Karnataka Court July 2012 Judgments
K. Gopala and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka by Women Police Station, Shi ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-03-2012
(Prayer: This Criminal Revision petition is filed under Section 397 read with 401 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, by the advocate for the petitioners praying that this Honble Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 19.3.2010 passed by the Principal, Sessions Judge, Shimoga in Criminal Revision Petition No.16/2010 (arising out of Crime No.125/2009 of Women Police Station, Shimoga) and further confirm the order dated 7.12.2009 passed by the Judicial magistrate First Class-II, Shimoga, in Cr.No.1742/2009.)1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader.2. The present petition is filed by the accused, who had initially obtained bail before the Court of the Magistrate when there were allegations of commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A and 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the IPC, for brevity) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. However, the same was question...
Tag this Judgment!Narendra D.V. Gowda and ors. Vs. Vineet JaIn and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-03-2012
DILIP B. BHOSALE J.1. Three advocates practicing in this Court have instituted a Contempt of Court Case (Criminal) (for short "the petition") against the alleged contemnors - accused nos.1 to 4 (for short "the accused"). Accused no.1 is Chairman and Managing Director of Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. Accused no.2 is Chairperson and Editorial Director of Hindustan Times India Ltd. Accused nos.3 & 4 are Reporter and Editor-in-Chief respectively of a daily news paper "Kannada Prabha". The only prayer made in the petition reads thus:"WHEREFORE, the complainant respectfully prays that this Honourable Court be pleased to frame the charge and punish accused nos.1 to 4 for committing criminal contempt of this Honourable High Court and allow the above petition in the interest of justice."2. The petitioners before filing this petition, on 3.4.2012 had submitted a memorandum under section 15 (1) (b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, (for short the Act) read with Article 215 of the Constitution of...
Tag this Judgment!Chikkasiddappa and anr. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-02-2012
(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned endorsements as per Annexures A and B and etc.)1. In these cases, the petitioners have challenged the validity of the endorsements at Annexures A and B dated 8.2.2011 and 11.5.2011 respectively, whereby their applications for reconveyance of site No.244-A, West of Chord Road, First Stage, First Block, Industrial Town, Rajajinagar Extension, Bangalore, has been rejected.2. The petitioners contend that they had purchased the aforesaid site under a registered sale deed dated 1.7.1974 from one Smt.Girija Devi. The said site was formed in Sy.No.115/3, Saneguruvanahalli, Yeshwanthapura, Bangalore North Taluk. The entire Sy.No.115/3 was included in the reconveyance scheme formulated by the erstwhile CITB as per its resolutions dated 26.12.1974 and 25.3.1975. Therefore, the petitioners made applications requesting the 2nd respondent to reconvey the site in question in t...
Tag this Judgment!H.D. Chandrappa and ors. Vs. Smt. Hanumakka and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-02-2012
(Prayer: This M.F.A. is filed u/S 173(1) of M.V.Act against the judgment and award dated 26.12.2008 passed in M.V.C. No.674/2005 (old No.596/2003) on the file of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-1, Davangere.)1. This appeal is filed questioning the legality and correctness of the judgment and award dated 26.12.2008 passed by the Addl. M.A.C.T. and Presiding Officer, FTC-1, Davangere, in M.V.C.No.674/2005.2. The appellant was arrayed as respondent No.3 before the trial court. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein were the claimants while respondent Nos.3 and 4 herein had been arrayed as respondent Nos. 1 and 2 before the tribunal.3. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein would be referred during the course of this judgment according to their ranking before the tribunal.4. The claimants-petitioners filed the claim petition under Section 166 of the M.V.Act seeking compensation of Rs.10 lakhs for the death of their son Shivarudrappa in the motor vehicle accident that occurred at...
Tag this Judgment!ikramuddIn and Another Vs. Gurulingappa and Others
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jul-02-2012
(Prayer: This CRP is filed U/S. 115 of CPC, praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S. No.12/2003 dated 9/7/2010 by the Karnataka Wakf Tribunal Gulbarga Division Gulbarga.) 1. The petitioners herein filed O.S. No.12/2003 on the file of the Karnataka Wakf Tribunal, Gulbarga Division Gulbarga seeking judgment and decree of perpetual injunction against the defendants, restraining them from putting up any construction over the suit property. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to by their respective rank as arrayed before the Tribunal in the original suit. 3. The plaintiffs inter-alia contending amongst other contentions that they are the persons interested in the subject matter of the suit contending that the respondents/defendants are interfering with the said property which is meant for Burial Ground of Muslims which is also declared as Wakf property, filed the said suit. 4. Further it is also contended by the plaintiffs that they instituted ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›