Skip to content

Karnataka Court June 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 10 2015

Mrs Sandhya Goni Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-10-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 10th day of June, 2015 Present THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE VINEET SARAN & THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE BUDIHAL R B Writ Petition (Habeas Corpus) 75 / 2015 Between Petitioner Mrs Sandya Goni, 39 yrs W/o Mr Ashok S Goni R/a # 02, Ajantha Apartments TF302 N N Farms Sanjaynagar, Bangalore 94 (By Sri Smit N Mandgi, Adv.) And 1 2 3 4 5 Mr Ashok S Goni, 58 yrs S/o late Shivraj Goni R/a # 53, Goni Fairfeild Commissioner of Police Infantry Road, Bangalore State of Karnataka by its Prl. Secretary Home Department, Vidhana Soudha Bangalore Circle Inspector of Police Sanjay Nagar, Bangalore 94 Police Sub-Inspector Sanjaynagar Police Station Bangalore 94 2 Respondents GF002 N N Farms, 40 Ft. Road Sanjaynagar, Bangalore 94 (By Sri H V Manjunath, AGA for R1-4; Sri Vishnu Murthy for Smt H V Vasantha Lakshmi, Adv. For R5) Writ Petition is filed under Art.226/227 of the Constitution praying to direct 3rd respondent police to produce the daughter of the peti...


Jun 10 2015

V Anjaneya Reddy Vs. Special Additional Land Acquistion Officer

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-10-2015

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF JUNE2015BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S.PATIL CRP NO.212/2011 BETWEEN: V ANJANEYA REDDY S/O LATE YELE VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT62YEARS, R/A BANASWADI, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE-560043 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI P KRISHNAPPA, ADV.) AND1 SPECIAL ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE2 THE CHAIRMAN BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE ...RESPONDENTS2THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION115OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER MADE BY SECOND ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, AT BANGALORE IN EX.NO.811/2002, DT:21.04.2011 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS CRP COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER This revision petition is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure challenging the order passed by the executing Court dismissing the Execution Petition No.811/2002 as barred by time.2. The execution petition was filed on 09.04.2002 seeking enforc...


Jun 10 2015

Bharatiya Adima Jatti Sevaka Sangh (Regd.), Vs. Sanjeevappa S/O Mallap ...

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on: Jun-10-2015

:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE10T H DAY OF JUNE, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.100040 OF2015BETWEEN: BHARATIYA ADIMA JATTI SEVAKA SANGH (REGD.), BEARING REG. NO.52/1986-87 (B.A.J.S.S.) C/O SRI DURGA MATHA INDEPENDENT P.U. COLLEGE, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, RUDRAPPA S/O MANAPPA LAMANI, AGE:55 YEARS, OCC:SOCIAL WORK AND AGRICULTURE, AT: KAVALETTU, POST: KUMARPATTANAM, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. ... PETITIONER (By Sri. K L PATIL ADV.) AND: SANJEEVAPPA S/O MALLAPPA KUNDAPUR, AGE:60 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS, R/O: KODIYAL-HOSPET, POST: KUMARPATTANAM, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. (By Sri. V P KULKARNI ADV.) ... RESPONDENT :2. : THIS CRP IS FILED U/S.115 OF CPC., PRAYING TO (a) SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED:20.04.2015 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND1T ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR ON IA NO.14 IN OS NO.298/2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND DISMISS THE SUIT FOR WANT (b) CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIO...


Jun 09 2015

Sharanappa Shivappa Alur and Others Vs. Shivappa Bharamappa Alur and O ...

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on: Jun-09-2015

1. Plaintiff in O.S.No.34 of 1997 filed a suit for specific performance against Shivappa and his mother Shivakka with regard to the suit property mentioned therein. Shivappa's sons, daughter and wife filed O.S.No.100 of 1997 against Shivappa and Shivakka, who are defendants in O.S.No.34 of 1997 and Kotrappa for partition and separate possession with regard to the suit properties mentioned therein. Both the suits were clubbed together. 2. O.S.No.100 of 1997 namely, the suit for partition and separate possession was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the plaintiffs have filed the instant appeal. The parties are referred to as per their rank in the Trial Court in O.S.No.100 of 1997. 3. Suit schedule property in O.S.No.34 of 1997 is the first item of suit schedule property in O.S.No.100 of 1997. The case of the plaintiffs is that plaintiffs 1 to 4 who are minors are under the care and custody of their mother Smt. Renuka-plaintiff 5. Father of the plaintiffs 1 to 4 and husband of plaintiff 5...


Jun 09 2015

Kasturevva Vs. Jayashree

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on: Jun-09-2015

(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned compromise decree passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) Ramdurga in O.S.No. 81/2004 dated 28/02/2006 and 06/03/2006 vide Annexure-B and the suit be restored on its file for hearing on merits. 1. The petitioner/plaintiff has filed the above writ petition for quashing of the impugned compromise judgment and decree dated 28.02.2006 and 6.3.2006 made in O.S. No.81/2004 on the file of Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Ramdurga, and for restoration of the suit on its file mainly on the ground that the impugned compromise judgment and decree of the Court below is improper and illegal and the said compromise decree obtained by the defendant is a fraudulent act committed by son-in-law of the petitioner, who is the cousin brother of respondent. 2. The facts of the case are as under: The plaintiff/petitioner filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the defendant...


Jun 09 2015

ONMOBILE Global Limited Vs. N.Y. Narayan and Others

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-09-2015

1. This petition is filed under sub-section (6) of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Actfor the sake of brevity). 2. The petitioner is a company, incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 had entered into an agreement of lease with the respondents in respect of a commercial premises for the purpose of having their office in the premises in question located at Electronic City, Bengaluru-560 100. 3. Lease deed is dated 26-2-2013 executed at Bengaluru, between the parties (Annexure-A to the petition). Under the terms and conditions of the lease, respondents had to make available certain facilities in the leased premises. The grievance of the petitioner is that, the respondent-lessors did not comply with the terms and conditions of the lease deed. The petitioner, by legal notice dated 7-11-2014, demanded compliance of the terms and conditions of the lease deed (annexure-C to the petition), within a period of ten days...


Jun 09 2015

Mayura Vs. The State Rep. By The Range Forest Officer and Another

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-09-2015

(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to quash the order dated 9.5.2014 passed by the authorized officer and Deputy Conservator of Forests, Mangalore division, Mangalore in O.R.No. 21/2013-14 of Uppinangady Range Forest Office, Uppinangady vide Ann-F and the order dated 30th October 2014 passed by the V Addl. Sessions Judge, D.K. Mangalore in Criminal Appeal No. 124/2014 vide Ann-H in so far it pertains to the refusal to grant interim custody of the Eicher Canter Lorry Bearing Regn. No. KA-04-D-1265.) 1. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the order dated 09,05.2014 passed by the Authorized Officer and Deputy Conservator of Forests, Mangalore Division and the order dated 30.10.2014 passed by the V Additional Sessions judge, Dakshina Kannada in Criminal Appeal No. 124/2014 which are impugned at Annexures- F and H to the petition. 2. The petitioner is the registered owner of the Eicher Canter Lorry bearing No...


Jun 09 2015

Vasantha C. Kerur and Others Vs. B. Basavaraj and Others

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-09-2015

(Prayer: This Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated:12.01.2010 passed in O.S.No.235/2009 on the file of the I additional District and Sessions Judge, Davanagere, decreeing the suit for partition and separate possession.) 1. This appeal is filed by the legal representatives of the plaintiff. The plaintiff is said to have died during the pendency of the suit, in the year 2008. 2. The suit was for partition and separate possession of the properties described in Schedule-'Aand Bto the suit. Defendants 1 to 3 were the brothers of the plaintiff and defendants no.4 and 5 were the sister and sister-in-law, respectively, of the plaintiff. The parties were admittedly governed by the Hindu law. The genealogy of the family is as under: Late Siddalingappa (Deceased-1961)(wife) Shantamma (Deceased-1994)Vasantha C. Kerur (Plaintiff-Since deceased now represented by)B. Basavaraja (D-1)B. Nagaraja (D-2)Devamma (D-4) married in ...


Jun 09 2015

Kasturevva W/O Hemappa Basureddy Vs. Jayashree W/O Late Basavareddy Ba ...

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on: Jun-09-2015

:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH R DATED THIS THE09h DAY OF JUNE, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA W.P. NO.109988/2014 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN KASTUREVVA W/O HEMAPPA BASUREDDY AGE:65. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD & AGRICULTURE, R/O: MULLUR, TQ: RAMDURG, DIST: BELGAUM. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. B V SOMAPUR, ADV.,) AND SMT.JAYASHREE W/O LATE BASAVAREDDY BASUREDDY NOW AFTER HER REMARRIAGE HER NAME IS SMT. JAYASHREE W/O BASAVAREDDY DEVAREDDY, AGE ABOUT30YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: PADESUR, TQ: NAVALGUND. ... RESPONDENT ... THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED COMPROMISE DECREE PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) RAMDURGA IN O.S.No.81/2004 DATED :2. :28. 02/2006 AND0603/2006 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND THE SUIT BE RESTORED ON ITS FILE FOR HEARING ON MERITS. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The petitioner/plaintiff has filed the above writ ...


Jun 09 2015

Vasantha C Kerur Vs. B Basavaraj

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-09-2015

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF JUNE2015R BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.1326 OF2010BETWEEN:1. Vasantha C.Kerur W/o Chandrashekar B.Kerur Dead by her legal heirs a. Chandrashekar D.Kerur H/o Vasantha C.Kerur Aged about 67 years R/a 53, 3rd cross, B Block Devraj Urs Layout Davanagere-577 006 b. M.C.Vidya Rani W/o M.Chandrashekhar Age: Major R/a 106, 4th cross, B Block Devraj Urs Layout Davanagere-577 006 c. Kavitha Veerendra W/o Veerendra Patel Aged about 33 years R/a Bussenahalli Channagiri Taluk-577001 2 APPELLANTS S/o Chandrashekhar D.Kerur d. Viveka C.Kerur Aged about 31 years R/a 53, 3rd cross, B block Devraj Urs Layout Davanagere-577006 (By Sri. Prasanna B.R., Advocate for Ram Bhat and Sreepada Associates-Advocates) AND:1. B.Basavaraj Aged about 56 years R/a Dodda Bathi Davanagere Taluk 2. B.Nagaraja Aged about 54 years R/a Dodda Bathi Davanagere Taluk 3. B.Giri Raj Aged about 46 years R/a Dodda Bat...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial