Karnataka Court September 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.G. Revanasiddeshwara Vs. State Election Commission For Co-Operation ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-16-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash Ann-F Dated 19.5.2014 Passed By The R-3 And Etc.) 1. Petitioner is the Director of 5th respondent-Katalagere Milk Producers Co-operative Society Ltd., Channagiri. 5th respondent-Society is the member of the 4th respondent- Shimoga Co-operative Milk Producers Union. The members of the 5th respondent-Society are entitled to nominate one of their Directors to represent them in the election to be held to the Board of Directors of the 4th respondent-Union. 6th respondent is another Primary Milk Producers Co-operative Society at Channagiri, having similar privilege to send by way of nominating one of its Directors to represent it in the election of the Board of Directors of 4th respondent-Union. 2. Petitioner was nominated to vote, propose or contest in the election to the Board of Directors of 4th respondent-Union by the 5th respondent-Society. Likewise, 7th respondent was nominate...
N. Vijay Vs. Kavitha Kanaparthi
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-16-2014
(Prayer: This Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed By The 1st Addl. Family Court, Bangalore In M.C.No.811/2008, Dated 29.10.2013 Passed On IA U/S.11 R/W S.151 Of CPC, By The Respondent At Annexure-H.) 1. Petitioner is aggrieved by an order of Family Court, Bangalore, whereby, I.A.No.8 was allowed and the defence raised in paragraph Nos.2 to 6 of the statement of objections was held as barred by principles of res judicata and was struck down. 2. The respondent has filed, on 18.03.2008, M.C. No.811/2008, under S. 13(1)(i)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act'), against the petitioner, in the Family Court at Bangalore, to pass a decree of divorce and dissolve the marriage solemnized on 18.11.2002 and registered on 20.11.2002, in the Office of the Sub-Registrar, Gandhinagar, Bangalore. The petitioner being the first respondent in the said case, filed statement of objections on 19.11.2011...
M.P. Manjunath Vs. Karnataka Information Commission and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-16-2014
(Prayer: This Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Impugned Order Passed By The 1st Respondent Dated 20.05.2014, Copy Of Which Is Herein Produced As Annexure-F, As Being Illegal And Without Jurisdiction.) 1. Petitioner is working as a Co-operative Development Officer in the Department of Co-operation, Government of Karnataka. 3rd respondent made an application under S.6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for short, 'the Act'), on 23.09.2013 to issue information relating to the entire service of the petitioner in the Co-operation Department. The application having been submitted before the 2nd respondent and the information having not been furnished and issued Annexure-D, the 1st respondent was approached by way of a complaint vide Annexure - E for relief. The 1st respondent having passed the order bearing No.KIC 10561 PTN 2013, dated 20.05.2014, as at Annexure-F, this writ petition was filed to quash the said order. 2. Smt....
Symbiosis International University Vs. University Grants Commission an ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-16-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India, With A Prayer Quash The Statement Of Compliance, Issued By The R2 As Against The Petitioner In As Much As It Seeks Petitioner University To Submit Statement Of Compliance In Respect Of Ugc Instituons Deemed To Be Universities Regulations 2010, Vide An-G And Etc.) 1. Though the petition is listed for consideration of the interlocutory application, since the same would relate to the consideration of the main petition, the petition itself is taken up for hearing with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties and disposed of by this order. 2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking that the statement of compliance issued by the second respondent as against the petitioner be quashed since the second respondent had sought the petitioner- University to submit the statement of compliance in adherence to the requirements of UGC (Institutions Deemed to be Universities) Regulations, 2010 ('R...
Sri Vijay N Vs. Mrs Kavitha Kanaparthi
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-16-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE16H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014 B E F O R E THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.58749/2013 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI VIJAY N., S/O NARASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT35YEARS, R/AT JILIPI JARAPALLI, SOMANATHAPURA POST, CHOLLUR HOBLI, BAGEPALLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT. (BY SRI M.I. ARUN, ADV.) AND: Mrs. KAVITHA KANAPARTHI D/O VENKAT R.N. KANAPARTHI, AGED ABOUT43YEARS, R/AT112 PRIVATE DRIVE, CARO, MICHIGAN 48723. (BY SRI CHANDAN FOR M/s. AGNUS LAW, ADVS.) ... PETITIONER ... RESPONDENT2THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE1T ADDL. FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE IN M.C.NO.811/2008, DATED2910.2013 PASSED ON IA U/S.11 R/W S.151 OF CPC, BY THE RESPODNENT AT ANNEXURE-H. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Petitioner is aggrieved by an order of Family Court, Bangalore, whereby, I.A.No.8 was allow...
t.venkatesh S/O Kothlamma, Vs. The State of Karnataka,
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-15-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE15h DAY OF SEPTEMBER2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION NO.81979/2013 AND WRIT PETITION Nos.82002-82006/2013(LB-ELE) BETWEEN:1. T. VENKATESH, 50 YEARS, S/O KOTHLAMMA, WARD5 KUDLIGI583135, BELLARY DIST.2. NOOR AHMED, 30 YEARS, S/O N.M. NABI, WARD13 KUDLIGI583135, BELLARY DISTRICT.3. CHOWDAPPA, 43 YEARS, S/O KADAPPA, WARD9 KK HATTI, KUDLIGI583135, BELLARY DISTRICT.4. N. NAGARAJ, 38 YEARS, S/O NEELAKANTAPPA WARD18 ADIGUDDA, KUDLIGI583135 BELLARY DISTRICT.5. SOVINAHALLI, KOTHLAPPA, 65 YEARS, S/O BHEEMAPPA WARD13 KUDLIGI583135, BELLARY DISTRICT.6. SANNA KOTLAPPA, 42 YEARS, S/O H. SANNA KOTLAPPA, WARD3KUDLIGI583135, BELLARY DISTRICT. (BY SRI. HARSH DESAI, ADV.) .. PETITIONERS2AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE5600001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELLARY, DIST. BELLARY583101 3. TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, KUDLIGI583135...
Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Bangalore Vs. Ramesh Babu
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-12-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the award dated 4.6.2012 in I.D.No.200/2010 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore, etc.) 1. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Bangalore has filed this writ petition challenging the validity of the award in I.D.No.200/2010 at Annexure 'J' dated 4.6.2012 whereby the Industrial Tribunal, Bangalore, has set aside the order of punishment passed by the Disciplinary Authority dated 26.6.2003. 2. The respondent has been working as a driver in the establishment of the petitioner-Corporation. Disciplinary proceedings was initiated against him and it was alleged that while he was driving the bus bearing registration No.KA-01/F-6316 on route Bangalore to Chittoor, dashed against a person and caused the accident. The Disciplinary Authority found that workman is guilty of misconduct. He was imposed with a punishment of withholding of ensuing two annual increments with ...
M.V. Leelavathi and Another Vs. C.R. Swamy 63 @ C.R. Kumara Swamy and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-12-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution of India Praying To: The Order Dated 2.8.2013 Passed On I.A. No.3 In M.C. No.2006/2011 Pending On The File Of The Court Of The I Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore, Vide Ann-F Be Set Aside And Modified Directing The Respondent To Pay Higher Monthly Maintenance At Rs.50,000/- A Month By Issue Of Writ Of Certiorari And / Or Any Other Appropriate Writ Directing The Respondent To Pay To Petitioner Costs Of This Proceedings. This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To: Quash The Orders Dt.2.8.13, Passed By The Hon'ble I Addl. Prl. Judge Family Court At Bengaluru In Mc.No.2006/11 On Ia.Iii Vide Ann-E.) 1. Marriage of the parties was solemnized on 27.02.2009. The parties are estranged couple. M.C. No.2006/2011 was filed by the husband, in the Family Court at Bangalore to pass a decree of divorce and dissolve the said marriage. The case has been con...
Iynanda K. Chinnappa and Others Vs. Balachanda M. Thammaiah and Anothe ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-12-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 praying to set aside the judgment dated 27.12.2005 in Criminal Revision Petition No.5/1999 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Kodagu, Madikeri.) 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2. The learned Counsel for the respondent No.1 has remained absent though the matter was heard on several occasions and was adjourned to in expectation of the learned Counsel for the respondent appearing before the Court, he has failed to appear. 3. The learned State Public Prosecutor was also heard. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follows: The first respondent herein is said to have filed an application under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "the Cr.P.C." for brevity) claiming that the petitioners were causing obstruction in respect of free passage between the lands bearing survey numbers 63/1 and 60/1 of Yadoor village, Virajpet Taluk,...
K.R. Mahadevappa Vs. Ramanna, Since Deceased By His Legal Representati ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-12-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Appeal Is Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition No.30788/2002 Dated 18/3/2008.) 1. This appeal is filed by the appellant challenging the concurrent findings of the Land Tribunal, Arasikere Taluk in Case No.LRF 4:74-75 dated 29.06.2002 which has been confirmed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.30778/2002 dated 18.03.2008 in this intra Court appeal. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 3. Sri S.N.Gangadarappa, who was the father of respondents 1 to 4 herein along with the respondents 1 to 4 had made an application in Form No.7 claiming of occupancy right in respect of 5 acres 20 guntas of land in Sy.No.57 of Vaderahalli Village, Javgal Hobli, Arsikere Taluk against K.Ananthamurthy, K.L.Rajashekariah and H.N.Nanjudappa. Rajashekaraiah, died during the pendency of the matter before the Tribunal. 4. The appellant Mahadevappa is the son of K.L.Rajashekaraiah. K.L.Rajashekaraiah had purchased the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »