Karnataka Court August 2014 Judgments
Sri Sanjay P Naidu Vs. Smt Rupreka Bhaskar
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-20-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 B E F O R E THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.17889/2014 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI SANJAY P. NAIDU S/O SHRI PRITHVIRAJ NAIDU, AGED ABOUT39YEARS, #323, "INDU HOUSE"2. D B CROSS, 4TH MAIN ROAD, CHIKKABANASAWADI ROAD, OMBR LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 043. (BY SRI SARAT CHANDRA BIJAI, ADV.) AND: SMT. RUPREKA BHASKAR D/O SRI J.BHASKAR, AGED ABOUT32YEARS, R/AT V.M. MEADOWS, E019 HORAMAVU MAIN ROAD, BANASAVADI, BANGALORE-560 043. (BY SMT. SHWETHA ANAND, ADV.) ... PETITIONER ... RESPONDENT2THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED32.2014 ON I.A. FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN UNDER SECTION10READ WITH SECTION151OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IN M.C.NO.1120/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE, i.e., ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY GRANT THE RELIEF SOUGHT FOR IN THE SAID I.A. i.e., ANNEXURE-H. THI...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Raman Boards Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-20-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 P R E S E N T THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N. KUMAR A N D THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA STRP NOS.389-435 OF2012BETWEEN: M/S. RAMAN BOARDS LTD., (UNIT OF M/S. ABB LTD., ) REPRESENTED BY ITS ASST. VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE AND TAXATION, SANTHOSH KUMAR HEGDE, AGED ABOUT48YEARS, MYSORE-OOTY ROAD, TANDAVAPURA. MYSORE DISTRICT-571 302 PETITIONER (BY SRI R.V.PRASAD, ADV.) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA, 1ST MAIN ROAD, GANDHINAGAR, BANGALORE 560 009. RESPONDENT (BY SMT.S.SUJATHA, AGA.) - 2 - THESE SALES TAX REVISION PETITONS ARE FILED UNDER SEC.65(1) OF KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED:29.06.2012 PASSED IN STA. NOS.2394 TO24402011 ON THE FILE OF THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEALS. N. KUMAR, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: - THESE STRPs COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER These revision peti...
Tag this Judgment!H. Lalithamma and Another Vs. V. Venkateshulu
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
(Prayer: Second 10.2.2010 in RA 134/2008 and RA 133/2008 by the Fast Track Court Appeals are filed under S. 100, CPC praying to set aside the judgment dated II, Bellary Cross Objection is filed under O 41 R 22, CPC praying to set aside the judgment dated 10.2.2010 in RA 134/2008 so far as it relates to ordering refund of consideration amount plus the installments paid to KHB and the interest amount to 2nd respondent, etc.) These two appeals and cross objection arise out of the order passed by the Fast Track Court, Bellary in RA 133/2008 and 134/2008 which arises out of the common order passed by the II Addl. Civil Judge, (Sr.Dvn.), Bellary in OS 97/2005 and 420/2005. Parties are referred to as per the reference made in this appeal as appellants and respondent. Respondent Venkateshulu/plaintiff has filed cross objection 54/2010 in RSA 5244/2010. Two appeals are filed by the appellants who is the agreement holder in respect of the suit property which is said to be a house which was allot...
Tag this Judgment!Vaijayanti W/O Prabhakar Patil Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR WRIT APPEAL NOs.30966-30967/2012 (ULC) BETWEEN VAIJAYANTI W/O PRABHAKAR PATIL D/O, ARJUN YESHWANT KITTUR @ KITTURKAR, AGED27YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O BHAVANI NAGAR, MANDALI ROAD, BELGAUM-590 001, REPRESENTING THE ESTATE OF SRI YESHWANT KITTUR @ KITTURKAR BEING GRAND DAUGHTER OF Y.R.KITTUR. (BY SRI. SHIVARAJ C BELLAKI, ADVOCATE) AND1 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY IT SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE. ... APPELLANT22. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, URBAN LAND CEILING, BELGAUM REGION, BELGAUM-590 001. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C.S PATIL, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT APPEALS ARE FILED U/S.4 AND R/W. SEC.10(iv)(a) OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO, CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN W.P.NO.67162 AND67163OF2009(ULC) AND ON PERUSAL OF THE SAME BE PLEASED TO SET A...
Tag this Judgment!Smt H Lalitamma W/O Veema Reddi Vs. V Venkateshul S/O Late v Mareppa
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Dated this the 19th day of August, 2014 Before THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH Regular Second Appeals 5244 / 2010 c/w Cross Objection 54 / 2010 c/w 5249 / 2010 Between In RSA52442010 1 2 Smt H Lalithamma, 40 yrs W/o Vema Reddi Vemareddi, 50 yrs S/o Veerabhadragouda Attender in Engineering College Both are R/o # 131, LIG, KHB Colony Netaji Nagar, Bellary Appellants (By Sri V P Kulkarni, Adv.) And V Venkateshulu, 60 yrs S/o late V Mareppa Ex-Driver of KSRTC & Mine Owner R/o Plot # 4, Veeraanna Gowda Colony Near Bellary Club, Cantonment, Bellary (By Sri B S Kamate, Adv.) Respondent 2 Cross Objector In Cross Objection 54/2010 V Venkateshulu, 60 yrs S/o late V Mareppa Ex-Driver of KSRTC & Mine Owner R/o Plot # 4, Veeraanna Gowda Colony Near Bellary Club, Cantonment Bellary (By Sri B S Kamate, Adv.) And 1 2 Vemareddi, 50 yrs S/o Veerabhadragouda Attender in Engineering College Smt H Lalithamma, 40 yrs W/o Vema Reddi Both are R/o # 131, L...
Tag this Judgment!State Bank of Mysore Vs. The Karnataka Industrial Co-Operative Bank Lt ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-18-2014
(Prayer: This Rfa Is Filed U/S 96 Of Cpc Against The Judgment And Decree Dt: 02.01.2007 Passed In Os. No. 2715/2001 On The File Of The X Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore, Cch-26, Decreeing The Suit For Recovery Of Money.) 1. This is an appeal filed by the plaintiff of an original suit in O.S.No.2715/2001 which was pending on the file of the City Civil Court Hall No.26, presided over by X Addl. City Civil Court, Bangalore. Respondents herein are the defendants 1 and 2 in the said suit. Parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants as per their ranking given in the Trial Court. Suit filed by the plaintiff has been decreed against defendant No.2 only. Being aggrieved by the dismissal of suit against defendant no. 1, plaintiff has filed this appeal under Section 96 of CPC. 2. Suit had been filed for the recovery of money to an extent of Rs.8.55 lakhs with interest at 18% p.a. thereon from 17.04.1998 till the date of payment. The plaintiff had prayed for a joint and several decre...
Tag this Judgment!Tadikela Subbaiah Trust ® Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences Vs ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-18-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India, With A Prayer To Call For The Entire Records From The Office Of Respondent Authorities In The Matter Of Rejection Of Conferment Of Linguistic Minority Status To The Petitioner Institution And Etc.) 1. The petitioner is before this Court, in this writ petition seeking that the recommendation dated 08.07.2013 (Annexure-S) and the order dated 09.07.2013 (Annexure-T ) be quashed and consequently direct the first respondent to confer the Telugu Linguistic Minority Status on the petitioner institution. 2. The petitioner is a registered charitable Trust constituted and established in the year 2003 with the object of establishing among others, the educational institutions in Shimoga which would be open for the students of all caste, creed and community. Out of the five Trustees, four of them belong to the Balijiga Community and the other to the Schedule Tribe. Their mother tongue being Telugu, have es...
Tag this Judgment!R. Harish Vs. M.V. Shalini
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-18-2014
(Prayer: This Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Call For The Records And Quash The Order Dated 8.4.2014 Made In M.C.No.153/2013 On I.A.No.5 Passed By The Court Of The Family Court, Kolar Vide Annexure-A And Direct The Family Court, Kolar To Allow The I.A.No.5 Filed By The Petitioner Vide Annexure-D.) 1. This writ petition is directed against an order dated 08.04.2014, passed on I.A.No.5, filed in M.C.No.153/2013, by the learned Judge of the Family Court at Kolar. 2. Petitioner has filed M.C.No.153/2013 against the respondent, under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act'), in the Family Court at Kolar, to pass a decree and dissolve his marriage with the respondent, solemnized on 26.04.2012. Respondent has contested the case by filing statement of objections. I.A.No.5 was filed by the petitioner, under Order 23 Rule 1(3) of Code of Civil Procedure, for grant of permission to withdraw M.C.No.153/2013, with libert...
Tag this Judgment!State Bank of Mysore Vs. The Karnataka Industrial Co-Operative Bank Lt ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-18-2014
(Prayer: This Rfa Is Filed U/S 96 Of Cpc Against The Judgment And Decree Dt: 02.01.2007 Passed In Os. No. 2715/2001 On The File Of The X Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore, Cch-26, Decreeing The Suit For Recovery Of Money.) 1. This is an appeal filed by the plaintiff of an original suit in O.S.No.2715/2001 which was pending on the file of the City Civil Court Hall No.26, presided over by X Addl. City Civil Court, Bangalore. Respondents herein are the defendants 1 and 2 in the said suit. Parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants as per their ranking given in the Trial Court. Suit filed by the plaintiff has been decreed against defendant No.2 only. Being aggrieved by the dismissal of suit against defendant no. 1, plaintiff has filed this appeal under Section 96 of CPC. 2. Suit had been filed for the recovery of money to an extent of Rs.8.55 lakhs with interest at 18% p.a. thereon from 17.04.1998 till the date of payment. The plaintiff had prayed for a joint and several decre...
Tag this Judgment!R. Harish Vs. Smt. m.v. Shalini
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-18-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 B E F O R E THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.28168/2014 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: R. HARISH, S/O. RAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT32YEARS, R/AT HOLUR VILLAGE, KOLAR TALUK & DISTRICT 563 101. PETITIONER (BY SRI M. VISHWAJITH RAI, ADV.) AND: SMT. M.V. SHALINI, W/O. R. HARISH, D/O. VENUGOPAL, AGED ABOUT26YEARS, R/AT MARUTHI LAYOUT, MALUR TOWN, KOLAR DISTRICT 563 130. RESPONDENT THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS AND QUASH THE ORDER DATED84.2014 MADE IN M.C.NO.153/2013 ON I.A.NO.5 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOLAR VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND DIRECT THE2FAMILY COURT, KOLAR TO ALLOW THE I.A.NO.5 FILED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-D. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER This writ petition is directed against an order dated 08.04.2014, passed on I.A.No.5, filed in M...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »