Karnataka Court June 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Laxmibai and Others Vs. Shantappa P. Kamat and Others
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jun-10-2014
(Prayer: This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section 1.73 (1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgement and Award dated 01.08.2006 passed in MVC No. 54/2004 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Muddebihal, partly allowing the claim petition and seeking further enhancement of compensation. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section 173 (1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgement and Award dated 01.08.2006 passed in MVC No. 54/2004 on the file of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Muddebihal, awarding a compensation of Rs.2,74,600/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till date of realisation.) 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellants and the learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. The present appeals are filed in respect of the same judgment and award. The appeal in MFA 12587/2007 is filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation that is awarded and the connec...
Lakshmidevi and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-10-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Article 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Intimation Letters Issued By The R-2 And R-3 To The Petitioners Placed Vide Annexure - Ci To C90 And All Subsequent And Consequent Actions Thereto And Etc.) These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Article 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Intimation Letters Issued By The R2 And R3 To The Petitioners Placed Annexure - Cl To C29 And All Subsequent And Consequent Actions Thereto And Etc. These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Article 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Impugned Intimation Letters [Tiluvalike Patra] Dt.24.4.14, Issued By The Executive Engineer 2nd Subdivision Of Karnataka Slum Clearance Board The R3, Herein Vide Annexures - Al, A2, A3, A4, A5,A6, A7, A8, A9,A10, All, A12, A13, A14, A15, A16, A17, A18, A19, A20, A21, A23, A24, A25, A26, A27, A28, A29, A30, A31, A32, A33, A34, A35, A36, A37, A38, A39, A40, A41, A...
Bethel Educational Trust Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-10-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Article 226 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Declare That The Action Of The Respondents Mandating The Petitioner To Admit The Children From 1st Standard Instead Of Lkg Level Is Contrary To The Provisions Of The Right Of Children To Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009 As Illegal, Without Jurisdiction And Violative Of Article 14 Of The Constitution Of India, Vide Annx-M.) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for a declaration that the action of the respondents mandating the petitioner to admit the children from first standard instead of LKG level is contrary to the provisions of the Right of Children 'to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 as illegal and without jurisdiction. In that view, the notice dated 25.01.2014 at Annexure-M is assailed. The petitioner is also seeking that the respondents be restrained from meddling with the admission process of the petitioner. 2. Though contentions have been urged in the instant pe...
Vakil Housing Development Corporation and Others Vs. State By Sanjay N ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-10-2014
(Prayer: This petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to quash the PCR No.24421/2011 on the file of the IV ACMM Court, Bangalore, (Annexure - "A") and the FIR in Crime No.70/2012 filed by the 1st respondent in Annexure - "B".) 1. Accused Nos. 1 to 5 in PCR No.244^-1/2011 pending on the file of IV ACMM Court, Bangalore, have come up in this petition seeking quashing of the said proceedings. 2. Admittedly the PCR is filed by the second respondent herein. The transaction between the petitioners and second respondent, which has led to filing of this petition, is as under: A construction agreement is entered into between the first petitioner - Company and second respondent - Company with reference to property belonging to second respondent. In the said transaction, it is stated that certain cheques were deposited with the first petitioner towards performance guarantee amount. It is not in dispute that the project, which was taken up between the first p...
Vakil Housing Development Corporation Vs. State by Sanjay Nagar Police ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-10-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF JUNE2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5521 OF2012BETWEEN:1. VAKIL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.78, KORAMANGALA INDUSTRIAL AREA, JYOTHI NIVAS COLLEGE ROAD, BANGALORE 560 009, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR.MOHSIN ALI VAKIL.2. MR.MOHSIN ALI VAKIL, S/O WAHID ALI VAKIL, AGED59YEARS, CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, VAKIL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.78, KORAMANGALA INDUSTRIAL AREA, JYOTHI NIVAS COLLEGE ROAD, BANGALORE 560 009.3. MR.MOHAMMED ARIF VAKIL, S/O MR.MOHSIN ALI VAKIL, AGED32YEARS, DIRECTOR, VAKIL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.78, KORAMANGALA INDUSTRIAL AREA, 2 JYOTHI NIVAS COLLEGE ROAD, BANGALORE 560 009.4. MR.MOHAMMED ALI VAKIL, S/O MR.MOHSIN ALI VAKIL, AGED28YEARS, DIRECTOR, VAKIL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ...
Smt Lakshmidevi Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-10-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF JUNE2014BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI W.P.NOS.23662-23793 OF2014[GM-SLUM]. C/W WP NO.24073/2014 AND WP NOS.25418-25535/2014, WP NOS.24075-24117/2014, 22843-22891/2014, 22184-22191/2014, 25591-25646/2014, 25590/2014 AND25674791/2014 W.P.NOS.23662-23793/2014 BETWEEN1 2.3. 4.5.6. SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI W/O SHRI V MUNIRAJ, AGED ABOUT41YEARS, HOUSE NO.151, SMT. SUBBALAKSHMI W/O SHRI BALU AGED ABOUT44YEARS HOUSE NO.152, SMT. OBALAMMA W/O SHRI VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT33YEARS HOUSE NO.155, SMT. RAMALAKSHMI W/O SHRI OBALESH, AGED ABOUT34YEARS, HOUSE NO.158, SMT. OBALAMMA W/O SHRI ANTHONY AGED ABOUT42YEARS, HOUSE NO.269, SMT. RAJAMMA W/O SHRI RAMACHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT50YEARS, 7.8.9. 2 HOUSE NO.344, SHRI NARAYANA V S/O SHRI VENKATRAMANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT31YEARS, HOUSE NO.415, SMT. SUKANYA W/O SHRI KESHAV MURTHY, AGED ABOUT43YEARS, HOUSE NO.480, SMT. THIMMAKKA W/O SHRI NARASHIMAPPA, AGED ABOUT41YEARS, HOUSE NO.22, ...
M/S Bhagvathi Express Pvt Ltd Vs. New India Assurance Co Ltd
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-10-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF JUNE2014PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.591 OF2011BETWEEN: M/s.Bhagvathi Express Pvt. Ltd., No.4/4, Sri Laxmi Chamber D.B.Gupta Road, Pahar Ganj, New Delhi 110 055 Represented by its Manager. APPELLANT (By Sri C.K.Nanda Kumar, Advocate) AND:1. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Divisional Office-X, Vinay Complex, No.52, Vani Vilas Road, Basavanagudi, 2 Bangalore 560 004 By its Divisional Manager.2. MEP Electronics Pvt. Ltd No.253/23 & 24, Begur Hobli N.S.Palya, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore 560 076. Represented by First respondent as Special Power of Attorney Holder. RESPONDENTS (By Sri C.R.Ravishankar, Advocate for R1, Sri K.Suryanarayana Rao, Advocate for R2) ***** This RFA is filed under Section 96 of CPC, against the judgment and decree dated 18.12.2010 passed in O.S.No.5221/2000 on the file of the VII-Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore, de...
Smt Laxmibai Vs. Shantappa P Kamat
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jun-10-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, GULBARGA BENCH DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF JUNE, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.12587/2007 (MV) C/w MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.13450/2006 BETWEEN:1. 2. 3.4. Laxmibai W/o Yallappa Bilagi Age:38. years, Occupation: House hold R/o Balabatii Taluka: Muddebihal District: Bijapur. Hanamanth S/o Yallappa Bilagi Age:24. years, Occupation: Student, R/o Balabatii Taluka: Muddebihal District: Bijapur. Srishail S/o Yallappa Bilagi Age:21. years, Occupation: Student, R/o Balabatii Taluka: Muddebihal District: Bijapur. Bouramma D/o Yallappa Bilagi Age:19. years, Occupation: Student, 2 R/o Balabatii Taluka: Muddebihal District: Bijapur. APPELLANTS (Shri H.R. Malipatil and J.S. Shetty, Advocates) AND:1. Shantappa P. Kamat Age: Major R/o Itagi, Now residing at Muddebihal behind the Syndicate Bank, Reshma Building Muddebihal Naragund Taluk Naragund, District: Gadag.2. Branch Manager National Insurance Company Limit...
The National Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Laxmibai W/O Yallappa Bilagi
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jun-10-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, GULBARGA BENCH DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF JUNE, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.12587/2007 (MV) C/w MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.13450/2006 BETWEEN:1. 2. 3.4. Laxmibai W/o Yallappa Bilagi Age:38. years, Occupation: House hold R/o Balabatii Taluka: Muddebihal District: Bijapur. Hanamanth S/o Yallappa Bilagi Age:24. years, Occupation: Student, R/o Balabatii Taluka: Muddebihal District: Bijapur. Srishail S/o Yallappa Bilagi Age:21. years, Occupation: Student, R/o Balabatii Taluka: Muddebihal District: Bijapur. Bouramma D/o Yallappa Bilagi Age:19. years, Occupation: Student, 2 R/o Balabatii Taluka: Muddebihal District: Bijapur. APPELLANTS (Shri H.R. Malipatil and J.S. Shetty, Advocates) AND:1. Shantappa P. Kamat Age: Major R/o Itagi, Now residing at Muddebihal behind the Syndicate Bank, Reshma Building Muddebihal Naragund Taluk Naragund, District: Gadag.2. Branch Manager National Insurance Company Limit...
Govindappa and Others Vs. Anjinappa and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-09-2014
(Prayer: This Appeal Is Filed Under Section 100 Of Cpc, Against The Judgment And Decree Dated 15.12.2010 Passed In R.A.No.23/2009 On The File Of The Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court-Iii, Hospet, Partly Allowing The Appeal Filed Against The Judgment Dated 01.12.2008 And The Decree Passed In O.S.No.17/2006 On The File Of The Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Kudligi, Decreeing The Suit Filed For Declaration And Partition.) 1. Sri.Ananda defendant No.4 of an original suit bearing O.S.No.17/2006 is before this Court by filing an appeal under Section 100 of CPC in RSA No.5174/2011. Sri.Govindappa defendant No.2 in the said suit bearing O.S.No.17/2006 has filed an appeal in RSA No.5239/2011 and Smt.Sudheelamma defendant No.5 in the said suit has filed an appeal in RSA No.5240/2011. As all these appeals have arisen out of a common judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.17/2006, they are taken up together for discussion. Respondent No.1- Anjinappa in these appeals is the plaintiff in the said suit. Respo...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »