Karnataka Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.V. Lalitha Vs. the Bruhat Bangalore Development Authority, Represent ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
(This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the endorsement Annexure-A dated 4.3.2011 issued by the respondent-BDA; direct the respondents to conduct the survey of the lands bearing Sy. Nos. 114, 115 and 117 of Mathikere Village, Kasaba Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, now called Rajamahal Vilas II Stage and earmark the vacant sites and direct the respondents to allot a site in the layout formed by the BDA in Raj Mahal Vilas II Stage, pursuant to the resolution dated 26.6.1984.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The facts of the case briefly stated are as follows: The petitioner was said to be the absolute owner of lands bearing Sy.Nos.114, 115 and 117 of Mathikere Village, Bangalore North Taluk. The lands in Mathikere, Chikkamaranahalli, Dyavasandra, Nagashetty Halli, Lotte Gollahalli, Geddalahalli and Vyalikaval Villages were notified for acquisition, for the formation of the R...
Smt. C. Shilpa Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by Its Secretary ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
The petitioner was appointed as the Junior Engineer by the second respondent on probation as per the order dated 06.10.2005 and placed at the disposal of the third respondent. The third respondent in turn posted the petitioner to work under different Town Municipal Councils. Though she had worked for over a period of seven years, her probation was not declared. On the basis of the report of the third respondent, the second respondent has discharged the petitioner from service as per the order at Annexure-A dated 26.7.2012. The petitioner has called in question the validity of the said order in this writ petition. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would contend that the report submitted by the third respondent to the second respondent for discharge of the petitioner contains stigmatic statements. The second respondent without holding an enquiry has passed the order discharging the petitioner from service. The said order is not a discharge simplicitor. Therefore, the second responden...
Divisional Manger National Insurance Co. Ltd., Represented by Its Admi ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
(Prayer: MFA filed U/S 30(1) of W.C. Act against the Judgment and award dt:24.09.2008 passed in W.C.Cr.No.124/2006 on the file of the Labour Officer nd Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Gulbarga partly allowing the claim petiion for compensation and awarding compensation of Rs..1,00,800/- @ 12% P.A. after 30 days from the date of order.) 1. Aggrieved by the Judgment and award passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation the Insurer has filed the present appeal questioning its liability to satisfy the award. 2. The case sought to be made out is that the claimant was working as a labourer in the tractor and trailer bearing No.KA-33:1119-1120. That on 10-2-2006 the driver of the tractor trailer drove the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner and suddenly applied brakes due to which the claimant fell down from the trailer and sustained grievous injuries. That the injuries sustained by the claimant arose during the course of employment. The injuries have resulted in permanent...