Karnataka Court September 2014 Judgments
C S Ramanath Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-19-2014
WPs.2985-2986/2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL W.P.Nos.2985-2986/2014 (CS-RES) BETWEEN1 C S RAMANATH S/O LATE SHRI C S RAMA SASTRY, AGED ABOUT73YEARS, R/AT NO.109, 2ND MAIN, SESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE-560 020 2. G B UMESH S/O LATE SHRI G C BASAVARAJU, AGED ABOUT62YEARS, 276,"BASAVAKRUPA"11. H CROSS,TELCOM LAYOUT, K P AGRAHARA, BANGALORE-560 023. ... PETITIONERS (By Sri.SRINIVASA MURTHY S R, ADV.) AND1 STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY THE SECRETARY/ MINISTER FOR CO-OPERATION, DEPARMENT OF COOPERATION, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES IN KARNATAKA, HAVING OFFICE AT ALI ASKAR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 052 WPs.2985-2986/2014 2 3. STATE BANK OF MYSORE EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., REP BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, HAVING OFFICE AT644645, 1ST FLOOR, SBM BANGALORE BRANCH PREMISES, AVENUE ROAD, BANGALORE-09. ... RESPONDENTS (By Smt.S.SUSHEELA, AGA FOR R...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Coromandel Sugars Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-19-2014
- 1 - WP No.41106/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF SEPTEMBER2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO.41106/2014 (T-KST) R ... PETITIONER BETWEEN: M/S.COROMANDEL SUGARS LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ICL SUGARS LTD.,) MAKAVALLI, K.R.PET-571426 MANDYA DISTRICT NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE-PRESIDENT C.PAVANKUMAR AGED ABOUT56YEARS (BY SRI H.N.SHASHIDHARA, FOR M/S. KESVY & CO. ADVOCATE) AND:1. 2.3. (BY SRI H.VENKATESH DODDERI, AGA) THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAX GANDHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 009 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT SSI SUGARS AND TEXTILES I FLOOR, VIKAS SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT AND RECOVERY) 3.7, DVO-3, 2ND FLOOR BMTC, TTMC, B-BLOCK SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027 ... RESPONDENTS - 2 - WP No.41106/2014 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO...
Tag this Judgment!Paravva Bandroli Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-19-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE19h DAY OF SEPTEMBER2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION NOs.106117-118/2014(LB-RES) BETWEEN:1. SMT. PARAVVA BANDROLI, W/O YALLAPPA BANDROLI, AGED ABOUT60YEARS, PRESIDENT, GRAM PANCHAYAT KOTTUR-SHIVAPUR, R/O KOTTUR, TQ. SAVADATTI DIST. BELGAUM2 SHIVANAND HADIMANI, S/O MAHADEVAPPA HADIMANI AGED ABOUT50YEARS, OCC: VIDE-PRESIDENT GRAM PANCHAYAT KOTUR-SHIVAPUR R/O KOTUR, TQ. SAVADATTI DIST. BELGAUM. (BY SRI.RAJASHEKAR BURJI, ADV.) .. PETITIONERS AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ, M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE01 REP BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY2 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELGAUM DISTRICT, BELGAUM.3. BASAVARJ L. DALAWAI AGE KNOT KNOWN, ADMINISTRATOR GRAM PANCHAYAT KOTUR-SHIVAPUR AND TALUK WATERSHED2DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SAVADATTI, TQ. SAVADATTI DIST. BELGAUM.4. GRAM PANCHAYAT KOTUR-SHIVAPUR-35, SHIVAPUR TQ. SAVADATTI, DIST. BELGAUM REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER.5. ST...
Tag this Judgment!Sri Srinivasa Minerals Trading Company Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-19-2014
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014 R PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR.D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI W.P. No.30978/2008 (GM-MMS) BETWEEN: Sri. Srinivasa Minerals Trading Company Hotel Priyadarshini Complex, Station Road, Hospet, Represented by its Partner, Sri. Y. Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Y. Umamaheswar Rao, Aged about 38 years, R/o. Hospet. (By Shri. Ashok Haranahalli, Senior Counsel for Sri. H. Aravind, Advocate for Petitioner) ...PETITIONER AND:1. State of Karnataka Represented by its Secretary, Department of Forest, Ecology and Environment, M.S. Building, Dr. Ambedkar Veedhi, K.R. Circle, Bangalore-560001.-. 2 - Sandur Range, Sandur (Bellary District), Sandur.2. The Range Forest Officer, 3. The Deputy Director of Mines and Geology, Department of Mines and Geology, Hospet, Bellary District.4. The Conservator of Forests, Bellary Circle, Bellary. ...RESPONDENTS (Sri. D.Nagaraj, Additional Government...
Tag this Judgment!Rangappa and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-18-2014
(Prayer: This criminal petition is filed u/s 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking to set aside the entire criminal proceedings in Spl. Case No.43/2013 for an offence p/u/s 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 420 of IPC and 3(l)(ix) SC/ST (PA) Act, 1989, pending on the file of the Prl. Dist. and Sessions Judge, Bagalkot, insofar as it relates to the petitioners; and etc.) 1. A case has been registered against these petitioners in Special Case No.43 of 2013 for the offence punishable under Section 196, 197, 198, 199, 200 and 420 of IPC and Section 3(l)(ix) of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 pending on the file of Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bagalkot. They have obtained certificate as belonging to Scheduled Tribe community to get Government benefit under "Swarna Bhoomi" scheme. The second respondent has lodged a complaint before jurisdictional police alleging that Adhyaksha of the Karnataka Valmiki Sangha, Mudhol Branch has made a complaint informed that for the...
Tag this Judgment!Milind Chaudhary and Others Vs. Karnataka State Law University and Oth ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-18-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash Mandatory Instructions 3 and 4 In Notification Dated 8.4.2014 Vide Annexure-A To The Effect That The Application Forms Of Those Students Who Are Not Having 70% Attendance Shall Not Be Forwarded And Etc.,) Oral Judgment: Dilip B. Bhosale, J. 1. Heard. Rule. By consent of learned counsel for the parties heard forthwith. 1.1. The petitioners, in these writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, are students of different years of five year integrated degree course in law and were due to appear for different semesters in June, 2014. By means of these petitions, they seek to challenge mandatory instructions 3 and 4 in the notification dated 08.04.2014, (for short "the Notification") issued by respondent No.1 - Karnataka State Law University (for short 'the University') for provisional registration of the examination application forms for different examinations,...
Tag this Judgment!L. Narasegowda and Another Vs. M/s. The Karnataka Power Transmission C ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-18-2014
(Prayer: This W.P. Filed Under Article 226 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Call For The Entire Records Including The Records Pertaining To Ann-F And G And Etc., This W.P. Filed Under Article 226 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Call For The Entire Records Of The Case Pertaining To Endorsement Dt.8.4.14, Vide Ann-M and Endorsement Dt.17.5.14, Vide Ann-N and Grant The Petitioner The Following Reliefs Quash The Endorsement Dt.8.4.14, Issued By The R3, Vide Ann-M and Endorsement Dt.17.5.14, Issued By The R4, Vide Ann-N As The Same Are Illegal and Without Authority Of Law And Etc.,) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. By consent of learned counsel for the parties heard forthwith. 3. The petitioners, in these writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, retired as the employees of respondent No.2-M/s. Bangalore Electrical Supply Co. Ltd., (for short "the BESCOM"). The petitioner in W.P.No.11936/14 attained the age of superannuation on 30.06.201...
Tag this Judgment!Swamy Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-18-2014
(Prayer: This Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Order Dated 29.04.2014 Passed By The 1st Respondent Vide Annexure-H.) 1. Petitioner was a card holder in a fair price depot, which was run by the 6th respondent. 6ased on a complaint of the petitioner and few other card holders, inspection of the said fair price depot was conducted and a report of the irregularities noticed, having been submitted, Deputy Commissioner, Mysore District - 3rd respondent, served on the respondent, a show cause notice. A reply having been submitted, 3rd respondent, on 20.05.2010, pending enquiry, suspended the authorisation granted to the 6lh respondent and ordered for making alternative arrangement. By an order dated 23.11.2010, 3rd respondent cancelled the authorisation issued to the 6th respondent, reeling aggrieved, Appeal No.227/2010-11 was filed, under Clause 17 of KEC (PDS) Control Order, 1992 (for short 'Control Order'), before the 2nd respo...
Tag this Judgment!S.M. Basavaraju Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-18-2014
(Prayer: This Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Impugned Notification Dated 05.11.2013, Passed By The Respondent Produced Vide Annexure-A.) 1. Challenge in this writ petition is to a Notification dated 05.11.2013, as at Annexure-A, withdrawing the nomination of the petitioner as a Member of the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (for short, 'the Board'). 2. Petitioner joined the services of the Board, on 01.02.1980, as Assistant Engineer and ultimately, he rose to the rank of Chief Engineer. Petitioner attained the age of superannuation on 29.03.2014. While he was working as Chief Engineer, by issue of Notification No.UDD 155 MNI 2008 dated 28.06.2012, he was nominated as Member of the Board, as per Section 3(3)(b) of the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1964 (for short, 'the Act'). The said notification (Annexure-B) reads as follows: (Language) 3. The appointment of the petitioner to the Board came to be with...
Tag this Judgment!Rangappa S/O. Ningappa Talawar Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-18-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101220 OF2014BETWEEN1 RANGAPPA S/O. NINGAPPA TALAWAR AGE:55. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE2 GANGAPPA S/O. BASAPPA BARAKER AGE:54. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE3 RANGAPPA S/O. BASAPPA BARAKER AGE:42. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE4 GADDEPPA S/O. BASAPPA BARAKER AGE:34. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE5 6. ANASUYA W/O. GADDEPPA BARAKER AGE:28. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK SATTEPPA S/O. BASAPPA BARAKER AGE:32. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE2ALL ARE R/O. HEBBAL, TQ: MUDHOL DISTRICT: BAGALKOT ... PETITIONERS (BY SHRI SHIVARAJ P MUDHOL, ADVOCATE) AND1 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THROUGH LOKAPUR, POLICE STATION LOKAPUR, TQ: MUDHOL DIST: BAGALKOT ... RESPONDENT (BY SHRI VIJAYAKUMAR MAJAGE, HCGP) This criminal petition is filed u/s 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking to set aside the entire criminal proceedings in Spl. Case No.43/2013 for an offence p/u/s 196, 197, 198...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »