Karnataka Court September 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Residents Welfare Association Vs. The Karnataka Housing Board and Othe ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-08-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Direct Respondent Nos.1 And 2 To Enable R.3 For Developing C.A. Site Bearing Nos.48, 48a 49 And 49a Situated At 4th Phase Yelahanka New Town, Bangalore-560064, Formed By The Karnataka Housing Board As A Public Park Only And Etc.,) 1. The petitioner association is seeking a writ of mandamus to the 1st and 2nd respondents to enable the 3rd respondent for developing the civic amenity sites bearing Nos.48, 48A, 49 and 49A situated at 4th phase, Yelahanka New Town, Bangalore, formed by the Karnataka Housing Board, as a public park only. It has also sought the quashing of the allotment of civic amenity site No.49A in favour of the 4th respondent and the resolution dated 06.06.2009 amending the Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP). 2. Sri N.G.Sridhar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner association is formed for safeguarding the interests of the residents of the local...
H S Subramanya S/O H S Srinivasa Vs. H S Lakshmi
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-08-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE8H DAY OF SEPTEMBER2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER WRIT PETITION NOS.45043/2011 & 45319/2011 (GM-RES) H.S.Subramanya, S/o H.S.Srinivasa, Aged about 64 years, Cherala Srimangala Village, Chettalli, Somwarpet Taluk, Kodagu Dist. 571 248. Between:1. 2 (By Sri Pundikai Ishwara Bhat, Adv.) And:1. H.S.Lakshmi, W/o H.S.Srinivasa, Aged about 84 years. H.S.Ganesh Kumar, S/o H.S.Srinivasa, Aged about 60 years, Anugraha, No.34, Block 8, Kaveri Layout, Madikeri, Kodagu District 571 201. . Petitioners. 2 H.S.Mangala Gowri, Aged about 51 years, D/o H.S.Srinivasa, W/o Balachandra. Both are r/a Hosakeri Village, Chettalli Post, Somwarpet Taluk, Kodagu District 571 248. 2 3 4 , (By Sri N. Jagadish Baliga, Adv. for R1 to R3 Sri H.V.Manjunath, AGA for R4) H.S.Thimmappaiah, S/o H.S.Srinivasa, Aged about 61 years, Chettalli Post, Somwarpet Taluk, Kodagu District. 571 248. The Maintenance Tribunal, And Assistant Commisisoner, Madik...
M/S Shantadurga Petro Chemicals Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-08-2014
:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE8T H DAY OF SEPTEMBER2014PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR W.A. No.31357 OF2013[T - KST]. BETWEEN: M/s.Shantadurga Petro Chemicals Vardhe Comples, Belgaum Road Khanapur, Belgaum represented by its partner Vinayak Vasant Vardhe Age 48 years. .. APPELLANT (By Sri Pramod S Yadawad & Sri N G Rasalkar, Advs.) AND1 2. State of Karnataka R/b its Finance Secretary Government of Karnataka Vidhana Soudha, Bangalore. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes in Karnataka, Vanijya Therige Karyalaya, Gandhinagar Bangalore-9.3. 4. :2. : The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Recovery-)1 Su-Moulya Karyalaya Club Road, Belgaum. Tata Power Co. Ltd., KIADB Kanabargi Industrial Area Auto Nagar, Belgaum. .. RESPONDENTS (By Sri C S Patil, Govt. Adv. for R1 to R3) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S.4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO, SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED18. 2013 PASSED I...
H. Govindaraju Vs. The State Of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-05-2014
(Prayer: This W.P. Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Direct The R-1 To Consider The Application Made By The Petitioner On 29.12.1995 For Regularization Of Unauthorized Construction Vide Annex-C And Etc.,) 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Senior counsel for respondent No.3, learned Government Advocate for respondents-1 and 4 and Mr.Venkatesha Dodderi, learned counsel for respondent No.2. 2. The petitioner, in the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks the following reliefs: "(a) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the application made by the petitioner on 29.12.1995 for regularization of unauthorized construction; vide Annexure 'C' (b) Issue a writ in the nature of writ or appropriate direction to the first respondent to follow due procedure of law for the eviction of the petitioner in the event he is not entitled for regularization of unauthorized construction...
Shakunthalam and Others Vs. Kanthamma and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-05-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Impugned Order Dt.27.06.2013 Passed By The Learned Principal Senior Civil Judge and Cjm At Chitradurga, In M.A.No. 12/2013 "As Per Annx-? and Thereby Confirm The Order Dt. 16.01.2013 Passed In O.S.No.499/2010 On I.A.No.Ll In Respect Of The Suit Schedule Property By The Learned I Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Dvn.) [Now The Civil Judge] At Chitradurga As Per Annx-M. This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Set Aside The Impugned Order Dtd:24.01.2014 In M.A.No. 16/2013 Passed By The Learned Principal District And Sessions Judge At Chitradurga Vide Annex-A As Illegal, By Issuing A Writ Of Certiorari.) 1. These writ petitions are placed before us by the Hon'ble Chief Justice on the request of the Learned Single Judge to refer the following question to a larger Bench for consideration: "Whether the defendant in a suit for decla...
Smt Shakuntahlamma Vs. Smt Kanthamma
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-05-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE05H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014 P R E S E N T THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N. KUMAR THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.S.PATIL A N D THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA WRIT PETITION NO.58906/2013 (GM-CPC) WRIT PETITION NO.16412/2014 (GM-CPC) & W.P.No.58906/2013 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:1. SMT.SHAKUNTHALAMMA W/O CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT52YEARS, 2.3. SMT.GIRIJA W/O VENKATASWAMY, AGED ABOUT31YEARS SMT.SUNITHA W/O LATE SURESH, AGED ABOUT31YEARS, 2 ALL ARE R/o SIDDAPURA VILLAGE, CHITRADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 520 PETITIONERS (BY SRI.VASANTH V. FERNANDES A/W SRI R.GUNASHEKAR, ADV.) SMT.KANTHAMMA, W/O LATE BHEEMANNA, AGED ABOUT72YEARS, SRI.RAMANJANEYA, S/O BHEMMANNA, AGED ABOUT40YEARS ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. BOTH RESIDING NEAR OLD BUS STAND, SRISHAILA TALKIES ROAD, HIRIYUR TOWN AND TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. PIN CODE 577 598. SRI SHIVASHANKARAPPA S/O SEEBEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT50YEARS, AGRICULTURIST & BUSINESSMAN, TAGARANAHATTY VILLAGE, CHITRADURGA TALUK,...
Ramesh C. Shetty and Another Vs. State Of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-04-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Call For The Records From The Respondent Nos. 2 And 3 Which Ultimately Resulted In Passing Impugned Endorsement Annexure A Dated 16.09.2011 Bearing No.1/1908 Issued By The 2nd Respondent.) 1. Petitioners are members of the 4th respondent society. They have filed these writ petitions challenging the endorsement Annexure-A dated 16.09.2011 issued by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Dakshina Kannada District, Mangalore, certifying the amendment to the Rules and Regulations proposed by the 4th respondent - Society to its bye- laws and registering the same under Section 10 of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 (for short 'the Act'). 2. 4th respondent - Society held a Special General Body Meeting on 07.08.2011 at Kundapur for considering the proposal for amendment of the bye-laws of the Society. In the said meeting, a resolution was passed as per Annexure-P d...
S.J. Lakshminarasimha Shastry Vs. Bank of India
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-04-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Order Dated 23.1.2014 At Annexure-F Passed By The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Bangalore In O.A.No.39/2010 Allowing The I.A.U/S 22(2)(H) Of The Rddbfi Act Filed By The Respondent Seeking Amendment Of The Original Application And Etc.) 1. Respondent has instituted O.A.No.39/2010, vide Annexure-A, against the petitioner, in the Debts Recovery Tribunal, at Bangalore. The petitioner being the respondent in the said O.A., filed written statement on 8.4.2010, vide Annexure-B. An application vide Annexure-C, under Section 31A r/w S.22(2)(h) of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (for short 'the Act'), was filed by the petitioner, on 28.4.2010, seeking rejection of the O.A., to which statement of objections vide Annexure-D was filed by the respondent-bank on 24.7.2010. 2. An application vide Annexure-E, seeking amendment of O.A. having been filed ...
T. Ramesh and Another Vs. The Commissioner Food and Civil Supplies Dep ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-04-2014
(Prayers: W.P.No.5264/2014 Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Call For The Records and Quash The Impugned Order Passed By The 1st Respondent In Cfs.Appeal No.87/2013-14 Dated 04.01.2014, As Per Annexure-E And The Order Passed By The 2nd Respondent Dated 8/11.11.2013 As Per Annexure- C By Issuing Writ Of Certiorari.) W.P.No.7073/2014 Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Impugned Order Dated 04.01.2014 Passed By The 1st Respondent As At Annexure-H Insofar As Directing The Head Quarters Assistant, Food and Civil Supplies Department To Take Steps To File Revision Petition Under Clause 20 Of The KEC (PDS) Control Order, 1992 Before The Secretary, Government Of Karnataka, Food and Civil Supplies Department, Bangalore.) 1. The petitioner in W.P.No.5264/2014 is a resident of Hoskote Village, Molakalmuru Taluk, Chitradurga District. He was a card holder of a Fair Price Depot run by the petitioner in W.P....
Ashith Karthik Rao and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-04-2014
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records from the respondent Nos.5 to 11 for scrutiny by this Hon'ble court regarding the claim of the minority status of respondents schools 5 to 11 and declare that none of the R-5 to 11 has such a status and etc.) C.A.V. Judgment: 1. The grievance of the petitioning toddlers is over the denial of admissions by the respondent schools. The petitioners are all selected and allotted to the respective respondent schools under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 ('R.T.E. Act' for short). 2. Smt. Suman Hegde, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent schools claim to be outside the put view of the R.T.E. Act on the ground that they are minority institutions. She submits that the respondent schools are not justified in claiming the minority status, as they have admitted the students mainly from the general category. She submits th...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »