Karnataka Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Commissioner of Income Tax and Another Vs. Gururaja Seva Samithi
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
(Prayer: ITA filed u/s.260-A of I.T.Act, 1961 arising out of order dated 13-3-2009 passed in ITA.No.1405/Bang/2008, praying to: ƒ i. Formulate the substantial questions of law stated therein, ii. Allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the ITAT Bangalore in ITA No. 1405/Bang/2008, dated 13-3-2009 and confirm the order passed by the Director of Income Tax (Exemptions), Bangalore.) Vineet Saran, J. 1. The respondent Sri Gururaja Seva Samiti had on 02.04.2008 applied for registration of the Society as a religious trust under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The said application of the respondent was rejected by the Director of Income Tax (Exemptions), (for short 'DIT (Exemptions), Bangalore, after holding that the objects of the Society were not specific and also since it was not possible to verify the genuineness of the objects and activities of the Trust, as required under Section 12AA of the Act. Challenging the said order, the respondent filed an appeal before ...
Suresh Chandra Mehta Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
1. Facts briefly stated are: 4 Acres in Sy. No. 200/19 of Marenahalli, Jala Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore District, is claimed to be owned, and possessed by the petitioner having acquired the same under a registered deed of sale executed by his vendor by name Ramaiah, pursuant to which in the year 1972, in accordance with Section 128 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, mutation entry was effected in the name of the petitioner in respect of 2 out of 4 acres. These entries it is stated were in force until the year 2000. Petitioner having noticed the discrepancy in not recording his name for the balance extent of 2 acres, made a representation Annexure-C on 12-10-2006 to 3rd respondent-Tahsildar, who did not take any action and therefore, filed Writ Petition No. 10979 of 2008 whence, by order dated 20-11-2008, Annexure-D, a direction was issued to the Tahsildar to consider the representation and passed orders in accordance with law within three months therefrom. Petitioner file...
K.S. Venkatesh Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Bengaluru
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
(Prayer: This ITA is filed under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 arising out of order dated 09-04-2009 passed in ITA No. 60/BNG/2009. For the Assessment year 2004-05, praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: I. Formulate the Substantial questions of law stated therein, II. Allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the ITAT Bangalore Bench, Bangalore in ITA No. 60/BANG/2009, dated 09-04-2009, in the interest of justice and equity.) 1. Assessee is in appeal questioning the correctness of the order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore Bench in ITA No. 60/BANG/2009. 2. Facts in brief which has led to the filing of this appeal are as under: Return of income came to be filed for the assessment year 2004-05 claiming a loss of Rs. 24,23,760/- and the jurisdictional Assessing Officer after issuing notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act (for short Act') framed the assessment order under section 143(3) of the Act on 30.11.2006 whereunder th...
G. Vinod and Others Vs. Jijabai
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
(Prayer: This HRRP is filed u/s.115 of CPC, praying to set aside the order passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court-III, at Belagavi, dated: 04.02.2015, passed in H.R.C. Revision Petition No.19/2014 confirming the Order of eviction passed by the Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Belagavi, passed in H.R.C. No.31/2012 dated:26.09.2014 and dismiss I.A.No.4 by allowing the present revision petition. This HRRP is filed u/s.115 of CPC, praying to set aside the order passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court-III, at Belagavi, dated: 04.02.2015, passed in H.R.C. Revision Petition No.17/2014 confirming the order of eviction passed by the Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC., Belagavi, passed in H.R.C. No.29/2012 dated:26.09.2014 and dismiss I.A.No.4 by allowing the present revision petition. This HRRP is filed u/s.115 of CPC, praying to set aside the order passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court-III, at Belagavi, dated 04.02.2015, passed in H.R.C. Revision ...
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. sri.gururaja Seva Samithi
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE3D DAY OF JULY, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR ITA No.411/2009 BETWEEN1 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS C R BUILDING QUEENS RAOD, BANGALORE. THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS C R BUILDING QUEENS RAOD, BANGALORE.2. (BY SRI. K V ARAVIND, ADV.,) AND SRI.GURURAJA SEVA SAMITHI CA SITE NO.5, 2ND MAIN, 8TH A CROSS YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE64(BY SRI. BALRAM R RAO, ADV., ) APPELLANTS ... RESPONDENT ITA FILED U/S.260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED133-2009 PASSED IN ITA.NO.1405/BANG/2008, PRAYING TO:2. I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN, II. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT BANGALORE IN ITA NO.1405/BANG/2008, DATED133-2009 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGME...
Vinod, G. Vs. Jijabai W/O Shrikant Jadhav,
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE03R D DAY OF JULY, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA HOUSE RENT REVISION PETITION No.100005 OF2015C/w. HOUSE RENT REVISION PETITION No.100006 OF2015HOUSE RENT REVISION PETITION No.100007 OF2015In HRRP No.100005/2015: BETWEEN: VINOD, G. AGED ABOUT:33. YEARS, PRESENTLY R/AT: R.S.NO.79/A+A, MANCHALAYA BUILDING, 5TH CROSS, ADARSH NAGAR, HINDWADI, BELAGAVI, OLD ADDRESS:79. A+A, (OLD RS No.79/1B) 5TH CROSS, MANCHALAYA NIVAS, ADARSH NAGAR, BELAGAVI. (By Sri. MRUTYUNJAY TATA BANGI ADV.) ... PETITIONER AND: JIJABAI W/O SHRIKANT JADHAV, AGED ABOUT:54. YEARS, PRESENTLY R/AT:R.S.NO.79/1, 5TH CROSS, SHANKAR KASHI BUILDING, :2. : ADARSHA NAGAR, HINDWADI, BELAGAVI. OLD ADDRESS: SHANKAR KASHI NIVAS, CTS No.2956 OF ADARSH NAGAR, ANGOL, BELGAUM. (By Sri. M G NAGANURI ADV.) ... RESPONDENT THIS HRRP IS FILED U/S.115 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT-III, AT BELAGAVI, DATED:04...
K S Venkatesh Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-03-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE3D DAY OF JULY, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR ITA NO.416/2009 BETWEEN: K.S.VENKATESH NO.29, WEST PARK ROAD MALLESWARAM BENGALURU-560 010 ..APPELLANT (BY SRI.A.SHANKAR & SRI.M.LAVA, ADVOCATES) AND: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDINGS QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 ..RESPONDENT (BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION260A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED0904-2009 PASSED IN ITA NO.60/BNG/2009, 2 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR200405, PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO: I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN, II. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT BANGALORE BENCH, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.60/BANG/2009,DATED0904- 2009, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ARAVIND KUMAR J., DELIVERED TH...
K.V.G. Dental College and Hospital, Rep. by its General Secretary Dr. ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
(Prayer: These Writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records of the proceedings from the respondents and quash the impugned communication dated 17.03.2015 issued by the R-2 vide ANNEXURE-A in so far as it seeks to direct discharge of petitioners 2 to 4 and denial of their admission to 1st year BDS course and declare that the admissions granted to the petitioners No. 2 to 4 are valid and that they are entitled to continuation of their studies by grant of approval of their admissions.) Order H.G. Ramesh, J. (Oral): 1. In these writ petitions presented on 29th June 2015, the petitioners (two colleges and nine students) are challenging disapproval of admissions of nine students to the B.D.S. course (commencing from 2014-2015) by Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences ( ˜the University'). The University has disapproved the admissions on the ground that the colleges had not furnished rankings (rank cards) of the nine st...
Rockline Bar and Restaurant Vs. The State of Karnataka by its Principa ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
(Prayer: This writ appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in the Writ Petition No. 19605/2015 dated 05/05/2015.) 1. The appellant is operating a 'Bar and Restaurant' for which it has been granted a license under the Karnataka Excise Act, read with Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968. ƒ 2. Being aggrieved by the demand notice dated 07.03.2015 issued by the respondent No.3, Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru City, Bengaluru requiring the appellant to deposit penalty amounting to Rs.15,30,200/- under Rule 14 of the Rules of 1968, the appellant filed a Writ Petition No. 19605/2015 (Excise) whereby the petitioner-appellant challenged the power of the Deputy Commissioner, Respondent No.3 in raising the said demand, as according to the appellant power under Rule 14 lies with the Deputy Commissioner-Excise and not Deputy Commissioner-Revenue. The challenge to the said notice was also on the ground that...
M.V. Perumal and Others Vs. A. Vijay Kumar and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
(Prayer: This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Order XLIII Rule 1(j) CPC., against the order dated 22.7.2014 dismissing IA No.9 in Execution Case No.1230/2010 on the file of the XIV Addl. Judge, City Civil Court, Bangalore and etc.) 1. This appeal is filed challenging the order dated 22.07.2014 passed by the Executing Court dismissing the application filed by the judgment-debtors under Order XXI Rule 90 read with Section 47 CPC seeking to set aside the sale certificate issued on 08.10.2013. 2. Facts necessary for the disposal of the case, stated in nutshell, are that O.S.No.705/1994 was filed by the decree-holder for recovery of money. The said suit was filed against one Perumal “ father of the appellants herein/judgment-debtors. The suit was decreed on 12.10.2007 for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with interest and costs. Respondents 1 and 2 herein/decree-holders filed E.P.No.1230/2010 against the legal representatives of M.V. Perumal. 3. The Executing Court issued notices to t...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »