Karnataka Court December 2011 Judgments

Durha Constructions Private Limited, New Delhi, Rep. by Its Authorized ...

Court: Karnataka

(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 04.08.2011 passed in I.A. No.2/2011 in O.S.No.27279/2009 by the City Civil Court, Mayohall, Bangalore, vide Annexure-A.) 1. IA No.2 filed by the defendant-petitioner herein under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, ‘the Act’) seeking to refer the parties for arbitration, having been dismissed vide order dated 04.08.2011 passed by the learned XXVI Addl. City Civil Judge, Mayohall, Bangalore, the present writ petition is filed. 2. Petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.27279/2009. Plaintiff-respondent herein has filed the said suit seeking a Judgment and decree against the defendant-petitioner herein to pay a sum of Rs.10,88,10,521.96  along with interest at 15% with effect from 21.12.2008. The suit is based on a contract entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant as per the letter of intent date...

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Mrs. Lakkamma and Oth ...

Court: Karnataka

(MFA No.2952/2008 is filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, against the Judgment and Award dated 14.12.2007 passed in MVC No.338/2005 on the file of II Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) and Additional MACT, Chitradurga, awarding a compensation of Rs.2,64,420/- with interest @ 6% P.A. from the date of petition till deposit. MFA No.3528/2008 is filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, against the Judgment and Award dated 31.01.2008 passed in MVC No.704/2006 on the file of Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) and Additional MACT, Chitradurga, awarding a compensation of Rs.18,000/- with interest at 6% P.A. from the date of petition till realization.) Second respondent, Insurance Company in MVC No.338/2005 on the file of MACT, Chitradurga, has come up in appeal in MFA No.2952/2008. Similarly the same Insurance Company, which is second respondent in MVC No.704/2006 on the file of MACT, Chitradurga, has also come up in appeal in MFA No.3528/2006. Both the claim petitions are filed by two di...

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Mrs. Lakkamma and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2011KAR5912

(MFA No.2952/2008 is filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, against the Judgment and Award dated 14.12.2007 passed in MVC No.338/2005 on the file of II Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) & Additional MACT, Chitradurga, awarding a compensation of Rs.2,64,420/- with interest @ 6% P.A. from the date of petition till deposit.MFA No.3528/2008 is filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, against the Judgment and Award dated 31.01.2008 passed in MVC No.704/2006 on the file of Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) and Additional MACT, Chitradurga, awarding a compensation of Rs.18,000/- with interest at 6% P.A. from the date of petition till realization.)Second respondent, Insurance Company in MVC No.338/2005 on the file of MACT, Chitradurga, has come up in appeal in MFA No.2952/2008. Similarly the same Insurance Company, which is second respondent in MVC No.704/2006 on the file of MACT, Chitradurga, has also come up in appeal in MFA No.3528/2006. Both the claim petitions are filed by two differ...

S.N. Sinha, Bangalore. Vs. the State of Karnataka, by Its Secretary, D ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2012(2)KarLJ701; ILR2012KAR448; 2012(2)KantLJ701

(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the notice dated 3.11.2011 issued by the respondent the Special Tahsildar, Bangalore East Taluk, K.R. Puram, Bangalore as per Annexure-A hereto.)H.G. RAMESH, J. (Oral):1. Learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for respondent nos. 1 & 2.2. This writ petition is directed against the notice dated 03.11.2011 (Annexure-A) issued by respondent no.2-the Special Tahsildar, Bangalore East Taluk, K.R. Puram, Bangalore, directing the petitioner to appear before him on 01.12.2011.3. Heard. The solitary contention urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforesaid notice does not state as to why the petitioner should appear before the Special Tahsildar except merely stating that the subject relates to change of khatha in respect of the land measuring 2 acres 8 guntas in Survey No.142/1B1. According to the counsel, the notice is vague and hence is ...

S.N. Sinha, Bangalore Vs. the State of Karnataka, by Its Secretary, De ...

Court: Karnataka

(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the notice dated 3.11.2011 issued by the respondent the Special Tahsildar, Bangalore East Taluk, K.R. Puram, Bangalore as per Annexure-A hereto.) H.G. RAMESH, J. (Oral): 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for respondent nos. 1 and 2. 2. This writ petition is directed against the notice dated 03.11.2011 (Annexure-A) issued by respondent no.2-the Special Tahsildar, Bangalore East Taluk, K.R. Puram, Bangalore, directing the petitioner to appear before him on 01.12.2011. 3. Heard. The solitary contention urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforesaid notice does not state as to why the petitioner should appear before the Special Tahsildar except merely stating that the subject relates to change of khatha in respect of the land measuring 2 acres 8 guntas in Survey No.142/1B1. According to the counsel, the notice is vague and h...

V.M. Ramakrishna and ors. Vs. State by Maddur Police Station

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2012(2)KarLJ174; 2012(1)KCCR153; 2012(2)KantLJ174; 2012CriLJ357(NOC)

(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by the advocate for the petitioners praying that this Honble Court to set aside the order dated 18.08.10 passed by the C.J., (JR.DN.) and JMFC, Maddur in Cr.No.23/09 and in C.C.No.11/10.)1. This petition is filed seeking to set aside the order dated 07.09.2010 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) and JMFC, Maddur in crime No.23/2009 of Maddur Police Station.2. The incident happened on 18.01.2009 at about 08.45 PM at Shimsha Bar and Restaurant where it is alleged that the petitioners picked up a quarrel with respect to payment of hotel bill with the cashier under the influence of alcohol. When the same was questioned by one Shivaramu CW2, it is alleged that the petitioners have assaulted him with iron rod on his head and another person picked up a stone and attempted assault CW2. It is also further stated that accused No.4 assaulted on the chest of CW2 with a small stone with an intention to cause his death...

Gopalachari, Bangalore and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka, Social Wel ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2012(2)KarLJ211; 2012(2)KantLJ211

(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 27.8.2011 vide Annexure-E, passed by the 1st Respondent referring the matter to Honourable Lokayukta to examine the alleged mis-utilisation of assets sanctioned by the Government under the 2 schemes i.e. (a) Self Employment Scheme and (b) Safai Karmachari Rehabilitation Programme sponsored by the Corporation and etc.)1. Learned Government Pleader takes notice for the 1st respondent.2. In these writ petitions, the petitioners are challenging the Government Order dated 27.08.2011 produced at Annexure-E whereby the allegations made against the petitioners herein and the role played by them in the alleged irregularity and illegality committed in the matter of disbursement of loan under the self employment scheme of Dr. Ambedkar Development Corporation are referred for an enquiry to the Lokayukta.3. The State Government has exercised its powers under Section 7(2-A)...

V.M. Ramakrishna and Others Vs. State by Maddur Police Station

Court: Karnataka

(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by the advocate for the petitioners praying that this Hon’ble Court to set aside the order dated 18.08.10 passed by the C.J., (JR.DN.) and JMFC, Maddur in Cr.No.23/09 and in C.C.No.11/10.) 1. This petition is filed seeking to set aside the order dated 07.09.2010 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) and JMFC, Maddur in crime No.23/2009 of Maddur Police Station. 2. The incident happened on 18.01.2009 at about 08.45 PM at Shimsha Bar and Restaurant where it is alleged that the petitioners picked up a quarrel with respect to payment of hotel bill with the cashier under the influence of alcohol. When the same was questioned by one Shivaramu – CW2, it is alleged that the petitioners have assaulted him with iron rod on his head and another person picked up a stone and attempted assault CW2. It is also further stated that accused No.4 assaulted on the chest of CW2 with a small stone with an intention t...

Gopalachari, Bangalore and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka, Social W ...

Court: Karnataka

(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 27.8.2011 vide Annexure-E, passed by the 1st Respondent referring the matter to Honourable Lokayukta to examine the alleged mis-utilisation of assets sanctioned by the Government under the 2 schemes i.e. (a) Self Employment Scheme and (b) Safai Karmachari Rehabilitation Programme sponsored by the Corporation and etc.) 1. Learned Government Pleader takes notice for the 1st respondent. 2. In these writ petitions, the petitioners are challenging the Government Order dated 27.08.2011 produced at Annexure-E whereby the allegations made against the petitioners herein and the role played by them in the alleged irregularity and illegality committed in the matter of disbursement of loan under the self employment scheme of Dr. Ambedkar Development Corporation are referred for an enquiry to the Lokayukta. 3. The State Government has exercised its powers under Section 7...

Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Rep. by Its Chairman and Managi ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2012(4)CTC(IP)8; 2012(3)KCCR140(SN)

(Prayer: This O.S. filed under Order VII Rule 1 of CPC before the City Civil & Sessions Court, Bangalore District, Bangalore, registered as Original Suit No.7801/2003 and transferred to the High Court of Karnataka, praying to the pass a judgment and decree against the defendants as under: a) for permanent injunction restraining the defendants and/or their licensee, nominees, agents, suppliers, dealers, consignees or any one acting directing or indirectly on their behalf from manufacturing and/or producing and/or selling of the products LIVOLIV-250 by infringing the plaintiffs protected patent rights under patent No.186857 of 20th April 1998 granted A method of preparing a Herbal Hepatoprotective and Anthiepatotoxic Composition in the market throughout India and etc.)1. The plaintiff has filed this suit for a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from manufacturing, producing or selling of the product Livoliv-250 by infringing the plaintiffs protected Patent rights u...