Karnataka Court July 2015 Judgments
Siddhartha Vs. State of Karnataka through Sub Inspector of Police
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jul-31-2015
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to allow the petition and thereby enlarge the accused petitioner on bail, directing the JMFC Aurad, (Hokrna P.S.) Dist Bidar to release the accused petitioner, on getting necessary personal and surety bonds in crime No.70/2015, which is registered for the offences P/U/Sec.344, 345, 347, 365, 366, 367, 368, 370 (2) R/W 34 of IPC.) 1. The petitioner has approached this Court for grant ob bail in connection with Crime No.70/2015 of Hokrana Police, for the offences U/Sec.344, 345, 347, 365, 366, 367, 368, 370 (2) R/W Sec.34 of IPC. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the abducted and took away the daughter of the complainant by name Kavita wife of Gopal Chikale of Ganeshpur(U) village long back. It is stated in the complaint that on 2-11-2014 the husband of said Kavita by name Gopal has lodged a missing complaint stating that his wife and daughter were missing from his house and he has also distribut...
Tag this Judgment!Srinivasa Alias Seena and Others Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-31-2015
1. The judgment and order of conviction dated 24-4-2009 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge at Hassan in S.C. No. 45 of 2004 is called in question in all the above three appeals. 2. Cri. Appeal No. 527 of 2009 is preferred by accused 1, 2, 4 and 5. Cri. Appeal No. 523 of 2009 is filed by accused 6 and Cri. Appeal No. 621 of 2009 is filed by accused 7. 3. Brief facts leading to the case of prosecution are that P.W.3-Somashekar lodged the complaint as per Ex. P.3 alleging that on 25.7.2003 at 12.00 midnight, the complainant-Somashekar, his wife Bhagya and their two children i.e., Lavanya and Praveen, after having the meals, slept in the bed room of the front side of the house. On the backside, in one room, the worker Somla Naik was sleeping. At about 12.30 midnight, they heard the sound that somebody was trying to break open the door of the house. Immediately, five persons came to the bedroom. One person was holding the club in his hand and he assaulted the complainant on the head and...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. H.S. Sathish Vs. The Principal Secretary and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-31-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the proceedings of the Selection Committee dated 13.3.2015 vide Annexure-A.) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the appointment order dated 20.4.2015, whereby the respondent No.3 “ Dr. T. Durganna has been appointed as a Medical Superintendent. He is also aggrieved by the fact that he has not been appointed on the said post. 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that on 26.2.1985, the petitioner was appointed as Assistant Surgeon in the department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Karnataka,. On 2.7.1991, he joined the post of Assistant Professor with the Bangalore Medical College and Research Centre. After eight years of experience, he was promoted, in the year 1999, to the post of Associate Professor. In 2003, he was promoted as Professor. In 2007, he was appointed as the Head of Department of ENT Department of the Bangalore Medical College and Research Institut...
Tag this Judgment!Siddhartha S/O Ramadas Sonkambale Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jul-31-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA R KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF JULY2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA CRIMINAL PETITION No.200718/2015 Between: Siddhartha S/o Ramadas Sonkambale, Age:25. years, Occ: Private work, R/o Ghatkopar West, Niyae Sainath School, Mumbai (Maharastra State) (By Sri. K.M. Ghate, Advocate) And: State of Karnataka through Sub Inspector of Police Hokarana Police Station Taluka Aurad-B and Distirct Bidar, Represented by State Public Prosecutor. Petitioner (By Sri. Prakash Yeli, Addl. SPP) Respondent This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to allow the petition and thereby enlarge the accused 2 petitioner on bail, directing the JMFC Aurad, (Hokrna P.S.) Dist Bidar to release the accused petitioner, on getting necessary personal and surety bonds in crime No.70/2015, which is registered for the offences P/U/Sec. 344, 345, 347, 365, 366, 367, 368, 370(2) R/W34of IPC. This petition coming on for Orders this day, th...
Tag this Judgment!Shivananda B. Nagur and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, rep. by its Sec ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-30-2015
(Prayer: These Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash Annex.E dated 03.12.2010 in Application No.1437 to 1442/2010 passed by the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal and allow the Application No.1442/2010 filed by the petitioners by granting the relief sought in the Application No.1442/2010 before the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal and etc.) P.S. Dinesh Kumar, J. 1. Petitioners are unsuccessful applicants before the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal', for short) and calling in question the order of the Tribunal dated 03.12.2010 in Applications No.1437 to 1442/2010, dismissing their applications. 2. Gravamen of petitionerscase is that they are Assistant Primary School Teachers appointed on various dates and working in various schools and they are aggrieved by the notification No.DPAR 59 SRE 2002, Bangalore, dated 24.06.2003, whereby the qualification for Teachers has been amended. Petitioners have...
Tag this Judgment!N.H. Shivamurthy and Others Vs. Mark Gomez and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-30-2015
(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India quash the Order dated 9.1.2015 passed by the learned principal senior civil Judge, Bangalore rural district at Bangalore in Ex.P.No.65/2010 vide Ann-Q and allow the application filed by the petitioners in I.A.3 vide Ann-J etc.) 1. The present petitions are filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India challenging the common order dated 9.1.2015 passed by the Court of Prl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Bangalore in Execution Petition No.65/2010 arising out of the judgment and decree passed in O.S.674/2008. 2. The respondent No.1 herein is the GPA holder of Smt. Ursila, Sri. Marcose, Sri. John Jeffry and Sri. Keny. Respondent No.2, Sri.N.H.Krishnamurthy is the applicant in Ex.Pn.65/2010 and he had filed 3 applications (1) I.A.1 filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of CPC read with Order 21 Rule 97 of CPC to implead himself as an additional decree holder (DHR) (2) I.A.2 filed under Order 16 Rule 1(a) of CPC f...
Tag this Judgment!Chintamani Education Society (Kishora Vidhya Bhavan), Chintamani Taluk ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-30-2015
1. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, these cases are being decided at this stage itself. 2. Since both these writ petitions challenge the same action of the respondents viz., issuance of notice under Section 4(1) of the Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1974 ( the Act for brevity), both the petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment. 3. The facts are being taken in Writ Petition Nos. 28024 to 28036 of 2015. 4. In these petitions, the petitioners have challenged the notice dated 8-6-2015 issued under the above mentioned section of the Act, It is the case of the petitioners that they happen to be the absolute owners of the site bearing Municipal Khatha No. 3250/35 situated at New Extension, 1st Division, Chinthamani Town, measuring 45 feet East to West and 15+25/2 feet North to South. The first petitioner had purchased the said property from its original owner under a registered sale deed dated 4-6-1991. Subsequently, ...
Tag this Judgment!Aruna and Others Vs. Madhukar Bapusaheb Lengade and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-30-2015
(Prayer: RFA filed under Sec. 96 r/w Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC, 1908, against the Judgment and decree dated 30.10.2010 passed in O.S.249/1996 on the file of the II Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Belgaum, partly decreeing the suit filed for partition and separate possession, declaration. RFA is filed under order 41 Rule 1 r/w section 96 of CPC, against the Judgment and decree dated 30.10.2010 passed in O.S.No.95/1991 on the file of the II Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Belgaum, partly decreeing the suit filed for partition an separate possession.) P.S. Dinesh Kumar, J. 1. In both appeals, appellants are aggrieved by the common judgment and decrees dated 30.10.2010, in O.S.Nos.95/1991 and 249/1996, on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Belgaum, decreeing both suits in part. Both cases pertain to family properties belonging to Lengade family Belagavi. Hence, they are heard and disposed of by this common judgment. 2. The genealogical tree of the family is as follows: CHART ? 3. Plaintiff...
Tag this Judgment!State of Karnataka Vs. K. Nagaraja and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-30-2015
Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the State against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 13-11-2009 passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court-V, Bengaluru City, in S.C.No.110 of 2006. The accused were tried and acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 302 and 506 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. 2. Case of the prosecution in brief is that deceased Chandrakala married accused 1-Nagaraja on 6-11-2003 as per the customs prevailing in their community in the presence of the elders, relatives and friends of both the families. Accused 2 and 3 are the mother and father of the accused 1, respectively. Among them accused 3-Krishnamurthy has expired. Accused 4 and 5 are brothers of accused 1. The allegation of the prosecution is that prior to the marriage, the marriage talks took place in the presence of P.Ws.6, 8, 9 and 10 regarding the marriage, wherein, the accused dem...
Tag this Judgment!Aruna W/O Sudhir Lengade Vs. Madhukar Bapusaheb Lengade
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-30-2015
:1. : R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH ON THE30H DAY OF JULY, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR R.F.A.NO.4100/2012 C/W30112011 IN RFA NO4100OF2012BETWEEN1 ARUNA W/O SUDHIR LENGADE AGE:55. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O. 23, KHANAPUR ROAD TILAKWADI, BELGAUM-590 006 2. MAITHILI D/O. SUDHIR LENGADE AGE:33. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O. 23, KHANAPUR ROAD TILAKWADI, BELGAUM-590 006 3. AISHWARYA D/O. SUDHIR LENGADE AGE:30. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O. 23, KHANAPUR ROAD, TILAKWADI, BELGAUM-590 006 ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI M G NAGANURI, ADVOCATE) AND1 MADHUKAR BAPUSAHEB LENGADE AGE:70. YEARS SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRs. 1A) 1(B) 1(C) 1(D) 2.3. 4.5.6. :2. : SMT.SUNITHA W/O MADHUKAR LENGADE AGE:64. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD R/O23 KHANAPUR ROAD BELGAUM-590 006 SMT.SANJANA W/O RAHUL MIRAJKAR AGE:43. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD R/O LENGADE BUILDING, CLUB ROAD BELGAUM-560 001 SHRI MAHAVEER MADHUKAR LENGADE AGE:40. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »