Karnataka Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chairman Vs. S Arul Selvan
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF NOVEMBER2014R PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B. WRIT APPEAL No.1611/2014 C/W. WRIT APPEAL No.1612/2014(S-DIS ) IN WRIT APPEAL NO.1611/2014 BETWEEN :1. Chairman, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, 15/1, Cubbon Road, Bangalore-560 001.2. Mr. P. Soundara Rajan, Aged about 61 years, Retired Managing Director & Disciplinary Authority, Helicopter Complex, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Vimanapura Post, Bangalore-560 017. ... APPELLANTS (By Sri S.S. Ramdas, Senior Counsel along with Sri. Abhilash Raju, Adv and Sri. Kamalacharan S.R. Adv. for M/s. Sundaraswamy & Ramdas, Advs.) 2 AND :1. S Arul Selvan S/o O Sivaraman Aged about 52 years, A001, Hemanth Orange, VI Cross, Vignan Naar, Bangalore-560 075.2. Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Defence, DHQ P.O. South Block, New Delhi-110 011. RESPONDENTS (By Sri S Arul Selvan, Party in person for R1, Sri Naveen Cha...
Rathnamma Vs. State Of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-11-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Govt. Order Dated 18.9.2014 Passed By The R-1 Vide Ann-A. Grant An Interim Order To Stay The Order Dated 18.9.2014 At Ann-A Passed By The R-1 and Etc.,) 1. Petitioner, when elected as 'Upadhyaksha' of the 2nd respondent Grama Panchayat is said to have illegally done away with four pipes belonging to Grama Panchayat to 'Devastanada Gudigowdaru' by creating Minutes of Meeting dated 26.12.2011, following which a notice was issued, to show cause as to why she should not be removed from the Membership of Grama Panchayat on charges of misconduct in terms of section 48[4] and 43A of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, for short 'Act'. 2. Petitioner responded to the show cause notice by a reply stating that the four pipes were handed over to Grama Panchayat by A. Nagaraj, Junior Engineer, Kadur, in charge of the pipeline work in Ward No.1 of Hirenellur Grama Panchayat limits, statin...
Rajesh @ Venkatesha @ Raja @ Raju Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-11-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal Is Filed Under Section 374 Cr.P.C. Praying To Set Aside The Judgment And Order Of Conviction And Sentence Dated: 30.03.2009/02.04.2009 Passed By District And Sessions Judge, Kodagu, Madikeri And Incharge Presiding Officer Of Fast Track Court, Madikeri In Sessions Case No.58/2oo6-Convicting The Appellant/Accused For The Offence P/U/S 376 (2)(F), 323 And 506 (Ii) Of Ipc, And The Appellant/Accused Sentenced To Undergo: 1. For Having Committed An Offence P/U/S 376 (2) (F) The Appllant/Accused Is Sentenced To Undergo R.I. For Ten Years Amd Also To Pay Fine Of Rs.35,000-00 (Rupees Thirty Five Thousand Only). 2. For Having Committed An Offence P/U/S 323 Of Ipc, The Appellant/Accused Sentenced To Undergo S.I. For A Period Of Six Months. 3. And For Having Committed An Offence P/U/S 506(Ii) Of Ipc, The Appellant/Accused Sentenced Undergo S.T. For A Period Of Six Months.) 1. This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374 Cr.P.C. by the Advocate for the appellant pra...
Rathnamma Vs. State Of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-11-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Govt. Order Dated 18.9.2014 Passed By The R-1 Vide Ann-A. Grant An Interim Order To Stay The Order Dated 18.9.2014 At Ann-A Passed By The R-1 and Etc.,) 1. Petitioner, when elected as 'Upadhyaksha' of the 2nd respondent Grama Panchayat is said to have illegally done away with four pipes belonging to Grama Panchayat to 'Devastanada Gudigowdaru' by creating Minutes of Meeting dated 26.12.2011, following which a notice was issued, to show cause as to why she should not be removed from the Membership of Grama Panchayat on charges of misconduct in terms of section 48[4] and 43A of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, for short 'Act'. 2. Petitioner responded to the show cause notice by a reply stating that the four pipes were handed over to Grama Panchayat by A. Nagaraj, Junior Engineer, Kadur, in charge of the pipeline work in Ward No.1 of Hirenellur Grama Panchayat limits, statin...
Basappa Vs. The State Of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-11-2014
(Prayer: This W.P. Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The General Award Dtd 30.12.2013 Passed By The R-3 Which Is Produced At Annx-D To The Writ Petition In So Far Petitioner's Property In Sy No.63/2 Admeasuring About 22 Guntas Situtated At Kurgal Village, Vemgal Hobu, Kolar Taluk And District Is Concerned.) 1. The petitioner is before this Court assailing the general award dated 30.12.2013 impugned at Annexure-C to the petition. The petitioner also seeks for issue of directions to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners m terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act (for short 'KIAD' Act). 2. This petition lies in a narrow compass, only on the issue relating to the payment of compensation to the petitioners and the acquisition per se is not under challenge. The details of the lands acquired from the petitioner in urgal village, Vemgal Hobli, Kolar Taluk and District, is also not in dispute. 3. Th...
Rajesh @ Venkatesha @ Raja @ Raju Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-11-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE11H DAY OF NOVEMBER2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE C.R.KUMARASWAMY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.526 OF2009... APPELLANT BETWEEN: RAJESH @ VENKATESHA @ RAJA @ RAJU S/O LATE NAGARAJA AGED27YEARS CHETTALLI KANDAKERE VILLAGE NOW R/AT CHEMBEBELLOOR VILLAGE VIRAJPET KODAGU DISTRICT. (BY SRI.T.A.KARUMBAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY C.P.I., GONIKOPPAL CIRCLE KODAGU DISTRICT. (BY SRI.K.R.KESHAVAMURTHY, ADDITIONAL SPP) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION374CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE3003.2009/02.04.2009 PASSED BY DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KODAGU, MADIKERI AND INCHARGE PRESIDING OFFICER OF FAST TRACK COURT, MADIKERI IN SESSIONS CASE NO.58/2006-CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S ...RESPONDENT DATED:2. 376 (2)(f), 323 AND506(ii) OF IPC, AND THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED SENTENCED TO UNDERGO:1. FOR HAVING COMMITTED AN OFFENCE P/U/S376(2) (f) THE APPLLANT/ACCU...
Lakshmamma Vs. Mahadevamma and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-10-2014
(Prayer: This Rsa Filed U/S. 100 Of Cpc Against The Judgement and Decree Dtd 20.7.07 Passed In R.A.No 2/06 On The File Of The Civil Judge, (Sr.Dn.), T.Narasipura, Allowed The Appeal And Filed Against The Judgement And Decree Dtd 23.12.05 Passed In Os 381/93 On The File Of The Civil Judge (Jr.Dn), T.N.Pura.) 1. Defendant of an original suit bearing O.S.No.381/1993 on the file of the Court of Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, T.Narasipura, Mysore District, is before this Court challenging the divergent judgment passed in R.A.No.2/2006 by the learned Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), T.Narasipura, on 20.07.2007. 2. Suit filed for the reliefs of partition and separate possession by the respondents as plaintiffs in the trial Court came to be partly decreed. Against the said judgment and decree, plaintiffs preferred an appeal under Section 96 of CPC insofar as it relates to the rejection of relief pertaining to item No.1. The said appeal came to be allowed and as such, suit has been decreed in its entirety...
Rajeshwari @ Vanamala Vs. Srishail and Another
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Nov-10-2014
(Prayer: This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed U/S. 173(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act praying to against the Judgment and award dated 25.09.2012 passed in MVC No.582/2010 on the file of the II Addl. Senior Civil Judge and M.A.C.T at Gulbarga, partly allowing the claim Petition and seeking enhancement of compensation.) 1. By consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties the appeal is heard and disposed of finally at the stage of admission. 2. The appellant having sustained certain injuries in a road traffic accident filed a claim petition in MVC.No.582/2010 before MACT at Gulbarga, seeking compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act (herein after referred to as MV Act for short) from the owner and the insurer of the offending vehicle. 3. The Tribunal by the impugned judgment and award has awarded a sum of Rs.4,81,128/- with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of petition till the date of realisation. Aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded by the Trib...
Regional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Others Vs. Latha ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-10-2014
(Prayer: This MFA is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the judgment and award dated 17.4.2008 passed in MVCNo.4487/2005 on the file of the XIX Addl.Judge, Court of Small Causes,, Member, MACT, Metropolitan Area, Bangalore, (SCCH-No.7), awarding a compensation of Rs.22,76,000/ - with interest @ 6% P.A. from the date of petition till deposit. This MFA is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act, against the judgment and award dated 17.4.2006 passed in MVC.No.4487/2005 on the file of XIX Additional SCJ and Member, MACT, Bangalore, SCCH-17, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.) 1. These two appeals arise out of the Judgment and award passed by the MACT, Bangalore, in MVC No.4487/2005 dated 17th April, 2006. MFA No.8987/2008 is filed by the Insurance Company challenging the liability and so also the quantum of compensation awarded by the tribunal. MFA 9600/2008 is filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of the compensation be...
Regional Manager Vs. Smt Latha Jagannathan
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-10-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF NOVEMBER2014PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.8987 OF2008MV) C/W MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.9600 OF2008MV) MFA.NO.8987/2008: BETWEEN: Regional Manager United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Shankarnarayana Building, M.G.Road, Bangalore 560 001 By its Manager. APPELLANT (By Sri O.Mahesh, Advocate) AND:1. Smt.Latha Jagannathan W/o Jagannathan Aged about 53 years 2 2. T.T.Jagannathan Aged about 61 years S/o T.T.Narashiman Both R/at No.5/13,. Burton Road Cross, Bangalore 560 025.3. M/s.T.T.K.LIG Limited No.6, Cathedral Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 086. RESPONDENTS (By Sri T.N.Raghupathy, Advocate for R1 & R2 Smt.N.S.Sandhya, Advocate for R3) ***** This MFA is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the judgment and award dated 17.4.2008 passed in MVC.No.4487/2005 on the file of the XIX Addl.Judge, Court of Small Causes, Member, MACT, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »