Karnataka Court September 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle, Bangalore Vs. McDowell and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-02-2014
N. Kumar, J. 1. The Revenue has preferred this appeal against the order passed by the Tribunal holding that the deferred tax can be taxed neither under Section 41(1) nor. under Section 28(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). 2. The assessee is a listed Public Company. The assessee filed return of income for the assessment year 2004-05 on 29.10.2004 declaring total income of Rs.42,16,81,790/-. In the computation of income for income tax purposes filed along with the return of income, the assessee has deducted an amount of Rs.S-52.61,916/- from the book profit as the amount representing Sales Tax deferral Loan Incentive Schema and has not offered the same as tax. As per the provisions of Section 43B of the Act, the Sales Tax collected and not paid before the due date for filing the return of income should have been offered for tax as a part of total income for the assessment year 2003-04. The assessee did not offer the same for the assessment year 2003-0...
Siddaraju Vs. State of Karnataka by Malavalli Rural Police Station and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-02-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 372(4) of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the advocate for the appellant/accused praying to set aside the judgment of acquittal dated 03.11.2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mandya in S.C.No.123/2010 - acquitting the respondent/accused for the offence punishable under Section 306 read with 34 of IPC.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. The brief facts are as follows: The present appellant is said to be the husband of one Shoba. They were residents of Nidaghatta village, Malavalli Taluk. The complainant was said to be working at Bangalore and he was home only once in fifteen days. They had two children by the marriage. It is the allegation that Accused No.2, namely Respondent No.3 herein who was a neighbourer, taking advantage of her husband's absence, was constantly misbehaving with the deceased Shoba and he was making physical advances and was constantly teasing her. It is stated that she had veheme...
B. Keerthivarma Shetty Vs. The State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-02-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India, With A Prayer To Declare That The Order At Annexure-A Passed In W.P. 26788/2005 On The Pile Of This Court As It Is One Without Jurisdiction Does Not Bind The Petitioner And Quash The Order Dated 8.10.2010 Passed In Misc. Case Nos.37, 54, 70/2008, Misc. Case N0.8/2009 And 2/10 On The File Of I Addl. District Judge, D.K. Mangalore and The Mokthesari Sannad Dated 24.1.2012 Issued By The Respondent No.9 Vide Annexures-B and C Respectively.) 1. The petitioner herein is seeking review of the order dated 04.02.2008 passed by this Court in W.P.No.26788/2005 and declare that the said order does not bind the petitioner. The petitioner is also seeking that the order dated 08.10.2010 passed in Misc. Case Nos.37, 54, 70/2008, 08/2009 and 02/2010 on the file of the Addl. District Judge, Da.Ka., Mangalore and the Mokthesari Sannad dated 24.01.2012 issued by the eighth respondent be quashed. 2. The concise...
Patel Munireddy and Another Vs. Appaiah Reddy and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-02-2014
(Prayer: This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dt. 5.1.2007 passed in R.A. No.21/1999 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge/ Presiding Officer, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore, allowing the appeal and setting aside the judgment and decree dated 29.9.1999 passed in O.S.No.153/1992 on the file of the II Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore.) 1. This regular second appeal is preferred by the appellants being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 5.1.2007 passed by the Court of Addl. District Judge, Fast Track Court No.IV, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore in R.A.No.21/1999 setting aside the judgment and decree dated 29.9.1999 passed by the Court of the II Addl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Bangalore Rural District in O.S.No.153/1992. 2 The appellants were the defendants 1 and 2 in the trial Court and respondents in the first appellate Court. 3. Respondent No.1 herein was the plaintif...
The Union of India Vs. M/S Best Cast Construction pvt.ltd.,
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-02-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE02D DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.248/2014 THE GENERAL MANAGER SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY KESHWAPURA, HUBLI-580 023. THE UNION OF INDIA OWNING SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY (FORMERLY SOUTHERN RAILWAY) REP. BY CHIEF ENGINEER (CN)/CENTRAL, BANGALORE CANTONMENT BANGALORE-560 046. BETWEEN:1. 2.3. (BY SRI.ABHINAY Y.T., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S BEST CAST CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD., NO.9, 6TH STREET, TN NAGAR, PALANIPET, ARAKKONAM-631 002, TAMIL NADU REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT. (BY SRI.V.G. BHANU PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER CONSTRUCTION, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY #18, MILLERS ROAD BANGALORE CANTONMENT BANGALORE-560 046. ... PETITIONERS ..RESPONDENT2THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION115OF CPC PRAYING AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED1104.2014 PASSED IN EX.NO.1045/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE XIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE ORDERING THE MEMO OF CALCULATION FILED...
Smt Gajalakshmi Vs. Sri N Nagaraja Reddy
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-02-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE02D DAY OF SEPTEMBER2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION No.40996 of 2014 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: Smt. Gajalakshmi, Wife of Sri. L.C.Satisha, Aged about 36 years, Residing at No.1485/1, Aravindanagar, Kammanahalli, Bangalore 560 084. PETITIONER (By Shri. H.N.Shashidhara, Advocate) AND:1. Sri. N. Nagaraja Reddy, Son of Sri. B. Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 70 years, Residing at No.55, Ganesh Residency, 13th Cross, 4th Main, Malleswaram, Bangalore 560 003.2. 2 Smt. Jayalakshmi, Wife of Sri. Ramakrishna Reddy, Aged about 75 years, Residing at No.55/2, 13th Cross, Malleswaram, Bangalore 560 003. RESPONDENTS ***** This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records and to quash the order dated 16.8.2014 in P.& S.C.No.143/2009 passed by the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions, Bangalore, vide Annexure-F. This Writ Petition having been heard and reser...
B Keerthivarma Shetty Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-02-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE2D DAY OF SEPTEMBER2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A S BOPANNA WRIT PETITION Nos.27894-27898/2012 (GM-R/C) ... PETITIONER BETWEEN: B KEERTHIVARMA SHETTY AGED ABOUT47YEARS, S/O LATE SRI. B NAGKUMAR SHETTY, R/AT698A, "YESHODA" BETKERI, PRANTHYA VILLAGE, MOODABIDRI-574 227 (By Sri. K SANATH KUMAR SHETTY, ADV.) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY TO THE REVENUE DEPT., M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-01 2. SRI. D SAMPATH SAMRAJYA AGED ABOUT54YEARS, S/O LATE SRI. DHARMA SAMRAJYA, R/AT SHIMUNJE GUTHU, SHIRTHADY POST, MANGALORE TALUK, PIN-574124, D.K.3. SRI. BHASKER S KATTEMAAR S/O LATE NAGASWAMY AGED ABOUT72YEARS, R/A KATTEMAAR, KELENJAR VILLAGE, POST KUPPEPADAVU, MANGALORE TALUK, PIN-574162 D.K. 2 4. DR. M. VIDYADHARA SHETTY AGED ABOUT66YEARS, S/O SRI. B K DHARMAPALA SHETTY, R/AT VIJAYA MAHAL, KADRI KAMBLA ROAD, MANGALORE, PIN-575004 D.K. DIST.5. SRI. M SUNIL KEERTHI S/O LATE SRI JAGATHPAL AGED ABOUT65YEA...
Thabagouda Satteppa Umarani Vs. Satteppa S/O. Thabagouda Umarani
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-02-2014
1 R IN T HE HI GH CO U RT OF K AR NAT AK A DHARW AD BEN CH Dated this the 2 n d Day of September, 2014 Bef or e THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH Review P et it ion N o.163 3/2 012 In R.S .A.N o.5 985 /2010 Bet w een:1. Thabagouda Satteppa Umarani Age:78. years, Occ: Agriculture, Since deceased, P.2 to P.7 are the only surviving L.Rs.2. 3.4. 5.6.7. Smt.Mahadevi D/o. Thabagouda Um arani Age:32. years, Occ: Household work, Smt.Neelawwa W/o. Thabagouda Um arani Age:73. years, Occ: Household work, Narasappa S/o.Thabagouda Umarani Age:47. years, Occ: Agriculture, Paragouda S/o.Thabagouda Umarani Age:43. years, Occ: Agriculture, Miss.Saraswati D/o. Thabagouda Umarani Age:39. years, Occ: Household work, Dundappa S/o.Thabagouda Umarani Age:31. years, Occ: Agriculture, 2 All are R/o.Harugeri-591220, Tq: Raibag, Dist: Belgaum. (By Sri Srikant Patil, Advocate.) Petitioners. And: Satteppa S/o.Thabagouda Umarani Age:53. years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.Harugeri-591220, Tq: Raibag, Dist: Belgaum. ...
Gayathri Devi College of Nursing, Bangalore and Others Vs. The Registr ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Direct The Respondent To Approve The Admissions Of The Petitioners 2-17 For The Academic Year 2013-14 For B.Sc.(N) Course And Etc.,) 1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for issue of mandamus to the respondent to approve the admissions of the petitioners 2 to 17 for the academic year 2013-14 for B.Sc.,(N) Course vide Annexure - 'D'. The petitioners are also seeking that the petitioners 2 to 17 be permitted to appear for the forthcoming examination of B.Sc.,(N) Course. 2. The first petitioner is the Institution wherein the petitioners 2 to 17 are stated to have secured admission for the B.Sc.,(N) Course. The pleading would indicate that according to the petitioners, the admission had been made well within the date prior to which the admission was to be made as per the Notification dated 13.08.2013. The petitioners would however contend that the details pertaining to the...
Mitra Bhoomi Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. Vs. N.S. Niranjan and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-01-2014
(Prayer: This CMP Is Filed Under Section 11 (5, 6) Of The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 Praying To Appoint A Sole Arbitrator To Adjudicate The Dispute Arising Out Of The Memorandum Of Understanding Dated 23.05.2013, Duly Registered On 05.06.2013 As Per The Clause No.10 In The Above Matter By Appointing Any Retired District Judge In Pursuance Of The Clause No.10 Of The Memorandum Of Understanidng Dated 23.05.2013 And To Pass Such Other Orders As Necessary Under The Facts And Circumstnaces Of The Case And In The Interest Of Justice.) 1. The petitioner has filed this civil miscellaneous petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Act'), for resolution of the dispute, which has arisen in relation to the Memorandum of Understanding ('MOU' for short) at Annexure-A dated 23.05.2013. 2. The petitioner contends that the respondents are the owners of property bearing Sy.No.6 measuring 1 acre 36 guntas, Sy.No.15 measuring 2 acres, Sy.No.16 m...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »