Karnataka Court August 2014 Judgments
Sri M C Ponnappa Vs. State Bank of Mysore
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-26-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE26H DAY OF AUGUST2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION No.13399 OF2012(GM-CPC) BETWEEN: Sri. M.C.Ponnappa, Son of M.B.Kariappa, Aged about 48 years, No.2776, 5th Main, Flat No.38/C, M/s.Sankalpa Saffire Apartments, Vontikoppal, Mysore 570 002. PETITIONER (By Shri. D.R.Sundaresha, Advocate) AND:1. 2. State Bank of Mysore, Metagalli Industrial Area Branch, Mysore 570 016. Sri. B. Raghavendra Bhatt, Son of Late Ananthakrishna Bhat, Aged about 53 years, No.721, Vasanthga Nilaya, 4th Stage, 11th Cross, T.K.Layout, Behind Raghavendra Mutt, Mysore 570 002. 2 RESPONDENTS (By Shri. Chithappa, Advocate Shri. Bharath Kumar.V, Advocate for Respondent No.2) for Respondent No.1 ***** This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records in Ex.No.44/2010 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Virajpet and set aside the order dated 15.3....
Tag this Judgment!Jayantilal N Shah Vs. Smt. Nagarathna Murthy
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-26-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE26H DAY OF AUGUST2014 BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.6588-6589 OF2012(GM-CPC) Jayantilal N Shah, Son of Late N.P.Shah, Aged about 81 years, Residing at No.221, 1st Floor, Nagarthpet, Bangalore 560 002. BETWEEN:1. 2. 3. Esha G Shah, Daughter of Sri Girish J Shah, Aged about 22 years, Residing at No.5/1, North Public Square, Basavanagudi, Bangalore 560 004. Punit N Shah, Son of N.J.Shah, Aged about 26 years, Residing at No.106, Venkateshwara Market, 2 120 Avenue Road, Bangalore 560 002. PETITIONERS Smt. Nagarathna Murthy, Wife of A. Ramesh Murthy, Daughter of Late D.S.Hanumantha Rao, Aged about 57 years, Residing at No.29, 3rd Cross, Judicial Officers Layout, RMV2d Stage, Bangalore 560 094. (By Shri. S.S. Naganand, Senior Advocate for Shri. S. Sriranga, Advocate) AND:1. 2. 3. Smt. Andalu, Daughter of Late V.N.Shankar, Aged about 85 years, Residing at No.55, Annaswamy Mudaliar Road, Kond...
Tag this Judgment!The Dargah Hazarat Khaja Bandanawaz (Rh) Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Aug-26-2014
- -1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA GULBARGA BENCH R DATED THIS THE26H DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.84748/2010 (GM-WAKF) BETWEEN THE DARGAH HAZARAT KHAJA BANDANAWAZ (RH) GULBARGA, THROUGH ITS SAJJADA NASHEEN AND MUTAWALLI Dr. SYED SHAH KHUSRO HUSSAINI S/O LATE SYED SHAH MOHAMMED MOHAMMED-UL-HUSSAINI AGE:65. YEARS, R/O ROZA (B), GULBARGA. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI AMRESH S. ROJA, ADVOCATE) AND1 2.3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY PWD VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GULBARGA AT GULBARGA. THE STATE OF KARANTAKA BOARD OF WAKFS, BY ITS - -2 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BANGALORE. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHIVAKUMAR R. TENGLI, ADDL. GOVT. ADV., FOR R1 & R2 SRI A VIJAYAKUMAR, ADV., FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTON OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI, QUASHING THE ORDER DATED0604.2010, IN O.S.No.10/2004 OF THE FILE OF ...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Ratnamma W/O Devendrappa Jirlbhavi Vs. Smt. Gurudevi
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-26-2014
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Dated this the 26th day of August, 2014 Before THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH Regular Second Appeals 5743 c/w 5784 / 2010 Appellant Between Smt Ratnamma, 53 yrs W/o Devendrappa Jirlbhavi R/o Hirekonati Taluk Hirekerur Now r/a Sunakalbidiri Tq Ranebennur, Haveri District (By Sri M C Bandi, Adv.) And 1 2 3 Smt Gurudevi claiming to be W/o Devendrappa Jirlbhavi 52 yrs, R/o Sunakalbidiri Ranebennur, Haveri District Basavarajappa claiming to be S/o Devendrappa Jirlbhavi R/o Sunakalbidiri Ranebennur, Haveri District Shivanand claiming to be *s/o Devendrappa Jirlbhavi, 23 yrs *Corrected vide court order dated 10.9.2014 2 R/o Sunakalbidiri, Ranebennur Haveri District 4 Branch Manager Life Insurance Corporation of India Ranebennur Branch Haveri (By Sri Chandrashekar P Patil, Adv. for R1-3; Sri Narayan V Yaji, Adv. for R4) Respondents Second Appeals are filed under S.100, CPC praying to set aside the judgment dated 23.7.2010 in RA72009 & 16/...
Tag this Judgment!Annasaheb Vs. Suresh
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
(Prayer: This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 29.8.2009 passed in R.A.No.56/2007 on the file of VI Addl.District Judge, Belgaum.) 1. This Second Appeal is filed by the appellant-plaintiff against the judgment and decree passed by the learned VI Addl.District Judge, Belgaum, in R.A.No.56/2007, dated 29th August 2009. 2. Plaintiff filed suit in O.S.No.143/2000 for recovery of an amount of Rs.77,658-75 ps. with interest at the rate of 18% and with costs of the suit. By the judgment and decree dated 27th July 2007, the trial Court decreed the suit with costs holding that plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum of Rs.77,658-75 ps. with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of tobacco transaction i.e., 5.4.1998 till realisation of entire suit claim. Against this, defendant-respondent filed R.A.No.56/2007 before the lower Appellate Court. By the impugned judgment and decree, the lower Appellate Court confirmed the recovery of the amount...
Tag this Judgment!H.V. Srinivas Vs. The State of Karnataka, By its Secretary, Bangalore ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, praying to set aside the Order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 28376/2013 (LR) dated 25/07/2013.) 1. The appellant, questioning the correctness or otherwise of the order impugned passed by the learned Single Judge, in Writ Petition No.28376/2013 (LR) dated 25th July 2013, has presented this writ appeal. 2. Along with the appeal, learned counsel appearing for appellant has also filed I.A.No.1/2014, seeking condonation of delay of 49 days in filing the appeal. 3. The delay of 49 days in filing the appeal has been explained at paragraphs 1 and 2 of the affidavit filed in support of the application, I.A.No.1/2014. Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the said affidavit read thus: "1. It is submitted that the being aggrieved by the order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 17/05/2013, the appellant had filed the writ petition before this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No.28376/2013, this Hon'ble Court was ple...
Tag this Judgment!Annasaheb Vs. Suresh
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
(Prayer: This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 29.8.2009 passed in R.A.No.56/2007 on the file of VI Addl.District Judge, Belgaum.) 1. This Second Appeal is filed by the appellant-plaintiff against the judgment and decree passed by the learned VI Addl.District Judge, Belgaum, in R.A.No.56/2007, dated 29th August 2009. 2. Plaintiff filed suit in O.S.No.143/2000 for recovery of an amount of Rs.77,658-75 ps. with interest at the rate of 18% and with costs of the suit. By the judgment and decree dated 27th July 2007, the trial Court decreed the suit with costs holding that plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum of Rs.77,658-75 ps. with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of tobacco transaction i.e., 5.4.1998 till realisation of entire suit claim. Against this, defendant-respondent filed R.A.No.56/2007 before the lower Appellate Court. By the impugned judgment and decree, the lower Appellate Court confirmed the recovery of the amount...
Tag this Judgment!The Secretary to Government Revenue Department and Others Vs. Sri Pras ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Appeals are filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, praying to set aside the Order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition Nos.14251-14253/2012 (GM-R/C) dated 28/03/2013.) 1. The appellants, questioning the correctness or otherwise of the order impugned passed by the learned Single Judge, in Writ Petition Nos.14251-14253/2012 (GM-R/C) dated 28th March 2013, have presented these writ appeals. 2. In the impugned writ petitions, the first respondent herein - Sri Prasanna Veeranjaneya Swamy Trust had sought for quashing the Government Notification dated 11th April 2012 issued by the first appellant vide Annexure A to the writ petitions and also the Notification dated 13th April 2012 issued by second appellant vide Annexure B to the writ petitions. The said writ petitions were disposed of, quashing Annexures A and B, with an observation that the Administrator in- charge of management of Temple shall take decision depending upon the facts and ci...
Tag this Judgment!Annasaheb S/O Dadu Kamagouda Vs. Suresh S/O Dadu Gouraj
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Dated this the 25th Day of August, 2014 Before THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH Regular Second Appeal No.5574/2009 Between: Annasaheb S/o Dadu Kamagouda 48 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Kothali, Tal: Chikodi, Dist: Belgaum. ( By Sri N.D.Gunde for Gunday Associates) And: Suresh S/o Dadu Gouraj, 48 yrs, Business R/o Kothali, Tal: Chikode, Dist: Belgaum. ( By Sri Raviraj Patil, Advocate ) .. Appellant .. Respondent This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 29.8.2009 passed in R.A.No.56/2007 on the file of VI Addl.District Judge, Belgaum. This Appeal coming on for final hearing this day, the Court delivered the following:2. JUDGMENT This Second Appeal is filed by the appellant-plaintiff against the judgment and decree passed by the learned VI Addl.District Judge, Belgaum, in R.A.No.56/2007, dated 29th August 2009.2. Plaintiff filed suit in O.S.No.143/2000 for recovery of an amount of Rs...
Tag this Judgment!Ananthaiah Vs. Gangamma and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-22-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Praying To Quash The Impugned Judgment And Decree Dt 11.02.2008 Passed By Lok Adalat (Addl. Civil Judge (Jd) And Conciliator) Chikmagalur In O.S. No. 10/08 Vide Annxures H and J Respectively.) 1. This is yet another case of abuse of Alternate Dispute Resolution Mechanism of Lok Adalath to deceive the person having legitimate right over the property. 2. Brief facts of the case are: Certain Chikkaiah S/o Huli Chikkaiah was cultivating 3 acre 39 guntas of wet land in Sy.No.40 of Chikmagalur Kasaba Hobli, Chikmagalur Taluk, Chikmagalur District, an Inam land as the Baravardar. After abolition of the lnams by the Government, he filed an application seeking grant of the said land. The Asst. Commissioner, Chikmagalur after holding an enquiry passed order dated 12.3.1974 vide VOA/RGT/2/71-72 granting the same in Chikkaiah's favour and its katha came to be mutated in his name as per M.R.No. 16/73-74 and R.R. entry 1750. Chikkaiah died on 18.5.1980. Gangamma,...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »