Karnataka Court June 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
U. Amarnath Shetty Vs. State of Karnataka and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-23-2015
(Prayer: This CRL.P. is filed under S.482 Cr.P.C., praying to quash the order dated 11.10.2010 made in Spl.C.C.No.44/2006 by the II Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge and special Judge, Bangalore and entire proceedings in Spl.C.C.No.44/2006 pending on the file of the II Addl. City Civil and sessions judge and special judge, Bangalore pending as against the petitioner.) 1. A private complaint alleging commission of offences punishable under S.3(1)(x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and under S.323 of IPC was filed by the respondent No.2. The learned Sessions Judge, directed an enquiry under S.156(3) of Cr.P.C., by the jurisdictional Police. A case in Crime No.157/2004 for the said offences was registered. After investigation, on 20.01.2005, Breport was filed. The complainant filed protest petition on 13.06.2005. Sworn statement of the complainant was recorded on 27.09.2005 and 24.10.2005. The learned Sessions Judge, by an order dated 13.01.2006, took cognizance against the peti...
M/s. NGEF Ltd. Vs. The Managing Director, Karnataka Power Transmission ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-23-2015
(Prayer: This Company Application is filed under Section 446(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956, r/w rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, praying that for the reasons stated therein and this Hon'ble Court may be pleased that the respondent be order and decreed to pay the applicant a sum of Rs.2,72,38,000/- along with interest at 18% p.a. on 3.8.2004 and future interest till date of making payment and etc.,) 1. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. 2. The applicant is the official liquidator appointed in respect of the company in-liquidation M/S.NGEF Limited. It was claimed that the Managing Director, KPTCL had placed purchase orders with M/S.NGEF Ltd. (in liquidation) as per the invoices furnished by the Ex-director of the captioned company in liquidation for a sum of Rs.2,72,38,000/- for the supply of erection and commissioning of transformers (2 nos) of 50 MVA capacity, one at Harohalli and one at Tataguni Sub-station. The respondent is said to have withheld the amoun...
M/S Ngef Ltd (In Liqn) Vs. The Managing Director
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-23-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE23d DAY OF JUNE2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY COMPANY APPLICATION NO.780 OF2008IN COMPANY PETITION NO.154/2002 Between: M/S. NGEF LTD (in liqn) Reptd. By Official Liquidator Attached to High Court of Karnataka 4th Floor, D & F Wing, Kendriyasandan, Koramangala, Bangalore 560 034. Applicant (By Sri.K.S.Mahadevan and Sri.V.Jayaram, Advocates) And: The Managing Director, Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, Cauvery Bhavan, Bangalore 560 009. (By Sri.S.Sriranga, Advocate) Respondent ***** This Company Application is filed under Section 446(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956, r/w rule 9 of the Companies (Court) 2 Rules, 1959, praying that for the reasons stated therein and this Honble Court may be pleased that the respondent be order and decreed to pay the applicant a sum of Rs.2,72,38,000/- along with interest at 18% p.a. on 3.8.2004 and future interest till date of making payment and etc., Court ...
U Amarnath Shettys/O Thyampanna Shetty Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-23-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF JUNE, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3271/2011 BETWEEN: U. AMARNATH SHETTY S/O. THYAMPANNA SHETTY AGED ABOUT67YEARS R/AT FLAT NO.401, NO.30 15TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM BANGALORE 560 003. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY & SRI N.K. SHETTY, ADVS.) AND:1. 2. SMT. JAYAMMA @ JAYALAKSHMI C/O. GOWRAMMA SAI RAMAKRISHNA BUILDING NO.102-103, 5TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM BANGALORE 560 003. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS BANGALORE 560 001. (BY SRI B. VISWESWARAIAH, HCGP FOR R1; SRI C.S. KUMAR, ADV. FOR R2) ... RESPONDENTS2THE ORDER DATED THIS CRL.P. IS FILED UNDER S.482 CR.P.C., PRAYING TO IN QUASH SPL.C.C.NO.44/2006 BY THE II ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE, BANGALORE AND ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN SPL.C.C.NO.44/2006 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE, BANGALORE PE...
Gaurav Goel Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-23-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE23d DAY OF JUNE, 2015 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B. WRIT PETITION (HABEAS CORPUS) NO.83/2015 BETWEEN: Gaurav Goel Aged about 32 years S/o Vinod Goel # 408, 12th Main, Sadashivanagar, RMV Extn. Bengaluru-560080 (By Sri M.T.Nanaiah, Senior Counsel for Sri M.Vinaya Keerthy Adv.,) AND : .. Petitioner 1. State of Karnataka Represented by its Principal Secretary Dept. of Home & Prisons Vidhana Soudha Bengaluru-560001 2 2. The Inspector General of Police (Prisons) Seshadri Road Bengaluru-560009 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police (Prisons) Central Prison Parappana Agrahara Bengaluru-560100 4. The Sr. Superintendent Central Prison Parappana Agrahara Bengaluru-560100 ..Respondents (By Sri D.Nagaraj, Addl. Government Advocate ) This Writ Petition (Habeas Corpus) is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpu...
A. Devendra Vs. State of Karnataka, rep. by Station House Officer
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-22-2015
(Prayer: This Crl. Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. by the Advocate for the appellant praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 05.12.2009 in Spl. CC No.117/2005 on the file of the I Addl. District and Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru convicting the appellant/accused for the offence punishable under Sections 39 and 44 of the Indian Electricity Act, 190 and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence under Section 39 of the Indian Electricity Act, 190 or in default to undergo S.I. for two months, and the accused is also convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- for the offence under Section 44 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 or in default to undergo S.I. for three months, in the event of default to pay fine, both sentences shall run concurrently.) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 05.12.2009 in Special Case No.117/2005 on the file of...
Shivalinge Gowda Vs. M/s. Inter Trans Services India Private Limited a ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-22-2015
(Prayer: This MFA is filed U/S 173(1) of M.V. Act against the judgment and award dated: 22.07.2014 passed in MVC No. 1979/2013 on the file of the XXI A.C.M.M and XXIII A.S.C.J., court of Small Causes, MACT, Bengaluru (SCCH-25), partly allowing the petition for Compensation and seeking enhancement of Compensation.) 1. This appeal by the claimants is directed against the impugned judgment and award dated 22.07.2014 passed in MVC No. 1979/2013 on the file of the XXI A.C.M.M. and XXIII A.S.C.J., Court of Small Causes, MACT, Bengaluru (SCCH-25), (hereinafter referred to as Tribunalfor short), for enhancement of compensation. 2. The Tribunal by its judgment and award has awarded a sum of Rs. 8,03,618/- under different heads with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit, as against the claim made by the appellant, on account of the grievous injuries sustained by him in the road traffic accident. 3. Being dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded ...
Bhimappa @ Bhyimanna, Kalaburagi District Vs. State by Kembavi Police, ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jun-22-2015
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the Petitioner on Bail on Cr. No.123/2014 of Kembhavi, P.S., Yadgir, for the offences P/U/S 366, 376 (D), 506, 507 R/W 34 of IPC.) 1. The Kembhavi Police lodged a charge sheet against the petitioner and another accused for the offences U/Sec.366, 376(A), 506, 507 R/w Sec.34 IPC on the complaint lodged by one Smt.Priyanka, aged 21 years of Kembavi, stating that her marriage took place with one Manjunath Mandewal on 8-5-2014. The Accused No.1 even earlier to the marriage and after the marriage had been threatening the complainant and later her husband stating that he would ravish the complainant at any time. In this background, it is alleged that on 10-12-2014 at about 2-00 p.m., when Priyanka had been to attend nature call near Shri Muttappa Temple of Kembhavi, both the accused came in Car and forcibly took her and committed rape on her, one after the another in the Car itself. Thereafter threatene...
A.M. Govinde Gowda Vs. B.V. Ravi
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-22-2015
(Prayer: This Crl. Appeal is filed under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C. by the Advocate for the appellant praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to set aside the judgment and order dated 16.12.2008 passed by the Addl. C.J. (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC., Maddur in C.C.No.958/2003 acquitting the respondent/accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act.) 1. This appeal is against the judgment dated 16.12.2008 in C.C.No.958/2003 on the file of Addl. C.J. (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC., Maddur whereby the respondent/ accused has been acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 2. The facts in brief, which gave rise to this appeal are as under: The accused is stated to be the friend of appellant/complainant as both of them are residing at Besagarahalli Village. The accused was in need of money to discharge hand loan taken by him and to meet other domestic expenses. He borrowed a sum of Rs.95,200/- from the complainant on 07.04/2003 and agreed to repay ...
C.K. Rama Murthy and Others Vs. State Election Commission and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-22-2015
(Prayer: When this Court renders judgments, it does so with great care and responsibility. The law declared by this Court is binding on all courts. All authorities in the territory of India are required to act in aid of it. Any interpretation of a law or a judgment, by this Court, is a law declared by this Court. The wider the power, more onerous is the responsibility to ensure that nothing is stated or directed in excess of what is required or relevant for the case, and to ensure that the Court's orders and decisions do not create any doubt or confusion in regard to a legal position in the minds of any authority or citizen, and also to ensure that they do not conflict with any other decision or existing law. Som Mittal v. Government of Karnataka [(2008) 3 SCC 574].) 1. The aforesaid observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court are being tested by the State and other impleading applicants, after conclusion of litigation before the Hon'ble Supreme Court arising out of these writ petitions,...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »