Karnataka Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kalavathi Vs. State of Karnataka, by Senior Secretary, Bangalore and O ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition (Habeas Corpus) is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to declare the detention of the detenue Bharatha under the order passed by Second Respondent vide order No:CRM(4)/DTN/20/2015 dated 14.05.2015, at Annexure-A which is confirmed by Respondent No.1 vide Order HD 251 SST 2015 dated 18.06.2015 at Annexure-B as illegal and vide ab-initio.) 1. The order of detention dated 14.5.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Bangalore vide Annexure-A as confirmed by the Government of Karnataka on 18.6.2015 vide Annexure-B, are called in question in this writ petition. 2. The records reveal that the order of preventive detention is passed against the detenue, i.e., son of the petitioner by the Commissioner of Police, Bangalore on 14.5.2015 vide Annexure-A by exercising jurisdiction vested in him under Section 3(2) r/w. Section 3(1) of the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders, Gamblers, Goondas, Immoral T...
B Narayana Rao Vs. Syndicate Bank
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17h DAY OF JULY2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN Writ Petition No.10709/2013 (S-RES) Between : B.Narayana Rao Aged about 60 years, S/o late B.Channakeshava Rao R/at No.11-13-758, Greenhills Colony Saroornagar, Hyderabad. (By Sri M.N.Prasanna, Advocate ) Petitioner And : Syndicate Bank A body constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, having its Head Office At Manipal, Represented by its Chairman & Managing Director. (By Sri K.Radhesh Prabhu, Advocate for M/s.Prabhu & Dave Associates ) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 20.10.2012 vide Annexure-L and the order dated 31.12.2012 vide Annexure-N both passed by the respondent/Syndicate Bank and direct the respondent/Bank by issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the bank to pay the petitioner full pension as admissible ...
The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S Khivraj Motors
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF JULY2015PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR ITA NO.426 OF2009BETWEEN1 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, 55/1, SHILPASHREE, VIDYARANYA COMPLEX, VISHVESHWARANAGAR, MYSORE-507 008.2. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-9(1), JEEVAN SAMPIGE, 3RD FLOOR, SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE 560 003. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRIYUTHS K.V.ARAVIND & G.KAMALADHAR ADVS. ) AND M/S.KHIVRAJ MOTORS, 10/2, KASTURBA ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001. ...RESPONDENT (BY SRIYUTHS A.SHANKAR & G.VENKATESH-ADVS.) 2 THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT1961PRAYING TO: i. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN. ii. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE INCOME-TAX ORDERS PASSED BY THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE ITA NO.1110/BANG/2008, DATED313-2009 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOM...
Mohammad Sharif S/O Husainam Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-17-2015
- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF JULY2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.100536/2015 C/w. CRIMINAL PETITION No.100355/2015 IN CRL.P.NO.100536/2015: BETWEEN MR.MOHAMMAD SHARIF S/O HUSAINAM AGE42YEARS, OCC. DRIVER R/O: GURUKATTE, TQ. BELATANGDI DIST. DAKSHINA KANNADA (BY SRI.SRINAND A.PACHHAPURE, ADVOCATE) ... PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH NIPPANI POLICE STATION NOW REP. BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD (BY SRI.K.S.PATIL, HCGP) ... RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION439OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO GRANT BAIL TO THE PETITIONER IN CRIME NO.7/2015 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS379 411 OF IPC & SECTIONS86& 87 OF KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 AND - 2 - RULE144OF KARNATAKA FOREST RULES, ACT BY RESPONDENT NIPPANI TOWN POLICE STATION. IN CRL.P.NO.100355/2015: BETWEEN1 V.P. IBRAHIM BADASHA S/O MOYDU AGE51YEARS OCCUPATION TRADE R/O MORESHWAR BUILDING RAJESHKUMAR ANGAR...
Rajappa Reddy and Another Vs. A. Gopal Reddy and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
1. Heard Sri Yoga Narasimha, learned Senior Counsel for petitioners and Sri Venkatakrishna, learned Counsel for respondent 1. Facts leading to the filing of these petitions are as follows: 2. Respondent 1 herein, Sri Gopal Reddy is the sole plaintiff in the original suit bearing O.S.No.5516 of 2011 pending on the file of Court of XX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore. It is a suit filed for partition and separate possession. 3. The facts leading to filing of these petitions are as follows: Sri Gopal Reddy has filed the suit for relief of partition and separate possession in respect of 3 items of properties as described in the schedule appended to the plaint. Item No.1 is carved out of Survey No.5 and item 1(b) is carved out of Survey No.5/A situated in BTM 1st Stage, 1st Phase, Madivala Village, Bangalore which are stated to be the subject-matter of the joint development agreements executed by the defendants 2 and 3 in favour of defendants 16 to 18. Item 2 is carved ou...
Naved M. Hassan Vs. The Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Urban District, ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
1. Petitioner and respondents 3 to 5 claim title to the immovable property in question through a common vendor, while respondent 3 claims title under a sale deed executed at a point in time prior to that of the sale deed executed in favour of petitioner. The Tahsildar having noticed the rival claims declined to effect change in the revenue records into the name of 3rd respondent which led to an appeal invoking sub-section (2) of Section 136 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short Act') before the Assistant Commissioner, who set aside the order of the Tahsildar and directed recording the name of the 3rd respondent. That order when carried in a revision petition under sub-section (3) of Section 136 of the Act, the Deputy Commissioner confirmed the order by rejecting revision petition. Hence these petitions. 2. If regard is had to proviso to Section 135 of the Act, it is needless to state that the Revenue Authorities are bound by the judgment and decree of a Competent Civil Cou...
Lakshmi Malleables Private Limited Vs. G. Channarayappa and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
1. Although these matters are appearing under the heading, Hearing “ Interlocutory Application ?, we have considered the matters at length because of long pendency of the matter. 2. Bangalore Development Authority ( BDA for short) issued a preliminary notification on July 15, 1982 for the formation of Nagarbhavi Layout. Writ Appeal No.1522 of 2009 has been filed by respondent 4 in Writ Petition No.13028 of 2007 against order dated March 20, 2009 by the Hon'ble Single Judge. 3. The writ petitioners in Writ Petition No.13028 of 2007 are the owners of 2 acres of land in Survey No.103 at Nagarbhavi Village. They have impugned the award passed by the BDA on the ground that the acquisition proceeding got lapsed. This reveals as to how the provisions of Section 27 of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 are misutilised by the owners to stall the formation of layouts. The relief claimed against the appellant herein by the respondent-landowners, that is, petitioners 1 to 4 in the...
Abdul Kareem Vs. The State through Hunasagi Police Station
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
(Prayer: This Crl.P. is filed U/s. 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to exercise its inhernet powers U/Sec.482 Cr.P.C. and examine the records and quash the Order of issuance of NBW against A-5 and arraying him as accused in SPL. Case No.46/2013 (Crime No.101/2013) pending before the district and Sessions Judge at Yadgiri.) 1. The petition is filed seeking quashing of the order dated 24.07.2014 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Yadgiri, in Spl. Case (SC/ST Act) No.46/2013, issuing NBW against the present petitioner arraigning him as Accused No.5. 2. The records disclose that Hunasagi Police have registered a case against 23 accused persons, but at the time of filing of the charge sheet, the Police have implicated only 15 accused persons, wherein the name of Accused No.5 in the charge sheet is shown as Abdul son of Rajsab, aged about 32 years doing centering work, Muslim by caste, residing at Dyamanal village. Subsequently, it appears, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Yadgiri, on 24.07.201...
The Board of Governors, Indian Institute of Management and Another Vs. ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
1. The order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of M. Siddappa v Board of Governors, Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore (ILR 2006 Kar.3192: 2006 (5) AIR Kar.R.388), dated 26th July, 2006 in Writ Petition No.29639 of 1993 (S) is under challenge by the aggrieved respondent-India Institute of Management, which is a premier National Institute Imparting Education in Management Studies. By the impugned order, the penalty of dismissal from service ordered by the Management vide its order dated 9-7-1993 against their delinquent employee/respondent herein passed by the Secretary of the appellant-Board, is quashed with all monetary benefits. 2. An undisputed fact of the case is, the respondent-charge-sheeted official ( ˜C.S.O.for short) herein joined the service of the appellant-Management in the year 1974 as a Research Fellow. He was designated as Assistant Professor on 16-1-1986. He was an active Trade Union leader and was the elected Vice-President of th...
Dr.K.V. Satish and Another Vs. The Principal Secretary, Government of ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-16-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the official memorandum dated 27.8.2014 issued by the R3 vide Ann-J as unjust and illegal.) 1. These petitions have been filed challenging the legality of the appointment order dated 27.8.2014, whereby Dr. S. Venkataraghava has been promoted from the post of Associate Professor to the post of Professor in Forensic Medicine. Since both these writ petitions challenge the same order, they are being decided by this common judgment. 2. The facts are being taken from the Writ Petition No. 45474/2014. It is the case of the petitioner, Dr. K. V. Satish, that on 11.8.2000 he was appointed as Lecturer in Forensic Medicine in the Bangalore Medical College. Subsequently, by order dated 28.11.2005, he was promoted to the post of Assistant Professor in the said college. Thereafter, by an order dated 25.5.2009, he was also promoted as Associate Professor in the said college. Subsequently, a v...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »