Karnataka Court February 2015 Judgments
G. Ramappa and Another Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-13-2015
(Prayer: This Crl.A. Filed Is Filed Under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C Praying To Set Aside Conviction And Sentence Dated 15.4.2010 Passed By The Special Judge, Davangere In Spl.C Sc/St No.4/2007 - Convicting The Appellants/Accused For The Offence Punishable Under Section 3(1)(X) Of Sc/St (Pa) Act 1989 Read With Section 34 Of IPC.) 1. This appeal is preferred by the appellants/accused Nos.1 and 2 being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 15.04.2010 passed by the Prl.District and Sessions Judge and Spl.Judge at Davangere in Spl.C.SC/ST.No.4/2007. 2. The appellants challenged the judgment and order of conviction of the Spl.Court on the grounds urged in the appeal memorandum at Sl.No.1 to 19. 3. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel appearing for the appellants/accused Nos.1 and 2 and also the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State. 4. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that though the case was registered against the accused persons for ...
Tag this Judgment!G. Ramappa and Another Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-13-2015
(Prayer: This Crl.A. Filed Is Filed Under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C Praying To Set Aside Conviction And Sentence Dated 15.4.2010 Passed By The Special Judge, Davangere In Spl.C Sc/St No.4/2007 - Convicting The Appellants/Accused For The Offence Punishable Under Section 3(1)(X) Of Sc/St (Pa) Act 1989 Read With Section 34 Of IPC.) 1. This appeal is preferred by the appellants/accused Nos.1 and 2 being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 15.04.2010 passed by the Prl.District and Sessions Judge and Spl.Judge at Davangere in Spl.C.SC/ST.No.4/2007. 2. The appellants challenged the judgment and order of conviction of the Spl.Court on the grounds urged in the appeal memorandum at Sl.No.1 to 19. 3. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel appearing for the appellants/accused Nos.1 and 2 and also the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State. 4. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that though the case was registered against the accused persons for ...
Tag this Judgment!Appasab Patil and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka Through Its Regist ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Feb-12-2015
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Article 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Issue Writ Of Certiorari For Quashing The Endorsement Issued To The Petitioners Dated 31.10.2011, 02.11.2011, 31.10.2011, 26.10.2011 And 02.10.2011 Respectively, In Respect Of Resolution Dated 24.10.2011 Passed By Respondent No.3 Which Are At Annexures - K And K1 To K4 Respectively. These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Article 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Issue Writ Of Certiorari For Quashing The Endorsement Issued By The Respondent No.3 To The Petitioners No.1 To 8 Dated 28.10.2011 Which Is Annexure-1 TO 8. This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Article 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Issue Writ Of Certiorari For Quashing The Endorsement Issued By The Respondent No.3 To The Petitioner Dated 28.10.2011 Which Is Annexure-K. This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Article 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Issue Writ Of Mandamus Or Any...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Sri Chamundeshwari Sugars Ltd Vs. The Government of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-12-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF FEBRUARY2015PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE R AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT APPEAL NOS. 3143-3145/2014 & WRIT APPEAL No.3073/2014 (GM-RES) W.A. NOS. 3143-3145/2014 BETWEEN1 M/s. Sri Chamundeshwari Sugars Ltd., No.88/5, Richmond Road, Bangalore-560 025 Represented by its President Sri N.Nachiappan, S/o Ramaswamy, Aged about 67 years.2. M/s. Shamanur Sugars Limited Regd. Office No.374, 4th main, P.J.Extension, Davanagere-577002. Represented by its Liason Officer Sri H.C.Venkatesh, Aged about 55 years.3. The India Sugars & Refineries Ltd., having its Branch office at Midford House, Midford Garden, Off M.G.Road, Bangalore-560 001 Represented by its Manager Finance- Sri P.S.Krishnamurthy, S/o Late P.K.Soundarajan, Aged about 54 years. . APPELLANTS (By Sri D.N.Nanjunda Reddy, Sr.Adv. for Sri Shashidhara.H.N., Adv.,) 2 And:1. The Government of Karnataka Vidhana Soudha Dr.B.R.Ambedkar V...
Tag this Judgment!Khaleel and Another Vs. Eramma and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
(Prayer: This MSA is filed u/Order 43 Rule 1(u) r/w Sec 104 of CPC, against the Judgement and Decree dated 20.2.2014 passed in R.A.34/2013 on the file of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga, allowing the appeal and setting aside the Judgement and Decree dt 24.12.2005 in O.S.No.145/2004 on the file of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Chitradurga, remanding the suit to the trial court.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants. Perused the order dated 20.1.2014 passed by the Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Chitradurga in R.A.No.34/13. 2. The appellants herein are the plaintiffs in original suit bearing O.S.No.145/2004 pending on the file I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Chitradurga. The respondents are the defendants in the said suit. 3. The parties will be referred to as per their ranking before the trial court. 4. The plaintiffs chose to file a suit for the main relief to the effect that they are absolute owners and for consequential reliefs of possession and pe...
Tag this Judgment!Gajanan Ramachandra Velangi Vs. Vijaya Irappa @ Chudamani Undre and Ot ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of Constitution Of India Praying To A. Strike Down Stamp On Instruments Article 5(E) If Relating To Sale Of Immovable Property Wherein Part Performance Of The Contract,(I) Possession Of The Property Is Delivered Or Is Agreed To Be Delivered Without Executing The Conveyance, (Ii) Possession Of The Property Is Not Delivered, And Etc.) 1. In CMP.8/2006, by order dated 2.8.2006, Sri.B.S.Ramakantha, District Judge (Retd), was appointed as the sole arbitrator, to adjudicate the dispute between the petitioner and the respondents, in respect of the matters pertaining to 'an agreement of sale' dated 14.4.2012. Learned Arbitrator having entered the reference, the parties filed their respective pleadings. Points for determination having been moulded, affidavit evidence of the petitioner was filed. During the course of further evidence of the petitioner, on 21.04.2008, before the learned Arbitrator, the original agreement of sale was ...
Tag this Judgment!Hyderabad Karnataka Education Society, Through its President, Gulbarga ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
1. The management has filed this writ petition challenging the order dated 11.5.2012 passed by the Labour Court, Gulbarga in Application No.43/2011. 2. The facts of the case are that the respondent preferred application before the Labour Court under Section 33(C-2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, hereinafter referred to as `the Act for short, seeking payment of Rs.5,09,040/- with interest at 18% p.a. The Labour Court passed order directing the petitioner to pay Rs.3,28,782/- towards D.A. difference and leave encashment salary etc., with interest. 3. The first contention of the petitioner is that the Labour Court exceeded its jurisdiction and the application under Section 33(C-2) of the Act should have been dismissed as there is no prior determination or adjudication of the claim made by the respondent. The petitioner had settled all the claim of the respondent on his retirement. In order to substantiate his submission, the learned counsel referred Section 33(C-2) of the Act and contend...
Tag this Judgment!Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. Vs. Akhilabanu
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
(Prayer: This CRL.A. is filed U/S. 378(4) CR.P.C by the advocate for the Appeal praying that this Honble Court may be pleased to set aside the Judgement and order of Acquittal dated 16/4/2009 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Jr.DN.) and JMFC Hospet in C.C.No. 634/2008 and convict the respondent for an offence P/U/S 138 of Negotiable instruments act.) 1. This appeal is filed assailing the judgment of acquittal recorded by the learned Magistrate in dismissing the complaint filed the complainant in respect of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as N.I. Act for brevity) thereby acquitting the respondent accused. 2. Facts succinctly stated, the complainant Sriram Transport Finance Company Limited filed a private complaint through its General Power of Attorney holder against the accused alleging the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act. The allegation was, the accused being a customer of the Company availed loan from th...
Tag this Judgment!K. Anbazhagan Vs. State of Karnataka, by its Chief Secretary, Governme ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Appeal filed Under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in the Writ Petition No. 742 of 2015 dated 19-01-2015.) 1. This appeal is preferred against the order dated 19th January, 2015 passed in W.P. No.742/2015 by the learned Single Judge declining to entertain the writ petition where the appellant had sought for a direction to the State of Karnataka to appoint any other Senior Lawyer as Special Public Prosecutor in Criminal Appeal Nos. 835-838/2014. 2. The appellant is a Senior Politician and now he is 93 years old. He is the General Secretary of Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (D.M.K.) party, which is the principal opposition party in Tamil Nadu. He was elected as a Member of the Parliament. He was later elected as a Member of the Tamil Nadu State Legislative Assembly and served as Cabinet Minister in the State of Tamil Nadu on four occasions. 3. Selvi Jayalalitha was the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu. AIADMK party headed by her w...
Tag this Judgment!K Anbazhagan Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 11th day of February 2015 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA Writ Appeal No.260 of 2015 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: K. Anbazhagan Aged about 93 years General Secretary DMK Party, Anna Arivalayam 367 369, Annasalai Teynampet Chennai 600 018 Appellant (By Sri C. V. Nagesh, Senior Counsel for Sri Mahesh Kumar H & P. Kumaresan, Advocates) AND:1. State of Karnataka By its Chief Secretary Government of Karnataka Vidhana Soudha Bangalore 560 001 2 State by Superintendent of Police Special Investigation Cell Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Chennai 600 028 The Secretary Law Department Vidhana Soudha Bangalore 560 001 2.3. 4.5. Mr. Bhavani Singh The Special Public Prosecutor In Special C. C. No.208/2004 On the file of the XXXVI Additional Sessions Judge (C.H.No.36), Bangalore and Crl. Appeals Nos.835 to 838 of 2014 Special Public Prosecutor in Special C.C. No.208/2004 On the file of the...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »