Karnataka Court March 2014 Judgments
Renu and Another Vs. the Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-21-2014
(Prayer: This MFA Is Filed U/S 173(1) Of MV Act Against The Judgment And Award Dated: 15.06.2010 Passed In MVC No.4344/2009 By He Iii Additional Senior Civil Judge, Member Mact, Bangalore, Seeking Enhancement Of Compensation.) 1. This appeal by the claimants is against the judgment and award passed by the learned III Addl.Senior Civil Judge and MACT, Bangalore, in MVC.No.4344/2009, dated 15th June 2010 seeking enhancement of compensation and challenging the finding of the Tribunal fastening liability to pay compensation on the owner while absolving the liability on the insurance company. 2. Claimants are the parents of deceased Vinodkumar who died in the accident that occurred on 23.9.2008. It is the case of the claimants that on 23.9.2008 at about 9.45 p.m. when Vinodkumar was crossing road on Tumkur road, a lorry bearing registration No.KA-21-A-4297 came in a rash and negligent manner and dashed to him due to which, he sustained grievous injuries all over the body. He was taken to Pr...
Tag this Judgment!Mahesha Vs. the State of Karnataka by Its Spp
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-21-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal Is Filed U/S.374(2) Of Cr.Pc Seeking To Set Aside The Judgment Of Conviction And Order Of Sentence Dated 12/16.10.2012 Passed By The Spl. Judge, Bellary, In Spl. Case No.80/2011 And Acquit Him Of All The Charges. This Criminal Appeal Having Been Heard And Reserved For Judgment On 9.1.2014) 1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kudligi Sub- Division, Bellary District, has laid a charge sheet against the accused for the offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC and also u/s.3(1)(X)(XI) and 3(2)(V) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 2. The accused was arrested on 4.9.2011 on the date of the incident itself and since then, he has been in Judicial Custody. After committal proceedings, the Sessions Judge held the trial and held the accused guilty for the above said offences and sentenced him to undergo Rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine Rs.50,000/- and in default to undergo Simple imp...
Tag this Judgment!Azagar Begum Vs. Khamarjaha Begum
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Mar-21-2014
(Prayer: This Crp. Is Filed Under Order 115 Of The Cpc, Praying To Set Aside The Order Dated 19.7.2012 Pass Ed On Ia-2 Filed Under Order Vii Rule 11(D) R/W 151 Cpc In O.S.No.114/2011 On The File Of The Learned Civil Judge At Lingasugur And Pass Any Other Appropriate Order.) 1. This CRP is filed to set aside the order dated 19.7.2012 on IA-2 filed under Order VII Rule 11(d) r/w 151 of CPC in O.S.No.114/2011 on the file of the Learned Civil Judge at Lingasugur. 2. The facts briefly stated; that on 15.4.2011, Lok Adalath passed the decree based on the compromise in O.S.No.60/2011, subsequently the affected party Smt. Khamarjaha Begum filed a suit i.e. O.S.No.114/2011 seeking to declare the compromise decree as null an d void. Petitioner herein/Azagar Begum being the defendant put her appearance and filed an application under Order VII Rule 11(d) r/w 151 of CPC to reject the plaint on the ground that the plaintiff/Khamarjaha Begum only after reading the terms and conditions of the compromi...
Tag this Judgment!Vodafone South Limited and Another Vs. the Deputy Director of Income T ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
(Prayer: These W.Ps. Are Filed Praying To Quash The Order Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench Vide Order Dt: 06.03.2014 Vide Annx-G. Direct The R1 Not To Initiate Recovery Proceedngs Or Any Other Coercive Steps Pursuant Notice Dt: 28.01.2013 Vide: Annx-B Or Proceedings Pending Disposal Of The Appeals Before The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal On Merits Etc.,) (Prayer: These W.Ps. Are Filed Praying To Quash The Order Dtd: 06.03.2014 Passed Y The Income -Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench-B, Bangalore Vide Annex-F. Etc.,) 1. Petitioner, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, and a subsidiary of M/s Vodafone Mobile Services Limited, engaged in the business of providing telecom services to its subscribers in India, has Drought in question the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, (hereinafter referred to as ITAT, for brevity) dated 6.3.2014 (vide Annexure-G) or. two interlocutory applications filed by it in...
Tag this Judgment!Dhruva Kumar Vs. Office of the Joint Commissioner
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition Is Filed Under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Praying To Enlarge The Petitioner On Bail In The Event Of His Arrest In Crime No.44/2014 Of Joint Commissioner Of Excise Seib, Bangalore, For The Offences P/U/S 32, 38a 43a Of Karnataka Excise Act.) 1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner - accused No.3 under Section 438 of the CR.P.C seeking anticipatory bail and to direct the respondent - police to release the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest of the petitioners for the offences punishable under Section 32, 38A, 43A of Karnataka Excise Act 1965. 2. The brief facts of the prosecution case is that on 28.01.2014 at about 2.05 p.m. as per the order Joint Commissioner of Excise S E I B at Bangalore at M.G. Road trinity Circle, Old Madras Road in front of MG Mahal as person was carrying Foreign Liquor of 15 liters in Yamaha bearing R-15 KA-02-HV-2291 and one more vehicle KA-05-K-6381 Bajaj Discover 150 disk brake 1000 ml 6 bottle and 6 liters Foreign liquors...
Tag this Judgment!Vodafone South Limited and Another Vs. the Deputy Director of Income T ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
(Prayer: These W.Ps. Are Filed Praying To Quash The Order Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench Vide Order Dt: 06.03.2014 Vide Annx-G. Direct The R1 Not To Initiate Recovery Proceedngs Or Any Other Coercive Steps Pursuant Notice Dt: 28.01.2013 Vide: Annx-B Or Proceedings Pending Disposal Of The Appeals Before The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal On Merits Etc.,) (Prayer: These W.Ps. Are Filed Praying To Quash The Order Dtd: 06.03.2014 Passed Y The Income -Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench-B, Bangalore Vide Annex-F. Etc.,) 1. Petitioner, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, and a subsidiary of M/s Vodafone Mobile Services Limited, engaged in the business of providing telecom services to its subscribers in India, has Drought in question the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, (hereinafter referred to as ITAT, for brevity) dated 6.3.2014 (vide Annexure-G) or. two interlocutory applications filed by it in...
Tag this Judgment!Ajay Rajasekhar Vs. Tripti
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 8s 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Impugned Order Dt.26.08.2013 Passed By The Ii Addl.Prl. Judge, Family Court, Bangalore -In G 8s Wc No. 153/2013 In Interim Application No.Ii Filed By The Petitioner U/S.12 Of The Guardian 8and Wards Act Produced Vide Annexure-A To The Wp. And Etc.,) 1. The petitioner filed GandWC.No. 153/2013 against the respondent on the file of the II Additional, Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore, for appointing him as a guardian of the minor children viz., Master Dheer and Kumari. Mischa till they attain the age of 18 years and to grant him full custody of both the minor children. In the said case, he filed an application - I.A.No.2 for grant of an interim custody of the minor children. The application was opposed by the respondent. On consideration of the rival contentions of the parties, the Court below has allowed the application on 26.08.2013 by granting him the visitation rig...
Tag this Judgment!Doreswamy Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
(Prayer: This criminal petition is filed under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event oi' his arrest in Cr. No. 11/2014 of Besagarahalli P.S., Mandya, for the offences punishable under Sections 504, 323, 327, 353, R/W 34 of IPC.) 1. This petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.l under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to the respondent police that in the event of his arrest, he be released on bail of the offences punishable under Sections 504, 323, 327 and 353, read with Section 34 of IPC registered in respondent Police Station Clime No. 11/2014. 2. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner-accused No.l and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner, during the course of the arguments, submitted that the petitioner is totally unconnected with the offences alleged and he has been falsely implicated in the case. He submitted that accused ...
Tag this Judgment!Doreswamy Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
(Prayer: This criminal petition is filed under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event oi' his arrest in Cr. No. 11/2014 of Besagarahalli P.S., Mandya, for the offences punishable under Sections 504, 323, 327, 353, R/W 34 of IPC.) 1. This petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.l under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to the respondent police that in the event of his arrest, he be released on bail of the offences punishable under Sections 504, 323, 327 and 353, read with Section 34 of IPC registered in respondent Police Station Clime No. 11/2014. 2. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner-accused No.l and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner, during the course of the arguments, submitted that the petitioner is totally unconnected with the offences alleged and he has been falsely implicated in the case. He submitted that accused ...
Tag this Judgment!Guruswamy and Others Vs. the Registrar of Societies and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-19-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Issue A Writ In The Nature Of Prohibition Against The R-1 Not To Accept Any List Of Office Bearers Of The Election Said To Have Been Conducted By The R-3 To The R-1 And ETC.) 1. Petitioners are members of the 2nd respondent - Advocates Association, Malavalli in Mandya District. 2. The 2nd respondent is an Association registered under the provisions of the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960. Election to elect members of the Executive Committee of the 2nd respondent and as also office bearers thereof was conducted on 04.03.2014. Results of the said election except that of the President have been declared. 3. In these writ petitions, though petitioners have sought for a direction against the 1st respondent not to accept any list of office bearers elected in the election conducted by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent - association with a further direction to conduct fr...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »