Karnataka Court October 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
n.jayaramappa Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-28-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARN7ATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE28H OCTOBER, 2014 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5958/2014 BETWEEN N.JAYARAMAPPA S/O LATE S. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT52YEARS, R/AT BHAKTHARAHALLI, JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562105 .... PETITIONER (BY SRI K MUNIRAJAPPA, ADV.,) AND STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CHIKKABALLAPURA TOWN POLICE-562101, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-560001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI NASRULLA KHAN, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO A)SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED3107- 2014 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE PRL.DIST.& S.J., AT CHIKKABALLAPUR IN CR.R.P.NO.49/2014 & ORDER DATED1012-2013 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE2IN JMFC JUDGE (JR.DN.) & C.C.NO.100/2011 AT PRL.CIVIL CHIKKABALLAPUR (PCR no.78/2010) AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S463464,465, 467,420 R/W120(B) OF IPC. B)CONSEQUENTLY THIS PETNR/ACCUSED ...
Sri Mubarak Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-28-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE28h DAY OF OCTOBER2014BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY CRIMINAL APPEAL No.648 OF2009BETWEEN: Sri. Mubarak, Son of Sri. Babu, Aged about 27 years, Occupation: Cycle Shop Owner Resident of: No.490 Ullala Upanagara, Gnanabharathi Post, Bangalore. (By Shri. Amar Correa, Advocate) AND: The State of Karnataka, By Sreerampuram Police Station, Bangalore City. (By Shri. K.R. Keshavamurthy, State Public Prosecutor1) RESPONDENT APPELLANT ***** 2 This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the advocate for the appellant praying to set aside the judgment dated 1.7.2009 in Special Case No.176/2006 passed by the Second Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-17), Bangalore convicting the appellant/accused for the offence punishable under Section 363 of IPC. and sentenced to undergo R.I. for three years and to pay a fine of five thousand rupees and in default of payment ...
Syndicate Bank Vs. R. Bali Reddy
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-28-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE ON THE28H DAY OF OCTOBER2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT APPEAL NO.656 OF2011S-DE) BETWEEN: Syndicate Bank A body constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 Having its Head Office at Manipal 576 119, represented by General Manager (P) Now represented by its Senior Manager(IR). APPELLANT (By Sri Abhilash Raju, Advocate for M/s.Sundaraswamy & Ramadas, Advocates) 2 AND: R.Bali Reddy Aged about 54 years S/o R.Konda Reddy, Earlier Working as Officer, In Junior Management Grade Scale-1 At Syndicate Bank, Regional Officer, Patna since illegally dismissed from Service and residing at House No.6-782/2, Puttaveedhi, Shankarapuram, Cuddapah 561 002. RESPONDENT (By Sri M.Nagaprasanna, Advocate for M/s.P.S.Rajagopal Associates, Advocates) ***** This Writ Appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the o...
Dr Deepak Kumar M M Vs. Dr Poornima S
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-28-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014 B E F O R E THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.39657/2014 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: Dr. DEEPAK KUMAR M.M., S/O SRI MALLIKARJUNA AGED ABOUT37YEARS R/A NO.4060, 8TH CROSS B.I.E.T. MAIN ROAD SIDDAVEERAPPA LAYOUT DAVANAGERE 577 004. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI G. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADV.) AND: Dr. POORNIMA S., W/O. Dr. DEEPAK KUMAR D/O SRI SADASHIVAIAH AGED ABOUT31YEARS R/O NO.75, GANESH KRUPA1T CROSS, 4TH MAIN, J.P. NAGAR8H PHASE BANGALORE-560 076. (BY SMT. GEETHA DEVI M.P., ADV.) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED3004.2014 IN M.C.NO.1018/2012 ON THE FILE ... RESPONDENT2OF THE VI ADDL. PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, AT BANGALORE VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER This writ petition is directed against the order dated 30.04.2014 passed i...
Shrinivas S/O Late G D Krishnappa Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-28-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.358 OF2013BETWEEN: Shrinivas, Son of Late G.D.Krishnappa, Aged about 50 years, Resident of near Neheru Park, Gundlupet Town Pin Code 571 111. (now in judicial custody) (By Shri. Somashekar Kashimath, Advocate) PETITIONER AND: State of Karnataka Through Gundlupet Police, District Chamarajanagar Pin code 571 313. (By Shri. B. Visweswaraiah, Government Pleader) RESPONDENT ***** This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the advocate for the petitioner praying to set aside the order 2 dated 1.2.2013 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagara in Criminal Appeal No.9/2012 and Order dated 7.2.2012 passed by the Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gundlupet in C.C.No.276/2007. made the following: This petition coming on for Admissi...
N. Vishwanatha Kumar and Others Vs. State Of Karnataka and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-27-2014
(Prayer: This Crl.P Is Filed U/S.482 Cr.P.C Praying To Quash The Complaint Filed By Respondent No.2, Consequently Quash The Charge Sheet Registered By Respondent No.1 In C.C.No.735/14 Pending On The File Of The Ii Addl.C.M.M., Bangalore, Against The Petitioners Herein.) 1. Petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 and Respondent No.2 along with their counsels are present before the Court. 2. Both the parties agree that they have entered into a compromise to resolve their dispute in M.C. No.4988/2013 on the file of the IV Additional Principal Judge, Family Court at Bangalore, before the Bangalore Mediation Centre and they have entered into Memorandum of Settlement under Section 89 of C.P.C. 3. The learned counsels have drawn my attention to Paragraph-4 of the compromise petition, wherein the parties have agreed for some terms and by virtue of the said compromise, Respondent No.2 herein has accepted to co-operate with the petitioners' in getting the criminal complaint filed by her in C.C. No.735/2014 pendi...
Rustom Kerawala Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-27-2014
(Prayer: This Crl.P is filed U/S.482 Cr.P.C praying to set aside the Order /Communication dated: 24.7.14 passed in Case No. Mag/Cr/107 Cr.P.C/32/14-15 on his file, Requiring the presence of the petitioner before him in relation to the action initiated by the respondent police U/S 107 of Code of Criminal Procedure and Further be pleased to quash all the proceedings which Came to be recorded subsequent to the appearance of the Petitioner in the Case before the Court.) 1. Heard Sri. C.V.Nagesh, Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.B.T.Venkatesh, learned SPP II, who takes notice for respondent - State. Perused the records. 2. The petitioner has sought for quashing of the entire proceedings in Case No. MAG/CR/(107 CRPC)/32/14-15 dated 24.7.2014 on the file of the Taluka Executive Magistrate ("TEM" for short), Bangalore East Taluk, Krishnarajapura, Bangalore. 3. Sri C.V. Nagesh, learned Senior counsel fairly submitted that though the order of the TEM is revisable, this...
Gowramma Vs. State by Mahila Police
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-27-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the advocate for the appellant praying to set aside the judgment dated 22.6.2009 passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court-V, Mysore, in S.C.No.90/2008 - convicting the appellant/accused for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A) and 304(B) of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and etc;) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned State Public Prosecutor. 2. The present appeal is filed by Accused No.2, in the following background: Accused No.1 Lokesh was said to have been married to Poornima as on 1.11.2005. Poornima was the daughter of Nagamma and it is alleged that though Lokesh and Poornima were reasonably happy as a couple for the first four months of their marriage, it is alleged that thereafter there were constant demands for dowry and that Poornima was subjected to both physical and mental torture calling upon her to fetch more ...
Union of India Vs. G.V. Yaswanth and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-27-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Impugned Order Dt.12.12.2013 Passed In T.A.No.470/2013 By The Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore Bench Vide Annx-E.) 1. Present writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India requesting this Court to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order passed on 12.12.2013 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, in case bearing T.A.No.470/2013 and consequently, to dismiss the said case T.A.No.470/2013. 2. Respondent was applicant before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore Bench. Respondent No.1-Yaswanth G.V. appeared for the Civil Service Examination (CSE) 2009, under the category "Physically Handicapped" (Visually impaired) and secured 107th rank. Hence, his name was recommended as a successful candidate by the Union Public Service Commission in VI sub-category o...
Lilly Mascharanhas Vs. State Of Karnataka Rep. By Its Secretary and Ot ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-27-2014
(Prayer: These Wps. Are Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Call' For The Records Pertaining To The Order Dated 15.1.1997 in Lrt 1401/79-80 From The File Of The Mangalore Taluk Alnd Tribunal As Well As The Entire Records Pertaining To Lrt 5731, 5732/77-78 From The File Of The Mangalore Taluk Land Tribunal, D.K. And On Perusal Of The Same And Set Aside The Amended Order Of Mangalore Taluk Land Tribunal Dated 15.1.1997 In Lrt 1401/79-80 Vide Ann-A and Consequently Declare That The Order Of The 12 Land Tribunal Mangalore Dated 27.10.1981 In The Very Same Lrt 1401/79-80 Vide Ann-D Is Valid And Final And Etc.) 1. Petitioner has assailed order dated 15.1.1997 in LRT No. 1401/79-80, passed by the Land Tribunal, Mangalore Taiuk. The relevant facts of the case are that the petitioner's brother Lawrence Mascaranhas had filed form No.7 seeking grant of occupancy right in respect of the following lands to their respective extents:Sy.No.Extent1-1C10-503A10-801-3...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »