Karnataka Court June 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arun Kumar Nevatia and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Housing and Urba ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-24-2015
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India praying to declare the notifications issued by the R1 U/Sec. 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 vide Ann-D, Dt. 4.3.1994 and Final Notification vide Ann-E issued U/Sec. 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 dt. 14.06.1995 as Lapsed in terms of Sec.24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Re-Settlement Act 2013 and etc.,) 1. Land measuring 2 acres in Sy.No. 7 and 1 acre in Sy.No.9 of Gubbalala village, Uttarhalli hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, amongst other lands though proposed to be acquired pursuant to a preliminary notification on 04.03.1994, Annexure “ Dunder Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (for short Act') and a final notification dated 14.06.1995 Annexure “ Eunder Subsection (1) of Section 6 of the Act, led to the framing of an award dated 9.10.1997, following which possession of the land was taken by issu...
Commissioner of Customs and Service Tax Vs. M/S. Sdv International Log ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-24-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF JUNE, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR C.S.T.A.NO.7/2014 APPELLANT BETWEEN: COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & SERVICE TAX, C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, P.B.NO.5400, BANGALORE-560 001 KARNATAKA. (BY SRI.G.RAJAGOPALAN, ADDL. SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA A/W SRI. N.R. BHASKAR, CGSC) AND: M/S SDV INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS LTD., NO.90/1B, KINGS CROSS, 2ND FLOOR, NEXT TO INNOVATIVE MULTIPLEX, MUNNEKOLAU VILLAGE MARATHAHALLI, BANGALORE. RESPONDENT (BY SRI.SHIVADASS G, AND SRI. HARISH R, ADVOCATES) 2 THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION130OF CUSTOMS ACT, 1962 PRAYING TO ANSWER THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW FRAMED ABOVE IN FAVOUR OF THE APPLLANT BY ALLOWINT THE APPEAL AND TO SET ASIDE THE FINAL ORDER No.20928/2014 DATED2305.2014 PASSED BY THE CESTAT, SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, BANGALORE AND RESTORE THE ORDER-IN-ORIGINAL DATED284.2014 PASSED BY THE APPELLANT. NO.VIII/13/28/99 THIS APPEAL ...
mr.arun Kumar Nevatia Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-24-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24h DAY OF JUNE2015BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NOS. 53890-53891 OF2014(LA-RES) BETWEEN:1. MR. ARUN KUMAR NEVATIA S/O LATE GAURISHANKAR NEVATIA, AGED ABOUT71YEARS, 2. MRS. SUSHILA NEVATIA, W/O MR. ARUN KUMAR NEVATIA, AGED ABOUT68YEARS, 3. MR. GAUTAM NEVATIA, S/O MR. ARUN KUMAR NEVATIA, AGED ABOUT45YEARS, 1 TO3ARE RESIDING AT NO.15, ALIPUR ROAD, KOLKATA 700 027. REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER MR. D.U MALLIKARJUNA, S/O MR. D.S.UMAPATHY, AGED ABOUT47YEARS, NO.29/5, ATHASREE, 38TH CROSS ROAD, 8TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 070. (By Sri. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI. NISHANTH A.V, ADV.,) ... PETITIONERS2AND1 STATE OF KARNATAKA HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMETN, VIKASAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE-560 001.3. THE JAYANAGAR CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED, NO.902, 8TH MAIN ROAD, JAYANAGAR2D BLOCK, BANGALORE-...
Eraiah Vs. The Branch Manager
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-24-2015
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF JUNE2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA M.F.A.NO.7537/2011(MV) C/W M.F.A.NO.7538/2011(MV) C/W M.F.A.NO.7510/2011(MV) C/W M.F.A.NO.7536/2011(MV) C/W M.F.A.NO.7539/2011(MV) M.F.A.NO.7537/2011: BETWEEN: ERAIAH S/O THOPAIAH AGED ABOUT46YEARS, RESIDENT OF GOORANAHALLY EXTENSION, CHANNARAYAPATNA TOWN AND TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT 573 116. APPELLANT (BY SRI GIRISH B.BALADARE, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE BRANCH MANAGER THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, JAYADEVA HOSTEL BUILDING, B.H.ROAD, TIPATUR, TUMAKURU DISTRICT 572 103.2. A.J.RAVI S/O JAVAREGOWDA RESIDENT OF ANEKERE VILLAGE AND POST, DANDIGANAHALLY HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATANA TALUK, - 2 - HASSAN DISTRICT 573 116. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI H.S.LINGARAJ, ADV. FOR R1 R2-SERVED) THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION1731) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED226.2011 PASSED IN MVC.NO.156/2011 ON THE FILE OF PRESIDING COURT, CHANNARAYAPATNA, PARTLY ALLO...
Nalla Reddy @ Hussaini and Another Vs. The State of Karnataka, Raichur ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jun-23-2015
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the Petitioner on bail, in C.R.No.35/2015 of Manvi P.S., Raichur Dist., for the offences P/U/S 143, 147, 148, 504, 324, 323, 302 R/w 149 of IPC.) 1. The petitioners are arrayed as Accused Nos.1 and 2 in C.C.No.218/2015 on the file of Addl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC, Manvi, for the offences U/Secs.143, 147, 148, 504, 323, 324, 302 R/w 149 IPC. 2. The charge sheet papers disclose that on 27-1-2015 a person by name Syed Mahiboob who is an eye witness to the incident lodged a complaint stating that Syed Jahangir, the deceased was granted with a house under Ashraya scheme in Kurdi village. In order to bring some building materials the said Syed Jahangir and others including the complainant had been to Ashapur village. When they were proceeding near the land of accused persons, the accused persons were rearing their cattle on the road, inspite of the driver of the tractor made attempts to scatter them...
Shashikanth and Another Vs. Devaru and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-23-2015
1. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 9-11-2009 in O.S.No.198 of 2005 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sirsi in partly decreeing the suit of the plaintiff for declaration etc., the defendants 3 and 8 have filed this appeal. 2. Parties shall be referred to as per their rank in the Trial Court. 3. The case of the plaintiff is that defendants 1 to 3 are the brothers. Defendants 4 to 7 are the sisters of the plaintiff. Defendant 8 is the wife of defendant 3 and they are members of the Hindu undivided family. The suit schedule properties are the joint family properties and therefore, the plaintiff and defendants have a share in that. The plaintiff and defendants 1 to 3 have 9/40th share and defendants 4 to 7 have 1/40th share. The propositus of the family Ganapati Ramayya Hegde died on 18-2-2002 and their mother Gouramma died on 26-1-2003. The plaintiff and defendants 1 to 7 are the only legal heirs. Some of properties have been acquired from out of the income of the joi...
Prabhakara Shetty and Another Vs. State by Gundulpet Police, Chamaraja ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-23-2015
1. A complaint was filed by CW1-Surendranath, who is the son of Nalinamma (Hereinafter referred to as the deceased ?). The allegation in the complaint is that, on 22.10.2011, at about 11.00 a.m., the petitioners/accused came near his house and demanded repayment of loan amount of Rs.5 lakhs and in default, caused threat of getting the house auctioned and also used highly abusive language and thereby caused mental harassment, on account of which, Nalinamma, doused herself with kerosene and ignited and despite she being immediately taken to a hospital at Mysuru, the treatment having not materialized, died at 08.15 p.m., on 25.10.2011. According to the complainant, the petitioners were solely responsible for the suicidal death of his mother and that the accused abetted in his mother committing suicide. It was alleged that, since the deceased was insulted by the petitioners, she felt ashamed and committed suicide and that the overt acts committed by the accused drove the deceased to commit...
Lakshmama Vs. Manju
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-23-2015
(Prayer: This R.F.A. is filed under Section 96 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 12.11.2010 passed in O.S. No. 1705/2007 on the file of the I-Addl. Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Mysore, dismissing the suit for partition and separate possession.) 1. The plaintiff has preferred this regular first appeal challenging the judgment and decree of the trial Court which has dismissed the suit of the plaintiff for partition and separate possession. 2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are referred to in the original suit. 3. The plaintiff “ Smt. Lakshmamma and defendant “ Manju are the children of Rangegowda. Originally, the suit was filed only in respect of agricultural land bearing Sy. No. 148/P2 measuring 3 acres situated at Kalalavadi Village, Jayapura Hobli, Mysore Taluk. The said land was granted to Rangegowda by the Government by its order dated 22.8.1973. The case of the plaintiff is, from the date of grant, Late Range Gowda along wi...
Gaurav Goel Vs. State of Karnataka, rep. by its Principal Secretary, D ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-23-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition (Habeas Corpus) is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus against the respondents to produce the detenue before this Court and release him from illegal detention of the respondents.) M. Shantanagoudar, J. 1. Petitioner is son of the detenue viz., Vinod Goel. Crime No.10/2015 came to registered against the detenue by the Special Investigation Team, Karnataka Lokayukta, Bengaluru on certain allegations; consequently, remand order dated 12.6.2015 was passed by the Court of XXIII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Bengaluru City (CCH-24) { ˜Special Courtfor short}; the detenue was detained pursuant to such order; the detenue filed an application before the Special Court seeking an order of bail; the Special Court enlarged the detenue on bail by the order dated 19.6.2015 and issued a release order which has been duly served on the Central Prison authorities, Bengaluru wherei...
Jayalakhsmamma Vs. Radhika and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-23-2015
(Prayer: This W.P. is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to allow this petition by issuing a writ of certiorari, by setting aside the order of the Prl City Civil and Session Judge, Bangalore dated 2.1.2014 on I.A. in O.S. No.7713/2011 vide Annx-D and etc.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 2. The order dated 2.1.2014 passed on I.A, in O.S.7713/2011 which was pending on the file of Court of Prl. City Civil and Session Judge, Bangalore is called in question. The petitioner is the plaintiff in the said suit filed for relief of permanent injunction in respect of immovable property measuring 15ft East-West and 15ft North-South situated in Sy.No.56/4, Sarakki Village, Bangalore. The property in question belonged to one Sri.Narayanaswamy, father of defendant No.l. He is stated to have executed an unregistered Power of Attorney in favour of Chengalarayappa, the deceased husband of plaintiff. The said Chengalarayappa is stat...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »