This Company Petition filed under ...
Tag this Judgment!Shrikant S/O Dharmajappa Chavan Vs. Subhas S/O Ramanna Pawar,
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-28-2015
:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE28T H DAY OF JULY, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION No.107205 OF2015[GM-CPC]. BETWEEN: SHRIKANT S/O DHARMAJAPPA CHAVAN AGE:53 YEARS, OCC:GOVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O: KOTE KAKOLARA ONI, RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. ... PETITIONER (By Sri. N P VIVEKMEHTA ADV.) AND: SUBHAS S/O RAMANNA PAWAR, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS1 MAINAVATI W/O.SUBHAS PAWAR AGE:53. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK2 RAGHU S/O.SUBHAS PAWAR AGE:33. YEARS, OCC: AGRI., 3. RENUKA D/O.SUBHAS PAWAR AGE:31. YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK4 PADAMA D/O.SUBHAS PAWAR AGE:29. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK :2. : ALL ARE R/O.KOTE KAKOLARA ONI RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED0506.2015 OF THE COURT OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, RANEBENNUR PASSED ON I.A.NO.5 IN R.A.81/2012 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION I.A.NO.5. THIS WRIT PETITION C...
Tag this Judgment!Sri K. Veerabhadraiah Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-28-2015
- 1 - WP.Nos.6404-6405/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF JULY2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NOS.6404-6405/2015 (CS-EL/M) R BETWEEN:1. SRI K VEERABHADRAIAH S/O ERANNA AGED ABOUT60YEARS DIRECTOR, DEVANAHALLI TALUK PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. R/AT NEAR BUS STAND MANDIBALE ROAD WARD NO.9, VIJAYAPURA 562 135 DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT2 G.S.BHEEMARAJ S/O LATE SONEGOWDA AGED ABOUT48YEARS MEMBER, DEVANAHALLI TALUK PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. GOHURU VILLAGE, VIJAYAPURA HOBLI NARAYANAPURA POST DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI MAHAMMED TAHIR.A, ADVOCATE) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPUTY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION2 - 2 - WP.Nos.6404-6405/2015 3.4. 5.6. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI...
Tag this Judgment!Raja alias Yuvaraj Vs. Ashwath and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-27-2015
N.K. Patil, J. 1. This appeal by the claimant-appellant for enhancement of compensation is directed against the impugned judgment and award dated 21-3-2014, passed in MVC No. 1407 of 2012, by the Senior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Holenarasipur (hereinafter referred to as Tribunalfor short), on the ground that, a sum of Rs. 4,16,000/- awarded by the Tribunal with interest at 6% p.a., from the date of petition till the date of deposit (excluding future medical expenses), as against the claim of Rs. 30,00,000/-, on account of the injuries sustained by him in the road traffic accident is inadequate. 2. In brief, the facts of the case are: The appellant claims to be aged about 21 years at the time of the accident. He was hale and healthy prior to the accident, studying Diploma in Bahubali Polytechnic College at Shravanabelagola, doing agriculture and milk vending business and earning Rs. 25,000/- per month. That on 23-5-2012 at about ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »