Karnataka Court April 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt.Shobha Rani, Wo Govinda Raju. Vs. the State of KarnatakA.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-11-2012
1. The petitioner has been arrayed as accused No.1 in S.C.No. 1482/2011 pending before Principal City Civil & Sessions Judge. Bangalore. She along with other accused person said to have committed offences punishable under Sections 302. 201. 120(B) read with Section 34 of IPC.2. According to the case of the prosecution, this petitioner had some monetary transactions with one Vijaya Kumar who was working as Head Constable in Malleshwaram Traffic Police Station. The petitioner used to borrow money from said Vijaya Kumar. Later there were certain differences between them in connection with monetary transactions. According to the prosecution, between 6.30 to 6.45 p.m. on 6.5.2011, the petitioner called deceased Vijaya Kumar over mobile phone and asked him to come to her house. Accordingly, when the deceased went to the house of the petitioner, there the petitioner with the help of accused No.2-Kumar strangulated Vijaya Kumar with the help of rope and killed him and thereafter to destroy...
M.A.Yogesha, Son of Late Ankegowda Vs. State by Arakalgud Police
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-11-2012
1) Apprehending his arrest by Arakalgud police of Hassan District in connection with case in Crime No. 25/2012 registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC and Sections 71(a) & 104(a) of the Karnataka Forest Act r/w. Rules 144 & 165 of Karnataka Forest Rules, the petitioner has sought for the relief of anticipatory bail.2) According to the case of the prosecution, the Police Sub-Inspector of Arakalgud Police Station received Information at about 10.50 p.m. on 08.02.2012 that, some persons are illegally transporting Teakwood logs in vehicle bearing registration No. KA. 10.A.4644: Immediately, he along with the staff and panchas went near SRS Rice Mill situated near Ganjalgud-Basavanahalli Road and while they were waiting there, at about 00.30 hours a canter vehicle bearing registration No. KA, 10.A.4644 came from Ganjalgud side towards Basavanahalli, but the driver of the said vehicle, on seeing the police jeep from a distance, stopped the lorry and ran away f...
Sri. E. Ahmed Waheed Son of Shariff and anr. Vs. the State of Karnatak ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-11-2012
K.N.KESHAVANARAYANA, J.1) Heard both sides. Perused the records made available. Petitioners have been arraigned as Accused Nos. 9 & 10 in Crime No.38/2012 of J.C. Nagar Police Station. Bangalore City, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 306, 304-B, 307, 506(b), r/w. 34 of IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act (for short. 'D.P. Act')2) One Asma R. Begum is the wife of Accused No.1-Sadiq Basha, is the deceased in the case. The petitioners are stated to be the friends of Accused No. 1. The marriage of the deceased with Accused No.1 said to have been solemnized in the year 2001 and the death has occurred on 02.03.2012. The petitioners are admittedly not the relatives of the husband of the deceased. This Court has granted the relief of bail to Accused No.8 in Criminal Petition No.1713/2012.3) According to the case of the prosecution, Accused Nos. 7 to 11 are the friends of Accused No. 1. The allegations made against Accused Nos. 7 to II are one and th...
Basavanayaka, Son of GadrinayakA. Vs. State by Javagal Police.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-11-2012
1. The petitioner who has been arrayed as accused No.1 in Crime No.1/2012 of Javagal Police Station, Hassan District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 448 and 307 read with Section 34 of IPC has presented this petition under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.2. According to the case of the prosecution, in the evening of 4.1.20 J 2 there was a quarrel between the complainant Cheluva Naika on the one hand and this petitioner and also other accused persons on the other hand in Singatagerepalya in Arasikere Taluk with regard to theft of motor cycle belonging to said Cheluva Naika. Said Cheluva Naika had expressed suspicion against this petitioner and others for the theft of the motor cycle. In that background, according to the prosecution, in the intervening night of 4/5.1.2012 at about 2.30 hours, this petitioner along with other accused persons gained forcible entry into the house of Cheluva Naika and by stating that said Cheluva Naika has falsely implicated them in the theft of...
Sudarshan P.O. Son of Late P.V. Gopalkrishna and ors. Vs. the State of ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-11-2012
1) Petitioners in Criminal Petition No. 1586/2012 have been arraigned as Accused Nos. 1 to 4 in Crime No.45/2012 of Gudibande Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 307. 341, 392. 506 r/w. 34 of [PC, while the petitioners in Criminal Petition No. 1633/2012 have been arraigned as Accused Nos. I to 5 in Crime No.47/12 of Gudibande Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 504, 143, 147, 148, 149. 307, 323 & 324 of IPC.2) The petitioners in these petitions are close relatives being brothers and sisters. All of them are residents of Peresanrira Village. IVlandikaJ Hobli in Chikkaballapur Taluk.3) According to the case of the prosecution, at about 7.00 p.m., on IK02.2012, there was a quarrel between two groups, in which incident, persons on both sides sustained injuries and in respect of the said Incident, one Smt. Veena, wife of M. Nagaraj, lodged a report, based on which, the case in Crime No. 45/2012 came to be regist...
Shivakumar Son of NanjappA. Vs. the State of KarnatakA.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-11-2012
1. The petitioner has been arrayed as accused No.4 in Crime No.7/2012 of Koratagere Police Station. Tumkur, registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 IPC.2. According to the case of the prosecution, the petitioner herein along with four other persons committed acts of dacoity by robbing the complainant -Ramakrishna of gold ornaments worn by him, cash and also a mobile phone with Sim card No. 9980770774. In respect of this incident, complainant Ramakrishna lodged a complaint based on which case came to be registered against unknown persons for the aforesaid offence and investigation was taken up. During investigation, this petitioner was apprehended on the basis of the Sim card number mentioned in the complaint belonging to the complainant as the same was being used by him in his mobile. According to the prosecution, after arrest, the mobile hand set containing the sim card of the complainant along with a gold ring said to have been robbed at the time of the incident were ...
Krishnamurthy at P. Murthy, Son of Papaiah. Vs. State by Nelamangala R ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-11-2012
1) In this petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C, the petitioner who has been arraigned as Accused No. 1 in Special Case No.7/2012 on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge) Bangalore, registered for the offences punishable under Sect ions 143, 147, 148. 302, 201 r/w. 149 of IPC and Sections 3(2)(5) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (for short. 'Special Act'), has sought for an order to enlarge him on bail.2) According to charge sheet allegations, at about 10.30 am. 20.10.2011. Accused Nos. 1 to 8 with a view to search hidden treasure, came to the land bearing survey No. 191/1 of T. Begur village and they secured the presence of the deceased Baluswamy for performing pooja and while digging the earth for searching the hidden treasure, since the deceased Baluswamy fell into the pit, all the accused assaulted him and killed him with a view to make sacrifice and thereafter threw the dead body in the land of CW. 1 -Venkatarajappa. situated in Amshadiha vil...
Sudha S.R., Wo. ManjunathA. Vs. State by Hiriyur Rural Police
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-11-2012
1) Petitioner, who has been arraigned as Accused No.1 in Crime No.360/2011 of Hiriyur Rural Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406,409.420,468,471 r/w. 34 IPC, apprehending her arrest by the respondent-police in connection with the said case, has sought for the relief of anticipatory bail, since her similar application filed before the learned Sessions Judge for anticipatory bail came to be rejected.2) According to the case of the prosecution, petitioner being resident of Aranakatte Village in Hiriyur Taluk, in connivance with Accused No.2, the President and Accused No.3, P.DO of the Gram Panchayath, by producing fabricated and forged documents received 39,402/- under the Indira Awas Scheme during the year 2009-10. On coming to know of the acts committed by this petitioner and others, the Executive Officer of Taluk Panchayath, Hiriyur, lodged a complaint, based on which. the aforesaid case came to be registered and investigation was taken-up.3) The pet...
Khurshidunnisa and Others Vs. the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bangalo ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-11-2012
1. Petitioners have called in question orders dated 28-10-2011 passed by 1strespondent in No.RRT(2)N(A)CR.158 to 161/2009-10, Annexures-M, N, P and Q, respectively, whereunder, the claim of the petitioners to retain their names in the revenue records have been rejected and petitioners’ names have been ordered to be deleted.2. Heard Sri Ramesh P. Kulkarni, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.3. On 12-12-1956, the Tahsildar, Devanahalli is said to have granted 1 acre 6 guntas of land in Sy.No.404 in favour of one Sri Budan Sab alias Kyatasandra Budansab pursuant to which, the revenue records were mutated in his name and khata is also said to be made out in his name. petitioners herein claim to be the lineal descendants of said Mr. Budansab. The Tahsildar, in the year 1959 has cancelled the grant made in favour of Mr. Budansab and questioning the said order of cancellation, an appeal came to be fi...
B.V. Jagannatha Vs. the Commissioner, City Municipal Council, Bhadrava ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-11-2012
1. Plaintiff’s second appeal. Appellant instituted O.S.No.211 of 2005 before the II Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) and JMFC, Bhadravathi for a direction to the defendant to allot alternate suitable site within the Town Municipal Council (TMC), Bhadravathi or in the alternative to determine compensation being the value of site No.157/1 in Sy.No.91/2 due to formation of Municipal Road by encroaching upon the said site. That suit, after contest, was dismissed by judgment and decree dated 27-3-2008 following which the plaintiff preferred R.A.No.34 of 2008 along with an application under Order 41, Rule 27(b) of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 of permission to adduce additional evidence, whence the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Bhadravathi by judgment and decree dated 23-7-2010 dismissed the appeal. Hence, this second appeal.2. The case of the plaintiff in a nutshell is that, he purchased a site No.157/1 in Sy.No.91/2 Ward No.10 of Hosamane Extension, Bhadravathi measuring ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »