Karnataka Court May 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kumara at Gudi Kumara So. Late Manjegowda, Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-05-2011
1. This petition is under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking direction to the Station House Officer of Extension Police Station, Hassan, to release petitioner m the event of his arrest. 2. Not in dispute is the fact that on the basis of statement given by One Durga Prasad, S/o Neelappa, a case came to be registered in Cr. No.237/2010 for the offence punishable under Section 504.. 341, 323, 324 and 506 of IPC. He was arrested. He applied to jurisdictional Court, which granted him bail. During investigation Durga Prasad was treated at NIMHANS for sufferance of injury to fronto temporal oerietel craniotony region and evacuation of right temporal contusion followed by left fronto tempro parietal craniotomy and evacuation of left temporal contusion was done. It had a devastating effect on brain. He was subjected to surgery in NIMHANS and doctors being of the opinion that he was out of danger, discharged him on 14-10-2010, after his admission on 09-09-2010. After discharge he returned to the Villag...
K.Kumar at Halumachi, Son of Kalaiah Vs. the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-05-2011
1. The petitioner is 2nd accused in Cr. No.117/2010, which is now converted to C.C. No. 7/2011. 2. From what is urged by the learned counsel for petitioner and the records, it is seen the petitioner was arrested during investigation in Cr. No. 117/2010 for the offence punishable under Section 399 and 402 IPC regarding offence on 23-08 2013. He applied to this Court seeking bail, which was granted in Cr!. P. No. 343/2011 dated 15.02.2.011 Thereafter he continued to be in judicial custody as the JaH Authorities informed him that there was another case pending against him. In this manner though this Court allowed Crl. P. No.343/2011 he is still in judicial custody. 3. Meanwhile another case in Cr. No.113/2010 is registered against him in which the body warrant is issued. Petitioner seeks bail on the ground that in Cr. No.113/2010 he is not yet arrested, but he is not being released. In fact, the learned counsel for petitioner is not clear as to whether the petitioner has been interrogated...
Mr.ZaIn Sheriff, So. Irfan K.Sheriff and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-05-2011
1. Petitioners apprehending arrest by the Officers of the All Women Police Station, Halsoor Gate, Bangalore, seek direction to release them in the event of their arrest. 2. From what is urged by the learned senior counsel Mr. R.3.Naik, and the materials made available, it is noticed that the Petitioner No.1 married to one Sadaf Shariff @ Sadaf Mouzzam Jan, according to Islamic rites. However, the marriage was not successful and it failed. Sadaf Shariff @ Sadaf Mouzzam Jan approached the Officials of All Women Police Station, Halsoor Gate, Bangalore, seeking action against the petitioners for physical and mental cruelty perpetrated on her. She alleged that at the time of marriage the petitioners have demanded and received dowry, which will be an offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Based on her complaint and in pursuance thereto Officials of the respondent - Police Station have summoned the petitioners, as could be seen from the c...
Sri. Ramanjaneya Son of Late Sri.D.T. HanumantharamappA. Vs. State of ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-05-2011
1. In this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the petitioner has sought for quashing the FIR, the charge sheet: and the entire criminal proceedings initiated against him by the respondent - Lokayukta Police, City Division, Bangalore in Spl.CCNo.45/11 on the file of the Special Judge, Bangalore City. 2. The ease of the prosecution is as under: On 29.11.2010 one C.Narayanaswamy son of late Chikkonappa. resident of No.5, Classic colony, Banglapet, Bommasandra, Bangalore, filed a complaint with the respondent - Lokayukta Police inter alia alleging that he being the absolute owner of the agricultural lands measuring 3 acres 11 guntas in Survev No.23/1; 1 acre 10 guntas in Survey No.23/2 and 33 guntas in Survey No. 26, in all, 5 acres 14 guntas of Thimmasandra village in Anekal laiuk Bangalore Rural District, on 25.10.2010 presented an application addressed to the Tahsikiar, Anekal taluk before the jurisdictional Revenue Inspector seeking conversion of the aforesaid agricultural lands ...
Mr. M.K. Poovayya, Son of M.A.KunjappA. Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-05-2011
1. In this petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. the petitioner who has been arraigned as accused No.2 in Crime No. 122/2009 of Virajpet Town Police Station, has sought for quashing the FIR registered for the offences punishable under Sections 342. 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC on the basis of the information lodged by respondent No.2 herein. 2. The facts, which according to the petitioner led him to file this petition seeking to quash the FIR, are as under Respondent: No.2 herein at the relevant point of time was working as Chief Officer of Town Panchayath, Virajpet in Coorg district. The petitioner herein is one of the elected Councilors of the said Town Panchavath. The petitioner is also a member of Bar for over 48 years in Kodagu district and he was also president of Virajpet town municipal Council and Virajpet Town Panchavath for over 20 years. The petitioner, along with seven other Councillors, moved a No Confidence Motion against the President of Virajpet Town panchavath, Smt.Kanthi...
Ramanjaneya Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-05-2011
1. In this petition filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C.. the petitioner has sought for quashing the FIR, the charge-sheet and the entire criminal proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Lokayukta Police, City Division, Bangalore in Spl.C.C.No.45/11 on the file of the Special Judge, Bangalore City. 2. The case of the prosecution is as under: On 29.11.2010 one C. Narayanaswamy son of late Chikkonappa, resident of No.5, Classic Colony, Banglapet, Bommasandra, Bangalore, filed a complaint with the respondent-Lokayukta Police inter alia alleging that he being the absolute owner of the agricultural lands measuring 3 acres 11 guntas in Survey No.23/1; 1 acre 10 guntas in Survey No.23/2 and 33 guntas in Survey No.26, in all, 5 acres 14 guntas of Thimmasandra village in Anekal taluk Bangalore Rural District, on 25.10.2010 presented an application addressed to the Tahsildar, Anekal taluk before the jurisdictional Revenue Inspector seeking conversion of the aforesaid agricultural lands t...
Shaik Fahed Ahmed, So. Shaik Fahed Ahmed and ors Vs. Mrs.Mariam Fasihu ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-03-2011
ORDER1)In this petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, the petitioners have sought for quashing the entire proceedings in C,Mis.86/2010 on the file of Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court-V.. Bangalore.2) First petitioner is the husband. Petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 are the pa rents-in-law of the respondent, while petitioner Nos.4 & 5 are the eider sister and younger brother respectively of the 1st petitioner. The respondent has filed petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. ( for short, the 'Act') seeking protection order as contemplated under Section 18 of the Act, Maintenance Order under Section 20 of the Act and compensation order under Section 22 of the Act, against the petitioners herein in C.Mis. No.86/20.10. Upon presentation of the said petition, the learned Magistrate ordered registration of the case and directed issue of notices to the petitioners herein as provided by Section 13 of the Act- Upon receipt of the notice issued, the p...
Sri Badri Prasad Vs. the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-03-2011
1. Petitioner is accused no.7. He is facing charge for the offences punishable under Section 366-A of IPC and Sections 3,4,5,6 and 9 of Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act in Crime No. 145/2011. While in judicial custody he has sought bail after rejection of his petition by the trial Judge.2. From what is urged, it is manifest from the copy of the FIR made available, raid was conducted in a lodge run under the name and style "Sumukha Sagar Deluxe Lodge" by the designated Officer-Superintendent of Police and he took into custody several girls said to be native of different States, indulging in the act of Prostitution. Several arrests have been made and in all eight accused persons including the petitioner have been arrested. The main allegation is that petitioner was managing the lodge at the relevant point of time. He had rented different rooms for the purpose of prostitution, which is a plan for flesh trade.3. The accused No.4 facing similar charge sought bail in Crl.P.No.2067/11 along ...
Smt. Azeem Unnissa Wo. Late Rahamathulla and ors. Vs. the State of Kar ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-03-2011
1. The petitioners are accused 2 to 5 facing charges for offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323 and 504 of IPC along with one Rauila, accused No.1. They are not yet arrested. Apprehending arrest, they are seeking for a direction under Section 438 Cr.P.C to the Investigating Officer to release them in the event of arrest.2. From the prosecution papers, it is noticed a woman by name Sabeena was rushed to the hospital on 8.3.2011 for treatment of burn injuries she had suffered. Her statement was recorded in which she revealed she was married to accused No.1 Rahulla and out of their wedlock, she gave birth to a child. She was living in the accommodation occupied by her husband and Deiificners. She alleged that despite demands of petitioners and her husband Rahulla, having been met by her parents' three years ago at the time of marriage, their greed was not satisfied and they continued to pester her to secure additional dowry. They harassed her continuously resulting in mental turmoi...
Anjaneya at Antri Anjani So Antri Hanumanthappa Vs. the State of Karna ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-03-2011
1. Petitioner is accused No.6 facing charge for the offence punishable under Section 302 r/w Section 149 IPC and other offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148 on the accusation that he was one of the members in the un lawfully assembly who indulged in the act of violence resulting in death of Narayana.2. Narayana's dead body was discovered by a woman and fen such report, Investigation was taken up. During investigation, investigating Officer found that there was ili-will between Narayana and one Navule Mohan, Aruna and others relating to murder of one Manjunatha IV2 years ago. Knowing the fact, Smt. Shanthamma-complainanf sent her son-Narayana to her sister Lalithamma's house. However, he had returned three to four months prior to the incident on 29.7.10. It is suspected that due to such enmity, Navule Mohan, Aruna and others indulged in violence and killed Narayana and its disposed of his body, which was discovered later. On the same allegations, seven accused were arrai...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »