Karnataka Court September 2010 Judgments

M/S. Chitrakoot Steel and Power Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Sri.B.N. Ramapr ...

Court: Karnataka

1. Complainant-petitioner has approached this Court alleging non-compliance of the order dated 19.02.2010 passed by this Court, while disposing of W.P.No.5124/2010 (GM.MM.S). Id AGA has entered2. Sri V.S. Hedge, learned appearance on behalf of the accused-respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Learned counsel appearing for the accused- respondents, states that in furtherance of the directions issued by this Court on 19.02.2010. The claim raised by the petitioner through a representation submitted by him. Has been disposed of. And that the order passed in compliance of the directions issued by this Court dated 19.02.2010. Will be handed over to the learned counsel appearing for the claimant-petitioner during the course of the day. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the accused-respondents, we are satisfied, that the instant contempt petition has been rendered in fructuous.4. Accordingly, the same is disposed of. as having been rendered in fructuous. The accused-res...

The Commissioner of Customs, and ors.Vs. Sri/ Bandjesh Kumar, S/O. Dr. ...

Court: Karnataka

ORDER1. Heard on Misc.Ws. 8007/2010 and 8008/2010. 2. Misc.W.8008/2010 is filed for recalling the order dated 13.7.2010, wherein, the petition was dismissed in the absence of the counsel appearing for petitioners holding that there is no ground for adjourning the matter. Since there is a delay of 20 days in filing the application, Misc.W 8007/2010 is filed for condoning the said delay.3. In view of the averments made in the applications supported by the affidavits, we hold that sufficient cause has been made out for condoning the delay and recalling the order. Accordingly, both the Misc.Ws., are allowed. Delay condoned and order dated 13.7.2010 is recalled. The Writ petition is restored to its file....

Larsen and Toubro Limited, Rep. by Its Manager Vs. the State of Karnat ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR201OKAR3154

ORDER1. Revision petition under Section 23(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, for short) by a dealer registered under the provisions of this Act and directed against the order passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore order dated 30-6-2005 in STANos.J263 and 1264/2001.2. Under the impugned orders which had come to be passed by the Tribunal in exercise of its powers under Section 22 of the Act wherein the assessee's appeal against the suo motu revisional order dated 10-9-2001 passed by the Joint Commissioner of Commercial taxes in exercise of its power under Section 21(4) of the Act had come to be allowed in appeal in the sense that while the Tribunal had granted some relief to the appellant dealer in respect of the subject matter of appeal and in respect of the other part of the appeal which had not been allowed by the Tribunal as against the order of the Joint Commissioner, the present revision petition.3. The revision petition has...

N. Guruswamy, S/O Nanjegowda, Aged About 33 Years,vs. Rangaswamy, S/O ...

Court: Karnataka

ORDER1. Heard. For the reasons set out in the application-Misc.Cvl.No. 1689/2010, delay in filing the appeal is condoned subject to the condition that in case this; Court enhances the compensation, the claimant is not entitled for interest on the said amount for a period of 587 days. Misc.Cvl.No. 1689/2010 stands allowed accordingly....

Mr.Narendra Nath S/O S.Shanker.Vs. State by Cbi Bangalore.

Court: Karnataka

1.Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the petition.Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn....

T. Shashikuraar, S/O Late Thimmegowda, Aged About 22 Years, Vs. M. Man ...

Court: Karnataka

ORDER1. Heard. Delay of 182 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Misc.Cvl.No.437/2010 stands allowed accordingly....

Venkatesh, S/O Naga Nayak, Aged About 24 Years.Vs. State of Karnatka, ...

Court: Karnataka

1. After arguing the matter for sometime, learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for dismissal of this petition with a direction to the trial Court for expeditious disposal of the case.2. His submission is recorded.3. The learned Sessions Judge shall expedite the trial and decide the matter on merits not later than a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order for which the accused shall extend his co-operation....

State of Karnataka by Bagepalli Police Station. Vs. K.Mallikarjuna Red ...

Court: Karnataka

ORDER1. Learned High Court Government Pleader has filed this petition to cancel the bail granted to accused by the Trial Court.2. Learned Trial Judge has granted bail to accused on merits of the bail application. The bail was granted on 10.10.2009. There are no allegations that accused have misused the bail granted to them. If the accused were to misuse the bail granted to them, learned Public Prosecutor is at liberty to seek cancellation of bail.With these observations, criminal petition is dismissed....

Sudha Enterprises, a Partnership Firm,vs. Cave Caterers Private Limite ...

Court: Karnataka

1. Respondent has instituted O.S.6616/2006 against the petitioner on 22.7.2006 with a prayer for specific performance of an agreement dated 23.5.2002 and for permanent injunction. Petitioner/defendant has filed written statement and counter claim on 14.11.2006. Plaintiff has filed a rejoinder on 27.1.2007. Suit was referred to Mediation by the Bangalore Mediation Center on 16.11.2007. Mediation having not materialised, the suit was referred back to the Court on 6.2.2008. Issues in the suit have not been framed and no progress has taken place. The prayer in this writ petition is to direct the Trial Court to dispose of the suit within 3 months2, Perused the writ papers.3. Learned counsel on both sides submit that there is need for early trial and disposal of the suit and assured the Court that, they will extend ready co-operation for the early trial and disposal of the suit by the Trial Court. Keeping the said circumstance in view and the nature of claim and counter claim, the writ petit...

Hudco Niwas a Division of Housing and Urban Development Corp. Ltd.Vs. ...

Court: Karnataka

1. The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw this appeal. The said memo is taken on record. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn...