Karnataka Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr (Ms) B K Naik Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
:1. : R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF JULY, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.21216 OF2014CONNECTED WITH WP No.108991/2014, WP No.108986/2014 WP Nos.109282/2014 & 109294-310/2014 WP Nos.111162/2014 & 100853858/2015 WP Nos.111163/2014 & 100846852/2015 WP No.108979/2014, WP No.109265/2014 WP No.108992/2014, WP No.108984/2014 WP No.108976/2014, WP No.108978/2014 WP No.108989/2014, WP No.109264/2014 WP No.109261/2014, WP No.108988/2014 WP No.109273/2014, WP No.108983/2014 WP Nos.100077-100079/2015, WP No.108980/2014 WP No.109274/2014, WP No.109275/2014 WP No.109280/2014, WP Nos.101104/2015 & 101105-125/2015 WP No.100958/2015, WP No.108974/2014 WP No.113061/2014, WP Nos.109283/2014 & 109311-319/2014 WP Nos.110012/2014 & 100916-925/2015 & 100926/2015 WP No.108981/2014, WP No.110011/2014 & 100905-915/2015 WP Nos.109517109547/2014 & 109548/2014 WP Nos.109549-109556/2014 & 109557/2014 WP No.101240/2015, WP Nos.101084101103/...
Sri Dilli Babu Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-10-2015
- 1 - W.P.47811/14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF JULY2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE A. S. BOPANNA WRIT PETITION No.47811 OF2014(GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI DILLI BABU AGED ABOUT50YEARS, S/O M VENKAKATAPATHI NAIDU, R/AT NO332, VIJAY ENCLAVE APARTMENT, 8TH MAIN, 12TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE-560 003 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHINAV R, ADV. FOR M/S. KUMAR & KUMAR, ADVS.) AND1 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF STAMP AND REGISTRATION, K G ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD REP. BY THE CHIEF ENGINEER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, 3RD & 4TH FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE. (BY SMT. PRAMODINI KISHAN, HCGP FOR R1 SRI. R. SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADV. FOR R2) ... RESPONDENTS - 2 - W.P.47811/14 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD.23.8.2014 PASSED BY THE XIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE IN EXECUTION CASE NO.1983/2014 AT ANNEX-C TO THE W....
T. Hanumanthappa Vs. Ameena Bee @ Halima Bee
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
(Prayer: This CRP is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the order dated 18.11.2014 on I.A. No. II in Misc. Case No. 17/2011 passed by the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Ballari, and etc.) 1. The plaintiff has filed the above revision petition against the order dated 18.11.2014 on I.A. 2 made in the Miscellaneous Case No. 17/2011 on the file of the learned Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Bellary, allowing the application for condoning the delay and permitting the defendant/respondent to proceed with the miscellaneous case. 2. It is the case of the plaintiff/petitioner herein, that he had filed a suit in O.S. 79/2008 against the defendant/respondent herein, for specific performance to enforce the oral agreement said to have been executed by the defendant, contending that the defendant had approached the plaintiff and one Sanjeevappa to cultivate her lands in question and thereafter she agreed to sell the land and in part performance of said ag...
Mariyamma By LRs. and Others Vs. Distinappa
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
(Prayer: This CRP filed under Sec.115 of CPC., against the order dated 25.7.2014 passed on IA No.16 in O.S.No.591/1989 on the file of the Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC., Channarayapatna, rejecting the IA No.16 filed under Sec.28(1), (2) and 4 of specific relief Act, 1963 and r/w Sec.151 of CPC.,) 1. Defendants in O.S.No.591/1989 have filed this revision petition challenging the rejection of their application filed under Section 28(1), (2) and 4 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (for short the Act') for rescission of the contract. 2. Facts, stated in brief, are that on 26.11.1985, an agreement of sale was executed between the plaintiff and one Mrs. Mariamma “ 1st defendant. Defendant No.1 agreed to execute the registered sale deed to an extent of 2 acres 15 guntas of land situated at Moodala Dasapura Village in Channarayapatna Taluk, Hassaan District. Sale consideration agreed was Rs.25,000/-. Out of which, Rs.15,000/- was paid as advance and the remaining amount of Rs.10,000/- was to ...
N. Chandrappa Vs. The State of Karnataka, Secretary Home Department, V ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition (Habeas Corpus) is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other writ and quash the detention order No. NO CRM(4)/DTN/11/2015 dated 03.02.2015 vide Annexure-A and order of approval Annexure-N dated 13.2.2015 and order of confirmation Annexure-O dated 16.3.2015 and to direct the respondents to produce the detenue - Anand s/o late Ramanna before this Court.) 1. The order at Annexure-O dated 16.3.2015 passed by the State Government under Sections 12(1) and 13 of the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug offenders, Gamblers, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Slum-Grabbers and Video or Audio Pirates Act, 1985 ('the Act' for short) confirming the order of preventive detention, among others is called in question in this writ petition. 2. The records reveal that the initial order of preventive detention dated 3.2.2015 vide Annexure-A was passed by the delegate i.e., C...
Bangalore Tourist Taxi Owners Association (Regd.) and Another Vs. Regi ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the 100 permits the particulars and certified copies of which are produced herewith marked vide Annexure-D series [Annexure-D1 to D100] and etc.) H.G. Ramesh, J. (Oral): 1. In these writ petitions, the petitioners are challenging 100 contract carriage permits issued to respondent No.2 by the Regional Transport Authority, Bangalore. Copies of the impugned permits are produced as Annexures-D1 to D100. 2. I have heard Sri M.Keshava Reddy and Sri Mohammed Dastagir, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and perused the record. 3. The contention urged is that the impugned permits were not preceded by any order of grant by the Regional Transport Authority. The other contention is, no conditions referred to in sub-section (2) of Sec.74 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ('the Act') are attached to the permits. ƒ 4. In support of the aforesaid two contentions, learned counsel app...
Aravind S. Mangani Vs. State of Karnataka by Karnataka Lokayuktha Poli ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
(Prayer: This Crl.P. is filed under S. 482 Cr.P.C., praying to withdraw the case in Spl. C.C.No.466/2014 pending on the file of the II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Tumakuru and transfer to the court of special judge, designated to try offences under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, i.e., Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi, for trial of this petitioner.) 1. The present petition is filed under S.407 of Cr.P.C., 1973, for withdrawal of the case in Spl.C.C.No.466/2014 pending on the file of II Addl. District arid Sessions Judge, Tumakuru/Spedal Judge, designated to try cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and for transfer to the Court of Prl. District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge, designated to try the cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act') at Kalaburagi, for conducting the trial. 2. The petitioner was working as Deputy Commissioner (Excise) at Tumakuru. That on 10.08.2011, Superintendent of Police, Karnataka Lokayuktha, Tu...
L. Raju Vs. Gurappa Reddy
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
(Prayer: This Crl.A is filed under Section 378(2) Cr.P.C. praying to set-aside the Acquittal order dated 23.5.09 passed on the file of 16th Addl. CMM., at Bangalore in C.C. No. 9769/2008 “ Acquitting the Respondent/Accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act and convict the Respondent/Accused for the above said offence.) 1. The appellant was the complainant before XVI ACMM, Bangalore in C.C.NO. 9769/2008. By judgment dated 23.5.2009, respondent-accused has been acquitted of the charge under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. Hence, this appeal by the complainant. 2. The brief facts of the case of the complainant are as under:- The respondent (hereinafter be called as accused') borrowed a sum of Rs. 6.00 lakh as hand loan from the appellant (hereinafter called as complainant') to meet his family financial necessities during the month of January 2006. The accused repaid an amount of Rs. 88,000/- out of the loan amount of Rs. 6,00,000/-. For the balance amount of Rs. ...
Mohammed Jaffer Khan Vs. The State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition (Habeas Corpus) is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to issue (a) A writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus by quashing of the order of detention dated 11.04.2015 passed by Respondent No.2 in No.MAG(1) CR/39/38184/14-15 produced at Annexure-A and B; (b) A writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus by quashing the confirmation order of detention dated 20.04.2015 passed by Respondent No.1 in No. HD 211 SST 2015, Bangalore produced at Annexure-E; (c) A writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus by quashing of the extention of order detention dated 14.05.2015 passed by Respondent No.1 in HD 211 SST 2015, produced at Annexure-F; (d) A writ of direction directing the Respondent No.5 to release the detenue Sri Yasin Khureshi s/o Ejaj Ahamed, forthwith.) 1. Brief facts leading to this Habeas Corpus Petition are as under: The initial order of detention vide Annexure-A dated 11.4.2015 was passed by the delegate i.e., the District Magistrate, Shivamog...
Dr. S.R. Chowdaiah Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-09-2015
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11-1-2010 in Spl. Case No. 53 of 2002 on the file Special Judge, Mysore, whereby the appellant-accused has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 7and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, the Act') and has been sentenced to undergo one year imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 7 and 2 years imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 13(2) of the Act and to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/-. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the appellant (hereinafter called as accused') was working as Medical officer at K.R. Nagar General Hospital in Mysore District. The cousin brother of the complainant (P.W.1) by name Lakaiah and his wife Rajamma had consumed poison on 5-3-1999. The complainant brought and admitted them in K.R.Nagar General Hospital at about 11.00 p.m. The accused was the duty Doctor. He demanded a bribe ...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »