Karnataka Court August 2014 Judgments
Venkatesh and Others Vs. State of Karnataka By Handanakere Police
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
(Prayer: These Criminal Petitions are filed under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Cr. No.51/2014 of Handanakere P.S., Tumkur, for the offences P/U/S 497, 506, 498A of IPC and Section 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.) 1. Since these two petitions are in respect of the same crime number, they have been taken together to dispose of them by a common order. 2. Crl.P.No.4469/2014 is filed by petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3 and Crl.P.No.4709/2014 is filed by petitioner/accused No.4, both under Sections 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail, to direct the respondent-police to release the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 497, 506, 498A r/w Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act registered in respondent-police station Crime No.51/2014. 3. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 4 and also the learned Government ...
Tag this Judgment!Gurumallappa and Another Vs. The Assistant Commissioner and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Order Dated 17.06.2014 Passed By The R 1 In R.A.No.82/2012-13 Vide Annexure-A.) 1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 17.06.2014, wherein the Assistant Commissioner, Kollegal Sub-division has declared purchase of the land measuring 3 acres 99 cents by petitioner No.2 on 20th April 2011 as void on the ground that the purchase was violative of Sections 79A and 79B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (the 'Act'). 2. By consent of the learned Counsel on both sides, the petition is heard on merits and is being disposed of by this order. 3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that, no show-cause notice was issued to petitioner No.2 re.validity of the purchase and therefore, the petitioners had no opportunity to show that the purchase was not contrary to the provisions of the Act. Hence, he contends that the impugned order is violat...
Tag this Judgment!J.O. Channakeshava Vs. The Deputy Commissioner and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
(Prayer: This Petition Is Filed Under Article 226 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Set Aside The No Objection Certificate Dated 18.2.2014 Issued By The Deputy Commissioner And District Magistrate, Chitradurga District Permitting The 3rd Respondent To Establish 20 Kl Hsd And 15 Kl Petrol Bunk In Sy.No.294/1b Of Parashurampura Village As Per Annexure-A.) 1. The petitioner, an agent of M/s. Essar Oil Limited, running a retail outlet, at Parashurampura Village, Challakere Taluk, assails the validity of a "No Objection Certificate", issued vide Annexure-A, by respondent No.1, for establishing another 20 KL HSD and 15 KL Petrol Bunk, at Parashurampura Village, Challakere Taluk, Chitradurga District. 2. The Executive Director, M/s. Essar Oil Limited, Chennai, having made an application for issue of 'No Objection Certificate', for establishing a new retail outlet at Sy.No.189/2, Parashurampura Village, Challakere Taluk, to store 20 KL MS and 40 KL HSD and the first respondent having is...
Tag this Judgment!Sri J O Channakeshava Vs. The Deputy Commissioner/District Magistrate
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 B E F O R E THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.16893/2014 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI J.O. CHANNAKESHAVA S/O LATE P. OBANAYAKA AGED ABOUT53YEARS RESIDING BEHIND POLICE STATION PARASHURAMPURA, CHALLAKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA 577 538. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI K. RAMA BHAT, ADV.) AND:1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/ DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ONAKE OBAVVA CIRCLE CHITRADURGA 577 501 CHITRADURGA TALUK & DISTRICT.2. REGIONAL MANAGER (RETAIL) BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPOPRATION LTD., NEAR APMC YARD NH-17, BAIKAMPADY MANGALORE 575 011.3. 2 SMT. K. NAGALAKSHMI W/O B. HANUMANTHARAYA AGED ABOUT30YEARS DODDA CHELLUR CHALLAKERE TALUK 577 501 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI H.B. MAHESH, HCGP FOR R1; SRI B.S. SACHIN, ADV. FOR R2; SRI C.M. KEMPE GOWDA, ADV. FOR R3) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE NO OBJECTIO...
Tag this Judgment!Sri. Gurumallappa Vs. The Assistant Commissioner
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-27-2014
- 1 - WP No.37824/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF AUGUST2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO.37824/2014(KLR-RR/SUR) R SMT. L.GIRIJAMMA W/O. SRI GURUMALLAPPA AGED ABOUT58YEARS NO.563, E.W.S., 6TH MAIN ROAD6H A MAIN, KENGERI UPANAGAR BANGALORE- 560 060 ... PETITIONERS SRI GURUMALLAPPA S/O. MARIMADAPPA AGED ABOUT65YEARS LAKSHMIPURA VILLAGE PALYA HOBLI, KOLLEGAL TALUK CHAMARAJNAGAR DISTRICT- 571 440 BETWEEN:1. 2. (BY SRI THARANATHA SHETTY, K, ADVOCATE) AND:1. 2. 3. THE TAHSILDAR KOLLEGAL TALUK KOLLEGAL CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT- 571 440 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLLEGAL SUB-DIVISION KOLLEGAL CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571 440 SRI J.GOPAL S/O. J.JAVARAIAH MAJOR NO.424/A, 3RD CROSS - 2 - WP No.37824/2014 SOUTH EXTENSION KOLLEGAL TOWN CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT- 571 440 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI R.B.SATHYANARAYANA SINGH, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2 SRI AJAY M.D., CAVEATOR FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTIT...
Tag this Judgment!Narayanamma Vs. H.M. Krishnappa and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-26-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned order dated 12.3.2012 passed by the Presiding Officer Fast Track Court-IV, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore in I.A.No.II filed under Order I Rule 10(2) read with Section 151 of CPC., on the file of O.S.No.2289/2007 vide Annexure-E and allowing the I.A.No.II filed by the petitioner.) 1. The facts of the case are stated to be as follows: 2. It is the petitioner's case that she is the plaintiff in suit filed against respondents nos.1 to 3 herein, in OS 2289/2007 on the file of the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bangalore Rural District. The suit is for specific performance of contract in respect of an agreement to sell dated 13.7.2006. It is alleged that in order to deprive her of the property, respondents no.1 to 3 had colluded with respondent no.4 and a suit was said to have been filed, subsequent to the suit of the petitioner, in OS 2289/2007 - by respondent no.4 ag...
Tag this Judgment!The State By Hulimavu Police, Bangalore Vs. Ramanjj
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-26-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal Is Filed Under Section 378(1) And (3) Cr.P.C By The State P.P. Praying That This Hon'ble Court May Be Pleased To Grant Leave To File An Appeal Against The Judgment Date D:20.10.2010 Passed By The Additional Sessions Judge, Ftc-Xiv, Bangalore In S.C.No.999/2009- Acquiting The Respondent For The Offence Punishable Under Sections 397, 398 Read With Section 511 Of IPC.) 1. This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378(1) and (3) Cr.P.C. praying to grant leave to file an appeal against the judgment dated 20.10.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-XIV, Bangalore, in S.C. No.999/2009, acquitting the respondent for the offence punishable under Sections 397, 398 r/w Section 511 of IPC. 2. Heard the learned Special Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the respondent. The records of the trial court were called for and I have carefully examined the same. 3. Facts of the case is as under: That on 22.01.2008 at about 9.20 a.m. accused came to the...
Tag this Judgment!Jayamilal N. Shah and Others Vs. Nagarathna Murthy and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-26-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for the records in O.S.No.562/2010 and to set aside the order dated 14.2.2012 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli vide Annexure - K on I.A.No.3 and 4 under Order 1 Rule 10(2) read with Section 151 of CPC., and dismiss the said application.) 1. This writ petition is filed in the following circumstances. The petitioners no.1 to 3 are said to be arraigned as defendants no.3 to 5 in a pending civil suit in OS 562/2010, on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli. Respondent no.4, herein is said to be the plaintiff in that suit. The plaintiff has sought for a declaration that he is the absolute owner of the agricultural land measuring in all about 105 acres, comprising several parcels bearing individual survey numbers, of Shettarahalli, Devanahalli taluk. The plaintiff is said to have purchased the same under a sale deed dated 8.10.1969....
Tag this Judgment!Rathnamma Vs. Gurudevi and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-26-2014
Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J 1. These appeals arise out of the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dvn.), Koppal in RA 7/2009 and 16/2009 on 23rd July, 2010. Parties are referred as per their ranking before this Court. 2. Respondents 1-3 filed a suit before the Civil Judge (Jr.Dvn.), Koppal seeking to declare that they are the legal representatives of deceased Devendrapa Jirlbhavi and also have a right to claim the schedule A and B benefits. 3. It appears plaintiffs/respondents 1-3 are the wife and sons of late Devendrappa Jirlbhavi. The said Devendrappa was employed as a Principal in Junior College of Sunakalabidiri, Ranebeenur Taluk and there was pension and gratuity benefits given to him. It is stated, the 1st defendant began to create obstruction and also started troubling the plaintiff in one or the other way, she had led a immoral life with the 1st plaintiffs husband Devendrappa and began posing herself as the wife of Devendrappa and with an intention to knock of the termi...
Tag this Judgment!Gowri and Others Vs. Prabhakara Adiga
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-26-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order passed by the II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC., at Kundapura in the Execution Petition filed by the respondent numbered as Ex.C.No.25/2013 dated 26.2.2014 and 18.3.2014 filed as Annexures-A and B to the writ petition.) 1. The facts of the case are as follows: 2. The petitioners are the widow and children of one Divira Bolu. The respondent is said to have filed a civil suit against Divira Bolu, seeking a permanent injunction against him from interfering with property described as follows : "Description of the property situate in Kollur Village of Kundapura Taluk Mooli right Sy. No. SD No. Kissam Extent 32 5P1-P2 Converted to Non- 0.53 agricultural purpose Boundaries: East by: Sy.No.32/2 of Plaintiff South by: Portion of this SD sold to Surendra Shetty West by: Plot sold to Surendra Shetty North by: Sy.No.32/4 of Plaintiff, plot of Ayyappa Nair and V.V.Iyer" The suit ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »