Karnataka Court January 2015 Judgments
Shiv Raj Singh Vs. The Additional Chief Secretary Forest and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-16-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Article 226 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Call For The Entire Record's Leading To The Orders Dated 17.4.2012 And 28.5.2012; Quash The Order Dated 17.4.2012 Vide Annexure-P And Consequent Order Dated 23rd May 2012 Vide Annexure-R Passed By The 1st Respondent And Grant All Consequential Benefits.) 1. Government Advocate is directed to take notice for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. The petitioner was selected and appointed to the Indian Forest service and allotted to the Government of Karnataka. He was posted as Asst. Conservator of Forest in the year 1986. He has earned promotions to various cadres and presently he is in the cadre of Chief Conservator of Forest and working on deputation as Chief Vigilance Officer in Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited. 2. The petitioner while working as Deputy Conservator of Forest/ Sagar, certain allegations have been made against him in respect of tree cutting and making payment etc. in this regard, ...
Tag this Judgment!Asghari Banu and Others Vs. The State Of Karnataka By Its Secretary Re ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-16-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Appeal Is Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition No.4974/2012 Dated 06/06/2012.) 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned HCGP for respondents-1 and 2 and Sri Yoganarasimha, Senior Counsel, appearing for respondent No.5. 2. The legality and correctness of the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.4974/2012 is called in question in this appeal. 3. The facts leading to this appeal are here as under: Under a Rent; Agreement dated 1.1.1957, one Shaik Ismail Saheb S/o Shaik Hussain Saheb, hod taken the property in question from one Ragha vendra Ballal, on a monthly rental of Rs.14/- per month. The tenancy commenced from 1.1.1957. Lease was for a period of 11 months. The details of the property leased out under the agreement discloses here under: "one tiled roof house, one stone built well, in Sy.No.96-7 of Ward 56 of Badabettu village, No.76, Udupi Taluk along with a Jackfruit tree...
Tag this Judgment!Indian Machine Tool Manufacturers Association Vs. The State of Karnata ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-16-2015
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 16th day of January 2015 Before THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH Writ Petitions 59421 59424 / 2013 ( T ) Petitioner Between Indian Machine Tool Manufacturers Assn. 10th Mile, Tumkur Road, Madavara Post Bangalore 562 123 By its Director General . Secretary Mr V Anbu, 48 yrs (By Sri Arshad Hidayatullah, Sr.Adv. for Sri Thomas Vellapally, Adv.) And 1 2 3 Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Vanijya Therige Building, VTK1Gandhinagar, Bangalore 9 State of Karnataka by its Finance Secretary Vidhana Soudha, Bangalore State of Karnataka by its Principal Secretary To Finance Department, Vidhana Soudha Bangalore Additional Commissioner of Comml. Taxes (Policy & Law), VTK1 Gandhinagar Bangalore 4 5 (By Sri A S Ponnanna, Addl. Adv. Gen. a/w Sri S V Giri Kumar, AGA) Assistant Commissioner of Comml. Taxes (Luxury Tax 2), 4th Floor, BMTC Building Yeshwantpur, Bangalore 22 Respondents 2 Writ Petitions are filed under Art.226 of the Con...
Tag this Judgment!Shiv Raj Singh Vs. The Additional Chief Secretary
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-16-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE16h DAY OF JANUARY2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI WRIT PETITION NO.21735/2012 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SHIV RAJ SINGH S/O LATE SURENDRA SINGH AGED ABOUT49YEARS CHIEF VIGILANCE OFFICER HINDUSTAN STEEL WORKS CONST LTD. P.34A, GARIAHAT ROAD (SOUTH) DHAKURIA KOLKATA-700 031. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI K. PUTTEGOWDA FOR M/S. P.S. RAJAGOPAL ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATES) AND:1. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA M.S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001.2. THE UNDER SECRETARY FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA M.S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI3 4.5. 2 BANGALORE-560 001. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SHIMOGA DISTRICT SHIMOGA. THE TAHSILDAR SAGAR TALUK SAGAR DISTRICT. SMT. RADHA DEVI W/O SHRI K. SUBBA RAO AGED ABOUT40YEARS CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, GULBARGA CIRCLE, ARANYA BHAVAN GULBARGA. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI Y.D. HARSHA, AGA FOR R1 to R5...
Tag this Judgment!Asghari Banu Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-16-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE16H DAY OF JANUARY, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA W.A. NO.6857/2013 (LR) BETWEEN:1. ASGHARI BANU WIFE OF LATE ABDUL GAFOOR AGED ABOUT50YEARS RESHMA BANU DAUGHTER OF LATE ABDUL GAFOOR AGED ABOUT32YEARS RUBEENA BANU DAUGHTER OF LATE ABDUL GAFOOR AGED ABOUT30YEARS2 3.4. MAHAMMED PARVEZ SON OF LATE ABDUL GAFOOR AGED ABOUT28YEARS ALL ARE R/O VOLAKAKDU No.76, BADAGUBETTU VILLAGE UDUPI TALUK-576 101 ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. M.G.KUMAR, FOR SRI HARISH GANAPATHY, ADV.,) AND:1. 2. 3.4. 2 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT MULTISTORIED BUILDINGS DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560001 THE LAND TRIBUNAL UDUPI TALUK BY ITS SECRETARY UDUPI-576 101 SRI KALIYA MARDHANA KRISHNA DEVARU THE ADMINISTRATOR ADAMARU MUTT UDUPI-576 101 KRISHNA BALLAL SONOF RAGHAVENDRA BALLAL K R PURAM MYSORE-570 004 5. MAHESH BALLAL SON OF BOJARAJA BALLAL RESIDENT OF No.1243 KRISHNAMURTHY ...
Tag this Judgment!Dhanraj Jain Vs. The Deputy Commissioner and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-14-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order dated 14.10.2014 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Chickmagalur District, etc.) 1. The petitioner was permitted to construct a kalyana mantapa on the first floor of the existing guest house of Sri Ramanjaneyaswamy Temple, Tegur Village, Chickmagalur Taluk. In furtherance of the said order, an agreement was executed by the first respondent with the petitioner consisting of certain conditions for construction of the kalyana mantapa. The kalyana mantapa has to be constructed in terms of the aforesaid plan at Annexure 'B'. However, the permission to construct the kalyana mantapa was withdrawn by order at Annexure 'X' dated 14.10.2014 mainly on the ground that petitioner has failed to put up the construction within the period stipulated in the agreement. 2. It is also relevant to note here that the Assistant Archaka of the temple is residing with his family in a...
Tag this Judgment!Shahanaz Begum Vs. State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Secretary and Other ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Jan-14-2015
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Gulbarga dated 23.8,2011 in No.Revenue/PTCL-33/2009-10 and the order dated 30.9.2009 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Gulbarga in No.PTCL/2/08-09 produced at Annexure-D and C respectively.) 1. These writ petitions are filed by the petitioner being aggrieved of the orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Gulbarga dated 30tn September 2009 allowing the application for resumption and restoring the land in favour of the party respondent, which is confirmed by the Deputy Commissioner, Gulbarga by the order dated 23rd August 2011. 2. The facts of the case to be stated in brief are- husband of the 4th respondent was granted 3-00 acres of land in SyuNo.442/2/1 of Yadrami village, Jevargi Taluk by the Assistant Commissioner vide order dated 3rd August 1981 in No.83/1981- 82. The said land came to be sold vide Document No 80/1997-...
Tag this Judgment!K. Ramachandra Hebbar and Others Vs. State Of Karnataka, Reptd By Its ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-13-2015
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Direct The R4 To Consider The Appeal Filed By The Petitioners Dated 17.3.14, For Enhancement Of Compensation In Respect Of Acquisition Of Their Lands Under Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 By Setting Aside The Endosement Dt.19/21.5.14, Issued By The R4, As Per Annexure-A Etc.) 1. Petitioners have assailed endorsement dated 19.5.2014/21.5.2014 issued by the fourth respondent- Assistant Commissioner, Chickmagaluru District, Chickmagaiuru. 2. The grievance of the petitioners is that their applications filed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act read with 25(1) (d) of the Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 before the Assistant Commissioner- fourth respondent herein have not been considered. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the applications at Annexures - N to R are filed pursuant to the liberty granted by this Court to seek enhancement of compensation by order dated...
Tag this Judgment!Syed Riyaz Vs. The Secretary To Government Department Of Urban Develop ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-13-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying Direction Against Respondents To Quash The Preliminary Notification Published Dtd.12.1,1978 In Part-Iii As Per Annex-B To The Extent Of 10 Guntas Of Non-Utilised Land From The Purpose Of Acquisition In Sy.No.1 Of Bhoopasandra Village, Bangalore North Taluk Etc.) 1. Petitioner has assailed preliminary notification issued by the respondents under Section 17 of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976, (BDA Act, 1976) dated 12.1.1978 and the declaration and final notification dated 28.12.1982, which was gazetted on 6.1.1983 in so far as it pertains to land bearing survey No.1, measuring 10 guntas at Boopasandra Village, Bangalore North Taluk. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that his father was the original owner of the aforesaid land which was granted to him under the provisions of the Mysore (Religious and Charitable) Inam Abolition Act, 1955, vide order dated 14.7.1962 by the th...
Tag this Judgment!Basaveshwar Vs. The State Of Karnataka, Represented By Its Under Secre ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jan-13-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Award Dated 13.10.2014 Passed By Respondent No.3 Herein In Favour Of The Respondents Nos.4 and 5 Herein, As Per Annexure-E Herein And Etc.) 1. The petitioner having purchased property under a sale deed dated 18.12.2012 from respondent No.4, filed this writ petition to quash the award dated 13.10.2014 passed b/ respondent No.3 and for a mandamus against respondent Nos.1 to 3, to pass an award in his favour in respect of the acquired land to an extent of 3 acres of 35 guntas and 25 guntas of pot Kharab in Sy.No.67/4 of Walaki village, Chikkodi Taluk, Belgavi District. 2. The facts and circumstances giving raise to this writ petition are as under: A notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was issued on 21.04.2011, proposing to acquire amongst other lands, land bearing Sy.No.67/4, measuring 8 acres situated at Walaki village, Chikkodi Taluka, belonging to...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »