Karnataka Court January 2014 Judgments
Sri. B. V. Ramakrishna and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka and Other ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
(These Writ Appeals are filed under Section 4 of +he Karnataka High Court Act, praying to set aside the Order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition Nos.32823-835/2013 dated 18/11/2013. These Writ Appeals coming on for Preliminary Hearing, this day, N.K. Patil J., delivered the following:) 1. The appellants, questioning the correctness or otherwise of the order impugned passed by the learned Single Judge, in Writ Petition Nos.32823-835/2013 dated 18th November 2013, have presented these writ appeals. In the said v%Tit petitions, the appellants herein had sought for quashing the Notification dated 15th July, 2013 issued by second respondent vide Annexure A to the writ petitions, as without authority of law. 2. The said writ petitions were dismissed, following the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 15th July 2013 in Writ Petition Nos.25964- 967/2013. Being aggrieved by the dismissal of the writ petitions by the learned Single Judge, the appellants have presented ...
Tag this Judgment!Mysore City Corporation and Another Vs. M. S. Pushpavalli and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Appeals are filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, praying to set aside the Order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition Nos. 17882-95/2012 dated 10/09/2012.) N.K. Patil. J: 1. The appellants, questioning the correctness or otherwise of the order impugned passed by the learned Single Judge, in Writ Petition Nos. 17882-95/2012 dated 10th September 2012, have presented these writ appeals. In the said writ petitions, the respondents herein had sought for quashing of 14 endorsements all dated 18th January 2012, issued by appellants herein, vide Annexure F to F13, produced along with the writ petitions. 2. The said writ petitions were disposed of, with a direction to the appellants herein to consider the materials placed by the respondents herein and if complaint with Section 114 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, to forthwith record the names of the respondents in the Tax Assessment Registers in respect of the properties in q...
Tag this Judgment!Muthaiah Vs. State of Karnataka Rep. by Its State Public Prosecutor Hi ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
(Prayer: This Appeal Is Filed Under Section 374 Cr.P.C., Against The Judgment Dated 30.07.2007, Passed By The Ad-Hoc District and Sessions Judge and Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Ramanagaram, In S.C.No.307/2005 - Convicting The Appellant/Accused For Offences Punishable Under Sections 498(A) and 306 Ipc and Etc.) 1. The appellant (hereinafter referred to as accused) was tried and convicted for offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC. Therefore, he is before this court. 2. I have heard Sri.Somashekar Harvi, learned counsel for accused and learned Government Advocate for the State. 3. It is the case of prosecution that deceased Gowramma was married to accused about 8 years prior to 07.10.2001. She was living in the house of accused in Arekadakalu village within the limits of Harohalli Police Station. The accused and deceased were living happily for a period of 4 - 5 years. They have two children by their marriage. Thereafter, the accused was addicted to alcohol. He was...
Tag this Judgment!V. Chandra Manikyavelu Since Deceased by Lrs and Others Vs. Indira Viv ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Direct The Trial Court To Take Up Lac 83/1987 Vide Annx-C) For Early Hearing To Consider Enhancement Of Compensation U/S 18 Of The Land Acquisition Act and Dispose Of The Case On Merits At The Earliest With Specified Time Limits.) 1. The limited prayer of the petitioners is to the effect that they have reached a ripe old age and it is one of the concerns on which the present petition is filed. 2. It is their case that they are land owners whose lands have been acquired for extension of Mahalakshmi Residential Layout under a notification of the year 1977. The amounts awarded as compensation were disputed and were resolved at a Mediation and an agreement was filed in that regard. Thereafter the award amount having been deposited, the petitioners have sought for enhancement of the compensation. 3. Insofar as the entitlement is concerned, respondents 1 and 2 have resisted the claim and t...
Tag this Judgment!Sundaramma and Others Vs. M.P. Manjegowda and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
(Prayer: This MFA is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the judgment and award dated 01.03.2011 passed in MVC No.77/2011 on the file of presiding officer, Fast Track Court, Channarayapatna partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.) 1. This appeal is by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation against the award passed by the Fast Track Court, Channarayapatna in MVC No.77/2011 dated 01.03.2011 and also challenging the finding of Tribunal with respect to dismissal of case against the Insurance Company of auto rickshaw “ respondent No.4 as not liable. 2. The brief facts of the case are as follows: "On 16.04.2008 around 3.00 p.m. when the deceased Narasimhegowda @ Chandru was returning to his village from Channarayapatna in an auto rickshaw bearing registration No.KA-18-7853 near Mattanavile, he met with an accident due to the negligence on the part of driver of the canter lorry bearing registration No.KA-13-A-2175,...
Tag this Judgment!T. Rajakumar Naik and Another Vs. the Assistant Commissioner, Chitradu ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
(Prayer: These petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the 1st respondent to consider the representation dated 17.1.2014 given by the petitioners as Annexure-F and direct the 1st respondent to adjourn the vote of confidence/No Confidence Motion vide Annexure-C dated 20.01.2014 which is fixed by the 1st respondent and to be fixed to fresh date for vote of confidence/No Confidence Motion.) ORDER 1. Respondent No.4 is a Grama Panchayat. It has 18 members. Petitioners were elected as members of the 4th respondent during May 2010. Smt. Thimmakka was elected as the President and Sri. Parameshwarappa K.E., was elected as Vice President of the 4th respondent “ Kanchipura Grama Panchayat on 29.06.2010. On 30.12.2013, 14 members of the Panchayat, including the petitioners, presented a notice before the 1st respondent, with an intention to move a Motion of No-Confidence against the President - Smt. Thimmakka. The 1st respondent gave not...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Kingfisher Airlines Ltd., Represented by Company Secretary Bharat ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-18-2014
(Prayer: These Criminal Petitions Are Filed Under Section 482 Cr.Pc With A Prayer To Quash Proceedings Initiated By Spl.Court For Economic Offences, Bangalore In C.C.No.49/2013, C.C.No.77/2013 and C.C.No.78/2013 Against The First And Second Petitioners.) Nagamohan Das, J. 1. In these three petitions the petitioners have prayed for quashing the proceedings in C.C. No. 49/2013, 77/2013 and 78/2013 on the file of Special Court (Economic Offences), Bangalore City. 2. The parties are same in all the three petitions. The respondent filed three cases before the Economic Offences Court against the petitioners for the financial years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 for the offences punishable under Section 276-B read with Section 278-B of Income Tax Act. 3. Petitioner No. 1 is a registered company engaged in the business of operating passenger air lines in India. Petitioner No. 2 is the Chairman and Managing Director of petitioner No. 1 company responding for the day-to-day business of the company...
Tag this Judgment!Chaluve Gowda @ Chikkonu Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-18-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the preliminary notification dated 13.6.2005, issued under Section 28(1) of the KIAD Act issued by the first respondent published in the Karnataka Gazette on 15.6.2005 vide Annexure-A and final notification issued under Section 28(4) of KIAD Act dated 29.1.2007 published in the Karnataka Gazette on 29.1.2007 vide Annexure-B so far as the petitioner's land is concerned vide bearing Sy.No.41 of Pura (BE) village, Belagola Hobli, Srirangapatna Taluk, Mandya District, measuring 1 acre 33 guntas.) 1. The petitioner is said to be the absolute owner of the property bearing Sy.no. 41 measuring 1 acre and 33 guntas, at 3 Pura village, Srirangapatna Taluk, Mandya District. It is stated that the land in Sy.no.41 originally comprised of 5 acres and 25 guntas. It transpires that by virtue of a partition in the family, the petitioner has acquired the limited extent above. The remaining exte...
Tag this Judgment!Smst Transport, Represented by Its Proprietor Ameersab and Others Vs. ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-18-2014
(Prayer: These Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Order Dated 1.7.2010 Issued By The 3rd Respondent At Annexure-B, Quash The Corrigendum-Ii Dated 31.8.2010 Issued By The 3rd Respondent Vide Annexure-E And Declare That The State Is Devoid Of Power To Collect Toll Fee/ Road Tax On Lorries Carrying Iron Ore Only. These Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Government Order Dated 1.7.2010 Passed By The 1st Respondent Vide Annexure-B, The Corrigendum Dated 31.8.2010 Issued By The 1st Respondent Vide Annexure-D And The Government Order Dated 4.9.2010 Passed By The 1st Respondent Vide Annexure-E And All Further Proceedings Thereto, In So Far As The Petitioner Is Concerned. This Petition Is Filed Under Article 226 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Government Order Dated 1.7.2010 Passed By The 1st Respondent Vide Annexure-B, The Corrigendum Dated 31.8.2010 ...
Tag this Judgment!H. Venkataramana Vs. the State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
(This WP Is Filed Under Article 226 Of Constitution Of India Praying To Set Aside The Order Dt. 12.9.13 Made In Application No.7238/11, Produced At Ann-C As The Same Is Illegal and Violative Of Articles 14, 16 and 21 Of The Constitution Of Inida % Grant Consequential Benefits Upon Quashing Of The Order Produced At Ann-C And Etc,, This Petition Coming On For Preliminary Hearing This Day, S.Abdul Nazeer J., Made The Following:) 1. This writ petition is directed against the order in Application No.7238/2011 dated 12.9.2013, whereby the Kamataka Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore, has rejected the application of the petitioner consequential benefits like arrears of salary, increments, seniority and other benefits. 2. The petitioner was appointed as a Cook m the Community Health Centre at Sullia by an order dated 19.3.1988. He had reported for duty w.e.f. 21.3.1988. The Medical Officer terminated his services as per the order dated 18,7 1996. The petitioner challenged the said order by fili...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »