Karnataka Court September 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.P. Jaishankar Vs. The State Of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Resolution Dated 5.3.2013 Passed By The R-4 In Its 322nd Board Meeting Resolving To Entrust The Holding Of Disciplinary Enquiry Against The Petitioner To The R-2 Hon'ble Upalokayukta Vide Ann-A And Etc.) 1. Though the matter is listed for preliminary hearing, with the consent of the parties, the petitions are heard on merits. 2. The petitioner is working as a Development Officer in Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board, a statutory Board constituted under Section 5 of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966. Lokayuktha Police on 27.12.2007 caught red handed the petitioner while accepting bribe. Therefore, a case was registered against him in Special C.C.No.21/2010. Charge sheet was filed later on stating that sanction order was obtained to prosecute the petitioner under the provisions of Karnataka Lokayuktha Act, 1984. 3. On 11.11.2011, respondent No....
Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Sea Rock Investments Limited ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-2014
(Prayer: This Petition Filed Under Section 433(E) And (F) R/W Section 434 Of The Companies Act, 1956, Praying To Wind Up The Respondent, Namely Sea Rock Investment Limited, Having Its Registered Office At Syndicate House, Manipal, Udupi- 576104, Under The Directions Of This Court, Under The Provisions Of The Companies Act, 1956 And Etc.,) 1. TATA Capital Financial Services Limited is the petitioner in all these petitions. The three different petitions are filed against the three different respondent companies. Since the petitioner contends that the respondents in all these petitions have guaranteed the repayment of loan obtained by M/s. Manipal Motors Private Limited (hereinafter referred as 'Borrower' for short ) from the petitioner, the contentions being common to all these petitions, they were heard together at the stage of admission and is being considered by this common order. 2. For the sake of convenience, Co.P. No. 159/2009 is taken as the lead case for noticing the rival conte...
E. Raghunathan Vs. R. Sarala
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-2014
(Prayer: This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 20.06.2014 passed by the V Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore in M.C.No.2074/2009 on I.A.No.10 (Annexure-E) and allow the said application.) 1. Challenge in this writ petition is to an order dated 20.06.2014 passed in M.C. Mo. 2074/2009 by the V Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore. By the said order, I.A.No.10, filed by the petitioner, under Order 6 Rule 17 r/w S.151 CPC was dismissed. 2. Marriage of the petitioner with the respondent was solemnized on 03.05.1995. The parties are estranged couple. M.C.No.543/1999 filed by the petitioner to pass decree of divorce, on the ground of cruelty, was dismissed on 22.08.2002. MFA.No.6670/2002 filed there against was rejected on 26.10.2006. 3. Respondent filed M.C.No.2074/2009, under S.9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act'), seeking relief of restitution of conjugal rights. Pe...
E Raghunathan Vs. R Sarala
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE1T DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014 B E F O R E THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.38982/2014 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: E. Raghunathan, S/o. Elumalai, Aged about 49 years, R/at No.1/a-2A, 1st Cross, Assayee Road, Bangalore 560 042. PETITIONER (By Sri Vivek Holla, Adv.) AND: R. Sarala, W/o. E. Raghunathan, Aged 43 years, R/at No.159, 3rd Cross, L.N. Puram, Bangalore 560 021. RESPONDENT This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 2 20.06.2014 passed by the V Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore in M.C.No.2074/2009 on I.A.No.10 (Annexure-E) and allow the said application. This petition coming on for preliminary hearing this day, the Court made the following: ORDER Challenge in this writ petition is to an order dated 20.06.2014 passed in M.C.No.2074/2009 by the V Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore. By the said order, I.A...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›