Karnataka Court June 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suresh and Another Vs. The State of Karnataka, Rept By Its Secretary a ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-17-2015
(Prayer: This W.P. is filed praying to call for the entire records in Case No. SC/ST 96/2010-11, on the file of learned R-2 and quash the order passed by the R-2 in Case No.SC/ST (A)96/2010-11 on 5.2.2014 vide Annx-A.) 1. In this writ petition petitioners are calling in question order dated 05.02.2014 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru District, thereby dismissing the appeal tiled by the petitioners herein and confirming the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Bengaluru North Sub-Division dated 20.09.2010. 2. Petitioners are claiming to be the grand children of the original grantee. According to them, land bearing Sy. No. 177/p36 of Bagalur Village, Jala Hobli, Bengaluru North (Addl.) Taluk to an extent of 2 Acres, was an agricultural land grafted under darkasth in favour of their grand father Late Venkataramanappa @ Munivenkataramanappa S/o (Guddeppa. They contend that grand father of the petitioners belonged to Scheduled Caste and on 30.01.1975, original grantee sol...
Sanjay Chandusa Gongale Vs. Anjali @ Vidhya and Another
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-17-2015
(Prayer: This RPFC is filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1984 against the judgment and order dated 10.6.2004 in Criminal Misc. No. 223/2013 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Belgaum, partly allowing the petition filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.) 1. The petitioner/husband filed the above revision petition against the order dated 10.6.2004 made in Criminal Misc. 223/2013 on the file of the Family Court, Belgaum granting maintenance of Rs.2,500/- to the 1st respondent/wife and Rs.1,000/- to the 2nd respondent/daughter aged about 5 years as on today. 2. It is the case of the respondents that 1st respondent is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner and out of their wedlock 2nd respondent/daughter was born. It is alleged in the petition filed before the Family Court by the respondents that few months after the child was born, the petitioner and their family members started to harass the 1st respondent and abused her in filthy language and the petitioner used to com...
Sri Jayaram Hegde Vs. Authorized Officer Cum Chief Manager
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-17-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF JUNE, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.A.NO.1999/2014(GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SRI.JAYARAM HEGDE AGED ABOUT72YEARS, S/O LATE SUBBAYYA SHETTY, PROP:ANSHOOL METALS PVT. LTD., R./AT FLAT NO.5/5A, SEA BIRD APARTMENT114 BEACH ROAD, BANDRA (W) MUMBAI, REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA SRI.V.PRASAD SHETTY, AGED ABOUT53YEARS, S/O LATE V. RAMANNA SHETTY, SRIKRIPA KADEKAR KANNARPADI ROAD, POST - KADEKAR, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT - 574 009 ..APPELLANT (BY SRI.NATARAJA BALLAL A., ADVOCATE) AND:1. AUTHORIZED OFFICER CUM CHIEF MANAGER2CANARA BANK, PAREL BRANCH, PAREL, MUMBAI-400 022. 2.CHIEF MANAGER CANARA BANK, BALMATTA, MANGALURU-574 001. 3.THE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR HEAD OFFICE, CANARA BANK, J.C.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 021. 4.THE MANAGER CANARA BANK, COURT ROAD, UDUPI-574 009. 5.SRI.P.DHANANJAYA SHETTY MAJOR, S/O LATE THAUDA SHETTY, R/AT11535, DEV ASHISH CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY ...
Sanjay Chandusa Gongale Vs. Anjali @ Vidhya W/O. Sanjay Gongale
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-17-2015
:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF JUNE, 2015 R BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA RPFC No.100143/2014 BETWEEN: Shri Sanjay Chandusa Gongale, Age 36 years, Occ: School Rubber Stamp Maker, R/o Mahatma Gandhi Road, Main Road, Old Bagalkot, Dist: Bagalkot. ... PETITIONER (By Sri Girish. A. Yadwad, Advocate) AND:1. Smt. Anjali @ Vidhya W/o Sanjay Gongale, Age:28. years, Occ: Household work, C/o Ambasa S/o Anantsa Kalaburgi, Plot No.45, Sector NO.1, Ramnagar, Nehru Nagar, Belgaum.2. Kumari Vaishnavi D/o Sanjay Gongale, Age 51/2 years, Occ: Happy Nursery School, Student C/o do- (By Smt. Girija S. Hiremath, Advocate) ... RESPONDENTS :2. : This RPFC is filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1984 against the judgment and order dated 10.6.2004 in Criminal Misc. No.223/2013 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Belgaum, partly allowing the petition filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. This RPFC coming on for orders this day, the Court ma...
Bylamarappa and Others Vs. Bangalore Development Authority and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-16-2015
(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to execute a sale deed in respect of site measuring 30 x 40 ft. as per the entitlement of the petitioners in Sy.No.1/14 out of the extent of 20 guntas acquired by the Bangalore Development Authority for formation of further extension of Sri.M. Visveswaraiah layout covered under final notification dtd.9.9.2003 within the time limit that may be fixed by this Hon'ble court under the BDA (incentive scheme for voluntary surrender of land) Rules, 1989 and etc.,) 1. Heard on I.A.1/2015. Learned counsel for parties are ready, to put-forth their arguments. 2. Petitioners lost their land measuring 20 guntas out of 22 for a developmental scheme formulated by respondent- Bangalore Development Authority during the year 2004. Being aggrieved by the said acquisition of land under the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, petitioners filed a writ petition, whence, this Cou...
T.C. Venkatesh Babu Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-16-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution of India Praying To Quash The Impugned Order At Annx-A Dt.17.12.1986 and Also Notification U/S 6(1) Of Land Acquisition Act Dt.23.1.1990 (Annx-B) In Respect Of 23 Guntas Of Land (23 Acres) In Sy.No.91/5a Of Turuvekere Kasaba, Turuvekere, Tumkur Dist., Passed By The R-3.) 1. Land measuring 1 acre said to belong to the petitioner was proposed for acquisition by issue of a notification dated 17.12.1986 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (1 of 1984) ('the Act' for short). The last of the notification under Section 4(1) was published in village chavadi on 06.01.1988, following which a final notification under Section 6(1) was issued on 23.01.1990 and thereafter wards, followed 3 W.P.1092/14 by the making of an award on 19.04.2000 whence compensation was deposited and notice under Section 12(2) served on the petitioner. Possession of the land however was restricted to 23 guntas since final notific...
Narayanamma Vs. Munikempaiah and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-16-2015
(Prayer: This writ appeal is filed U/S 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in the Writ Petition No.8696/2007 dated 5/6/2013.) 1. This is a writ appeal against the judgment and order dated June 5, 2013, passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge in Writ Petition No 8696 of 2007 (SC/ST). 2. One Munikempaiah was a member of Scheduled Tribe Community. He was granted 2 acres of land on March 23, 1962. There was a clear condition stipulated in the allotment deed that the grantee would not alienate the land in question for a period of fifteen years. 3. Inspite of such stipulation, the said Munikempaiah, on May 23, 1973, sold that land in favour of one Hanumanthappa for valuable consideration. ƒ 4. Subsequently, on October 10, 1977, the said Munikepmaiah and Hanumanthappa jointly executed a registered deed of sale in favour of this appellant. 5. When the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978, came i...
Dr. H.S. Priyanka Vs. Dr. H.D. Lokesh Giri
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-16-2015
1. This is a defendant's regular first appeal challenging the judgment and decree of the Trial Court, which has decreed the suit of the plaintiff as prayed for. 2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are referred to in the original suit. 3. The case of the plaintiff is that property bearing No. 31 formed out of property No. 212 of Kodigehalli Village, Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk having CMC Katha No. 693/1175/293/31, amalgamated Katha Nos. 840 and 1246 measuring East to West 40 feet and North to South 60 feet totally measuring 2400 sq. feet, belonged to one Smt. Jayamma, the mother of the plaintiff. Adjacent immovable property bearing No. 32, formed out of property No. 212 of Kodigehalli Village, Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk having CMC Katha No. 693/1175/293/32, amalgamated Katha Nos. 840 and 1246 measuring East to West 40 feet and North to South 60 feet totally measuring 2400 sq, feet belonged to one Smt. Mogamma, the grandmother of ...
Smt. Narayanamma Vs. Munikempaiah
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-16-2015
-:1. :- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 16TH day of June, 2015 -: PRESENT :- THE HON' BLE MR. SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA WRIT APPEAL No.4152/2013 (SCST) BETWEEN: SMT. NARAYANAMMA, W/O LATE CHIKKA NARASIMAIAH, AGED ABOUT54YEARS, CHENNENAHALLI, CHENNARAYAPATNA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 110. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI: S.V.GIRIDHAR, ADV.) AND:1. MUNIKEMPAIAH, S/O MARIYAPPA, MAJOR IN AGE, CHENNENAHALLI, CHENNARAYAPATNA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 110. 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, PODIUM BLOCK, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE560001. 3.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, -:2. :- PODIUM BLOCK, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE560001. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: C.M.NAGABHUSHAN, ADV. FOR SRI.B.V.GANGI REDDY, ADV. FOR R1; SRI.R.DEVADAS, PRL. GA. FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ...
Kum.P.C. Bhagayalakshmi and Others Vs. The Branch Manager, SBM and Oth ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-15-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Appeal is filed u/s 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in the Writ Petition No.31940/2014 dated 21/10/2014.) Vineet Saran, J. 1. The appellants-writ petitioners have filed W.P.No.31940/2014 with the following prayers: i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to issue the nomination amount to the nominees, the L.Rs. of the deceased and other official benefits including employment on compassionate ground with interest- and compensation till date. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant other service benefits accordingly to each of petitioners. 2. By judgment and order dated 21.10.2014, passed by the learned Single Judge, the writ petition has been dismissed on the ground that the order dated 03.01.2009 passed in S.C.No.1/2003 granting succession certificate to the 7th respondent has not been challenged and in view of the same, th...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »