Karnataka Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt K Padma Vs. K Ramachandra
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF DECEMBER2014PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B. WRIT PETITION No.14876/2008 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN : Smt K Padma Aged about 48 years W/o C B Ganesh Gowda Residing at No 61, II Cross Cholurpalya, Magadi Road Bangalore-560 023. ... PETITIONER (By Mr P S Rajagopal, Sr Counsel For Mr M A Subramani, Adv.) AND :1. K Ramachandra S/o Late Ramanjaneyalu Aged about 47 years Claiming to be residing at No 144, 10th A Cross J P Nagar, I Phase Bangalore-560 078. 2 Rehabilitation and Recovery Branch Residency Road (Near Galaxy Theatre), Bangalore Represented by its Branch Manager.2. State Bank of India 3. M/S Tubeman Private Limited Represented by its Managing Director, Mr Shankarlal Agarwal @ S L Agarwal, No 144, 10th A Cross Ground Floor, J P Nagar I Phase Bangalore-560 078.4. Smt Laxmi Agarwal Aged about 48 years W/o Shri Shankarlal Agarwal No 144, 10th A Cross Ground Floor J P ...
Meharunnisa Vs. Syed Habeeb
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA CRL.P. NO.693/2014 BETWEEN: MEHARUNNISA D/O SYED HABEEB @ SYED HABEEBULLA, AGED ABOUT28YEARS, R/O DOOR No.83, LIG-1, KHB COLONY, SIRA GATE, TUMKUR-572 103.-. PETITIONER (BY SRI. BOPANNA. B, ADVOCATE BPDS ASSOCIATES) AND SYED HABEEB @ SYED HABEEBULLA S/O LATE SYED GHOUSE PEER, AGED ABOUT54YEARS,R/OF9H BATTALLION, KSRP, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE, NOW R/AT1T BATALLION, KSRP, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE, NOW R/AT1T BATALLION, D-KSRP, RICHMOND ROAD CIRCLE, NEAR HOSMAT HOSPITAL, BANGALORE-560 025. (BY SMT. BHUSHANI KUMAR, ADVOCATE) - RESPONDENT2THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S482OF CR.P.C. BY THE PETITIONER TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED2510.2013 PASSED BY THE F.T.C., TUMKUR IN CRL. R.P. No.149/2012 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER DATED1704.2012 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. C.J.AND J.M.F.C., TUMKUR IN C. MISC. NO.455/2007 AT ANNEXURE-A AND B & ETC. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN RE...
Asgarali S/O Khawajamainuddin Buddebhai Vs. Reshma D/O Shabudin Gadamp ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
:1. : RSA No.5526/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE18h DAY OF DECEMBER2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH Regular Second Appeal No.5526/2013 Between: Shri. Asgarali, S/O Khawajamainuddin Buddebhai, Age:33. Years, Occ: Service, R/O: Bailhongal, Taluk: Bailhongal, Dist: Belgaum, Now Residing At Plot No.23, Vivakanand Nagar, Taluk: Gokak, Dist: Belgaum-591307. Appellant (By Sri. Santosh B.Rawoot, Advocate) A n d : Smt. Reshma, D/O Shabudin Gadampalli, calling herself as Smt. Reshma W/O Asgarali Buddebhai, Age:32. Years, Occ: Household Work, R/O: Gandhi Nagar, Near Peer Panna, Hukkeri, Tal: Hukkeri, Dist: Belgaum-591307. Respondent (By Smt. S.P.Patil, Advocate for caveator/respondent) This appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 21.03.2013 passed in R.A. No.14/2011 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Hukkeri, dismissing the appeal filed against the judgment and decree dated 14.01.2011 and the...
Akash Education and Development Trust and Another Vs. The Union Of Ind ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India, With A Prayer To Quash The Communication/Order Dtd. 16.10.2014 Issued By The Respondent Rejecting The Application Of Petitioner For Establishment Of New Medical College For The Academic Year 2015-16 On The Ground That Consent Of Affiliation Was Not Submitted Along With The Application Dtd.27.8.2014 (Annex-A) And Etc.) 1. The petitioners are assailing the communication dated 16.10.2014 by which the scheme as submitted by the petitioners for establishment of a new Medical College at Devanahalli has been returned by the respondent-Central Government. In that view, the petitioners are seeking that the same be quashed and the respondents be directed to receive the application/scheme submitted by the petitioners and process the same in accordance with law by forwarding the same to the Medical Council of India ('MCI' for short). 2. The petitioners submitted the scheme for establishment of a new Me...
A.N. Nithya and Others Vs. The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its Chief Sec ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Final Notice / Order Dated 20.11.2012 Issued By The Seventh Respondent At Annexure-J As Illegal And Violative Of The Constitution Of India and Etc., These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Final Notice/Order Dated 10.9.12 Issued By The 7th Respondent At Annx-J As Illegal And Violative Of The Constitution Of India and Etc.,) 1. All petitioners claim to be permanent residents of Huliyurdurga, Kunigal Taluk, Tumakuru District - 572 123, while their common interest as landlord or tenants is over the immovable properties in their occupation along side the road known as 'Huliyurdurga Road' connecting Maddur to Tumakuru. 2. It is stated that State Highway No.33 runs from Maddur to Huliyurdurga and thereafter to Kunigal, in Tumakuru District passing through Huliyurdurga Town and the immovable properties along side the s...
M/s. Universal Associates Developers and Promoters Vs. Bhupat
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
(Prayer: This Rfa Is Filed Under Section 96 Of The Cpc, Against The Judgment And Decree Dated 12.12.2011 Passed In O.S. No. 92/2008 On The File Of The Ii Addl. Senior Civil Judge At Gulbarga, Dismissing The Suit Of Plaintiff.) 1. Unsuccessful plaintiff of an original suit in 92/08 which was pending on the file of II Additional Senior Civil Judge at Gulbarga, has challenged the judgment and decree passed therein dated 12.12.2011. 2. The suit filed by the appellant-plaintiff before the trial court for specific performance of the contract has been dismissed after contest mainly on the ground of limitation. Therefore this appeal has been filed challenging the same on various grounds as set out in the appeal memo. Respondent herein is the sole defendant I the said suit. Parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant as per their ranking before the trial court. 3. The facts leading to the filing of O.S.92/08 are as follows: a) The defendant was the absolute owner of the suit schedule...
State by Terakanambi Police and Others Vs. Shivappa and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378(1) and (3) Cr.P.C. Praying to Grant Leave to file an Appeal against the Judgment dated:30.11.2010/08.12.2010 passed By the District and S.J. Chamarajanagar in Spl.C.No.73/2008 - acquitting the Respondents/Accused for the Offence P/U/S 341, 326, 114 of IPC and Sec. 3(1)(X) of SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.) This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. Praying to Set aside the impugned Judgment and Order of conviction dated: 30.11.2010 passed by the Dist. 85 S.J., Chamarajanagar in Spl. Case No.73/2009 - convicting the Appellants/Accused for the Offence P/U/S 324 and 506 of IPC.) 1. Crl.A.No.695/2012 is filed by appellants (hereinafter referred as 'accused Nos. 1 to 4') against the judgment of conviction for offences punishable under Sections 324 and 506 IPC. Crl.A.No.698/2011 is filed by the State against the judgment of acquittal of accused Nos. 1 to 4 of offences punishable under Sections 326, 341, 1...
High Court of Karnataka, Represented by the Registrar General and Othe ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Referred Case Is Registered As Required Under Section 366 Cr.P.C. For Confirmation Of Death Sentence Awarded To Accused No.10 Syed Mohammed Ibrahim S/O Late Mohammed Ismail By The Xxxiv Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge and Presiding Oficer, Spl. Court, Central Prison Premises, Bangalore By Judgment Of Conviction Dated 21/29-11-2008 In Sc No.696 Of 2005. This Criminal Appeal Is Filed Under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C By The Advocate For The Appellant Praying To Set Aside The Judgment And Order Of Convictions Dated 21.11.2008 And Sentences Dated 29.11.2008 Passed In S.C.No.696/2005, On The File Of 34th Addl. City Civil And Session Judge And P.O Spl.Court For The Trial Of Church Bomb Blast Cases, Central Prison Premises, Bangalore.) 1. A series of bomb blasts at Churches situate at various places rocked the State of Karnataka in the year 2000 attempting to disturb the normal tranquility of the civilized society and the peace loving people of Karnataka who believe in co...
M/S Universal Associates Developers and Promoters Vs. Shri. Bhupat S/O ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURGI BENCH DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA RFA.NO.6007/2012 BETWEEN M/S UNIVERSAL ASSOCIATES DEVELOPERS & PROMOTERS, SUPER MARKET, GULBARGA REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PATNER SHAKEEL AHMED S/O. LAL AHMED SAHEB AGE :57. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. H.No.1-113/6A & 6B, MEHTAB ALI COMPOUND, NEELKANTHA PATIL ROAD, GULBARGA-585101. (BY SRI.JAMBAYYA SWAMI HIREMATH, ADV.) APPELLANT AND : SHRI. BHUPAT S/O. RATILAL CHOUDA, AGE:70. YEAS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. HYDERABAD (AP) THROUGH HIS S.P.A. HOLDER, SHRI. GHANSHYAM CHOUDA S/O. RATILAL CHOUDA, AGE:72. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. MAHAVEER NAGAR, GULBARGA PRESENT ADDRESS :13. CHOUDA CERAMIES54-76/1, M.G. ROAD, 2 OPP. TVS SHOW ROOM SECUNDRABAD-03 RESPONDENT. (BY SRI. SRINIVAS S. SIDHAPURKAR, ADV) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION96OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED1212.2011 PASSED IN O.S. No.92/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE ...
High Court of Karnataka Vs. Syed Mohammed Ibrahim
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 17th day of December, 2014 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR AND THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL RC NO.3 OF2008c/w CRL.A NO.1203 OF2008& CRL.A. NO.24 OF2009CRIMINAL RC NO.3 OF2008BETWEEN:: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR GENERAL BANGALORE ...PETITIONER (By Sri H N NILOGAL, SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR) AND: SYED MOHAMMED IBRAHIM S/O LATE SYED MOHAMMED ISMAIL ...RESPONDENT2THIS CRIMINAL REFERRED CASE IS REGISTERED AS REQUIRED UNDER SECTION366CR.P.C. FOR CONFIRMATION OF DEATH SENTENCE AWARDED TO ACCUSED NO.10 SYED MOHAMMED IBRAHIM S/O LATE MOHAMMED ISMAIL BY THE XXXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE & PRESIDING OFICER, SPL. COURT, CENTRAL PRISON PREMISES, BANGALORE BY JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION DATED2129-11-2008 IN SC NO.696 OF2005 CRL.A NO.1203 OF2008BETWEEN: SYED MOHAMMED IBRAHIM S/O LATE SYED MOHAMMED ISMAIL AGED ABOUT45YEARS ACCOUNTS MANAGER M.N.C., VARTHUR BANGALORE CITY (NOW IN JUDICIAL CUS...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »