Karnataka Court July 2011 Judgments
N.E. Dilip Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-20-2011
This Crl.P. is filed U/s. 439 Cr.P.C. by the Advocate for the petitioner praying that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in CR.No.143/11 of Ulsoor P.S. Bangalore City, for the offences P/U/S 406, 420 and 120-B of IPC. The petitioner herein, who has been arraigned as accused no.3 in Crime No.143/2011 of Ulsoor Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of IPC, has sought for the relief of bail. 2. According to the case of the prosecution, on the basis of the report lodged by one V. Druva Kumar, resident of Kotnahalli, Bettahalli Gate, Magadi road, Bangalore on 02.05.2011, criminal case came to be registered and investigation was taken up. 3. According to the allegations made in the report, the complainant came in contact with Shivadev Kumar, arraigned as accused no.1, petitioner herein, George and others for the first time in Lido Mal and thereafter, he met those person often and during such meetings, th...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Eta Melco Engg. Co. Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Reptd. by T. Subramanian ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-20-2011
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order of R4 dated 24.2.2010 at Annexure ‘A’, etc. Misc.W.No.5772/2011 is filed under Section 151 of CPC for vacation of the interim order, etc.) 1. In these cases, the petitioner has called in question the validity of the order at Annexure ‘A’ dated 24.2.2010 passed by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, the 4th respondent herein conferring jurisdiction on the first respondent to reassess the petitioner under Section 39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (‘Act’ for short) and to impose penalty and demand payment of interest. Consequent upon the power conferred by the 4th respondent as above, the first respondent has passed the orders of reassessment and penalty under Section 39(1) and 72(2) of the Act as per Annexures ‘B’, ‘B1’, ‘B2’, ‘B3’, ‘C’, ‘C...
Tag this Judgment!Agopal. Son of Late AppaihannA. Vs. the Bengaluru Development Authorit ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-19-2011
1. This appeal is being disposed of finally with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties and therefore the question of considering the I .A. filed to recall the order dated 28.4.11 does not arise. 2. The appellants are the plaintiffs in the court below and the suit that is filed by them is for grant of Temporary injunction in respect of the suit schedule property which is a portion of the land in Sy.No.55/6 measuring East to West 120' and North to South 480' consisting of Muneshwaraswamy Temple, KaJyana Mantapa, Anathashrama and residential buildings as described in the schedule to the suit and further the plaintiffs have sought: for an order of permanent injunction against the defendants in respect of the aforesaid suit schedule property. 3. Respondents 2 to 9 herein who are she defendants 2 to 9 in the court below filed an application under Order 7 Rule 1.1 of CPC carrying for rejection of the plaint. The appellants filed the objections to the said I.A. Learned trial judge...
Tag this Judgment!Girijesh Vyas and Another Vs. G. Vishnuvardhan and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-19-2011
(This MFA is filed U/S 173(1) of MV Act against the judgment and award dated: 19.06.2007 passed in MVC No.2768/2006 on the file of the XIII Addl. Judge, Court of Small Causes, Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Metropolitan Area, Bangalore, (SCCH.No.15), dismissing the claim petition for compensation.) Manjunath, J. The claimants have preferred this appeal being aggrieved by the dismissal of their claim petition by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore (hereinafter called as ‘Tribunal’ for brevity) dt. 19.06.2007 passed in MVC No.2768/06. 2. The admitted facts are as hereunder: The appellants who were the claimants before the Tribunal, lodged the claim petition claiming compensation on account of death of their son Manas Vyas in a road traffic accident occurred on 18.09.2005 at 11.55 p.m. On the unfortunate day the deceased was riding his motor cycle near Air View Point, inner Ring road, Ashoka nagar. The motor cycle of the deceased touched the road median as a...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Oriental Insurance Company Ltd Now Represented by Its Divisional O ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-19-2011
(Prayer: MFA Filed U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT against the Judgment and Award dated 12.1.2007 passed in MVC NO. 661/2002 on the file of the Civil Judge (SR.DN) and MACT, Kolar, awarding a compensation of RS.1,47,400/-.) 1. Both the appeals are by the insurer questioning the liability in judgment and award in MVC No.661/2002 and MVC No. 641/2002 on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.) and MACT, Kolar dated 12.01.2007 2. Tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs.1,47,400/- and Rs.21,600/- with interest respectfully and has held that the insurer to pay the compensation and recover the same from the owner. It is against the said direction, insurer is in appeals. 3. The case of the claimants is that on 3.5.2000 they were traveling in a tempo bearing registration No.KA-07-A-2545 from Channarayapattana to Kolar. When the tempo reached Rajapura and Mattigatta, on account of rash and negligent driving by the driver of the tempo, it dashed against the tree, as a result of which, claimants suffered griev...
Tag this Judgment!Anil Kumar and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-19-2011
N. Ananda, J: 1. Crl. A. No. 133/2006 is filed by the appellants (arrayed as Accused Nos. 1 to 5) against the judgment of conviction for offences punishable under Sections 366, 376(g), 328 read with 34 IPC. Crl. A. No.734/2006 is filed by the enhancement of sentence. 2. A1 to A5 were tried for the following charges and supplementary charges: “That you all in furtherance of the common intention on 21.8.2000 at about 4.00 p.m. when CW1 was proceeding towards Sadana Clinic of Santhekatte followed her in while Maruthi Car bearing reg. No.KL. 13-4647 and stopped the said car by her side and inducted her saying that her husband Sathish sent you to take her in your car and you brought CW1 in the said Car to KSRTC Bust Stop at Mangalore and from KSRTC Bus Stop to Mangalore you abducted her to an old big vacant house at Thokkottu in an autorickshaw bearing Reg. No.KA-19-3683 with the intend that CW1 may be forced by you all to illicit intercourse and you thereby committed an offence under...
Tag this Judgment!Kumari Sharmila Vs. the State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jul-19-2011
Patil, J 1. Though this matter is posted in orders list, with the consent of the Learned Counsel appearing for petitioner and Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 to 4, the same is taken up for final disposal. 2. Petitioner is a student prosecuting here studies in X standard. She has sought for quashing the memorandum endorsement dated 3rd June 2011, bearing No. A7 (N-9)/2011 PaFaPra/26/2011-12, vide Annexure — H. Further, she has sought for a mandamus, directing the second respondent to declare/announce the result of the petitioner in respect of SSLC Examination, taken up by her vide Registration No. 20110208972, conducted in the month of April 2011, by the second respondent/Board. 3. The only grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is that, she was admitted to the fifth respondent/School and she has been prosecuting her studies from I Std to X Std, and as per the examination curriculum issued in the respect of the SSLC Examination for the m...
Tag this Judgment!Shameer, So Ibrahim Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-18-2011
ORDER 1. This C riminal Revision Petition is' by the accused. who has been convicted by the trial Court if respect "of the offences punishable under Sections 279 and 304-A of the I.P.C. read with Sections 13H(a)(b) and 187 of the I.M.V.Act and being sentenced-to one year imprisonment. The said judgment, being confirmed by the lower' appellate court, the accused has come up before that,Court. 2. The case of the prosecution in short is that, on 7 at about 6.00 p.m., the accused-petitioner .drove his lony bearing registration No. CAS-1128 in athrash and negligent manner and caused an accident near gti Bridge on White Field Road as he took turn from the left side without giving am signal and in the process dashed to the motor cycle bearing registration No. TN-24-X-6248 in which one Chandramouli was travelling and the said Chandramouli died at the spot and one Java ram sustained grievous injuries and he also succumbed to the Injuries after two days of the accident, 3. Based on the complaint...
Tag this Judgment!Tata Elxsi Limited. Vs. Poinl Red Telecom Limited
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-15-2011
ORDER 1. This Company petition is filed under Sections 433(e) and 434 read with Section 439 of Companies Act, 1956 seeking for winding up of the respondent-company for non-payment of its debts. 2. The petitioner is a company incorporated under the. Companies Act having registered office, at ITBP Road. Whitefield, Bangalore. The petitioner-company is involved in the business of information technology, product and services. 3. The respondent-company was incorporated under the Companies Act, having its registered office at No. 18/1 IB, Roopena Agrahara. Begin? Hobli. Madiwala, Bangalore-68. The main objects for which, the Company is incorporated are to engage in the business of designing, development, production, managing advising, importing, exporting and marketing of telecommunication and internet related equipments, industry specific software and hardware solutions. The personal training and other kind of services or facilities relating to telecommunication and internet hardware, Softw...
Tag this Judgment!The State of Karnataka and ors. Vs. Sri R K Banta Naika Son of Late Ku ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-15-2011
1. This appeal is filed by the State - respondent In W.P. No.2840/06 being aggrieved by the order dt. 09.01.2007, wherein the Writ Petition filed by the respondents herein has been allowed by quashing the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Mysore in R.A. No. 13/2002-03 dt. 10.01.2006 and the appeal filed by the Tahsildar before the Deputy Commissioner is dismissed. 2. The material facts necessary for disposal of this appeal with reference to the ranking of the parties in the Writ Petition are as follows: It is the contention of the petitioners that they are displaced persons due to construction of Krishnaraja Sagar Dam and under a temporary Saguvali Chit dt. 13.10.1959 four acres to each of the petitioners were granted in Sy. Nos. 33/9, 33/7, 33/19 and 33/3 at Kolagatta Village, Hunsur taluk. Even though the' temporary saguvali chit was for a period of 5 years they continued to be in occupation of the lands temporarily granted to them since 1959 without any disturbance or interfe...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »