Karnataka Court August 2014 Judgments
smt.leelavathi Rai Vs. Deputy Commissioner
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-18-2014
WP.Nos.39316-39318/2014 -1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF AUGUST2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH R WRIT PETITION Nos.39316-39318/2014 (KLR-RES) ... PETITIONER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER D.K. DISTRICT MANGALORE 575 001 BETWEEN: SMT. LEELAVATHI RAI W/O LATE NARAYANA RAI AGED ABOUT65YEARS R/AT UBARADKA HOUSE UBARADKA MITHUR VILLAGE SULLIA TALUK D.K.DISTRICT 574 248 (BY SRI G BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE) AND:1. 2. 3.4. (BY SRI R.B.SATHYANARAYANA SINGH, HCGP) ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PUTTUR SUB-DIVISION PUTTUR, D.K. DISTRICT 574 201 TAHASILDAR SULLIA TALUK D.K. DISTRICT 574 239 STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE 560 001 ... RESPONDENTS WP.Nos.39316-39318/2014 -2 - THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER NO.ES.T(1)CR173/2013-14/124307/ A761/14-15 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, D.K. DISTRICT PROD...
Tag this Judgment!Tadikela Subbaiah Trust(r) Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-18-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF AUGUST2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A S BOPANNA WRIT PETITION No.31024/2013 (EDN-REG-P) BETWEEN: TADIKELA SUBBAIAH TRUST SUBBAIAH INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, NEAR SUBBAIA HOSPITAL COMPLEX JAIL ROAD, SHIMOGA, KARNATAKA, REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR (ADMISSIONS) SRI C. MAHESH KUMAR. ... PETITIONER (By Sri S VIJAYASHANKAR, SR.COUNSEL FOR Sri M SHIVAPRAKASH) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (MEDICAL EDUCATION) STATE OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (HIGHER EDUCATION) STATE OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2 3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (MEDICAL EDUCATION) STATE OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.4. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE (MEDICAL EDUCATION) STATE OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUD...
Tag this Judgment!State Bank of Mysore Vs. The Karnataka Industrial Cooperative Bank Ltd
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-18-2014
1 RFA No.1079/2007 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA R.F.A. NO.1079/2007 BETWEEN: STATE BANK OF MYSORE, AN ASSOCIATE OF STATE BANK OF INDIA, CONSTITUTED UNDER THE STATE BANK OF INDIA (SUBSIDIARY BANKS) ACT, 1959, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BANGALORE, AND HAVING INTERALIA, A BRANCH KNOWN AS BANGALORE BRANCH KNOWN AS BANGALORE BRANCH AT AVENUE ROAD, BANGALORE-560002, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL OFFICER & ASST. GENERAL MANAGER (BY SRI: VARADARAJ.R.HAVALDAR, ADV.) AND:1. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., BASAVANAGUDI BRANCH, APPELLANT2RFA No.1079/2007 2. BULL TEMPLE ROAD, BANGALORE-560004. SRI. JAYARAM BHATT No.256, 3RD CROSS, R.K. LAYOUT, PADMANABHANAGAR, BANGALORE-560004. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI R. CHANDRANNA, ADV. FOR R1 NOTICE TO R-2 IS HELD SUFFICIENT BY WAY OF PAPER PUBLICATION V/O DT:10. 12.12) THIS RFA IS FILED U...
Tag this Judgment!V. Sunith Kumar Vs. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anoth ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-14-2014
(Prayer: This MFA is filed U/S 173(1) of MV Act, against the Judgment and Award dated: 21/10/2008 passed in MVC No. 1467/2008 on the file of the V Additional Judge, Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Mayohall Unit, Bangalore (SCCH-20), dismissing the claim petition for compensation.) 1. This appeal by the claimant is directed against the judgment and award dated 21st October 2008, passed in MVC No. 1467/2008, by the V Additional Judge, Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Mayohall Unit, Bangalore (SCCH-20), (for short, 'Tribunal"), for awarding reasonable compensation on the ground that, the Tribunal is not justified in dismissing the claim petition. 2. The appellant claims to be aged about 18 37ears and hale and healthy prior to the date of accident. It is the case of the appellant that he met with an accident at about 8:15 A.M. on 18-07-2007 when he was crossing Old Madras Road, near Muthu Mariamma Temple, near Tin Factory, Bangal...
Tag this Judgment!Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 18 (1 ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-14-2014
N. Kumar, J. 1. As common questions of law are involved in all these appeals, they are taken up together for consideration and disposed of by this common order. BRIEF FACTS 2. In ITA No. 158/2013, the assessee is M/s Tata Teleservices Limited. It is engaged in the business of providing telecommunication services across the country. They provide telecommunication services, sell service products such as Starter Kits and the Recharge Coupon Vouchers. Recharge Coupon Vouchers (RCVs) are the prepaid vouchers used for selling talk time to the pre-paid subscribers. Starter Kits are the new connections containing 'Removable User Identity Module' for providing the telecommunication connection. The assessee has entered into agreement with its Channel Partners. The second respondent conducted a survey under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') on 29.2.2008. After hearing the explanation of the assessee, the second respondent opined that the Cha...
Tag this Judgment!S.K. Suresh Vs. The Principal Secretary, Department of Mines and Geolo ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-14-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for relevant records and quash the impugned order and- demand notice passed by the R3, i.e., Sr. Geologist bearing No. 127/10-5-13 order Dt. 10.5.13, as per ANNEXURE-M and demand notice Dt. 10.5.13, as per ANNEXURE-Q issued by R3. and etc.) 1. The petitioner is holder of Quarry Lease No.447 dated 10-11-2010 granted for quarry of a minor, non-specified mineral - steatite, valid for five years, executed as per the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as "KMMC Rules"). Admittedly, before execution of the quarry lease, Senior Geologist, 3rd Respondent herein, had asked the petitioner to submit an affidavit, which the petitioner executed on 16-09-2009, according to which the petitioner undertook to utilize the extracted mineral only fcr cottage industry and not for any other purpose or any big factory (industry). 2. While the petitioner was paying royalty and...
Tag this Judgment!V. Sunith Kumar Vs. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anoth ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-14-2014
(Prayer: This MFA is filed U/S 173(1) of MV Act, against the Judgment and Award dated: 21/10/2008 passed in MVC No. 1467/2008 on the file of the V Additional Judge, Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Mayohall Unit, Bangalore (SCCH-20), dismissing the claim petition for compensation.) 1. This appeal by the claimant is directed against the judgment and award dated 21st October 2008, passed in MVC No. 1467/2008, by the V Additional Judge, Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Mayohall Unit, Bangalore (SCCH-20), (for short, 'Tribunal"), for awarding reasonable compensation on the ground that, the Tribunal is not justified in dismissing the claim petition. 2. The appellant claims to be aged about 18 37ears and hale and healthy prior to the date of accident. It is the case of the appellant that he met with an accident at about 8:15 A.M. on 18-07-2007 when he was crossing Old Madras Road, near Muthu Mariamma Temple, near Tin Factory, Bangal...
Tag this Judgment!Lt Col. Rajiv Shankar Vs. Soumya Nair and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-14-2014
(Prayer: This Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Set Aside The Order Dated 6.11.2013 Passed By Vi Addl. Prl. Judge, Family Court, Bangalore On The Point Raised Therein As To Whether 2nd Respondent Is Necessary Party To This Divorce Petition Filed Under Hindu Marriage Act, Vide Annexure-B and Further Be Pleased To Issue A Writ Of Mandamus Directing The Vi Addl. Prl. Judge, Family Court, Bangalore To Permit The Petitioner Herein To Implead The 2nd Respondent As A Respondent In M.C.No.1305/2013, Pending Before The Said Court.) 1. This writ petition is directed against an order dated 06.11.2013 passed in MC.No.1305/2013 by the VI Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore. MC.No.1305/2013 was filed by the petitioner, contending that he married respondent No.1, on 15.03.2012 and sometime during May-June 2012, he unearthed the gory details about the adulterous relationship of respondent No.1, had with respondent No.2. According to t...
Tag this Judgment!Mahaboob BI and Others Vs. Sharfunnisa Since Dead By LRS Ghouse Mohiud ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-14-2014
(Prayer: Rsa Filed U/S. 100 Of Cpc Against The Judgement and Decree Dated:29.06.2009 Passed In R.A.No.24/2007 On The File Of The District And Sessions Judge, Ramanagara, Dismissing The Appeal And Confirming The Judgement And Decree Dated:12.10.1999 Passed In Os.No.05/1994 On The File Of The Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.) and Jmfc, Ramanagaram.) 1. These two second appeals are directed against the judgment in R.A.24/07 dated 29.6.2009 on the file of District and Sessions Judge, Ramanagar, whereby learned appellate judge while confirming the judgment and decree of the trial court in O.S.5/94 decreeing the suit partly, has held plaintiffs to be entitled to 1/6th share each and 1st defendant to be entitled to half share in item no.1 property. This judgment is assailed by the 1st defendant as also the plaintiffs in the suit. 2. R.S.A.1053/09 is by Mahaboob Bi-1st defendant against dismissal of her appeal R.A.24/07, while R.S.A.1052/10 is by the plaintiffs against the judgment in Cross Objections App...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Bharti Airtel Limited Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Income Tax
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE Dated this the 14th day of August, 2014 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR AND THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA ITA Nos.637-644 of 2013 c/w ITA Nos.256-263 of 2012; ITA No.158 of 2013 ITA No.159 OF2013 ITA No.160 OF2013ITA No.161 OF2013 ITA No.162 OF2013 ITA No.163 OF2013ITA Nos.637-644 of 2013 BETWEEN: M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED # 55, DIVYASHREE CHAMBERS BANNERGHATTA ROAD BANGALORE-560029 (REPRESENTED BY ITS HEAD LEGAL & REGULATORY OF KARNATAKA CIRCLE, SRI K G SURESH KUMAR AGED ABOUT48YEARS S/O GOPINATHAN NAIR ...APPELLANT (BY SRI CHYTHANYA K K, ADVOCATE) 2 AND: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX CIRCLE18(1) 4TH FLOR, HMT BHAVAN # 59, BELLARY ROAD BANGALORE-56032 ...RESPONDENT (By Sri K V ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) ITA is filed under Section 260-A of I.T. Act, 1961, arising out of order dated 23/08/2013 passed in ITA No.230 to 233/Bang/2011 and ITA.738 to 741/Bang/2013, for the Assessment Year 2005-06 to 2008-09, praying to: (i) formulate the ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »