Karnataka Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Management of National Aerospace Laboratories Vs. Engineering and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the award dated 30.12.2005 passed by the Court of Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore in Industrial Dispute No.37/2001 vide Annexure-A. ) C.A.V. Judgment : D.H. Waghela, CJ. 1. The petitioner, management of National Aerospace Laboratories (NAL), has challenged the award dated 30-12-2005 of the Industrial Tribunal, Bengaluru in I.D.No.37/2001, directing regularization of services of 24 workmen from the date of reference, with appropriate pay scales. 2. The petitioner is stated to be a constituent unit of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi which is registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and actively engaged in research and development work in science and technology area of aerospace. The petitioner is stated to be undertaking sponsored projects of the Government and other public and private institutions on commercial basis. Regular emplo...
Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. and Others Vs. Prodigy Hyydro Power ( ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
(Prayer: These Appeals Are Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition No.4375/2011 (Gm-Ten) Dated 09/08/2012.) 1. These two appeals are filed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.4375/2011 dated 09.08.2012. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for all the parties. 3. The facts leading to these appeals are as hereunder: The writ petitioners M/s Prodigy Hydro Power (P) limited filed the writ petition challenging the legality and correctness of the tender notification dated 10.12.2010 contending that the same is arbitrary discrimination and violative of Article 14 and to quash Annexure "A", rejection of the technical bid of the petitioner and to issue a further direction by issuing a writ of mandamus to consider the tenders submitted by the petitioner. 4. The Karnataka Power Corporation which is a wholly owned State Corporation invited tenders on 10.12.2010 to take the four mini hydal projects si...
Mr M S Subbe Gowda Vs. The Principal Secretary
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE7H DAY OF JANUARY2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI WRIT PETITION NO.4090 OF2012(S-R) BETWEEN: Mr. M.S. Subbe Gowda S/o. late Sheshe Gowda Aged about 67 years Old Mudigere, Mudigere Taluk Chickmagalur District. PETITIONER (By Sri M.A. Rajendra, Advocate) AND:1. The Principal Secretary Dept. of Social Welfare Government of Karnataka Vikasa Soudha Bangalore 560 001.2. The Under Secretary -1 Dept. of Social Welfare Government of Karnataka Vikasa Soudha Bangalore 560 001.3. The Accountant General (A & E) 4. The Commissioner Department of Social Welfare Government of Karnataka Bangalore. Government of Karnataka Bangalore. 2 Zilla Panchayat Government of Karnataka Chickmagalur District. Government of Karnataka Chickmagalur District. Karnataka Public Service Commission Government of Karnataka Bangalore.5. The Secretary 6. The Chief Executive Officer 7. The District Social Welfare Officer Chickmagalur. (By Sri Jagadee...
Sangappa S/O Mahadevappa Benkatte Vs. Nagraj U. Kodihalli & Anr
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE7H DAY OF JANUARY, 2015 BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.PACHHAPURE MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.31744 OF2013(WC) BETWEEN Sangappa S/o Mahadevappa Benakatte, Age:34. years, Occ: Nil, R/o Indi, Tq. Indi, Dist. Bijapur 586 101. (By Sri Harshavardhan R. Malipatil, Adv.) Appellant AND1 2. Nagraj U. Kodihalli, Age: Major, Occ: Business, R/o Raynal Building, H.No-3, Opp. Kailash Building, Janglepet, Old Hubli, Dist: Dharwad 580 028. The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Limited, Bijapur 586 101. Respondents (Sri Sudarshan M., Adv for R2; Notice to R1 dispensed with V/o Dtd. 06.03.2014) This MFA is filed U/S301) of WC Act, against the judgment and order dated 30.10.2009 passed in WCA/SR No.62/2008 on the file of the Labour Officer 2 and Commissioner for Workmens Compensation, Sub- Division-I at Bijapur. Wherein, seeking enhancement of compensation. This appeal coming on for hearing on I.A. this day the Cour...
The Management of National Aerospace Laboratories Vs. Engineering & Ge ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE7h DAY OF JANUARY2015R PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR.D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL.R.B. W.P. No.9974/2006 (L-TER) BETWEEN: The Management of National Aerospace Laboratories, Kodihalli Campus, BANGALORE 560 017 by its Director. (By Sri S.N.Murthy, Sr.counsel a/w Sri G.Lakshmeesh Rao, Adv.) AND :1. Engineering & General Workers Union, No.2, Mill Corner, Sampige Road, Malleshwaram, BANGALORE 560 003 by its Secretary.2. The Managing Director ...PETITIONER M/s. NALTECH Pvt. Ltd. T.S.Building, Kodihalli, BANGALORE 560 017 (By Sri V.R.Datar a/w Sri K.B.Narayana Swamy, Advs. for M/s. M.C.Narasimhan Associates, Advs. for caveator/R-1; Sri Ramchandran, Adv. for M.R.C.Ravi, Adv. for R-2) ...RESPONDENTS - 2 - This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the award dated 30.12.2005 passed by the Court of Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore in Industrial Disp...
The Managing Director, Gulbarga Electricity Supply Company Ltd. and An ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari, quashing award dated 15.06.2011 passed in reference No.87/2010 by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court at Gulbarga vide Annexure-A., and etc.) 1. Order dated 15th June 2011 passed in Reference No.87 of 2010 by the Labour Court, Gulbarga has been challenged by the Managing Director, Gulbarga Electricity Supply Company Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the GESCOM' for short) and the prayer is for quashing the same. The services of respondent has been engaged by the petitioner as per agreement entered into in the year 2003 and the respondent has been engaged as Grama Vidyut Pratinidhi and he was paid remuneration as per the agreement. The services of the respondent have been terminated since he was on unauthorised absence for a period of two months on medical grounds. The said termination was challenged by the respondent before the Labour Court on the ground th...
Dhiraj Vs. Naina
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
(Prayer: This Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Order Dated 31.10.2013 Passed On I.A.No.II In M.C.No.114/2013 On The File Of The Hon'ble Judge Family Court, Belgaum.) 1. The marriage of the petitioner with the respondent was solemnized on 07.05.2009. On account of incompatibility, they are living away from each other. The petitioner has instituted M.C.No.114/2013 against the respondent, under Section 13(1)(i-a) and (i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in the family Court at Belgaum to pass a decree of divorce. The case has been contested by the respondent by filing statement of objections. I.A.II was filed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Despite the objections being filed vide Annexure-D, an order having been passed, allowing the application in part and directed the petitioner to pay interim maintenance at Rs.4,000/- p.m. from the date of I.A.II was filed, apart from payment of Rs.5,000/- towards litigation...
Rekha and Others Vs. N.T. Ganesh and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-06-2015
(Prayer: This W.P. Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Impugned Order Dt. 14.8.2013 Passed By The Learned Principal Senior Civil Judge and Cjm; Davanagere On I.A.No.Vi In O.S.No.77/2011 Found At Annx-F And Allow This Writ Petition And Etc.) 1. Petitioners are defendants No. 2 to 4 in OS No.77/2011 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Davanagere. Being aggrieved by the order dated 14.8.2013 made on I.A.No.6 in the said suit, they have filed this writ petition. 2. The case of the petitioners is that the 1st respondent herein filed the suit seeking for refund of a sum of Rs.48 lakhs with future interest. In the plaint, it was contended that the 1st defendant entered into an agreement dated 4.6.2010 agreeing to sell the suit schedule property and received a sum of Rs.48 lakhs towards part of sale consideration. Though the transaction has been completed within five months, the 1st defendant has not come forward to perfo...
M/s. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Y. Amo ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-05-2015
(Prayer: This MFA is filed U/S 173(1) of MV Act against the judgment and award dated: 13/04/2010 passed in MVC No.2017/2009 on the file of the XVI Additional Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore City (SCCH-14), awarding a compensation of Rs.25,46,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till the date of realization. This MFA is filed IJ/s. 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award dated: 13/04/2010 passed in MVC No.2017/2009 on the file of the XVI Additional Judge and Motor Accident Claims: Tribunal, Bangalore City (SCCH-14), partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.) 1. Though these matters are posted today for orders, with the consent of learned counsel appearing for both trie parties, they are taken up for final disposal. These appeals by the Insurer and by the claimant- injured are directed against the same judgment and award dated 13/04/2010 passed in MVC No.2017/2009, by the XVI Additional Jud...
Manjula and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-05-2015
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to set-aside the conviction and sentence dated 24.09.2009 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Shimoga in S.C.No. 161/2008, convicting the appellants / accused No.1 to 3 for the offence punishable under Sections 504 and 326 read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 where Accused Nos.1 to 3 were to undergo simple imprisonment for six months for the offence punishable under Section 504 of the Indian Penal Code and further to undergo simple imprisonment for two years for the offence punishable under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code, which sentences were to run concurrently.) This appeal is filed by the accused before the trial court. The facts leading upto this appeal are as follows. It was the case of the prosecution that the accused were the daughter, wife and son, respectively, of one Durgappa. Durgappa is said to have deserted his family and is said to have ta...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »