Karnataka Court September 2014 Judgments
N. Lokesh and Others Vs. State
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-23-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the Advocate for the appellants/accused No.3 to 8 praying to set aside the judgment dated 15.7.2013 passed by the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiptur in S.C.No.55/2011, 129/2011 and 315/2011 - convicting the appellants/accused for the offence punishable under Section 395 read with 397 of IPC and etc; This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the Advocate for the appellants/accused No. 1 and 2 praying to set aside the judgment dated 15.7.2013 passed by the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiptur in S.C.No.55/2011, 129/2011 and 315/2011 - convicting the appellants/accused for the offence punishable under Section 395 read with 397 of IPC and etc;) 1. These appeals are heard and disposed of by this common judgment. 2. The facts of the case are as follows: It was alleged that by virtue of a conspiracy entered into between Accused no. ...
Tag this Judgment!Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Krishnegowda Since dece ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-23-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the award dated 19.6.2012 passed by the Labour Court, Mysore, etc.) 1. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Mandya Division, Mandya has filed this writ petition challenging the validity of the award at Annexrue 'F' in I.I.D.No.21/2010 dated 19.6.2012 whereby the Labour Court, Mysore, while setting aside the order of dismissal of the workman dated 25.2.2010 from service directed the Corporation to pay full backwages to the L.Rs. of the deceased workman, the respondents herein from the date of the dismissal till the date of death. 2. The respondents are the wife and children of Krishnegowda. Krishnegowda was appointed in the year 1993 as Badli worker in the establishment of the petitioner-Corporation at Mysore. He had produced the transfer certificate evidencing his educational qualification before the selection committee of the Corporation. He had worked as such for a pe...
Tag this Judgment!A.C. Mahesh and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-23-2014
(Prayer: Writ Petition Nos.6842-6880/2010 Are Filed Under Article 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Call For The Records Relating To, Connected With Concerning The Impugned Order Vide Annex-A Dtd. 2.3.2010 Passed By The Hon'ble Karnataka Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore In A.No.1212-1250/2010, Peruse The Same And Declare And Quash The Said Order And The Proceedings Culminating In The Same As Illegal And Unsustainable And Etc., W.P.Nos.15002/2011 and 21131-21146/2011 Are Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Set Aside The Order Of The Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Application No.5127/09, and Application No.5078 and 5079/09 Dt.10.6.2010 Produced Herein As Ann-A1, Disposed As Having Infructuous, In View Of The Disposal Of The Order Of The Tribunal In Application Nos.182 To 185, 187, 195, 197 To 202/2007 Dt.25th May 2010 Produced Herein As Ann-A2 And Set Aside The Order Of The Hon'ble Karnataka Administrative Tribunal In Applicatio...
Tag this Judgment!Dharmarathnakara Rai Bahaddur and Another Vs. Karnataka Information Co ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-23-2014
(Prayer: These Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Order Dated 04/13.02.2012 Passed By The 2nd Respondent Vide Annexure-C.) 1. An application filed under S.6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for short, 'the Act'), vide Annexure- A, having not been considered, an appeal under S.19(1) of the Act vide Annexure - B was filed. The First Appellate Authority having passed an order as at Annexure-C, these writ petitions were filed on 31.03.2012, to quash the order as at Annexure-C and grant consequential reliefs. 2. Sri G.B. Sharath Gowda, learned advocate appearing for respondent No.1 contended that these writ petitions are not maintainable on account of the non exhaustion of the alternative and statutory remedy provided under sub-section (3) of S.19 of the Act. He submitted that, without even approaching the 1st respondent, these writ petitions have been filed by impleading the 1st respondent. 3. Sri M.P. Srikanth, learned a...
Tag this Judgment!Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited (MRPL) Vs. The State Of ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-23-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India, With A Prayer To Direct The R1 To 3 To Consider The Representations Of The Petitioner Submitted As Per Annx-D,E And F Dated 25.11.10 And 5.4.12 Expeditiously And Take Immediate Action To Hand Over The Actual Vacant Possession Of The Acquired Land Mentioned In The Schedule Here Below Immediately And In Accordance With Law.) 1. The petitioner-Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited is before this Court seeking for issue of mandamus to direct respondents No. 1 to 3 to consider their representations as at Annexures-D, E and F and to take action to hand over the actual vacant possession of the acquired land mentioned in the schedule. 2. Respondents No. 1 to 3 had initiated acquisition proceedings for acquiring land for the benefit of the petitioners for establishing their Refinery in Kuttattur village, Mangalore Taluk. The total extent of the land which had been acquired for their benefit ...
Tag this Judgment!Sri N Lokesh Vs. State by Nonavinakere Police
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-23-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF SEPTEMBER2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY CRIMINAL APPEAL No.737 OF2013CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.764 OF2013IN CRL.A.No.737/2013 BETWEEN:1. 2. Sri. N.Lokesh, Son of Sri. N. Narasimhaiah, Aged about 28years, Residing at No.85, 9th Main Road, 8th Cross, Srinagar, Bangalore 560 015. Native place at: Hegdathahalli, Near Sathemavathuru, Huliyurudurga Hobli, Tumkur District. Sri. Keshavamurthy, Son of Sri. Harishkumar, 3.4. 2 Aged about 20 years, Residing at: No.4/1, Magadi Road, 7th Cross, Kalyani Road, Bangalore 560 023. Native Place at: Hett Kodi, Near Chikka Tirupathi, Kolar District. Sri. S. Shivakumar, Son of Sri. Sadashiva, Aged about 19 years, Residing at: No.86, 22nd Cross, K.P.Agrahara, Magadi Road, Bangalore 560 023. Native Place at: V. Rajipura, Kiragal Post/Hobli, Mandya District. Sri. M. Manukumar, Son of Sri. Prakash, Aged about 19 years, Residing at : No.4, 12th Cross, Byrasandr...
Tag this Judgment!Mahesh a C Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-23-2014
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF SEPTEMBER2014PRESENT AND THE HON'BLE MR. D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE R THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH WRIT PETITION Nos.6842-6880/2010 (S-KAT) WRIT PETITION Nos.15002/2011 & 21131-21146/2011,16948-16995/2010, 8215/2010, C/W87152010 & 8906/2010, 10106/2010 & 12726- 12763/2010, 17294-17327/2010, 17481/2010 & 17485-17490/2010 & 17723-17727/2010, 19401/2011 & 21520-21530/2011, 24525/2010, 41905-41908/2010 & 6747-6758/2011, 908-911/2011, 103593/2014 & 103620- 103657/2014 (S-KAT) IN WP Nos.6842-6880/2010 (S-KAT) BETWEEN:1. MAHESH A C S/O CHANDREGOWDA AGED35YEARS, NO.28/2, ARALAGUPPE VITULAPURA POST, K.R.PET TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT ARUN PATIL S/O SURENDRA S PATIL DELETED V/O DTD. AGED39YEARS0503.2010 SURESH C S/O CHANNAPPA POOJAR AGED35YEARS, KURUBARABEEDI JANNAPURA, BHADRAVATHI SHIVANANJEGOWDA B N S/O NANJEGOWDA B C AGED32YEARS, NO.37, M.E.S.ROAD OPP:MOTHER THERESA SCHOOL MUTHYALAMMA NAGARA JALAHALLI, BANGALORE560054 2...
Tag this Judgment!Dr Smt Mangala Shridhar Vs. The Karnataka Governor's
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-23-2014
- :1. :- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF SEPTEMBER2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA W.P.No.22801/2014 (S-RES) BETWEEN: Dr.SMT.MANGALA SHRIDHAR, AGED ABOUT40YRS, W/O.SHRIDHAR NARAYANIH, R/A.NO.1914, 18TH A MAIN, SHRI LAKSHMI VENKATESHWARA NILAYA, 5TH CROSS, II STAGE, J.P.NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 078. .. PETITIONER (By Sri K.V.DHANANJAYA, ADV. & SRI I.S.PRAMOD CHANDRA, ADV.) AND: THE KARNATAKA GOVERNORS SECRETARIAT OFFICE, REP.BY ITS UNDER-SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNOR (ADMN.) RAJ BHAVAN, BANGALORE 560 001. (DELETED V.C.O. DT.7/7/2014) 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE 560 001. 2.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIDHANA SOUDHA POLICE STATION, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE 560 001. .. RESPONDENTS (BY PROF.RAVIVARMA KUMAR, ADVOCATE GENERAL & SRI A.S.PONNANNA, A.A.G., FOR SRI S.V.GIRI KUMAR, AGA FOR R-1 &2) - :2. :- THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRA...
Tag this Judgment!K.R. Arun Vs. M. Latha
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-22-2014
(Prayer: These Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Impugned Order Dated 27.03.2014 Passed By The Hon'ble 4th Addl. Principal Family Court At Bangalore On I.A. No.3 And I.A.No.4 Of M.C. No.4029/2011 Vide Annexure-A.) 1. These writ petitions are directed against an order dated 27.03.2014 passed in M.C.No.4029/2011, by the IV Additional Prl. Judge, Family Court, Bangalore, partially allowing I.A.No.3 and allowing I.A.No.4 and directing the petitioner to pay Rs.3,000/- per month as interim maintenance to the respondent, apart from payment of Rs.5,000/- towards litigation expenses. 2. The marriage of the petitioner with the respondent was solemnized on 14.05.2007. The parties are estranged couple. The petitioner filed M.C.No.4029/2011 under S.13(1)(ib)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act') against the respondent, to pass a decree of divorce and dissolve the marriage solemnized between them. 3. The respondent ...
Tag this Judgment!Master Mohamed Moin Sadiq Vs. Amanath Co-Operative Bank Ltd. and Other ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-22-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Sale Proclamation Annexure-N Dated 20.4.2013 Issued By The Respondent No.8 And Etc.) 1. This is the second time petitioner is approaching this Court challenging the sale proclamation in respect of property bearing No.53/1 (Old No.53) situated at Muniswamappa Road, Munireddy Palya, Bangalore. 2. On an earlier occasion, the property had been brought for sale by way of public auction to recover the dues payable under the award dated 15.04.2009 passed in dispute No.JRB/UBF/1442/2004-05. The writ petition filed by the petitioner in W.P.No.21333/2010 was dismissed on 16.03.2012 observing that the petitioner had been granted an interim order of stay and the date of auction had been over and therefore, the petition had become infructuous. This order was challenged in W.A.No.1680/2012. By order dated 20.06.2012, Division Bench of this Court disposed of the Writ Appeal observing as ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »