Karnataka Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
United India Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Jayesh Arodi and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
(Prayer: This MFA Filed U/S 173(1) Of MV Act Against The Judgment And Award Dated: 2.7.2008 Passed In MVC No. 406/2006 On The File Of The Vii Addl. Judge, Court Of Small Causes, Member, MACT, Metropolitan Area, Bangalore, (Scch.No.3), Awarding A Compensation Of Rs. 21,38,000/- With Interest @ 6% P.A From The Date Of Petition Till Deposit.) 1. This appeal is by the United India Insurance Company questioning the liability saddled or the Company by the MACT, Bangalore, dated 02.07.2008 in MVC No.406/2006. 2. Heard Mr.Seetharama Rao, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Mr.S.P.Shankar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent No.2. Mr.S.V.Prakash, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1. 3. The facts leading to this appeal are as hereunder: The ciaimant-Jayesh Arodi, an employee of M/s.Concorde Motors (India) Pvt. Ltd, was travelling in a vehicle (Tata Sumo) bearing No.KA-01-TC-311 on N.H.4 road from Bangalore to Tumkur, which vehicle met with an accident on 15.08.2005...
Bank of Baroda Vs. ING Vysya Bank Ltd. Formerly known as Vysya Bank Lt ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
(Prayer: Revision Petition is filed under S.115, CPC praying to set aside the order dated 20.7.2013 in Ex.Petn.1576/2009 by the 19th Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore.) The revision is filed by the Bank of Baroda having its head office at Baroda and corporate office at Mumbai challenging the order passed by the 19th Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore in Ex.No.1576/2009 dismissing the execution petition as barred by limitation. The decree holder is represented by the General Manager, Bank of Baroda. The Court of Justice Queens Bench of London passed a decree on 20th February, 1995 in favour of the decree holder bank against the respondent Bank for recovery of amount of about 12,78,909.26 US $ and cost of 1,80,867.15 pounds with interest at 8% per annum from the decree holder by the judgment debtor on account of the negotiation and discount by the decree holder of the letter of credit issued by the judgment debtor. After service of summons on the respondent, it h...
United Inida Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Mr Jayesh Arodi S/O a.m.kamakalakar
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF NOVEMBER2014PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH MFA.NO.10910/2008 (MV) BETWEEN: UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD., RICHMOND ROAD BRANCH, BANGALORE-25, THROUGH ITS REGIONAL OFFICE, # 25, SHANKARANARAYANA BUILDINGS, M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001, REPTD BY ITS MANAGER, SRI.M.GOPINATHA RAO. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI B C SEETHARAMA RAO, ADV.,) AND1 MR JAYESH ARODI S/O A M KAMAKALAKAR, AGED ABOUT25YEARS, R/OF ARODI MANE, BELLENNE VILLAGE, TALAGUPPA HOBLI, SAGAR TQ., SHIMOGA DIST. PRESENTLY AT NO.2641/4, NANDI NILAYA, 6TH A MAIN, 10TH B CROSS, RPC LAYOUT, 2 VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040.2. M/S CONCORDE MOTORS (INDIA) PVT LTD., (A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT), # 9/8, HOSUR ROAD, DAIRY CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 029, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.3. MR. VENKATESH S/O GADDAIAH, MAJOR, AGED ABOUT37YEARS, R/A MALLANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, YEDIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TQ., HASSAN DIS...
National Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Smt Annapoorna W/O Late Ravi @ Ravi ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014 B E F O R E THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.31134/2011 (GM-AC) BETWEEN: NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., DO-11, NO.64, LALBAGH MISSION ROAD BANGALORE-560 027 BY REGIONAL OFFICE, SUBHARAM COMPLEX, 144, M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001, BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER N.DATTATREYA S/O D.NAGANNA, AGE52YEARS. (BY SRI O.MAHESH, ADV.) AND:1. SMT. ANNAPOORNA AGED ABOUT23YEARS, W/O LATE RAVI @ RAVIKUMAR OCC:HOUSEWIFE.2. KUMARI KAVYA AGED ABOUT3YEARS, D/O LATE RAVI @ RAVIKUMAR. ... PETITIONER3 2 SMT. LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT60YEARS, W/O LATE RAJANNA. SINCE THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IS MINOR, SHE IS REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT. ANNAPOORNA RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN). ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF MACHOCHALLI COLONY, NEAR DAIRY STOP, DASANAPURA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT- 562 123. (BY SRI K.A. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV.) ... RESPONDENTS THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AN...
dr.shrishail Ramakrishna Bijapure Vs. Vidya
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF NOVEMBER2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA RPFC.No.100001/2014 BETWEEN: DR.SHRISHAIL RAMAKRISHNA BIJAPURE, AGE:36. YEARS, OCC: DOCTOR, R/O MORAB, TAL: RAIBAG, DIST: BELGAUM. (BY SRI.SANGRAM S.KULKARNI, ADV.) AND: .. PETITIONER SMT.VIDYA DIVORCED WIFE OF DR. SHRISHAIL BIJAPURE, AGE:34. YEARS, OCC: DOCTOR, R/O C/O SHIR SHIVARAJ DHARMOJI BELAVADI, HOUSE NO.115, VIJAY NAGAR, GOLDEN PARK, HUBLI. .. RESPONDENT (BY SRI.VIJAY MALALI & SRI.SADANAND KALABURGI, ADVS.) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION194) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED2111.2013, IN CRL.MISC.NO.154/2012, ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, HUBLI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION125OF CR.P.C. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:2. ORDER The respondent in Crl.Misc.No.154/2012 on the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Hubli has come u...
The Branch Manager Oriental ins.co.ltd. Vs. Kumar Amit Ashok Jadhav & ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA GULBARGA BENCH DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF NOVEMBER2014PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. SREENIVASE GOWDA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.31891/2013 C/W MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL Nos.31899/2013, 200224/2014, 200225/2014 (MV) IN MFA NO.31891/2013 BETWEEN: The Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd., S.S. Front Road, Bijapur. (By Smt. Preeti Patil Melkundi, Advocate) Appellant AND:1. 2. Kumar Amit Ashok Jadhav Age:9. years, Occ: Student, Kumar Rohit Ashok Jadhav Age:7. years, Occ: Student 2 Both are minors R/by their grandfather M/g respondent-3 Ladappa Shivaram Jadhav 3. Ladappa S/o Shivaram Jadhav Age:66. years, Occ: Nil.4. Mahadevi W/o Ladappa Jadhav Age:61. years, Occ: Nil, All are R/o Neelagoan in Tulajapur Taluka, now residing at Chanegoan in Indi Taluka-586209.5. M/s. Manchukonda Prakasham & Co. 427, Kasegoan, South Solapur taluka Tulajapur road, Solapur-413001. (By Sri Koujalagi C.L., Advocate for R3 & ...
Chairman, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited and Another Vs. S. Arul Selvan ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
(Prayer: These writ appeals are filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in W.Ps. 27374/2013 and 39603/2012 dated 23/6/2014.) C.A.V. Judgment 1. In these writ appeals, the appellants have challenged the legality and correctness of the common order dated 23.6.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge, in W.P. Nos.27374/2013 and 39603/2012 by which the writ petition filed in W.P. No.27374/2013 by respondent No.1 was allowed quashing the order dated 13.6.2013 passed by the enquiring authority, and ordering reinstatement of respondent No.1 into service with all consequential benefits with interest at 9% p.a. from the date of dismissal till the date of reinstatement. In W.P. No.39603/2012, the learned Single Judge has also quashed the transfer order dated 14.9.2012 wherein respondent No.1 was transferred from Bangalore to Koraput Division of the appellant employer ('HAL' for short). 2. Heard the arguments of the learned Senior Counsel appeari...
D.R. Premaleela and Others Vs. D.R. Hanumantha Raju and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
(Prayer: This Regular First Appeal Is Filed Under Section 96 Of CPC, Against The Judgment And Decree Dated 12.04.2013 Passed In O.S.No.7731/2009 On The File Of The Xxv Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, Rejecting The Plaint U/Order 7 Rule 11(B) And (C) CPC.) 1. This appeal is filed by the aggrieved plaintiffs of O.S.No.7731/2009 on the file of the XXV Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, dated 12.04.2013 in rejecting their plaint under Order VII Rule 11(b) and (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure, for non-payment of the court fee. 2. Facts relevant for adjudication of this appeal is: The plaintiffs being the three daughters of one deceased D.Ramaiah Setty, filed a suit for partition against their brother (First defendant) niece and nephews (defendants-2 to 10) for partition of their share in the suit schedule property. They are spinsters. 3. The suit was contested by the defendants. During the pendency of the suit, one of the plaintiffs expired and the defendants-2 to 8 did not a...
Sridhar Punachithaya and Others Vs. State Of Karnataka By Police Inspe ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition Is Filed Under Section 482 Of Cr.P.C. Praying To Quash The Proceedings In C.C.N0.802/2011 On The File Of Prl. C.J. (Jr.Dn.) And Jmfc, Doddaballapura). 1. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking quashing of the entire proceedings in C.C.No.802/2011 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Doddaballapur registered against them for the offence under Section 304A of IPC. 2. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and also the learned High Court Government Pleader. Perused the records. 3. The Doddaballapur Rural Police has registered a case against the petitioners herein for the offence under Section 304A of IPC on the ground that on 5.2.2011 at about 6.30 p.m. in the premises of the factory by name M/s,Hexagon Bio-Pharma Pvt. Ltd., one Sri Arun Kumar was discharging his duty in the II Shift. At that time, there was an explosion of fuse as a result of which he suffered injury to his stomach...
The State of Karnataka, by Drugs Inspector Vs. Kushalchand @ Kushalcha ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-12-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 (1) and (3) of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the State Public Prosecutor for the State praying to grant leave to file an appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 17.12.2011 passed in C.C.No.630/2003 by the Presiding Officer, Special Court for Economic Offences, Bangalore - acquitting the respondent/accused for offences punishable under Sections 18(a)(i), 17-B(e), 18(a)(i) and 18-B, punishable under Sections 27(c), 27(d) and 28-A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.) 1. These appeals are considered together and disposed of by this common judgment. There is a delay of 46 days in filing the criminal appeal in the first of these appeals and there is a delay of 46 days also in filing the second of these appeals. The reasons assigned seeking condonation of delay are identical. For the reasons stated, the delay is condoned in each of these appeals. The appeals are considered on merits, even at this stage. 2. Fro...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »