Karnataka Court June 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arun Kiran Vs. The Regional Passport Officer and Public Information Of ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-04-2015
(Prayers: W.P.No.53403/2014 is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ directing the respondents to furnish the copy of the passport of Kum.Anika as stated IND Annx J. W.P.No.9041/2014 is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to furnish the information sought for under Annexs-D and G respectively.) IN W.P.No.53403 of 2014 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the petition does not survive for consideration at this stage. The petition is accordingly disposed of IN W.P.No.9041/2014 The petitioner is before this Court seeking for issue of mandamus to direct the respondents to furnish the information sought for under Annexures-D and G. ƒ 2. The petitioner had filed an application under the Right to Information Act seeking certain information relating to the passport issued to his wife Smt. Pushpa Mandikal Chandrashekar fr...
Suresh Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-04-2015
(Prayer: This Crl.P. is filed under S.482 Cr.P.C., praying to quash the order dated 09.04.2015 in S.C.No.429/2009 pending on the file of prl. sessions judge, Bangalore and allow the application filed under S.311 of the Cr.P.C. 1. This petition is directed against an order dated 09.04.2015 passed in S.C.No.439/2009 by the Prl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, whereby, the I.A. filed under S.311 of Cr.P.C. was rejected. 2. The petitioner is being prosecuted for the offence punishable under S.302 of IPC. The prosecution having concluded its evidence, the petitioner filed an I.A. under S.311 of Cr.P.C. for recall of PWs.2, 3 and 11, for cross-examination. The application having been opposed by the prosecution, the impugned order was passed. 3. The Trial Judge has held that the reason assigned that on 20.02.2015, the advocate was unwell, is not a sufficient justification to seek the recall of witnesses. ƒ Another reason assigned is, that by remaining absent, the advocate for t...
Mala @ Malawwa and Others Vs. Irappa and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-04-2015
(Prayer: This CRP is filed under Section 115 of CPC Against the Order dated 12.08.2013 passed in OS NO.20/2011 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Mudhol, rejecting IA No.II, filed by defendants, under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 of CPC.) 1. The petitioners, who are the defendants filed the above Civil Revision Petition against the order dated 12.08.2013 on I.A. No.II made in O.S.No.20/2011, rejecting the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short CPC'). 2. Respondents Nos.1 to 5, who are the plaintiffs in the trial court, filed the suit for declaration that they are the owners of the suit schedule property, more fully described in paragraph No.2 of the plaint and also sought for an alternative prayer that if the Court comes to the conclusion that the plaintiffs have not become the full owners of suit land in view of M.E. Nos.363 and 399, then, it may kindly be declared that plaintiffs have become the o...
Shankar Vs. Chandrashekhar and Others
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jun-04-2015
(Prayer: This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act, against the judgment and award dated 01.10.2010 passed in MVC No 372/2009 on the file of the I Addl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and MACT at Gulbarga, partly allowing the claim petition and seeking enhancement of compensation.) 1. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section 173.(1) of MV Act, against the judgment and award dated 01.10.2010 passed in MVC No.372/2009 on the file of the I Addl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and MACT at Gulbarga, partly allowing the claim petition and seeking enhancement of compensation. ƒ 2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned counsel for respondent No.2, this matter is heard on merits. The material placed before this Court is sufficient to dispose of this case. 3. The case of the claimant in the Claims Tribunal is as under; That on 2-1 1.2.2008 at about 1.00 p.m. the claimant was proceeding as a pedestrian on the extreme left side ...
K. Krishnappa Naidu Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-04-2015
(Prayer: Crl.P Filed U/S.439 Cr.P.C By The Advocate For The Petitioner Praying That This Hon'ble Court May Be Pleased To Enlarge The Petr. On Bail, In Cr.No. 144/2015 Of Channammanakere Achukattu P.S., Bangaluru City, For Offences P/U/S 498-A, 304(B), 302 R/W 34 of IPC. The Lxiii Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Has Rejected The Bail Petition In Crl.Misc.No.2467/15 on 2.5.2015.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government pleader appearing for the respondent - State. 2. Petitioner is the accused No.2 in Crime No.144/2015 on the file of Channamanakere Achukattu Police Station. Offences alleged against all the accused are under Section 498-A, 304(B), 302 R/W 34 of IPC. The petitioner - accused No.2 is in judicial custody since 14.04.2015 and hence regular bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is filed. 3. The allegation against this petitioner and his son is that they were ill-treating the deceased both physically and mentally in order to pressuri...
Divisional Manager, ICICI Lombardo General Insurance Company Limited, ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-04-2015
1. The appellant-Insurance Company filed this appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 31-7-2007 made in No. WCA-F/41/2007 passed by the Labour Officer and the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Bagalkot (hereinafter referred to as the WCC'). 2. Respondents 1 to 4 herein filed a claim petition before the WCC contending that they are the legal representatives of deceased Basavaraj Thotad, who was working as a driver in a lorry bearing registration No.KA-26/4292 belonging to the 5th respondent. On 23-4-2006, as per the instructions of the owner, after loading granite stones at Ilkai while proceeding towards Bangalore, the said vehicle met with an accident an NH-13 and Basavaraj Thotad succumbed to injuries. At the time of accident, the deceased was aged about 32 years and getting a salary of Rs. 5,000/- per month and batta of Rs. 100/- per day. The claimants are dependents of the deceased. The accident occurred during the course and arising out of the employment. In view of ...
B.V. Ramachandre Gowda Vs. Kempamma
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-04-2015
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer lo quash the order dated 03.12.12 vide Annexure-A passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Channapatna in O.S.No.19/12.) 1. By the impugned order dated 03.12.2012, the court below has directed to pay the deficit stamp duty and penalty in respect of the unregistered deed dated 19.09.2003, which is titled as panchayat parikat. 2. The petitioner herein filed a suit for declaration and for possession of certain property. In the said suit, the plaintiff/ petitioner herein produced and wants to rely upon a document dated 19.09.2003 (titled as panchayat parikat) to show that there was a partition among the brothers. At the time of recording the evidence of the plaintiff, the said document is sought to be marked. It is also relevant to note that what was sought to be produced and marked before the trial Court was certified copy of the deed dated 19.09.2003 inasmuch as the origi...
Suresh Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-04-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF JUNE, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2639/2015 BETWEEN: SURESH S/O. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT37YEARS, R/AT NO.161, 7TH CROSS, OPP. TO OM SHAKTHI TEMPLE, JEVANAHALLY, COX TOWN, BANGALORE-560 005. (BY SRI SANDESH J.CHOUTA, ADV.) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BANASHANKARI POLICE STATION, BANGALORE CTIY, THROUGH THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESETNED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. (BY SMT. ANITHA R., HCGP) ... PETITIONER ... RESPONDENT2THIS CRL.P. IS FILED UNDER S.482 CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED0904.2015 IN S.C.NO.439/2009 PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL. SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER S.311 OF THE CR.P.C. THIS CRL.P. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER This petition is directed against an order dated 09.04.2015 passed...
M/S Lakshmivan Polymers Pvt Ltd Vs. The Deputy Commissioner
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-04-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF JUNE2015BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI W.P.NO.19550 OF2014[KLR-RES]. BETWEEN M/s.Lakshmivan Polymers Pvt. Ltd. Represented by its Director, Sri Babu H.V., 27 years, S/o.Late A.R.Veerabhadrappa, No.2, West Park Road, Kumara Park East, Bangalore 560 001. ... Petitioner (By :Sri D.R.Ravishankar, Advocate) AND:1. The Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Urban District, Bangalore 560 001.2. The Tahsildar, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore 560 001.3. G.Venkatesh, Major, S/o.Gundappa, R/at Pattangere Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore 560 060. 2 4. Smt.Naseem, Major, W/o.Firoz Ahmed, R/at Pattangere Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore 560 060.5. Sri G.C.Prakash, Major, Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Urban District, Bangalore 560 001.6. Superintendent of Police, Crops of Detectives, Carlton House, Newly constructed Anex Building, Msb. Palace Road, Racecourse, Ga...
Shankar S/O Basappa Pujari Vs. Chandrashekhar S/O Ngappa Sulepetkar An ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jun-04-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF JUNE2015BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.R.KUMARASWAMY MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.30019/2011 (MV) BETWEEN: Shankar S/o: Bassappa Pujari, Age:31. Years, Occ: Goundi, R/o: Panchsheelnagar, Jewargi Road, Gulbarga. (By Sri Liyaqat Fareed Ustad, Advocate) ... Appellant AND:1. Chandrashekhar S/o: Nagappa Sulepetkar, Age:53. Years, Occ: Owner of the Car No.KA-32/M-7016, H.No.149-24-35-21, Sadashiv Nagar, Jewargi Road, Gulbarga. 2 2. The Manager IPPCO Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd., Stategic Unit Business No.127, Bhavani Arcade, 3rd Floor, 3.CS.308, Near Old Bus Stand, Opp: Basava Vana, New Cotton Market, Hubli-580029. (By Smt. Sharada R. Patil, Adv. for R1 Sri Sudarshan.M., Adv. for R2) ... Respondents This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act, against the judgment and award dated 01.10.2010 passed in MVC No.372/2009 on the file of the I Addl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and MACT at Gulbar...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »