Karnataka Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.R. Girish Rithvik and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for the records and to declare the action of R-1 in seeking to discharge the petitioner by endorsement dtd. 15.10.2014 vide Annexure-A as arbitrary, illegal and unjustified and to quash the impugned endorsement dtd.15.10.2014 vide Annexure-A and to direct the R-1 to consider the representation dtd.17.10.2014 vide Annexure-F and to direct the R-1 to consider the representation dtd. 17.10.2014 vide Annexure-G and etc.) H.G. Ramesh, J. 1. In Writ Petition No.49585/2014, the petitioner namely, Mr. Grisih Rithvik K.R. has sought for a writ of mandamus directing the Medical Council of India ( ˜the Medical Council') and Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences ( ˜the University') to approve his admission to I year MBBS course for the academic year 2014-2015 as per the list at Annexure-K sent by Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences ( ˜the College'). The petitione...
Wipro Infrastructure Engineering (A Division of Wipro Enterprises Limi ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
1. The petitioner has called into question the order dated 3-3-2014 (annexure-K) issued by the first respondent-Additional Labour Commissioner (Administration) and Appellate Authority The facts of the case in brief are that as per Clause 23 of the Standing Orders of the petitioner-Company, the retirement age of its employees is 58 years. The second respondent-Union filed an application before the Certifying Officer under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 ( ˜the said Actfor short), seeking the amendment of the Standing Orders for raising the age of retirement from 58 to 60 years. The Certifying Officer passed the order dated 7-8-2013 (Annexure-E) rejecting the second respondent's application. The second respondent challenged the same before the first respondent by way of appeal. The first respondent allowed the appeal by the impugned order dated 3-3-2014. 2. Sri C.K. Subramanya, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the first respondent-Appellate Auth...
Jana Bai and Others Vs. Komalan and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
(Prayer: This Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 1.12.2008 passed in O.S.No.10687/1994 on the file of the IV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Mayohall Unit, Bangalore, decreeing the suit for permanent injunction.) This appeal is filed by the plaintiffs. It was their case before the trial court that the first defendant and they were the children of one Jagannathan. The original plaintiff no.1 Janabai, was deleted from the array of parties after her death, by an order of the trial court, dated 9.4.2009. But is shown as the first appellant in the appeal. The first defendant had also died during the pendency of the suit and is now represented by his widow and two major sons. Jagannathan, the father of the parties aforesaid, is said to have died on 18.9.1956, leaving behind the plaintiffs, the first defendant and one R.J. Jeevanathan as his legal heirs. Jeevanathan, a brother of the plaintiffs and ...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Bantwal Taluk Vs. Mallika and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
1. This miscellaneous first appeal is filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated 17-9-2014 passed in MVC No. 1923 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mangalore, Dakshina Kannada, awarding compensation of Rs. 15,50,000/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization. 2. This MFA CROB No. 21 of 2015 is filed under Order 41, Rule 22 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, against the judgment and award dated 17-9-2014 passed in MVC No. 1923 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Member, MACT, Mangalore, D.K, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation. 3. The case of the claimants in the Claims Tribunal is as under: That on 30-9-2012, Keshava was proceeding by driving his autorickshaw bearing Reg. No. KA-19-D-5100 from his house slowly and when he reached Nethravathi Bridge at about 9....
Sri Girish Rithvik K R Vs. Union of India
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-08-2015
R W.P.No.49585/2014 c/w W.P.Nos.49627/2014, 49200/2014 & 49201/2014 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE8H DAY OF JULY2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO.49585/2014 C/W WRIT PETITION NOS.49627/2014, 49200/2014 & 49201/2014 (EDN-RES) IN W.P. No.49585/2014 BETWEEN SRI GIRISH RITHVIK K.R. S/O SRI K.R. CHOUDARY AGED ABOUT18YEARS RESIDING AT SAMSKRUTI, NO.24A37H A CROSS, 8TH BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560082 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI JAYAKUMAR S PATIL, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI S.SUBRAMANYA FOR M/S. UPASANA ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATES) AND:1. 2. 3. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE NIRMAN BHAWAN , C-WING, NEW DELHI-110 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA PACKET-14, SECTOR-8, DWARKA, PHASE-1, NEW DELHI-110 077 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES4H T BLOCK, JAYANAGR, BANGALORE-560 041 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY4 5.6. W.P.No.49585/2014 c/w W.P.Nos.49627/2014, 49200/2014 & 49201...
Ramegowda and Others Vs. Tahsildar, Alur Taluk, Alur, Hassan District ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
1. This is a classic case of a poor displaced farmer knocking at the doors of this Court periodically due to gross inertia exerted by the respondent-State and its authorities. 2. Hemavathi project when visualised, led to large scale displacement of farmers in Hassan District during the year 1970. That project was to harness water of the river Hemavathi and chanalised it to different areas in and around the district. As a result, petitioners, amongst others, gave up their lands which were the only source of eking their livelihood for a public purpose ?. The State though made a promise during the year 1970 to allot agricultural lands to the displaced farmers, which when not done, led to the institution of a writ petition, whence a learned Singe Judge, by order, Annexure-A, directed the State to issue saguvali chits in favour of the petitioners in respect of the lands granted, deliver vacant possession of the same within three months therefrom i.e., from 21-2-2006. In the writ appeal file...
Raghavendra and Another Vs. The State of Karnataka and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
(Prayer: This Crl.P. is filed under S. 482 Cr.P.C., praying to quash the entire criminal proceedings against the petitioners in C.C.No.11008/2010 (Crime No.314/2008) pending on the file of the III ACMM., Bangalore.) 1. On a complaint filed by the second respondent, on 23.10.2008, the first respondent registered FIR in Crime No.314/2008. After investigation, charge sheet was filed. Cognizance having been taken for the offences punishable under S.420 read with S.34 of IPC, C.C.No.11008/2010 was registered and process was issued to Nagappa S/o. late Ramachandraiah and the petitioners herein. Seeking quashing of the said proceedings, this petition under S.482 of Cr.P.C. was filed. 2. The second respondent has instituted O.S.No.26955/2010 on 18.11.2010 against all the accused, to pass a decree directing the defendants to pay jointly and severally Rs.13,78,000/- with interest at 18% p.a. The suit is pending on the file of Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City. 3. The cause of a...
Mohammed Tasnim Vs. State of Karnataka, by Udupi Town Police Station, ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
(Prayer: This Crl.P. is filed under S. 482 Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the order dated 19.08.2014 made on application filed by the petitioner U/S.451 of Cr.P.C. in Crime No.214/2013 by the court of Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Udupi and order dated 29.11.2014 made in Crl.R.P.No.37/2014 by the Prl. Sessions Judge, Udupi District.) 1. The petitioner is accused No.2 in Crime No.214/2013 of Udupi Town Police Station. The police have registered the FIR for the offences punishable under Ss.406, 468, 47-1, 420 read with 34 of IPC. Passport of the petitioner having been seized by the police, under PF No. 79/2014, an application was filed, under S.451 of Cr.P.C., before the learned Magistrate, for the release of the passport. Application having been opposed by the Assistant Public Prosecutor, learned Magistrate by being of the view, that the police have made out prima facie case and since the applicant/accused is working in a foreign country, rejected the application, on the ground that, if th...
Janaki Vs. Lalitha and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
(Prayer: This WP filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the Order dated 17.8.12 passed by the Civil Judge and JMFC, Belur passed on IA No.5 vide Annx-E and consequently dismiss the IA No.5 and etc.) 1. The present petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India challenging the order passed by the learned Civil Judge and JMFC, Belur on I.A.5 filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC in FDP 3/2004, petition filed under Order 20 Rule 18 of CPC seeking final decree on the basis of a preliminary decree passed in a partition suit bearing O.S.187/1997. The said application filed by the petitioner-plaintiff under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC has been allowed and permission is accorded to bring one more property in schedule appended to the plaint in a petition filed in FDP 3/2004. 2. The said application under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC had been filed by the plaintiff Smt. Lalitha, respondent No.1 herein with a request to include 3.30 acres of agricultural lan...
Gowramma Vs. Laxmikanthiah
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-07-2015
(Prayer: This Crl.P. is filed under S.482 Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the order dated 30.10.2010 passed by the FTC-V at Madhugiri in Crl.R.P.No.47/2009.) 1. Challenge in this petition Is to an order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, allowing in part, a revision petition filed by the respondent, under S.397 Cr.P.C. The Magistrate at Koratagere had directed the respondent to pay maintenance to the petitioner, at the rate of Rs.3,000/- p.m. from 02.02.2009. Assailing the said order, the criminal revision petition was filed. 2. The material facts to be stated for deciding of this petition are, that the petitioner and her son had filed C.Mis.No.23/1994 against the respondent. After contest, the petition was allowed on 04.11.1995 and each of the petitioners therein was held entitled to the payment of maintenance at Rs.300/- p.m. ƒ 3. After a lapse of about ten years, alleging change in circumstances, C.Mis.No.55/2006 was filed by the petitioner, under S.127(1) of Cr.P.C. to enhanc...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »