Karnataka Court June 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The O.S.C. Educational Society (R), Udupi Vs. Emmanuel Lalith Kumar
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-01-2011
1. In this writ petition the order passed by the Educational Appellate Tribunal (‘Tribunal’ for short) in EAT No.3/09 is called in question and the petitioner-society prays for setting aside the order of the tribunal which has allowed the appeal preferred by the respondent herein and had set aside the order of termination issued by the management to the respondent. 2. This is the second round of litigation between the parties, in as much as, the respondent herein was earlier dismissed from service on 21.4.07 and the said dismissal order was called in question before the tribunal and the tribunal had set aside the order of dismissal and in turn the present petitioner society came up before this court in writ petition and this court confirmed the order of the tribunal. Thereafter, the petitioner society again placed the respondent under suspension and held an enquiry against him in respect of the charges levelled against the respondent. The enquiry officer held the charge Nos...
Mohammad Yusuff Khan Vs. the Special Deputy Commissioner and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-01-2011
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to call for the records in SC/ST petition 147/2005-06 from the file of Assistant Commissioner south Sub-Division, Bangalore and SC/ST Appeal No. 107/2006-07 from the file of special Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore, Bangalore District. Quash the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner Bangalore South, Sub-Division, in SC/ST No. 147/2005-06 Dt.30.10.2006 vide Anx-B of this Writ Petition and the orders passed by the special Deputy Commissioner Bangalore District in SC/ST(A)107/2006-07 Dt. 12.10.2009 and quash Anx-D.) 1. There was a time when legal profession was practiced in proper, efficient committed manner. It is only because of this nature of practice of the profession, the profession earned the name that it is a noble profession. 2. Whether it is still being practiced in the same manner, whether it can still command the reputation of being a noble profession are all matters hi...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›