Karnataka Court July 2012 Judgments
Venkatesh, Bangalore. Vs. State by Siddapura Police.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
(Prayer: This Crl.R.P. is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the order passed by the FTC-VI, Bangalore in S.C.No.801/2010 dated 10.12.2010 for the offence punishable under Ss.364, 365, 302 and r/w 120-B and consequently the petitioner may be discharged from the case.)1. This petition is directed against an order dated 10.12.2010 passed in S.C.No.801/2010 by the learned Fast Track Judge-VI, Bangalore city, holding that there are materials against accused No.9/petitioner herein, to proceed with the matter by framing charges for the offences punishable u/s 364, 365, 302, 201 and 120-B IPC.2. Material facts of the case are:On 8.10.2009, one Smt. Shilpa Krishna, lodged a complaint at Siddapura Police Station, alleging that, her mother Smt. Padma Krishna W/o. Sri Krishna Kutti, is missing. The police registered a woman missing case in Crime No.319/2009. On 13.10.2009, police received a further complaint from Smt. Shilpa Krishma/CW-1 and registered a case in Crime No...
Tag this Judgment!Venkatagiriyaiah, Bangalore Dist. Vs. Shivalingamma and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
(Prayer: This Writ Appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, prays that this Honble Court be pleased to set aside the order of the learned Single Judge dated 22.08.2007 passed in W.P. No.12962/1997; dismiss W.P.No.12962/1997.)1. The legality and correctness of the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No.12962/1997 dated 22nd August 2007 is called in question in this appeal.2. Heard Mr. T.R. Subbanna, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.7 and 8.3. The fact leading to this appeal are as hereunder:The appellant claiming to be the tenant of 0.35 guntas of land in Sy.No.19 of Hagalahalli Village under late Mallaiah filed Form No.7 before the Land Tribunal, Ramanagaram. The Tribunal by its order dated 23.09.1988 granted occupancy rights in his favour, which was challenged by Mallaiah, the owner of the land before the Land Reforms Appellate Authority in ALRA No.3/1990. On account of amendm...
Tag this Judgment!M.S. Talawar, Bangalore. Vs. Bangalore University, Bangalore, Rep. by ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-30-2012
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to designate the petitioner as the Dean, Faculty of Education, Bangalore University, Bangalore and further to enable the petitioner to act as Dean for a statutory period of two years forthwith.)1. Petitioner has sought for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent-University to designate the petitioner as the Dean, Faculty of Education, Bangalore University, to enable him to act as Dean for a statutory period of two years forthwith.2. Petitioners case is that, in June 1978, he jointed as a Lecturer in SES College of Education at Karwar. On 22.11.1992, he joined to services of Bangalore University as a Reader in the Department of Education. He earned the promotion to the post of Professor in the Department of Education in November 2000. However, some of the faculty members of the Department of Education made 59 allegations against the petitioner. In this regar...
Tag this Judgment!Yashodha Rao. Vs. Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palik and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-30-2012
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for entire records from BBMP pertaining to construction made by Sharma Group as per plan LP No.J.C West 282/10-11 in No.24 (OLD 1662/1) in fact it should be 1662/6, 2nd Cross Road, Ramamohanapura, Bangalore-21 and etc.,)1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for issue of writ to quash the sanctioned plan LP No.J.C. West 282/10-11 granted in favour of respondent Nos.6 and 7 as at Annexure-A. Consequently, a direction is sought for demolition of the structure built on site No.24 i.e., 1662/6, 2nd cross, Ramamohanapuram, Bangalore 21. In the alternative, it is prayed that the private respondents be directed to pull down the structure on the eastern side of their property which is to the western side of the petitioner's property and thereafter leave a margin of 4.5 meters i.e., 15 feet from the boundary of petitioner's property. The prayer No.2 made in the petition is howev...
Tag this Judgment!S.N. Basavarajappa and ors. Vs. the Management of Vignyan Industries L ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-27-2012
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution Of India, praying to direct the respondent to consider the representations given by the petitioners dated 5.4.11 and make payment of the balance of amount as per the work sheet annexed to the representations of the petitioners Vide Annx-D TO D19, ETC.,1. Petitioners have sought for a direction to the respondents to consider their representation dated 5.4.2011 submitted as per Annexures-D, D1 to D18 and for quashing the reply given by the respondent dated 1.7.2011 produced at Annexures-E, E1 to E15. Further direction to declare that, the petitioners are entitled for monetary benefits accrued as a result of revision of pay scale for a period from 1.1.2003 to 30.4.2007.2. Facts, which are not in dispute are, that:The respondent - Management issued a Circular dated 4th April 2007 interalia providing a special scheme for voluntary retirement for the employees/executives mentioned in Clause (iii) of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Sannaiah Alias Basavaraju, Mysore Taluk. Vs. State of Karnataka, by Ja ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-27-2012
(Prayer: This Crl.R.P. is filed under Section 397(1) Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the judgment and order passed by the P.O., Fast Trace Court-III, Mysore, in Crl.A.No.93/2002 dated 01.10.2005 and the judgment and order passed by the JMFC-II Court, Mysore, in CC.No.1944/1999 dated 30.5.2002 and acquit the petitioner.)1. Petitioner faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Ss.354 and 448 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. He was convicted and sentenced to pay fine of Rs.500/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days for the offence under S.448 IPC and was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months and pay fine of Rs.500/-, in default, to undergo S.I. for 15 days for the offence under S.354 IPC. Feeling aggrieved, accused has filed this criminal revision petition.2. Prosecution case which led to trial is as follows:On 24.04.1999, at 1.00 p.m., at Mandanahalli Village, CW1-complainant was wearing cloths after taking bath, accused trespassed into her...
Tag this Judgment!Umesh Shetty, Udupi. Vs. Sathish Bhaktha, Udupi and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
(Prayer: This MFA is filed u/s 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award dated: 26/04/2007 passed in MVC No.1003/2005 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) & Member, Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Udupi, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.)1. This appeal by the claimant is directed against the impugned common judgment and award dated 26th April 2007, passed in MVC No.1003/2005, by the Principal Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) & Member, Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Udupi, (for short, Tribunal) for enhancement of compensation on the ground that, the compensation of Rs.1,27,000/- awarded in his favour as against his claim for Rs.15,89,000/-, is inadequate.2. The appellant claims to be aged about 32 years and running a provision store, earning a sum of Rs.500/- day or Rs.15,000/- per month. He was hale and healthy prior to the date of accident. That at about 9:00 P.M., on 29-05-2005, when the ...
Tag this Judgment!Deepa Shenoy, Bangalore and anr. Vs. the State of Karnataka, Rep. by I ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
(Prayer: W.P. No.23417/2012 is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the R2 to issue an order of appointment appointing the petitioner to the post of Professor in Information Science and Engineering in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering forthwith, etc.)1. In these two writ petitions, the petitioners claim that, in pursuance of a notification dated 21.06.2005 issued by the respondent-University inviting applications from the eligible candidates to fill up the post of Professor, Reader and Lecturer in Computer Science, petitioners applied for the post of Professor in Computer Science. Since no recruitment took place in pursuance of the same, another notification was issued on 08.08.2007. Both the petitioners were directed to attend the interview on 10.03.2008 and 08.08.2007 respectively.2. Though the interview process completed, however, insofar as the petitioners are concerned, their results were not announced and similarly inte...
Tag this Judgment!State of KarnatakA. Vs. Nagaraju and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-25-2012
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order dated 18.04.2011 passed by the 2nd respondent vide No.RRT/2/NA/CR/566/09-10 in respect of 16 guntas of land out of 2 acres of land in Sy. No.6/P9 situated at Singahalli Village of Jala Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk (Addl.) Bangalore Urban District as per Annexure-A.)1. In this writ petition, the State Government is calling in question the order dated 18.04.2011 passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore North in case No.RRT/2/NA/CR/566/09-10.2. By the impugned order, the Deputy Commissioner has dropped the proceedings initiated under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short 'the Act'). Proceedings came to be initiated on the report dated 30.12.2008 submitted by the Tahsildar, Bangalore North (Additional) Taluk. A copy of the said report is produced at Annexure-B. As per the said report, the Tahsildar states that an extent ...
Tag this Judgment!V. Sathish and ors. Vs. Karnataka Power Transport and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-25-2012
1. The petitioners have sought for declaration that the qualification prescribed as Diploma in Electrical / Mechanical / Electronics / Telecommunication from any polytechnic of the State of Karnataka for the purpose of promotion as per the schedule item No.2 to the Karnataka Electricity Board of Recruitment and promotion Regulation as void and unconstitutional. Further for a direction, directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for the appointment to the post of Junior Engineers (Electrical) under the in-service quota.2. The case of the petitioners is that:The petitioners were appointed as a Lineman and Station Attendant. The next higher post is Junior Engineer, the selection to the said post is 40% by direct recruitment and 10% from amongst the in-service candidate who are qualified and having diploma in Electrical / Telecommunication / Engineer in any of the polytechnic of the State of Karnataka.3. Prescribing the qualification of Diploma Certificat...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »