Karnataka Court April 2014 Judgments
M.N. Ramesh and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Appeal Is Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition N0.23946/2012(Lb-Res) Dated 05/08/2013.) (Prayer: This Writ Appeal Is Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition No.2394/13 Dated 5/8/2013.) (Prayer: This Writ Appeal Is Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition No. 13003/2010 Dated 5/8/2013.) (Prayer: This Writ Appeal Is Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition No.4579/2010 Dated 5/3/2013.) (Prayer: This Writ Appeal Is Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition No. 13001/2010 Dated 05/08/2013.) (Prayer: This Writ Appeal Is Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition No.141/13 Dated 5/8/2013.) (Prayer: This Wr...
Tag this Judgment!Syed Ameen Aii Vs. the High Court of Karnataka, Represented by Its Reg ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-16-2014
(Prayer: This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the entire records relating to concerning and connected with the impugned communication dated 2 9.4.2011 vide Annexure-N issued by the Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore - 560 001, perused the same and declare that the said communication as void and non-est and unsustainable in law, etc.) 1. The petitioner, a member of the Karnataka Judicial Service, was found guilty after a disciplinary enquiry was held against him. He was imposed with a punishment of withholding of two increments without cumulative effect. The said decision was communicated to the petitioner on 18.12.2008 and a copy was forwarded to the Accountant Genera1 (A and E), Karnataka. By a letter dated 23.03.2009, the office of the Accountant General (A and E), Karnataka, having stated that the punishment imposed is incapable of implementation, since the petitioner attained the age of superannuation...
Tag this Judgment!Abdul Rasheed Vs. Srinivas
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Apr-16-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India Praying To Issue A Writ In The Nature Of Certiorari To Set Aside The Impugned Order Passed By The Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) At Sedam On Memo Dated 11.02.2014 The Certified Copy Of Which Is Produced At Annexure-H And Thereby Rejecting The Memo Filed By Respondent.) Oral Order: H.G. Ramesh, J. 1. Whether a lease deed, where the term of lease stated therein does not exceed one year, requires to be registered under the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 is the question that needs an answer in this writ petition. The question is answered in the affirmative. In law, the lease deeds of the aforesaid kind also require to be registered and therefore, such unregistered lease deeds cannot be received as evidence of any transaction affecting the property. 2. This writ petition by the defendant is directed against an interlocutory order dated 26.03.2014 passed by the trial Court in the suit in O.S.No. 10/2...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Century Central Vs. State of Karnataka, Urban Development Departm ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-11-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Appeals Are Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition 47552- 553/12 Dated 2/7/13.) Cav Judgment 1. These writ appeals arise out of the order dated 02/07/2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.47552-47553/2012. Factual Background: 2. Appellant herein had filed two sets of writ petitions namely, W.P.Mos.47552-47553/2012 and W.P.Nos.268- 270/2013 in respect of land bearing Sy.Nos.18 and 19 (BBMP New No.234/19/3D) Kumudanapalya, Konankunte Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, admeasuring about ll,507sq.mtrs. (hereinafter referred to as "scheduled land" for the sake of convenience). By a common order, those writ petitions were disposed of. 3. In W.P.Nos.47552-553/2012 approval granted by the third respondent-State Level Single Window Clearance Committee ('SLSWCC for short) vide communication dated 12/09/2012 (Annexure "M") and consequently, communication dated 17/09/2012 (Annexure "N")...
Tag this Judgment!Branch Manager Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kempamma and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
(Prayer: This MFA is filed U/S 173(1) Of MV Act against the Judgment And Award dated 19.1.2007 Passed In MVC No.115/2006 On The file of the Civil Judge (SR.DN.) And JMFC And MACT, K.R. Pet, Awarding A Compensation Of Rs.9,51,333/- With Interest @ 6% P.A. from the date of petition till payment.) 1. This appeal under Section 173(1) of M.V. Act, 1988 is filed by the Appellant-Oriental Insurance Company Limited against the award dated 19.1.2007 in MVC No.115/2006 on the file of Civil Judge(Sr. Dn.) and MACT(for short Tribunal'), K.R. Pet, directing the appellant Insurance Company to satisfy the award amounting to Rs.9,51,333/- with interest at 6% p.a.. 2. One B.S. Ramakrishnegowda was working as Assistant Master in Government Junior College at Krishnarajpet Town. He used to travel daily from his native place Ballekere village to attend the School. On 27.8.2001, after finishing his duty, he was returning to his house on a motor cycle bearing No.KA-11-J-9846 as pillion rider from Krishnarajp...
Tag this Judgment!Lakshmi Priyadarshini Vs. Kamalamma and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Impugned Order Dated 12.12.2012 Passed By The Learned Principal Senior Civil Judge And C.J.M. Mandya In O.S. No.57/2010 On The Application Filed By The Petitioner U/O Iii Rule 2(A) R/W Section 151 Of Cpc Vide Annx-A And Etc.) (H.G. Ramesh, J.) 1. Whether a party to a proceeding in Court could be represented by his Power-of-Attorney holder is the question that needs to be answered in this writ petition. The answer is obviously in the affirmative. Whether a Power-of Attorney hoMer could be examined as a witness in the case is altogether a different matter. 2. This writ petition is by the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.57 of 2010 and is directed against an interlocutory order dated 12.12.2012 passed by the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Mandya, dismissing his application filed under Order III Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for leave to prosecute the s...
Tag this Judgment!Netharavathi @ Chaithra Vs. State of Karnataka and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-09-2014
(Prayer: This Crl.P Is Filed Under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code Praying To Quash The Criminal Proceedings In C.C.No.25964/2012 Pending Before The C.M.M., Bangalore For The Offences P/U/S 465, 468, 420 R/W 34 Of IPC.) 1. Accused No.3 in C.C. No.25964/2012 pending on the file of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, has come up in this petition seeking quashing of the proceedings in the said criminal case. Admittedly, the said proceeding is initiated pursuant to a complaint in Crime No.229/2911 registered with Yelahanka Police Station, Bangalore, for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 468 read with Section 34 of IPC. 2. It is seen that the crime No.229/2011 is registered pursuant to a complaint, which is filed by 2nd respondent, N.S. Vishwanath. The matter was investigated by the Police and chargesheet is filed for the said offences against accused Nos. 1 to 3. Incidentally, accused No.l is the husband, accused No.2 is the mother of accused No.l and accused No.3 ...
Tag this Judgment!Netharavathi @ Chaithra Vs. State of Karnataka and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-09-2014
(Prayer: This Crl.P Is Filed Under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code Praying To Quash The Criminal Proceedings In C.C.No.25964/2012 Pending Before The C.M.M., Bangalore For The Offences P/U/S 465, 468, 420 R/W 34 Of IPC.) 1. Accused No.3 in C.C. No.25964/2012 pending on the file of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, has come up in this petition seeking quashing of the proceedings in the said criminal case. Admittedly, the said proceeding is initiated pursuant to a complaint in Crime No.229/2911 registered with Yelahanka Police Station, Bangalore, for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 468 read with Section 34 of IPC. 2. It is seen that the crime No.229/2011 is registered pursuant to a complaint, which is filed by 2nd respondent, N.S. Vishwanath. The matter was investigated by the Police and chargesheet is filed for the said offences against accused Nos. 1 to 3. Incidentally, accused No.l is the husband, accused No.2 is the mother of accused No.l and accused No.3 ...
Tag this Judgment!High Court of Karnataka, Rep. by the Registrar General, Bangalore Vs. ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-09-2014
(Prayer: This criminal petition is filed under Sections 482 and 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to issue appropriate directions to the respondents and to pass appropriate orders pursuant to the Reports- I,II,III and IV registered as Criminal Petition under Sections 482 and 483 of Cr. P C.) 1. In Crl. A. No.90/2010 c/w Crl. A Nos.16/2010 and 169/2010, one of the appellants (namely appellant No.7/prisoner) was un-represented. Hence, we issued a Body Warrant to produce him before us. But, the Warrant was returned unexecuted with a report that he was released on parole, but did not return to Jail since two years. Therefore, we directed the State to file report as to in how many cases prisoners, who were released on parole, did not return to Jail and the action taken in that regard. Accordingly, on 21.2.2014, the State has filed reports. According to Report No.-II, in 42 cases, prisoners, who were released on parole from Central Jail at Bangalore, Mysore, Bijapur, Belgaum, Be...
Tag this Judgment!Shweta Prabhu Vs. the State of Karnataka and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-09-2014
(Prayer: This petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to quash the FIR registered before the Sadashivanagar Police Station, Bengaluru City, Bengaluru, in Crime No.45/2014 pending before the XXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge at Bangalore.) 1. Third accused in Crime No.45/2014 pending on the file of XXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, has come up in this petition seeking quashing of the aforesaid complaint, which is registered with Sadashivanagar Police Station. 2. Compliant in the aforesaid crime number is lodged by second respondent herein, who is said to be a sitting Minister of Karnataka State. The complaint is lodged by him against petitioner and two others for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 9 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The contents of complaint dated 10.03.2014, at Annexure-A, would disclose that two persons claiming themselves to be representatives of London based compa...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »