Karnataka Court January 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Chokkalingam. S/O Manikkam. Vs. the Karnataka State Transport Author ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. In these petitions, petitioner is seeking for a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 27.10.2009 passed by the Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal in R.P.Nos.714/2007 and 1499/2007 at Annexure 'A and for grant such other reliefs.2. As per the events, a joint survey has been conducted by the competent authority in the presence of the representatives of KSRTC and others on 7.9.2006 and by a resolution of the Is' respondent, it was decided to grant stage carriage permit to the petitioner. Being aggrieved by the said resolution, revision petitions were filed by the 2nd respondent-KSRTC and the 3rd respondent. Ultimately, impugned order came to be passed by the Tribunal allowing the revision and setting aside the permit granted to the petitioner by order dated 27.10.2009. Hence, these petitions.3. According to the petitioner, the Is' respondent-KSTA has ensured that joint sat vey is conducted as per the direction of this Court in the case of KSRTC v. Pauli Govis reported i...
Smt. Dr. Shobha W/o Dr. C. Bharath Bhushan. Vs. the State of Karnataka ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. Petitioner after obtaining MBBS qualification was appointed as Lady Medical Officer-cum Assistant Surgeon in the Department of Health and Family Welfare on 15.10.1987 Thereafter she worked in KSRTC on Deputation from 1995-1999. She was working as Tutor-cum-Post Graduate in Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute in the month of October, 1999 She obtained Master Degree in 'Community Medicine' in the month of September 2002. She reported to duty on 29.9.2004 at Bangalore Medical College. Her services were permanently absorbed in Bangalore Medical College on 20.10.2005. On 25.5.2009, she came to be promoted as Assistant Professor. Third respondent came to be appointed on consolidated salary as Associate Professor on ad-hoc basis for a period of four months as per Annexure-W, dated 7.12.2009. He was posted to take care of Community Health and out reach program. Representation came to be filed by the petitioner on 11.12.2009 claiming the post of Associate Professor. Since she wa...
Mr Ravi Kumar S/O Muniraju, and anr. Vs. the Special Deputy Commission ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. The complaint of the petitioners against the respondent - The Special Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore District, Bangalore, is that the respondent who had initiated suo motu proceedings in cases bearing No.RRT 2 CR 23 OF 06-07 and RRT 2 CR 23A of 2006-07, now consolidated and renumbered as RRT 2 CR 1 of 2006-09 vide Annexures-D & E has issued notice in No.RRT{2)CR 23/2006-07 (Annexure-B) to the petitioners to examine the correctness or otherwise of entries m the revenue records insofar as it related to the writ petitioners are concerned; that the 1st petitioner claiming interest in an extent of 1 acre and 2nd petitioner claiming interest in an extent of 2 acres in Sy.No. 115 of Channasandra Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk on the basis of certain private sale transactions dated 25.5.2005, is taking too long period and contemplating too much to pass orders after having heard the matter and closing the enquiry on 19.3.2009.2. Appearing on behalf of the petitioners submis...
Mr. M P Tikaram S/O. Late M N Pachiappan. Vs. Sollapuri Amman Temple T ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. This appeal by the defendant/tenant is directed against the judgment and decree dated 25.9.2010 passed by the Court of the XII Additional City Civil Judge. Bangalore, in the suit in O.S.No.5669/2008. By the impugned judgment the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff (Sollapuri Amman Temple Trust) by directing the appellant/defendant to vacate and to handover vacant possession of the suit schedule premises to the respondent/plaintiff within three months.2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the appeal may be disposed of by granting time till 31st March 2012 to the appellant/tenant to voluntarily vacate and to deliver vacant possession of the suit premises to the respondent/landlord. He further submits that the appellant is walling to pay damages @ Rs.4, 000/- (Rupees Four Thousand only) per month for the use and occupation of the suit premises for the period commencing from 1st February 2011 to 31st March 2012 and that if would be pa...
Hanuman S/O Late SanjeevappA. Vs. D.Ravi Kumar S/O Eranna, and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. This is a claimants' appeal for enhancement of compensation.2. I have heard Sri.K.Shantharaj, learned counsel for claimant and Sri.C.Shankar Reddy. learned counsel for insurance company.3. The Tribunal accenting the wound certificate and discharge summary has held that the claimant had suffered fracture of left petala with injuries to quadricep muscles The claimant has produced several bills and discharge summary. He had not examined the Doctor before the Tribunal.4. The claimant was aged about 44 years at the time of accident. He was an agriculturist by occupation. The Tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs.25.000/-under following heads:I. Pain and sufferingRs. 10.000II. Medical and other expensesRs. 15.000TotalRs.25.0005. On reconsideration of the matter, I find that the Tribunal should have awarded compensation towards 'loss of earnings during laid up period' and 'loss of amenities'. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the head 'pain and suffering' is inadequate. Ther...
Sri R.K.Murthy S/O D.Nanjaiah. Vs. M.V.Subramanya, and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. The claimant/petitioner in MVC No. !7'3/2()()G on the file of PT1. Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.) & MAC1. Mandya. Is the appellant.2. Facts necessary for consideration of the appeal are that on 24.8.1999 at about 8.30 pm. while the petitioner was travelling as a passenger in the busbearing Regn.No.MYT.6232 from Malavalli to Ravani. the driver of the bus has driven the bus rashly, negligently arid on account of it. it met with accident. After the accident, the petitioner was shifted to Malavalli hospital, then to K.R. Hospital. So for the pain and sufferings he seeks for a compensation of Rs. 1 lakh.3. PWs.1 & 2 are examined. Exhibits P 1 to P-9 are marked. In the course of evidence PW-2 Doctor states that in addition to the simple injuries, there is an injury to the pubic rami. The doctor has assessed the disability at 10% to the whole body. The injury pleaded by the petitioner is supported with the wound certificate marked at Ex.P-5.4. Heard the learned advocate for the Insurance Company. H...
Venkatappa S/O Venkataswamy, and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka by Channa ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. This appeal has been filed by the accused in S.C. No. 100/1998 challenging the judgment dated 08.12.2004 passed by the Fast Track Court 1. Bangalore Rural District convicting the appellants accused for the offences punishable under Section 143 of IPC and sentencing them to undergo imprisonment for three months and to pay fine of Rs.500/ . further convicting them for the offence punishable under Section 148 IPC and sentencing them to undergo imprisonment for a period of 2 years and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/- each and further convicting them for the offence punishable under Section 324 read with 149 IPC and sentencing them to undergo imprisonment for 2 years and to pay fine of Rs. 1.000/ each, with default clauses.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 30.12.1996 at about 10.30 a.m., at Ramapura Village, all the accused formed themselves into a unlawful assembly, entered the garden land with a common intention of causing hurt to PWs. 1. 2. 5 and 6 and thereafter, they have caused i...
K.Subramani, Aged S/O Kuruppanad. Vs. the Karnataka State Transport Au ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. In these petitions, petitioner is seeking for a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 27.10.2009 passed by the Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal in R.P.Nos.714/2007 and 1499/2007 at Annexure 'A and for grant such other reliefs.2. As per the events, a joint survey has been conducted by the competent authority in the presence of the representatives of KSRTC and others on 7.9.2006 and by a resolution of the Is' respondent, it was decided to grant stage carriage permit to the petitioner. Being aggrieved by the said resolution, revision petitions were filed by the 2nd respondent-KSRTC and the 3rd respondent. Ultimately, impugned order came to be passed by the Tribunal allowing the revision and setting aside the permit granted to the petitioner by order dated 27.10.2009. Hence, these petitions.3. According to the petitioner, the Is' respondent-KSTA has ensured that joint sat vey is conducted as per the direction of this Court in the case of KSRTC v. Pauli Govis reported i...
Sri T Shekara S/O Late Thimmaiah, and ors. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. Disputes amongst members of the family even as to whether a person was member of the family or otherwise, cannot be resolved by the revenue authorities while challenging the entries in the revenue records relating to the properties which are claimed to be joint family properties, assuming that claim put forth by the fourth respondent, vis-a vis petitioners and claiming to be second wife of one late Thimmegowda, while petitioners claim as children of Thimmegowda. but had no second wife, is not a fit subject matter which can be enquired or pronounced upon by the revenue authorities, in the exercise of their statutory functions under Section 136 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1965.2. In the present writ petition, petitioners are questioning the legality of the orders passed by the respondents 1 to 3 changing the revenue entries to show the name of fourth respondent in respect of an extent of 20 guntas of land from out of total joint family property of 1 acre 24 guntas etc.,.3. Subm...
Ve Commercial Vehicles Limited. Vs. State of Karnataka Through the Pri ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-21-2011
1. The petitioner in W.P.No.26934/2009 (GM RES) is before this Court in this intra-Court appeal assailing the order dated 23.11.2010 passed by the learned .Single Judge. The learned .Single .Judge, while adverting to the dispute involved in the petition, was of the view that the same would constitute a civil dispute which requires to be adjudicated by a Civil Court. Accordingly, the appellant herein has been relegated to the civil remedy. The appellant claiming to be aggrieved by the said course adopted by the learned Single Judge has assailed the order.2. Sri Rupinder Singh Suri. learned senior counsel along with Sri B.N.Prakash. learned counsel for the appellant while assailing the order of the learned Single Judge contended that learned Single Judge was not justified in. holding that the appellant has to approach the Civil Court. It is contended that there are no serious disputed questions to be decided in the instant case inasmuch as the terms of the contract are clear and pursuant...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »