Karnataka Court March 2014 Judgments
Armugam Vs. Shakuntla and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-25-2014
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Art.226/227 of the Constitution praying to quash the order dated 9.7.2012 - annexure A on IA 9 in OS 48232/2007 by the Add! City Civil Judge, Bangalore, etc.) Application was filed by the plaintiff before the trial court in IA 9 under O 14, R 5 r/w S. 151, CPC in a suit filed for declaration to declare him as the owner/successor of the suit property on the death of his sister in law Dhanbagyammal and also for recovery of possession. The matter was contested by the defendants. As it transpires, there is also a Will. It is also stated that defendants claim to be the adopted children of Dhanbagyammal and also there was a Will executed by Dhanbagyammal in favour of 1st defendant. However, denying the same, suit was filed for declaration. On the other hand, written statement was filed by the defendants contending that there was a valid adoption and also there is a Will executed in their favour as such, they sought dismissal of the suit. The trial court ...
Tag this Judgment!The State of Karnataka Represented by the Secretary and Others Vs. M/S ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-25-2014
(Prayer: CRP Filed U/S 55(1) Of Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957, Against The Order Dt 28.9.11 Passed In STA No.371/2005 On The File Of Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, Allowing The Appeal Filed U/S 32(5)(A) Of Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957.) (Prayer: CRP Filed U/Sec 55(1) Of Kait Act, 1957, Against The Judgment And Order Dated 07.03.2011 Passed In STA.254/2007 On The File Of Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, Allowing The Appeal Filed U/Sec.34 Of Kait Act.) (Prayer: CRP Filed U/S 55(1) Of Karnataka Agricultural Income-Tax Act, 1957, Against The Order Dated 2.9.2011 Passed In STA No.2424/2010 On The File Of Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, Partly Allowing The Appeal.) (Prayer: CRP Filed U/S 55(1) Of The Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 Against The Order Dated: 16.9.2011 In STA No.255/2010 On The File Of The Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, Partly Allowing The Appeal.) (Prayer: CRP Filed U/S 55 Of The Kat Act, Filed Again...
Tag this Judgment!Gangambike Vs. the Assistant Commissioner and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-25-2014
(Prayer: This Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash Annexure-E Given By The Respondents 3 To 16 Dated 10.2.2014; Annexure-F (Notice) Dated 19.2.2014 Issued By The 1st Respondent To The Petitioner; And Annexure-K Order Dated 11.3.2014 Passed By The 1st Respondent, ETC.) 1. Removal of the petitioner from the post of Adhyaksha of the Grama Panchayat pursuant to No- Confidence Motion moved against her has been called in question in this writ petition. 2. Petitioner along with respondent Nos.3 to 16 were elected on 17.05.2010 as the members of Koppa Grama Panchayat (for short 'the Panchayat'), Piriyapatna Taluk. On 29.12.2012, petitioner was elected as Adhyaksha of the Panchayat. Respondent Nos.3 to 16 submitted on 10.02.2014, vide Annexure-E, a notice of No-Confidence Motion to the respondent No.1, who in turn issued notices on 19.02.2014, vide Annexure-F, to the Adhyaksha, Upadhyaksha and all members of the Panchayat, of the meeting, t...
Tag this Judgment!irappa and Another Vs. Gouravva and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-25-2014
(Prayer: This Appeal Is filed Under Section 100 Of CPC Against The -Judgment And Decree Dated 20.10.2009 Passed In R.A.No.23/2006 On The File Of The Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Bailhongal, Dismissing The Appeal, Against The Judgment And Decree Dated 29.05.2006, Passed In O.S.No.39/2003, On The File Of The Prl.Civil Judge Vjr.Dn.), Bailhongal, Decreeing The Suit Filed For Declaration And Injunction.) 1. Defendants 3 and 4 of an original suit bearing O.S.No.39/2003, which was pending on the file of the Court of Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Bailhongal, Belgaum District are before this Court by filing an appeal under Section 100 of CPC. Respondents 1 and 2 herein are the plaintiffs in the said suit. Respondent No.3 is defendant No.2 in the said suit. Since suit against defendant No.1, Chief Manager Pension Dept., State Bank of Mysore, Head Office at Bangalore, had been dismissed in the trial Court, no appeal has been filed against it. Parties will be referred to as plaintiffs a...
Tag this Judgment!Savitha Seetharam Vs. Rajiv Vijayasarathy Ratnam
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Set Aside The Impugned Order Dtd.5.10.2013 Passed By The Honble 3rd Additional Family Judge At Bangalore In G and Wc No.101/2012 On I.A.3 Vide Annexure-A And Grant Consequential Reliefs. And ETC.,) 1. Though this matter is posted for orders, by consent of the learned counsel for the parties, it is taken up for final hearing. Heard and disposed of by this order. 2. This writ petition is directed against the order on I.A.No.3 dated 5.10.2013 in GandWC No.101/2012 on the file of the III Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore. 3. The petitioner herein filed the above case under Sections 7 and 17 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, for her appointment as the guardian of the minor child Master Aditya Rajiv Ratnam and for grant of his permanent custody. In the said case, respondent filed the application - I.A.No.3 seeking interim custody of the minor child. 4. The said appli...
Tag this Judgment!K.H. Basavaraja and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka by Its Secretary ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
(Prayer: These Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Call For The Entire Records Relating To Concerning and Connected With The Impugned Common Order Dated 18.08.2011 Passed By The Hon'ble Karnataka Administrative Tribunal, In Application Nos. 4367, 4371, 4372, 4374, 4375, 4376, 4377, 4378, 4380, 4381, 4383, 4384, 4386, 4389, 4394, 4402, 4410, 4413, 4414, 4415, 4416, 4417, 4420, 4425, 4427, 4429, 4433, 4434/2006 and Nos. 8347, 8348, 8349, 8350, 8351, 8353, 8355, 8356, 8357, 8359, 8360 and 8364/06 and No. 4842/06 On Its File, Peruse The Same and Quash The Said Common Order Vide Annexure - A In So Far As The Same Relates To The Petitioners Only As Unsustainable In Law And ETC.,) 1. The legality and correctness of the order passed by the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore, dated 18-8-2011 in Application Nos 4337-35 of 2006 and connected matters, is called in question in this petition. 2. Writ petitioners were appointed as either f...
Tag this Judgment!S. Rudrappa Vs. the Secretary, the Mysore Merchants Co-op. Society Ltd ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
(Prayer: This Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Set Aside/Quash The Annexures - B and C Passed By The 3rd Respondent And Karnataka Appellate Tribunal Dated 30.12.2006 And Appeal Dated 21.9.2013 And ETC.) 1. An order of compulsory retirement passed against the petitioner on 16.09.1986 by the respondents, when questioned in a dispute filed under S.70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 (for short 'the Act") having not been interfered with by the learned Departmental Arbitrator, Karnataka Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal0 and the learned Single Judge, W.A.No.2470/1997 filed by the petitioner was allowed by a Judgment dated 23.06.2000(reported in ILR 2001 Karnataka 14). The case having been remanded to the Departmental Arbitrator and a compromise petition having been filed and the respondents having handed over to the petitioner a pay order for Rs. 2,30,000/-, the compromise was accepted and the dispute was dismis...
Tag this Judgment!K.V. Nagaraj Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
(Prayer: This criminal petition is filed under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Cr. No.423/2013 of Kumaraswamy Layout P.S., Bangalore City for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471, 504, 506 of IPC.) 1. This petition is filed by the petitioner-accused under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to the respondent police that in the event of his arrest, he be released on bail of the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471, 504 and 506 of IPC registered in respondent Police Station Crime No.423/2013. 2. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner-accused and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State. 3. I have perused the averments made in the bail petition, FIR, complaint, the order passed by the lower Court on the bail application and the other materials on record. 4. Looking to the averments made in the complaint, it goes to show that the c...
Tag this Judgment!R. Pushpalatha Vs. Mysore City Corporation and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
(Prayer: This Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution of India, Praying To Quash The Reminder Letters/ Notices Dated 1.3.2014 And 10.3.2014 Issued By The 2nd Respondent Vide Annexures-A and B Respectively. 1. The petitioner, owner of site No.1234, situated at I Stage, Hebbal Layout, Deveraja Mohalla, Mysore, having made an application to the Mysore City Corporation, for approval of plan and issuance of building licence for construction of ground floor building, sanction was accorded on 28.05.2013. Construction having been made and respondent No.2 having submitted an inspection report dated 28.02.2014, a notice dated 01.03.2014 vide Annexure-A alleging violation in the matter of construction was served on the petitioner. The petitioner was served with another notice dated 10.03.2014 vide Annexure-B, to remove within 3 days, the unauthorized construction. Assailing the said notices, as at Annexures “ A and B, this writ petition was filed on 14.03.2014. 2. S...
Tag this Judgment!Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Narasubai Joshi @ N.L. ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
(Prayer: This MFA is filed U/s. 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award dated: 26.07.2011 passed in MVC No.3227/2010 on the file of the 14th Additional Judge, Court of Small Causes and MACT, Bengaluru City (SCCH.10), awarding a compensation of Rs.23,94,154/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till payment.) 1. This appeal by the appellant- Corporation is directed against the impugned judgment and award dated 26.07.2011 passed in MVC No.3227/2010 on the file of the 14th Additional Judge, Court of Small Causes, and MACT, Bengaluru City (SCCH.10), (hereinafter referred to as ' Tribunal' for short), on the ground that, a sum of Rs.23,94,154/- awarded by the Tribunal with interest at 6% p.a., from the date of petition till its payment as against the claim made by the claimants for a sum of Rs.40,00,000/-, on account of the death of the deceased Sri. Laxmanachar Joshi, in the road traffic accident is on higher side and disproportionate to the income of the deceased an...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »