Karnataka Court January 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Y Amoga Varsha
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-05-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE5H DAY OF JANUARY, 2015 :PRESENT: THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE N.K. PATIL AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE G. NARENDAR M.F.A.No.5333 of 2010 (MV) C/w. M.F.A.No.10742 of 2010 (MV) M.F.A.No.5333 of 2010 (MV) Between: M/s. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., Mangalya Punarbhav Bangalore, Through Corporate Office, Sorrento Buildings, No.6, I Floor, Lattice Bridge Road, Adyar Chennai. By Deputy Manager. .Appellant (By Sri. K. Suryanarayana Rao, Advocate) And:1. Y. Amoga Varsha, S/o. Y. Yellappa Gowda, Aged about 26 years, R/at. BHEL Layout, Rajarajeshwarinagar, Bangalore. Rep. by his mother K. Gowaramma.2. Roopawathi, 2 Major in age, W/o. Mallesh, R/at. Kempegowdana Doddi, Jeegonahalli Dakhale, Ijur P.O, Ramanagar Taluk & District. .Respondents (By Sri. Girimallaiah, Advocate for C/R1; Notice to R2 dispensed with v/o. dated 05/01/2015) ******** This MFA is filed U/S1731) of MV Act against the judgment and award dated:13. 04/2010 passed...
State of Karnataka Vs. Veeresh Alias Bende and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-02-2015
Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. 1. Criminal Appeal No. 691 of 2010 is filed by the State questioning the judgment and order of acquittal dated 30-1-2010 passed by the Fast Track Court-I, Bengaluru City in S.C. No. 330 of 2004. Criminal Appeal No. 371 of 2011 is filed by the original complainant questioning the very judgment and order of acquittal. 13 accused were charged and tried for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324 and 302 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2. Case of the prosecution in brief is that the deceased Manjunath had got verbal altercation with accused 5-Jagadeesha in a marriage choultry at about 9 p.m. on 11-6-2003; accused 3 had puffed cigarette against the face of the deceased Manjunath and in that regard altercation took place and ultimately due to intervention of friends, there was no quarrel between the two; with the said background, all the accused who are stated to be friends of accused 5 grouped together, armed themselves into an unlawful a...
Mugutsab and Others Vs. Khansab
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jan-02-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Order Dated 19/09/2014 On I.A.No.3 In O.S.No.41/2012 Passed By The Civil Judge And Jmfc, Bailhongal Sitfing At Kittur As Per Annexure-F Herein And Consequently By Dismissing The Said I.A.No.3 Filed Under Order 6 Rule 17 Of Cpc By The Respondent Herien.) 1. The petitioners are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.41/2012. In a suit filed by the plaintiffs seeking declaration of ownership in respect of the suit schedule property, the defendant filed an application in I.A.No.III under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking amendment to the written statement filed in the said suit. The Court below by the order impugned dated 19/09/2014, has allowed the application. The plaintiffs claiming to be aggrieved are before this Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the order passed by the Court below and also perused the written statement and the nature o...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›