Karnataka Court January 2015 Judgments
Karnataka State Financial Corporation Vs. M/S Yantra Udyog
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF JANUARY2015PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.L. MANJUNATH AND THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA MFA No.9591 OF2012*(SFC) BETWEEN KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT NO11 THIMMAIAH ROAD, NEAR CANTONMENT RAILWAY STATION BANGALORE52 REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (RECOVERY II) ... APPELLANT (By SRI : BIPIN HEGDE, ADV. ) AND1 M/S YANTRA UDYOG A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT1932 NO652, KCG INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, KAMAKSHIPALYA, BANGALORE79REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR * Corrected vide Court order dt:09.02.2015 2.3. 4.5. 2 SRI CHANDRAKANTH N HIREMATH S/O N R HIREMATH AGED ABOUT56YEARS SMT SOUBHAGYA J N HIREMATH W/O JAGADISH N HIREMATH AGED ABOUT52YEARS SMT SUMANGALA ESWARAIAH W/O S ESWARAIAH AGED ABOUT61YEARS RESPONDENT NOS. 2 TO4R/AT NO652, KCG INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, KAMAKSHIPALYA BANGALORE79SAROJA W/O S VENUGOPAL AGED ABOUT48YEARS R/AT NO1091, 7TH CROSS I MAIN RO...
Tag this Judgment!Ganesh Vilas Near Kittur and Another Vs. Samuel Baburao Dhawale and Ot ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Impugned Order On Ia.No.1 In Ep.No. 123/2013 Dtd. 10.10.2013 At Annexure-F On The File Of Principal Sr.Civil Judge, Hubli.) 1. The unsuccessful judgment debtors in Execution Petition No. 123/2013 are calling in question order passed on I.A. No.1, whereunder application filed by them under Order 21 Rule 29 read with Section 151 CPC to set aside the execution of the decree passed in O.S. No.89/1999 dated 15.11.2000 till the disposal of the suit O.S. No.351/2013 said to be pending before the III Additional Civil Judge, Hubli has been rejected. 2. Though writ petition is listed for orders for non-compliance of office objections, this Court has examined as to whether further time should be granted to comply -with the office objections or not and for this limited purpose merits of the case is examined. Impugned order is dated 10.10.2013 writ petition has been filed on 29.11.2013...
Tag this Judgment!Mahantesh Goudappa Wali Vs. Laxmi @ Gangamma
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of Constitution Of India Praying This Hon'ble Court To: Quash The Impugned Ordr Vide Annexure-J Dated 07.10.2013 Allowing I.A.No.1 In M.C.No.55/2012 Pending On The File Of The Learned I/C. Principal Civil Judge (Sr.Dn), Gokak.) 1. Marriage of the parties was solemnised on 17.03.2009 and a male child was born on 12.08.2010. On account of lack of compatibility between the spouses, a complaint filed by the petitioner against respondent in Ankalgi Police Station in Crime No.41/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 448, 406 and 498 IPC was registered on 12.06.2012. 2. M.C.No.55/2012 was filed by the petitioner in the Court of Principal Civii Judge, Gokak, to pass a decree of divorce and for dissolution of marriage. Police having conducted the investigation and filed the charge sheet, cognizance was taken and C.C.No.1195/2012 was registered on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC, Gokak. Respondent having fil...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income-tax, Exemptions, Bangalore Vs. CMR Jnanadhara T ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
N. Kumar, J. 1. The Revenue has preferred this appeal challenging the order passed by the Tribunal, holding that there is no violation of provisions of Sec.13(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and also the relevant provision for grant of exemption under Section 11. 2. The assessee is a Trust registered under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). It is running several educational institutions. It filed return of income for the assessment year 2005-06 declaring 'nil' income, after availing the benefit of Section 11 of the Act. In the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Authority noticed that the trustees Mr. K.R.Lakshmeesh is paid Rs. 9,10,000/-, Dr. Sabita Ramamurthy is paid Rs. 8,41,950/- and Mr. K.R.Jayadeep is paid Rs. 1,75,000/-. On account of the aforesaid payments made to the trustees, the Assessing Officer was of the view that it violated the provision of Section 13(1)(c) of the Act and therefore it denied exemption under Sec...
Tag this Judgment!P.V. Krishnappa and Others Vs. M. Ramaswamy Reddy
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
(Prayer: This Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 28.07.2009 passed in O.S.No.5821/1990 on the file of the XV Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore City, decreeing the suit for partition and separate possession.) 1. This is a defendant's appeal. 2. The parties are referred to by their rank before the trial court for the sake of convenience. 3. The plaintiff claimed that he and the defendant were co- owners of the land bearing survey no. 16/1, Byatarayanapura, Yelahanka hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, measuring about 2 acres and 9 guntas. The said land, which was described in the schedule to the suit, was said to have been acquired under a sale deed dated 24.4.1972 from one Nanjappa and four others for a sum of Rs. 10,000/'-. It was the plaintiff's claim that he had contributed Rs.7,000/- and that the defendant had contributed a sum of Rs.3000/-. This, according to the plaintiff, has been acknowledged by ...
Tag this Judgment!Avinash Lal Chandani and Others Vs. P.A. Niranjan and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
(Prayer: HRRP Field U/Sec.46(1) Of Karnataka Rent Act, 1999, Against The Orders Dated:01.08.2014 Passed In Hrc.87/2013 On The File Of Chief Judge, Court Of Small Causes, Bengaluru (SCCH-1), Allowing The Petition Filed U/Sec.27(2)(D)(i) And (ii) Of Karnataka Rent Act.) 1. Present Revision petition is filed under Section 46(1) of Karnataka Rent Act-1999. Revision Petitioners herein were the respondents in an eviction petition filed the respondents herein under Section 27(2) (i) (ii) (J), 31(1) (a) and (c) of Karnataka Rent Act 1999 in case bearing No.87/13 which was pending on the file of the Court of Chief Judge, Small Causes Court, Bangalore. Learned Chief Judge has allowed the said eviction after contest directing the petitioners herein to quit and deliver the vacant possession of a residential premises bearing No.23, PID No 49-54-23 (old No. E-10) first floor Shankar Mutt Road Bangalore-560004. 2. The Trial Court has dismissed the eviction petition in so far as it relates to Section ...
Tag this Judgment!P.V. Krishnappa and Others Vs. M. Ramaswamy Reddy
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
(Prayer: This Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 28.07.2009 passed in O.S.No.5821/1990 on the file of the XV Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore City, decreeing the suit for partition and separate possession.) 1. This is a defendant's appeal. 2. The parties are referred to by their rank before the trial court for the sake of convenience. 3. The plaintiff claimed that he and the defendant were co- owners of the land bearing survey no. 16/1, Byatarayanapura, Yelahanka hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, measuring about 2 acres and 9 guntas. The said land, which was described in the schedule to the suit, was said to have been acquired under a sale deed dated 24.4.1972 from one Nanjappa and four others for a sum of Rs. 10,000/'-. It was the plaintiff's claim that he had contributed Rs.7,000/- and that the defendant had contributed a sum of Rs.3000/-. This, according to the plaintiff, has been acknowledged by ...
Tag this Judgment!S.J. Dharma and Another Vs. The Branch Manager, ICICI Lombard General ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
(Prayer: M.F.A No. 7581/2010 is filed by the claimants under Section 173(1) of othe Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and award dated 22.07.2009 on the file of X Additional judge and member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore (Scch-16) in M.V.C. N0.8424/2006 by allowing the Claim of Compensation and seeking Enhancement of Compensation. M.F.A. No. 8516/2009 is filed by the claimants under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 22.07.2009 on the file of X Additional Judge and Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore (Scch-16) In M.V.C. N0.8424/2006 and setting aside the same by Reducing the Compensation Amount.) 1. These two appeals are filed by the claimants and the insurer being aggrieved by the same Judgment and Award dated 22nd July 2009 passed in M.V.C. No. 8424/2006 on the file of the X Additional Judge and Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore (SCCH-16). The Tribunal by its impugned Judgment and ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Mars Recording Private Limited Vs. M/S, Saregama India Limited
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JANUARY2015BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.125 OF2009BETWEEN: M/s. Mars Recording Private Limited, A Company incorporated under Indian Companies Act, 1956, Having its Registered Office, Presently at No.53, Ground Floor, Khadi Commission HBCS, Kattriguppe Main Road, Vivekanandanagar, Bangalore 560 085. Represented by its Director Mr. Vikas Jain, Son of Sri Suresh Kumar Jain, Aged about 24 years. (By Shri. Arvind Kamath .K, Advocate) AND: M/s. Saregama India Limited, # 33, Jessore Road, Dum Dum, Kolkata 700 028, A company incorporated under APPELLANT2Indian Companies Act, 1956. (By Shri. Ganapathy M.S., Advocate for Smt. Gayathri Balu, Advocate for M/s. Khaitan and Company) RESPONDENT ***** This Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the order dated 22.9.2008, passed in O.S.No.6671/2006 on the file of the XVIII Additional...
Tag this Judgment!Sri P v Krishnappa S/O Lt P Veerappa Vs. Sri M Ramaswamy Reddy S/O Lt ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF JANUARY2015BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.828 OF2009BETWEEN: Sri. P.V. Krishnappa, Son of Late P. Veerappa, Since deceased by his Legal representatives 1a) M. Bhagyamma, 1b) P.V.Manjunatha Babu, Aged about 40 years, Son of Late P.V.Krishnappa, Aged about 78 years, Wife of Late P.V. Krishnappa, Both are residing at Yashaswini Patel Nilaya, Behind Government Hospital, B.B.Road, Amruthahalli, Bangalore 560 092. [cause title amended As per the court order Dated 11.6.2012]. APPELLANTS for 2 (By Shri. Ashok Haranahalli, Senior Advocate Shri. R. Nataraj, Advocate) AND: Sri. M. Ramaswamy Reddy, Son of Late Ramaswamy Reddy, Aged about 85 years, Occupation: Agriculturist, Residing at No.22, North Public Square Road, Basavanagudi, Bangalore 560 004. (By Shri. Ramesh Chandra, Advocate) RESPONDENT ***** This Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »