Karnataka Court October 2011 Judgments
Shivaji Vittal Rao Chauhan Vs. Bahubali Devagouda Naslapuare
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
(Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 R/w 3-1 Cr.P.C. by the advocate for the petitioner praying to set aside the judgment and order dated 22.12.2009 passed by the learned IV Additional. District and S.J., Belgaum in Crl.A.No.204/07 and etc.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent regarding maintainability of the application. 2. The present petitioner had earlier approached this Court by way of Criminal Revision Petition No.2084/2010. The same was dismissed on merits by an order of this Court dated 18.8.2010. The same was carried by way of a Special Leave Petition before the Apex Court. The Apex Court has disposed of the Special Leave Petition, as withdrawn in Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.561/2011 dated 31.1.2011 in the following terms. “The Special Leave Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is needless to observe that the petitioner is entitled to avail such remedy as may be available to him ...
Tag this Judgment!T. Venkatesh Reddy, Bangalore and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka by ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
(Prayer: Writ Appeal Nos.4772-4811/2003 are filed u/s 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in the Writ Petition No.40150-167/2002 and 41771-792/2002 dated 10/04/2003. Writ Appeal Nos.263/2008 and 5137-97/2011 filed u/s 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in the Writ Petition No.13474/2005 dated 25/09/2007.) 1. These two batch of writ appeals are filed by two sets of persons challenging the acquisition of approximately an extent of about 60 acres of land under various survey numbers situated in Devarachikkanahalli and Bilekanahalli Villages, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore District. The appellants in W.A.Nos.4772-800/2011 were petitioners before the learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.40150-167/2002 and W.P.Nos.41771-792/2002. They are land owners of various survey numbers of Devarachikkanahalli and Bilekanahalli Village. They filed aforesaid writ petitions through their General Power of Attorney Holder, namely, the Man...
Tag this Judgment!K. Krishna Bhat Vs. Syndicate Bank and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
(Prayer: This Writ Appeal Is Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition No.294/2000 Dated 02/12/2005.) SABHAHIT, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the petitioner in W.P. No.294/2000 being aggrieved by the order dt.2.12.2005, wherein the Writ Petition filed by the appellant herein has been disposed of by declining to interefere with the impugned order dt.1.6.1999 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum Labour Court, Bangalore in Central Reference No.126 of 1997 holding that the domestic inquiry was valid. 2. The material facts leading up to this appeal are as follows: The petitioner/appellant herein was working as a Special Assistant in the employment of the respondent – Bank. He was served with articles of charge, accusing that he was guilty of misconduct as he had resorted to misappropriation of the Bank’s funds and fabrication of records which amounted to misconduct, for the period from 8.11.1985 to ...
Tag this Judgment!The Regional Provident Fund, Bangalore and Others Doddaballapur Spinni ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
This writ appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act pray ing to set aside the order passed in writ petition Nos.46277/03 and 52330/03 dated 19.8.2005. 1. Heard on I.A.No.I/06. 2. In view of the averments made in the application we hold that sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay of three days in filing this appeal. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. I.A.No.I/06 is allowed. 3. This appeal is filed by the respondents in W.P.Nos.46277 and 52330/03 being aggrieved by the order dated 19.8.2005 passed in W.P.Nos.46277 and 52330/03 wherein the learned Single Judge of this Court has quashed the orders passed by the appellants herein as per Annexures-‘F, G, H and J” in W.P.No.46277/03 and Annexures- “E and F” in W.P.No.52330/03 under Sections 7-Q and 14-B of the Employee Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as “EPF” Act). 4. The material fact leading to the filing of this appeal a...
Tag this Judgment!Canara Bank and Another Vs. M/S. Shimoga Steels Limited, Rep. by Its C ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
(This writ petition is field under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, with a prayer to call for the records before the R2 and Appeal No.266/2007 before the R3 and set aside the order dated 25.06.2007 of the R2 vide Anx-B and order dated 07.07.2008 of the R3 in Appeal No.266/2007 vide Anx-D.) The petitioner-Canara Bank is assailing the order dated 25.06.2007 passed by the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (‘BIFR’ for short) in Case No.254/2002 and the order dated 07.07.2008 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (‘AAIFR’ for short) in Appeal No. 266/2007. By the said order, the rehabilitation scheme in respect of the first respondent herein has been sanctioned and the same has been upheld by the Appellate Authority. 2. The brief facts are that the first respondent which is a company incorporated under the Companies Act and engaged in the manufacture of steel billets and rolled products availed...
Tag this Judgment!State of Karnataka Vs. K.A. Harsha
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
1. The State has filed this appeal against judgment of acquittal of respondent (hereinafter referred to as accused) for offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and also for offences punishable under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 2. We have heard Sri. N.S. Sampangiramaiah, learned Government Pleader for State and the learned counsel for accused. The learned Government Pleader has taken us through evidence and the impugned judgment. 3. In brief, the case of prosecution is as follows: Soubhagya @ Chandramma (hereinafter referred to as deceased) was the daughter of CW.5-Kalegowda and PW.16-Jayamma. PW.3-Annayappa is the paternal uncle of deceased; PW.21-Manjegowda is the younger brother of deceased; PW.15-Kumaragowda is the husband of elder sister of deceased; PW.17-Marigowda is the cousin brother of deceased; PW.18-Kempegowda is the maternal uncle of deceased; PW.23-Mahalakshmi is the elder sister of deceased. 4. Before marriage, the marriage negotiations were...
Tag this Judgment!SirajIn Basha Vs. B.S. Yediyurappa
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-04-2011
(This Writ Appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition No.37573/2011 dated 30/09/2011.) These appeals are preferred challenging the order passed by the learned Single Judge who has granted an interim order of stay of the operation of the order dated 08.08.2011 and 30.09.2011, issuing summons to the accused for their appearance in a proceedings initiated under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. 2. As common question of law is involved in all these appeals they are taken up for consideration together and disposed of by this common order. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are referred to in the writ petitions. 3. The petitioner is Sri B.S. Yediyurappa, the former Chief Minister of Karnataka. The respondent who is common in all these writ petitions is one Sri Sirajin Basha, a practicing Advocate at Bangalore. The petitioner was functioning as Chief M...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›