Karnataka Court October 2014 Judgments
M/s. Adinath Electricals Vs. The Assistant General Manager (E.E)-III A ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-31-2014
(Prayer: This Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Impugned Order Passed By The 1st Respondent Vide Annexure-H And Direct The 1st Respondent Not To Implement The Impugned Order Dated 22.09.2014 Vide Annexure-H.) 1. To quash the order dated 22.09.2014, as at Annexure-H, issued by the 1st respondent and asking for a mandamus not to implement the same, this writ petition was filed, by the petitioner, which participated in a tender proceeding, pursuant to the Tender Notice dated 04.02.2014, as at Annexure-B, issued by the 1st respondent, in the matter of supply of various sizes of LT cables at NAC Mumbai. The pre-qualification prescribed in Annexure-B is that the tender must be by the manufacturer or Authorized Dealer of having carried out similar nature of work. Petitioner claiming i-.o be an Authorized Dealer of M/'s. Havells India Limited, based on a Certificate dated 25.02.2014, claiming to be fulfilling the eligibility criteri...
Tag this Judgment!Union Of India, Ministry Of Defence, New Delhi and Others Vs. Minter M ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-31-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Appeal Is Filed Under Section 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition No.37710/1995 Dated 05/09/2001.) 1. The Union of India/ Ministry of Defence is challenging tiie order dated 5th September 2001 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No.37710/1995 whereby the respondent is ordered to be reinstated into service along with consequential service benefits. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred to as per their ranking in the Writ Petition. 3. Briefly stated the facts are: The petitioner was working in Army as 'Kayak' in 841, Light Regiment, 56 APO, Ajmeer. On the allegation that on 17.3.1994 in the midnight at Ajmeer Railway Station, he assaulted a superior officer, he was tried under Court Martial by issuing charge memo dated 8.4.1994. The Commanding Officer conducted Court Martial as prescribed by the procedure under Rule 22 to 24 of the Army Rules ('the Rules' for ...
Tag this Judgment!V. Vinay Patil Vs. D.V. Vijetha
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-31-2014
(Prayer: These petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order- dated 21.06.2014 passed by the Family Court:, Shimoga in M.C.No.130/2012 with respect to the direction to the petitioner to pay temporary alimony of Rs. 10,000/- per month, passed in the order sheet vide Annexure-A.) 1. These writ petitions were filed to quash the direction issued in the order dated 21.06.2014 in M.C. No.130/2012, while allowing I.As.1 and 2 of 2014, by the Judge of Family Court, Shivamogga, to pay Rs. 10,000/- p.m. as temporary alimony, from 01.06.2014, till disposal of the main petition.. 2. The brief facts necessary to decide these writ petitions are as under: The petitioner - husband, married the respondent - wife, on 27.04.2011. On account of estrangement, petitioner filed under S.9 of the Hindu Marriage Act (for short, 'the Act'), M.C.No.1374/2014 in the Family Court, Bengaluru, for restitution of conjugal rights. The respondent filed in the...
Tag this Judgment!Bhavana Ramaprasad Vs. Yadunandan Parthasarathy
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-31-2014
(Prayer: This Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Order Dated 06.08.2014 In M.C. No. 1163/2014 At Annexure-B By The Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore.) 1. This writ petition was filed by the petitioner - wife, being aggrieved by the order dated 06.08.2014 passed in M.C.No.1163/2014, by the Prl. Judge, Family Court, Bangalore. With consent of learned counsel on both sides, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing. 2. Brief facts of the case are that, following the Hindu Vedic rites, the marriage of the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 27.06.2013, at Nijaguna Kalyana Mantapa, Basavanagudi, Bangalore. The marriage was also registered. The respondent - husband, through his power of attorney holder, filed on 11.03.2014, in the Family Court, Bangalore, M.C. No. 1163/2014, under S.12(1)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, 'the H.M. Act') to pass a declaratory decree that the marriage is null an...
Tag this Judgment!Bharathi S. Prabhu Vs. State Of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-31-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition (Hc) Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Impugned Order Of Detention Passed By The 2nd Respondent Vide Order No.Hd 220 Sst 2014 Dated 03.05.2014 Produced As Annexure-A And Set At Liberty The Detenue Sri Sreedhar @ Sreedhar Prabhu.) 1. This petition is filed by the wife of the detenue Sri.Shridhar @ Shridhara Prabhu against the order of detention passed by the 2nd respondent dated 3.5.2014. 2. The case of the petitioner is, her husband Sri.Shridhar @ Shridhara Prabhu was arrested on 19.3.2014 in lieu of an order passed by the 3rd respondent under Sections 12(1) and 13 of the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders, Gamblers, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum- Grabbers Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), to detain him for a period of 12 months from the date of order, in Belgaum Central Jail. 3. Sri.Rahamathulla Shariff, learned Counsel appearing for th...
Tag this Judgment!Bhavana Ramaprasad Vs. Yadunandan Parthasarathy
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-31-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014 B E F O R E THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.40037/2014 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: BHAVANA RAMAPRASAD AGED ABOUT23YEARS, D/O. SRINIVASACHAR RAMAPRASAD, W/O. YADUNANDAN PARTHASARATHY, R/AT NO.185/24, DEVANATHACHAR STREET, 5TH MAIN, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE -560 018. (BY SRI A. RAVISHANKAR, ADV.) AND: YADUNANDAN PARTHASARATHY AGED ABOUT26YEARS, S/O. R. PARTHASARATHY, R/AT4265 148TH AVE NE, APT C207, BELLEVUE, WA-98007, USA. REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER R. PARTHASARATHY, S/O. RAJAGOPALAN S., C/O. RAGHUPATHY, NO.916, 1ST "A" MAIN ROAD, ... PETITIONER24TH CROSS, BSK3D STAGE, 3RD PHASE, 3RD BLOCK, BANGALORE-560 085. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI M.V.V. RAMANA, ADV.) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED0608.2014 IN M.C.NO.1163/2014 AT ANNEXURE-B BY THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE. THIS PETITION COMIN...
Tag this Judgment!sri.vinay patil.V Vs. smt.d.v.vijetha
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-31-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014 B E F O R E THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION Nos.37216/2014 & 39054/2014 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: Sri Vinay Patil V., S/o. Mr.Vishwanath Patil, Aged about 34 years, No.128, 13th Cross, Pavamana Nagar, Kembattahalli Main Road, Near Gottigere, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore 560 083. ...PETITIONER (By Sri V.B.Siddaramaiah, Adv.) AND: Smt. D.V. Vijetha, Daughter of D.N. Vivek, Wife of Mr.Vinay Patil V., Aged about 29 years, R/at 5th Cross, Ravindranagar, Shimoga City, Shimoga 577 201. Working in IDEA Cellular Store, Talk Time Devangi Complex, 2 Opp: Daivagna Kalyana Mandir, Jail Circle, Shivamogga 577 201. RESPONDENT (By Sri Sateesh Chandra.K.V., Adv.,) These petitions are filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated 21.06.2014 passed by the Family Court, Shimoga in M.C.No.130/2012 with respect to the direction to the petitioner to pay ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Adinath Electricals Vs. The Assistant General Manager (e.e)-iii
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-31-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014 B E F O R E THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.49455/2014 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/s. ADINATH ELECTRICALS BUILDING NO.5, SHOP NO.8 1ST FLOOR , S.V. LANE, 3RD CROSS CHICKPET, BANGALORE-560 053 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETRESS SMT. REKHA SHIYAL, D/O. MANIKCHAND AGED ABOUT40YEARS. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI VITTALA SHETTY P., ADV.) AND:1. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (E.E)-III AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, MUMBAI, OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, OPP. PARASIWADA SAHAR ROAD, VILE PARLE (E) MUMBAI 400 099.2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION, ARABINDO MARG, OPP. SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT3 4.5. 2 NEW DELHI 110 003. THE CHAIRMAN, AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, RAJIV GANDHI BHAVAN, SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI 110 003. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR HAVELLS INDIA LTD., 5TH FLOOR, THE ESTATE NO.21, DICKNSON ROAD, BANGALORE-560 042. THE AGM (ENGG. ELECT.) JUHU AIRPORT, MUMBAI-400 056. ... RESPON...
Tag this Judgment!G.N. Hanumanthaiah Vs. Patel Narasegowda and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
(Prayer: This R.S.A. is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 4.1.2006 passed in R.A. No.235/2005 (Old No.64/93) on the file of the Presiding Officer, FTC-V, Tumkur, partly allowing the appeal and modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 29.06.1993 passed in O.S.No.67/86 on the file of the Prl. Munsiff, Madhugiri.) 1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant-plaintiff being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 4.1.2006 passed by the Fast Track Court-V at Tumkur in R.A. No.235/2005, whereby the first appellate court has partly allowed the appeal and modified the impugned judgment and decree dated 29.6.1993 passed in O.S. No.67/1986 by the learned Principal Judge (Jr. Dn.), Madhugiri. 2. The facts leading to the filing of this case are that appellant-plaintiff filed the aforesaid suit before the trial Court for the relief of declaration that he is the owner of the suit schedule property and also for permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his ...
Tag this Judgment!Tippu Khan and Others Vs. The State By Bytrayanpura Police
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
(Prayer: A Crl.P Filed U/S.439 Cr.P.C By The Advocate For The Petitioner Praying That This Hon'ble Court May Be Pleased To Enlarge The Petr. On Bail In Crime No.40/14 Of Byatarayanapura P.S., Bangalore City, And Now In C.C.No.10944/14, For The Offences P/U/S 143, 144, 147, 148, 341, 323, 302 And 120(B) R/W 149 Of Ipc And Etc. Crl.P Filed U/S.439 Cr.P.C By The Advocate For The Petitioner Praying That This Hon'ble Court May Be Pleased To Enlarge The Petr. On Bail In Crime No.40/14 Of Byatrayanapura P.S., Bangalore City, For The Offences P/U/S 302 Of Ipc. Crl.P Filed U/S.439 Cr.P.C By The Advocate For The Petitioner Praying That This Hon'ble Court May Be Pleased To Enlarged On Bail In Byatrayanapura P.S., Bangalore City In Crime No.40/2014 U/S 143,144,147,148,341, 323, 302, 120(B) R/W 149 Of Ipc Now C.C.No.10944/2014 Of Acmm-Iii Court, Bangalore And Etc. Crl.P Filed U/S.439 Cr.P.C By The Advocate For The Petitioner Praying That This Hon'ble Court May Be Pleased To Enlarged On Bail In Byat...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »