Karnataka Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gururaj B. Rao Vs. The Inspector of Motor Vehicles, Shimoga District a ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the Check Report dt.1.12.2014 issued by the respondent No.1 in No.201002 vide Annexure-D and etc.) 1. In this writ petition, petitioner is challenging the check report and the observations made therein including the seizure of his vehicle by the Inspector of Motor Vehicles, Assistant Regional Transport Office, Sagar, Shimoga District, on 01.12.2014, vide Annexure-D. 2. A perusal of Annexure-D discloses that the vehicle bearing registration No.KA-51-B-0114 which is a contract carriage vehicle belonging to the petitioner herein was seized on the allegation that the permit covering the vehicle provided for seating capacity of 50 in all, but it was found on verification that the vehicle was fitted with 40 push back seats. As per the Motor Vehicles Inspector's report, the seating capacity did not comply with Rule 151(2) of Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, hence, the registered...
Moodabidri Gurugala Basadi Vs. Anantaraja Indira and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
(Prayer: This Civil Petition is filed under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code read with Section 17 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act read with Articles 226 and 22/ of the Constitution of India, that for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to consider this application and the Appeal No.LRA.3066/86 filed before the Land Reforms Appellate Authority, Karkala Taluk, Udupi District.) 1. Petitioner has filed this civil petition in the year 2006 being aggrieved by the order dated 24.07.1981 passed by the V Land Tribunal, Karkala, in Case No.TRL.1702.80-81. 2. The relevant facts of the case are that respondent No.1 had filed Form No.7 seeking grant of occupancy rights of land bearing Sy. No.53/4B measuring 64 Cents in Pranthya Village, Karkala Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District, on the enforcement of the amendments made to Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. Before the Tribunal, one B. Nagakumara Shetty and Charukeerthi Pandithacharyavarya Swami,...
G. Kantharaju Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
(Prayer: This Appeal Is Filed Under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., Praying To Set Aside The Judgment Dated 29.12.2010, Passed In S.C.No.260/2009, On The File Of Ii Additional District and Sessions Judge At Mysore, Convicting The Appellant/Accused For Offences Punishable Under Sections 381, 302 And 201 Ipc and Etc.) 1. The appellant (hereinafter referred as "accused") was tried and convicted for offences punishable under Sections 381, 302, 201 IPC and acquitted of an offence punishable under Section 27 of Arms Act in S.C.No.260/2009 by judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.12.2010 on the file of II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysore. 2. The prosecution case in brief is as under: The deceased-Gunasagara Hegde was the resident of Mangalore. The accused-G.Kantharaju was working as a Police Constable in Vijayanagar Police Station, Mysore. The deceased was dealing in a real estate. In connection with purchase of house site, accused came in contact with deceased. It is th...
Hyder Vs. State of Karnataka, Represented By Police Circle Inspector
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
(Prayer: This Crl.P. Is Filed U/S.482 Cr.P.C., Praying to Quash the entire proceedings in Sessions Case No.3/2008 (Crime No.71/2007) of Udupi Town Police Station, on the file of the P.O., etc, Udupi, against the petitioner registered for the Offence P/U/Ss.364, 302, 392 And 201 R/W S.34 of IPC.) 1. Inspector of Udupi Police Circle, having submitted a charge-sheet against the petitioner and others to the Prl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udupi for the offences punishable under 5s. 364, 302, 392 and 201 read with S.34 of IPC, in Crime No.71/200/ of Udupi Town Police station, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, having taken cognizance of the said offences, committed the case registered thereon to the Court of Sessions, Udupi District, under Section 209 of Cr.P.C. for trial, by splitting up accused No.2 from the case, as he was absconding. The petitioner herein, shown as accused No.3, having jumped the bail and as he could not be secured, case was split against him on 31.12.2007. Trial of the cas...
Hyder Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 B E F O R E THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2963/2011 BETWEEN: HYDER AGED ABOUT25YEARS, S/O. LATE ABDUL RAZAK, HYDER MANZIL, HANUMANTHANAGAR, PUTHUR VILLAGE, UDUPI. (BY SRI NISHIT KUMAR SHETTY FOR SRI NATARAJA BALLAL, ADV.) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY POLICE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, UDUPI CIRCLE, AND ALSO AT: STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS BANGALORE. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI Y.D. HARSHA, AGA) ... RESPONDENT2THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN SESSIONS CASE NO.3/2008 (CRIME NO.71/2007) OF UDUPI TOWN POLICE STATION, ON THE FILE OF THE P.O., FTC, UDUPI, AGAINST THE PETITIONER REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/Ss.364, 302, 392 AND201R/W S.34 OF IPC. THIS CRL.P. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Inspector of Udupi Police Circle, having submitted a charge-sheet against the petitio...
m/s.chalukya Motors Private Limited Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE12h DAY OF DECEMBER2014BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.106507 106509 OF2014(MV) BETWEEN: M/S.Chalukya Motors Private Limited Kustangi Building, Hubli Road, Gadag Represented By Its Managing Director Sri Rudranna Goneppa Gulaguli (By Smt. V.Vidya and K Raghavendra Rao, Advocate) PETITIONER AND:1. State Of Karnataka The Department Of Transport M S Building, Bangalore Represented By Its Principal Secretary 2. The Commissioner For Transport Multistoried Building, 5th Floor, Ambedkar Veedhi, Bangalore 2 3. The Regional Transport Authority Gadag, Represented By Its Secretary 4. The Regional Transport Officer Office of the RTO, Gadag 5. The Deputy Commissioner Gadag Cum Chairman Of Road Transport Authority Gadag (By Smt. K.Vidyavathi, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent) RESPONDENTS --- These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India quashing the...
The Managing Director Vs. Mohammed Imran
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
(Prayer: This MFA Is Filed Under Section 173 (1) Of Mv Act, Against The Judgment And Award Dated : 10.01.2012 Passed In Mvc No. 1000/2010 On The File Of The Prl. Senior Civil Judge And M.A.C.T. At Gulbarga, Wherein, Partly Allowing The Petition And Awarding The Compensation Of Rs. 10,65.400/- With Interest @ 6% P.A.) 1. The lone respondent of a case in MVC.1000/10 pending on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge and MACT, Gulbarga, has challenged the judgment and award passed on 10.1.2012. 2. Several grounds have been raised in the present appeal filed under Section 173(1), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Respondent herein herein is the claimant in the said case. He was injured in a road accident that took place on 19.2.2010 at 5.20 p.m. when he was proceeding in a tum-tum goods goods vehicle bearing No.KA-32-A- 9448. When they reached a place called Krishna Stone Machine on Gulbarga-Sedam road, the bus belonging to the appellant bearing no.KA-33-F-38, being driven in a rash and negligent...
Bhavani and Others Vs. Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Man ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order on I.A. No.1 dated 1.12.2014 passed by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Dakshina Kannada District, Mangalore in appeal No.2/2014-15 Appeal No. 3/2014-15, Appeal No.4/2014-15 and Appeal No.5/2014-15, Appeal NO.6/2014- 15, Appeal No.7/2014-15, Appeal No.8/2014-15 and Appeal No.9/2014-15 certified copies of which are produced at Ann-A, Al, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6 and A7 respectively and consequently allow I.A. No. 1 in the aforesaid appeals.) 1. Learned counsel for the applicant who has filed I.A. NO. 1/2014 seeking to implead, submits that LA. NO. 1/2014 is not pressed. Hence application is dismissed as Dot pressed. Petitioners are the Elected Directors of 3rd respondent cooperative society. They have been disqualified from continuing as Directors of the 3rd respondent co-operative society by exercising the power under Section 29(c) of Karnataka Co-operati...
The Managing Director Vs. Mohammed Imran
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
(Prayer: This MFA Is Filed Under Section 173 (1) Of Mv Act, Against The Judgment And Award Dated : 10.01.2012 Passed In Mvc No. 1000/2010 On The File Of The Prl. Senior Civil Judge And M.A.C.T. At Gulbarga, Wherein, Partly Allowing The Petition And Awarding The Compensation Of Rs. 10,65.400/- With Interest @ 6% P.A.) 1. The lone respondent of a case in MVC.1000/10 pending on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge and MACT, Gulbarga, has challenged the judgment and award passed on 10.1.2012. 2. Several grounds have been raised in the present appeal filed under Section 173(1), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Respondent herein herein is the claimant in the said case. He was injured in a road accident that took place on 19.2.2010 at 5.20 p.m. when he was proceeding in a tum-tum goods goods vehicle bearing No.KA-32-A- 9448. When they reached a place called Krishna Stone Machine on Gulbarga-Sedam road, the bus belonging to the appellant bearing no.KA-33-F-38, being driven in a rash and negligent...
Prakash and Others Vs. Thimmamma and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
(Prayer: This Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 27.2.2008 passed in RA.No. 174/2005, on the file of Prl.District Judge, Mandya.) 1. This appeal is filed by the plaintiffs against the judgment and decree passed by the Prl. District Judge, Mandya, in R.A.No. 174/2005, dated 27th February 2008. 2. Plaintiffs filed suit in O.S.No.39/1997 before the Prl.Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) and JMFC, Srirangapatna, for partition and separate possession of suit schedule properties. The propositus of the family was one Patel Neelegowda. He had two sons viz., Patel Venkategowda and Puttegowda. Plaintiffs are the children of Patel Puttegowda, whereas defendants are the children of Patel Venkategowda. According to the plaintiffs, the suit schedule properties are in joint possession of Venkategowda and Puttegowda, But, according to defendants, there was prior partition in the year 1947. After hearing, the trial Court decreed the suit and held that plaintiffs and defend...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »